Author Topic: Why is there a 1 year gap between TESB and ROTJ?
Vortigern99 
Title: Manager Emeritus
Registered: Nov '00
6129_Anakin Skywalker
Date Posted: 1/23 8:02am Subject: RE: Why is there a 1 year gap between TESB and ROTJ?
It appears to me that in the end, this is a perfectly subjective question with evidence for any and all conclusions, based on one's personal feelings and perceptions. I enjoy imagining a several-year gap, whereas others prefer a couple of weeks. There is nothing solid in the films to refute any particular timeline we might choose to imagine.

 

-----signature-----
"I knew from the beginning I was not doing science fiction.
I was doing a space opera, a fantasy film, a mythological piece,
a fairy tale."--George Lucas
My "Vader's Origins" thread:
http://boards.theforce.net/Classic_Trilogy/b10002/8708417/p1
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
zombie 
Registered: Aug '99
6217_4-LOM
Date Posted: 1/23 9:06am Subject: RE: Why is there a 1 year gap between TESB and ROTJ? - Date Edited: 1/23 9:14am (1 edits total) Edited By: zombie
Vortigern99 posted:
It appears to me that in the end, this is a perfectly subjective question with evidence for any and all conclusions, based on one's personal feelings and perceptions. I enjoy imagining a several-year gap, whereas others prefer a couple of weeks. There is nothing solid in the films to refute any particular timeline we might choose to imagine.


I dunno, I would strongly disagree with that conclusion. I know you have a personal view of the timeline based on your childhood wherein there is a few years worth of additional adventures that take place between--and nothing is stopping you from keeping this. But the films themselves clearly point to a shorter timeline; I'd say, based on the films alone, that its about two or three weeks, but I would arbitrarily allow as much as two or three months for the sake of stretching things out. But anything more than that is a baseless re-interpretation IMO.

Actually, that whole "Tatooine" thing made me think--when Luke says "I'll meet you on Tatooine," did Lucas at the time of writing it know that Jabba lived there? Obviously in ANH Jabba shows up on Tatooine--but, like Han himself and probably Greedo, that doesn't in itself sell the idea that its his home. Its a spaceport, after all. So I'll entertain the idea that Jabba and his men--including Greedo--stopped by for whatever reason and Greedo realised Han Solo had coincidentally also stopped by. Then in ESB Lucas gave Luke the line, "I'll meet you on Tatooine"--but was that just sort of "thrown in there", so to speak? Did Lucas know where he was going with it, or did he just have Luke say "I'll meet you at X" and chose Tatooine (logically, it would make a good out-of-the-way spot where they could meet in covert), and then when it came time to write ROTJ decided to make things uncomplicated by just supposing that Jabba lived there and that they were going to rescue Han? Was Luke simply going to "meet them on Tatooine" because Luke had to catch up with them and Tatooine was his home so it made for a good meeting spot? I'll give Lucas the benefit of the doubt, but suddenly it strikes me as a big coincidence that the distant planet from ANH that no one knows about is suddenly the home base for one of the biggest crime lords in the galaxy that everyone seems to know about.

 

-----signature-----
I'll swallow your soul!
---------------------------------
If you're gonna die, die with your boots on!
--------------------------------
author of The Secret History of Star Wars http://secrethistoryofstarwars.com
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Vortigern99 
Title: Manager Emeritus
Registered: Nov '00
6129_Anakin Skywalker
Date Posted: 1/23 10:19am Subject: RE: Why is there a 1 year gap between TESB and ROTJ?
Your conclusions are not baseless, zombie, and neither are mine. On my side we have 3PO's comment that "Lando and Chewbacca never returned from that awful place," indicating that some time has passed; and the fact that Yoda has grown aged and sickly since Luke left. It isn't concrete evidence, I grant that, but neither is your feeling, based largely on the intent of the characters at the end of ESB, concrete.

In the end, as I said before, we're entitled to our own thinking on the matter, since the films do not establish a definite timeline one way or another, and as far as I know Lucas has never clarified the issue in an interview or commentary.

 

-----signature-----
"I knew from the beginning I was not doing science fiction.
I was doing a space opera, a fantasy film, a mythological piece,
a fairy tale."--George Lucas
My "Vader's Origins" thread:
http://boards.theforce.net/Classic_Trilogy/b10002/8708417/p1
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Nordom 
Registered: Jun '04
8041_Christopher Lee
Date Posted: 1/25 7:51am Subject: RE: Why is there a 1 year gap between TESB and ROTJ?

Vortigern99 posted:
Your conclusions are not baseless, zombie, and neither are mine. On my side we have 3PO's comment that "Lando and Chewbacca never returned from that awful place," indicating that some time has passed; and the fact that Yoda has grown aged and sickly since Luke left. It isn't concrete evidence, I grant that, but neither is your feeling, based largely on the intent of the characters at the end of ESB, concrete.


CPO's comments are odd becasue a) Chewbacca had never gone there as we see Leia bring him there later and there is no mention of him being there before. And b) the timeframe one gets could be 1-2 weeks, hardly 1-2 years.
Since Yoda is already quite old in ESB, going from 800 to 801 is hardly significant but neither is 800 to 803. Sickness can come quite quickly, 2-3 weeks for an illness to weaken you hardly sounds far fetched.


Vortigern99 posted:
In the end, as I said before, we're entitled to our own thinking on the matter, since the films do not establish a definite timeline one way or another, and as far as I know Lucas has never clarified the issue in an interview or commentary.


Both scenarios cause problems, if a little time has passed then the Yoda issue that you brought up, Luke's much greater power and further the DS2 could also make you wonder.
If we have 1-2 years then we have questions what Lando, Chewbacca, Luke and the others were doing while Han suffered or why Luke did not go back to Yoda for more training and to find out if Vader was his father. ESB ends with the heroes imideatly going off to rescue Han and RotJ opens with them doing just that so it makes it seem like a very short time has passed.

Regards
Nordom

 

-----signature-----
"I think, therefore I am.. I think"
"Morte, how do you stay afloat?"
"Flatulence, you stupid polygon"
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Vortigern99 
Title: Manager Emeritus
Registered: Nov '00
6129_Anakin Skywalker
Date Posted: 1/25 9:13am Subject: RE: Why is there a 1 year gap between TESB and ROTJ?
3PO's comment may seem "odd", but nonetheless it's in the film and must be understood within the context of what we know to be true. That 3PO thinks Chewbacca disappeared into Jabba's Palace is our first indication (of several) that the droid is clueless about the real goings-on. Since 3PO thinks Chewie "never returned", Chewie must have disappeared some time ago in order to give time for Leia to establish her Bousshh identity and/or to present a credible length of time between Chewie's being captured by the Empire (on Bespin) and being captured by an independent agent out in the reaches of space.

What would our heroes have been doing during the 1-2-3 year timeframe THRAWNFAN and myself are suggesting? Even if one has not read anu EU literature, it seems perfectly reasonable to propose that Lando would be establishing himself as a worthy lowlife to gain employment in Jabba's throne room, Leia would be establishing her Boussh ID, and Luke would be developing his powers possibly in conjunction with a search for lightsaber materials. That the characters seem to intend to rendezvous on Tatooine "soon" is a subjective impression, and even if correct does not factor in the wrench-in-the-works/Murphy's Law factor of the GFFA.

Whereas we have:

* 3PO's comment that Lando and Chewie "never returned"
* Luke is more powerful and confident, and has "constructed a new light saber"
* Yoda is sick and close to death
* The DS2 is being built, and is in fact "fully armed and operational" (the opening scroll tells us the Empire "has secretly begun construction", indicating that this has occurred between ESB and ROTJ)
* The characters are all visibly older by several years

... it stands to reason that more than a few weeks or months have passed. We can refute each of the above points line-by-line, but the preponderance of evidence points logically to the 1-year+ scenario.


Nordom posted:

3PO's comments are odd becasue a) Chewbacca had never gone there as we see Leia bring him there later and there is no mention of him being there before. And b) the timeframe one gets could be 1-2 weeks, hardly 1-2 years.
Since Yoda is already quite old in ESB, going from 800 to 801 is hardly significant but neither is 800 to 803. Sickness can come quite quickly, 2-3 weeks for an illness to weaken you hardly sounds far fetched.


Vortigern99 posted:
In the end, as I said before, we're entitled to our own thinking on the matter, since the films do not establish a definite timeline one way or another, and as far as I know Lucas has never clarified the issue in an interview or commentary.


Both scenarios cause problems, if a little time has passed then the Yoda issue that you brought up, Luke's much greater power and further the DS2 could also make you wonder.
If we have 1-2 years then we have questions what Lando, Chewbacca, Luke and the others were doing while Han suffered or why Luke did not go back to Yoda for more training and to find out if Vader was his father. ESB ends with the heroes imideatly going off to rescue Han and RotJ opens with them doing just that so it makes it seem like a very short time has passed.

Regards
Nordom

 

-----signature-----
"I knew from the beginning I was not doing science fiction.
I was doing a space opera, a fantasy film, a mythological piece,
a fairy tale."--George Lucas
My "Vader's Origins" thread:
http://boards.theforce.net/Classic_Trilogy/b10002/8708417/p1
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
zombie 
Registered: Aug '99
6217_4-LOM
Date Posted: 1/25 9:42am Subject: RE: Why is there a 1 year gap between TESB and ROTJ?
Going through the reasons:

Vortigern99 posted:


* 3PO's comment that Lando and Chewie "never returned"


Since we later discover that Chewie actually hadn't been there, this then indicates that 3P0 is simply in the dark, as usual. R2 knows whats going on, but 3P0 genuinely has no idea of "the plan" (witness him freaking out at Luke's message), and believes that Chewie went to Jabba's palace, when in reality he had dissappeared with Leia so as to feign a bounty and bounty hunter. In any event, this has nothing to do with a 1 year passage of time--3P0 could believe that Chewie and Lando went to Jabbas palace a week or two earlier and never came back. Heck, he could believe they went there two days earlier and never came back. Theres no specific chronology to be gathered from this.

Vortigern posted:
* Luke is more powerful and confident, and has "constructed a new light saber"


We've been over the lightsaber thing before. He makes out of instructions (and possibly parts?) found in Ben's hut. As the film starts he has just completed it. Again, how long does it take to make a lightsaber? A week or two I would think. True that Luke's personality has matured, but after his experience on Bespin how could he not be? You can see in the end of ESB while he is onboard the Falcon during the escape that he looks almost shell-shocked. An experience like that will make you grow up real fast. Furthermore, if you propose that Luke has been not rescuing Han, then why doesn't he return to Dagobah until a year later? Whereas if the timeline is only a few weeks then he immediately begins the process of rescuing Han and then as soon as thats done returns to Yoda to complete his training as promised.

vortigern posted:
* Yoda is sick and close to death


This is the only real strike against the short timeline because it seems "out of nowehere". But as was pointed out, a few weeks is not that unreasonable to develop a fatal illness. I have a much simpler explanation--just as in the one-year timeline, its clumsey writing.
And again, if its a year later and Luke just got around to rescuing Han--why hadn't he returned to Yoda? Especially if you believe he has so improved his skill as a Jedi--returning to his training, or at least stopping by, would be his first priority, especially since it was his big promise.

vortigern posted:
* The DS2 is being built, and is in fact "fully armed and operational" (the opening scroll tells us the Empire "has secretly begun construction", indicating that this has occurred between ESB and ROTJ)


Since there are many years between ANH and ESB/ROTJ this indicates very little; why would the Empire wait three years (ANH-ESB) before beginning it? To me its much more rational that it was begun after ANH--its not until ROTJ that the Rebels discover it. In the official timeline provided by LFL the Empire begins construction of DSII after ANH, not ESB.

vortigern posted:
* The characters are all visibly older by several years


Since the actors are older this is merely the practical effect of reality; they can't not look older. If Lucas had intended for ROTJ to take place shortly after ESB, even if it was one day later, the cast would still be three years older because it takes three years to make a Star Wars film. So this isn't proof of anything. If you adhere to this logic then the film doens't take place one year later as you propose but three years.

So in the end what are you really left with? A 800 year-old that gets a terminal illness in a few weeks, which is not exactly out there. As I said, thats just convenient plotting no matter how long afterwards ROTJ is.

 

-----signature-----
I'll swallow your soul!
---------------------------------
If you're gonna die, die with your boots on!
--------------------------------
author of The Secret History of Star Wars http://secrethistoryofstarwars.com
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
morpha2 
Registered: Aug '05
20433_Piett
Date Posted: 1/25 10:29am Subject: RE: Why is there a 1 year gap between TESB and ROTJ?
Another factor to consider is Luke's encounter with Ben's ghost after Yoda died. By all indications, this is the first time Luke has spoken with Ben's spirit since before facing Vader. Did Ben decide to wait around 1 year or more allowing Luke to feel betrayed and manipulated? Seems like he'd want to clear up the Vader paternity issue and the "certain point of view" sooner than later.

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Vortigern99 
Title: Manager Emeritus
Registered: Nov '00
6129_Anakin Skywalker
Date Posted: 1/25 10:37am Subject: RE: Why is there a 1 year gap between TESB and ROTJ? - Date Edited: 1/25 10:43am (1 edits total) Edited By: Vortigern99
I can only agree with your lines of reasoning, zombie and morpha2 et al.. But since I could rebut each one of your rebuttals with my own reasoning, and since the films do not unequivocally state that 'X' amount of time has passed, my conclusion on this score is that we are free to interpret the evidence for ourselves. To me personally, it makes sense that 2-3 years have passed, with Luke too busy searching for saber materials (which like a magic sword must be acquired on a quest in the knightly sense, rather than assembled at one's workdesk like a transistor radio) to return to Yoda. It also allows the imagination to roam freely and create unseen adventures, which is important to me on a personal level.

 

-----signature-----
"I knew from the beginning I was not doing science fiction.
I was doing a space opera, a fantasy film, a mythological piece,
a fairy tale."--George Lucas
My "Vader's Origins" thread:
http://boards.theforce.net/Classic_Trilogy/b10002/8708417/p1
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
morpha2 
Registered: Aug '05
20433_Piett
Date Posted: 1/25 11:20am Subject: RE: Why is there a 1 year gap between TESB and ROTJ?
Not trying to rain on your parade; I can certainly see your way of thinking, too. To me, the new Death Star is the major mitigating circumstance--based on the verbiage about it in the opening crawl and the state of construction its in, it gives me pause enough to think that the time between ESB and ROTJ could be great indeed.

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Vortigern99 
Title: Manager Emeritus
Registered: Nov '00
6129_Anakin Skywalker
Date Posted: 1/25 12:19pm Subject: RE: Why is there a 1 year gap between TESB and ROTJ? - Date Edited: 1/25 12:22pm (1 edits total) Edited By: Vortigern99
But just for fun:

zombie posted:
Going through the reasons:

Vortigern99 posted:


* 3PO's comment that Lando and Chewie "never returned"


Since we later discover that Chewie actually hadn't been there, this then indicates that 3P0 is simply in the dark, as usual. R2 knows whats going on, but 3P0 genuinely has no idea of "the plan" (witness him freaking out at Luke's message), and believes that Chewie went to Jabba's palace, when in reality he had dissappeared with Leia so as to feign a bounty and bounty hunter. In any event, this has nothing to do with a 1 year passage of time--3P0 could believe that Chewie and Lando went to Jabbas palace a week or two earlier and never came back. Heck, he could believe they went there two days earlier and never came back. Theres no specific chronology to be gathered from this.


The word "never" implies a passage of time greater than two days, or even weeks. If the time that passed were that brief, the wording would be something like, "They haven't returned from that place". In the end this is a subjective interpretation, which at the very least leaves open the possibility that a greater amount of time may have passed.

zombie posted:
Vortigern posted:
* Luke is more powerful and confident, and has "constructed a new light saber"


We've been over the lightsaber thing before. He makes out of instructions (and possibly parts?) found in Ben's hut. As the film starts he has just completed it. Again, how long does it take to make a lightsaber? A week or two I would think. True that Luke's personality has matured, but after his experience on Bespin how could he not be? You can see in the end of ESB while he is onboard the Falcon during the escape that he looks almost shell-shocked. An experience like that will make you grow up real fast. Furthermore, if you propose that Luke has been not rescuing Han, then why doesn't he return to Dagobah until a year later? Whereas if the timeline is only a few weeks then he immediately begins the process of rescuing Han and then as soon as thats done returns to Yoda to complete his training as promised.


I agree about Luke's maturation level following his escape from Bespin. But I stll maintain that the process of constructing a light saber is something akin to questing for a magic sword; lest we forget, this a mythic space-fantasy we're engaged in, with mythic requirements for its significant events. At the very least, it is by no means outside the realm of possibility that the search for saber materials and guidance in constructing the item take longer than the facile "week or two" you propose. I reiterate that these are subjective conclusions we're both drawing; ergo, either of us could be correct.

zombie posted:
vortigern posted:
* Yoda is sick and close to death


This is the only real strike against the short timeline because it seems "out of nowehere". But as was pointed out, a few weeks is not that unreasonable to develop a fatal illness. I have a much simpler explanation--just as in the one-year timeline, its clumsey writing.
And again, if its a year later and Luke just got around to rescuing Han--why hadn't he returned to Yoda? Especially if you believe he has so improved his skill as a Jedi--returning to his training, or at least stopping by, would be his first priority, especially since it was his big promise.


I can only agree that at Yoda's age, illness could set in in a matter of weeks, days or even hours. Nonetheless the impression the film gives is that some time has passed, and again, since the script or commentary do not explicitly answer the question one way or the other, we are free to interpret the data as we like in this area. As to Luke returning to Yoda, his promise is to return after he has helped his friends. With Han still in jeopardy, and our other heroes immersed in a world of bounty hunters and criminal intrigue, his entire reason for leaving Dagobah has not yet been fulfilled.

zombie posted:
vortigern posted:
* The DS2 is being built, and is in fact "fully armed and operational" (the opening scroll tells us the Empire "has secretly begun construction", indicating that this has occurred between ESB and ROTJ)


Since there are many years between ANH and ESB/ROTJ this indicates very little; why would the Empire wait three years (ANH-ESB) before beginning it? To me its much more rational that it was begun after ANH--its not until ROTJ that the Rebels discover it. In the official timeline provided by LFL the Empire begins construction of DSII after ANH, not ESB.


Fair enough. I'm willing to accept the DS2 was being built from the end of 'ANH' on. But again, the impression its advanced state of completion gives is one of a passage of time greater than days or weeks. Either way, the data is still open to interpretation.

zombie posted:
vortigern posted:
* The characters are all visibly older by several years


Since the actors are older this is merely the practical effect of reality; they can't not look older. If Lucas had intended for ROTJ to take place shortly after ESB, even if it was one day later, the cast would still be three years older because it takes three years to make a Star Wars film. So this isn't proof of anything. If you adhere to this logic then the film doens't take place one year later as you propose but three years.


It isn't proof, I agree, but it weighs more heavily than if the actors looked exactly the same. Certainly, we can suspend our disbelief that the characters are only 2-3 days or weeks older than they were when we left them on the medical frigate at the end of ESB, but alternately, we are allowed by the vagueness of the on-screen timeline to imagine that several years have passed. Accepting that they have aged also avoids the mental contortions required to suspend our disbelief on this matter.

zombie posted:
So in the end what are you really left with? A 800 year-old that gets a terminal illness in a few weeks, which is not exactly out there. As I said, thats just convenient plotting no matter how long afterwards ROTJ is.


Well, since you asked, what are you really left with? The impression at the end of ESB that the characters intend a speedy rescue, and a point-by-point refutation of the on-screen evidence in ROTJ. I don't mean to say my own points constitute irrefutable proof; merely that there is some on-screen indication and a possiblity, at the very least, that more time than a few days or weeks has passed, up to and including a year or two.

 

-----signature-----
"I knew from the beginning I was not doing science fiction.
I was doing a space opera, a fantasy film, a mythological piece,
a fairy tale."--George Lucas
My "Vader's Origins" thread:
http://boards.theforce.net/Classic_Trilogy/b10002/8708417/p1
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
zombie 
Registered: Aug '99
6217_4-LOM
Date Posted: 1/25 12:49pm Subject: RE: Why is there a 1 year gap between TESB and ROTJ?
morpha2 posted:
Not trying to rain on your parade; I can certainly see your way of thinking, too. To me, the new Death Star is the major mitigating circumstance--based on the verbiage about it in the opening crawl and the state of construction its in, it gives me pause enough to think that the time between ESB and ROTJ could be great indeed.


All ROTJ says is that the rebels have just learned/dont know of its existance. Its obviously been in the making for months or years. If it was begun a year after the demise of the original Death Star, it would be two years into construction at the time of ESB/ROTJ.

Anyway, the timeline is all wonky by official sources. The 1983 novelisation of ROTJ--and the early EU--placed ROTJ at six months after ESB. The film itself strongly indicates a matter of weeks, though the plotting of ROTJ is so full of holes I don't blame people for expressing disagreement. Newer EU places ROTJ a year after ESB. Meanwhile the comic line provided three years worth of in-between adventures.

Actually, going off a point I brought up earlier: I believe that maybe Lucas did just put Jabba on Tatooine for convenience's sake! I raised this before: in ANH, Greedo, Jabba and Han were at Mos Eisely because its a spaceport. They were just passing through; maybe, in fact, Jabba tracked Han there and dispatched Greedo to get him to hand over the money. Because to me its very odd that this little outerrim rock called Tatooine that no one knows about is suddenly home base to the most powerful crime lord in the galaxy that everyone seems to know all about. So that to me seems very strange now that I think about it.

But look at the script to ESB:

LANDO: (into comlink) Luke, we're ready for takeoff.

LUKE: (over comlink) Good luck, Lando

LANDO: (into comlink) When we find Jabba the Hut and that bounty
hunter, we'll contact you.


INTERIOR: STAR CRUISER -- MEDICAL CENTER

Luke speaking into the comlink as a medical droid works on
his hand. Leia stands near him while Threepio and Artoo look
out the window.

LUKE: (into comlink) I'll meet you at the rendezvous point on
Tatooine.


INTERIOR: MILLENNIUM FALCON -- COCKPIT

LANDO: (into comlink) Princess, we'll find Han. I promise.

INTERIOR: STAR CRUISER -- MEDICAL CENTER

LUKE: (into comlink) Chewie, I'll be waiting for your signal.

Now, most of us haven't really thought about that dialog because we know ROTJ, we just take it for granted. But why is there such emphasis on finding Han if Jabba is just a big slug that lays around in his palace? The conventional thinking is that they are simply heading to Tatooine to Jabbas palace because that where Jabba lives and where Boba Fett is taking Han. Obviously thats the final interpretation when the trilogy was done. But really take a look at the dialog; read it again.

What they are actually saying is this:

-Lando and Chewie are going to search for Han
-When they find where Han is, Chewie will contact Luke via some signal.
-When Luke recieves the signal, they will all rendevouz on Tatooine

Tatooine is not mentioned because thats where Han or Jabba will be; its a rendevouz point to meet up at once Luke gets the signal that they know the location of Han.

LUKE: Good luck, Lando

LANDO: Princess, we'll find Han. I promise... [Luke,]When we find Jabba the Hut and that bounty hunter, we'll contact you.

LUKE: I'll meet you at the rendezvous point on Tatooine. Chewie, I'll be waiting for your signal.

When it came time to script ROTJ, Lucas probably just made things simplified by skipping a step and having them on Tatooine because thats where Han and Jabba are.

 

-----signature-----
I'll swallow your soul!
---------------------------------
If you're gonna die, die with your boots on!
--------------------------------
author of The Secret History of Star Wars http://secrethistoryofstarwars.com
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
morpha2 
Registered: Aug '05
20433_Piett
Date Posted: 1/25 12:58pm Subject: RE: Why is there a 1 year gap between TESB and ROTJ?
Spot on analysis.

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
timmoishere 
Registered: Jun '07
14706_AT-AT
Date Posted: 1/25 4:43pm Subject: RE: Why is there a 1 year gap between TESB and ROTJ?
Well, Jabba's main base of operations is on Nal Hutta. Tatooine is his "backup" base.

 

-----signature-----
What ain't no country I ever heard of. They speak English in What?
Vikings > Pirates > Ninjas
Everything tastes better wrapped in bacon, especially bacon
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
BaronLandoCalrissian 
Registered: Jun '06
14545_Lando Calrissian
Date Posted: 1/25 5:18pm Subject: RE: Why is there a 1 year gap between TESB and ROTJ? - Date Edited: 1/25 5:19pm (1 edits total) Edited By: BaronLandoCalrissian
By the way, those old comics didn't have 3 years of stories, the issues all led directly into each other moments or days apart. Kind of like how it's still 2004 on LOST. The more I think about it, the shorter it feels.
So, the "official" timeline is now a whole year? Really?

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
SoonerSean 
Registered: Jul '07
19230_Obi-Wan Kenobi
Date Posted: 1/25 5:58pm Subject: RE: Why is there a 1 year gap between TESB and ROTJ?
Why did they pick Tatooine as the rendezvous point? If they had no idea where Jabba was (no mention from Chewie that they had actually TALKED with Jabba ON Tatooine) then why picked that place to meet?

if you answer b/c Luke had to go there to build his saber... then couldn't he have gone there to build it and then met the rest of the group ANYWHERE else?

I think it's reasonable to believe that they knew exactly where they were going... Tatooine... and that they knew within reason where Jabba was. This was a core-group in the Rebel Alliance afterall, i.e. capable of getting some good intel. Luke was also obviously from there and could easily have heard about someone like Jabba and... as noted... Chewie HAS SEEN HIM THERE.

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History