| Author |
Topic:
Did the Empire need the DS?
|
Arawn_Fenn
Registered:
Jul '04
|
Date Posted:
2/14 3:37pm
Subject:
RE: Did the Empire need the DS?
|
|
Is there any official evidence that Alderaan had a deflector shield? Are we talking about a partial shield (see Hoth) over Aldera?
-----signature-----
"That power is evilly-gained and is evil in itself. The blade's strength will continue to increase and yours will, also. But, as Chaos-begotten power fills your being, you will have to fight, yet more strongly, to control the force within you."
|
Locked Topic |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
|
JediMasterChiefYoda
Registered:
Aug '03
|
Date Posted:
2/14 3:40pm
Subject:
RE: Did the Empire need the DS?
- Date Edited:
2/14 3:42pm (3 edits total)
Edited By:
JediMasterChiefYoda
|
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Empire/Tech/Beam/Alderaan.html
This shows that Alderaan had a shield that lasted over a tenth of a second against the Superlaser. Lots of science on how powerful the blast was, as well.
Edit: Forgot Link
-----signature-----
Proud vetern of Operations Enduring & Iraqi Freedom Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering. I sense much fear in you. Ever single Jedi is now an enemy of the Republic. Do what must be done. Do not hesitate. Show no mercy.
|
Locked Topic |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
|
Arawn_Fenn
Registered:
Jul '04
|
Date Posted:
2/14 4:10pm
Subject:
RE: Did the Empire need the DS?
|
|
I wouldn't call that canon.
-----signature-----
"That power is evilly-gained and is evil in itself. The blade's strength will continue to increase and yours will, also. But, as Chaos-begotten power fills your being, you will have to fight, yet more strongly, to control the force within you."
|
Locked Topic |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
|
TwiLekJedi
Title: Classic Trilogy & YJCC Manager
Registered:
Jun '01
|
Date Posted:
2/15 8:34am
Subject:
RE: Did the Empire need the DS?
|
Its Wookieepedia entry doesn't mention a planetary shield either, but strong defenses. However, it's still only Wookieepedia.
At any rate, I don't think a planetary shield would automatically create a need for a DS.
-----signature-----
We do what we must Because we can For the good of all of us Except the ones who are dead
|
Locked Topic |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
|
DarthButt
Title: Manager Emeritus
Registered:
Jun '03
|
Date Posted:
2/15 11:28am
Subject:
RE: Did the Empire need the DS?
|
No they didn't need one. It was just a method of instilling fear in the GFFA. What better way to keep the planetary systems in line when they know that they could have a Death Star appear in their back yard all of the sudden. I mean they really could have gotten the same results without one, but the DS was a real quick and easy way to say ST*U!
|
Locked Topic |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
|
Darth_Laudrup
Title: Host: PT Trivia Challenge
Registered:
Jul '04
|
Date Posted:
2/15 12:57pm
Subject:
RE: Did the Empire need the DS?
|
|
Palpatine ordered the 2nd one build because he could.
-----signature-----
I love Ellen Page: 5' 1" / 1.55 m tall and goddamn sexy.
|
Locked Topic |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
|
skyysoblue
Registered:
Jul '05
|
Date Posted:
2/15 9:15pm
Subject:
RE: Did the Empire need the DS?
|
Armies cost money, while the death star isn't cheap either, pouring money into soldiers, weapons, ships and training is expensive. Also, by building weapons you create opportunities for weapons to be stolen.
While the rebellion was on the run, it was also gaining force. The empire wanted the death star to be able to control the galaxy withouth the burocracy of the senate. Palpatine knew that building armies only causes bigger armies to be built to fight you. So he chose to go a different route.
|
Locked Topic |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
|
Alpha-Red
Registered:
Apr '04
|
Date Posted:
2/17 4:59pm
Subject:
RE: Did the Empire need the DS?
|
I'd say the Death Star was never really necessary. It was just something cooked up by Tarkin to add a dose of extra-evil to the Empire and basically say "We have this thing, DO NOT **** WITH US".
The second Death Star on the other hand, actually has a more interesting purpose to it. Instead of being built to terrorize worlds, it was meant to force the Rebels' hand, as it was a given that they would come out with an all-out attack on the station once they knew about it. I wouldn't be terribly surprised if Palpatine was planning to just discontinue work on the second Death Star after the battle was over and leave it there to rot.
|
Locked Topic |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
|
BobaFrank
Registered:
Jul '01
|
Date Posted:
2/17 7:24pm
Subject:
RE: Did the Empire need the DS?
- Date Edited:
2/17 7:24pm (1 edits total)
Edited By:
BobaFrank
|
|
Wasn't the DS2 more for lack of a better word, Mobile? In the Battle for Endor it was blasting ships out of the sky. I don't think the first DS had that capability or mobility. I could definitely see the Empire needing the DS2. Blasting ships and planets.
-----signature-----
"Fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate, hate leads to suffering." -Yoda TPM "May the Force Be with You." "One Nation Under GOD." "I want to come with you to Alderaan and become a Jedi like my father." "I am a Jedi. Like my father before me."
|
Locked Topic |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
|
General Kenobi
Title: Comms Admin SW & Film Music Classic Trilogy
Registered:
Dec '98
|
Date Posted:
2/17 8:50pm
Subject:
RE: Did the Empire need the DS?
- Date Edited:
2/17 8:51pm (1 edits total)
Edited By:
General Kenobi
|
Tarkin didn't "cook up" the Death Star. The Geonosians designed it and Dooku took the plans to Sidious for "safe keeping".
And it's not a question of need. It's a question of greed. And desire for power. It's a step closer to "unlimited power".
|
Locked Topic |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
|
THRAWNFAN
Registered:
Mar '07
|
Date Posted:
2/18 11:38am
Subject:
RE: Did the Empire need the DS?
|
|
Wasn't the Emperor powerful enough to destroy a planet using the Force?
|
Locked Topic |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
|
General Kenobi
Title: Comms Admin SW & Film Music Classic Trilogy
Registered:
Dec '98
|
Date Posted:
2/18 1:39pm
Subject:
RE: Did the Empire need the DS?
|
|
Apparently not.
|
Locked Topic |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
|
THRAWNFAN
Registered:
Mar '07
|
Date Posted:
2/18 5:17pm
Subject:
RE: Did the Empire need the DS?
|
|
In the EU, it said the Emperor could create wormholes using the Force, so theoretically he could create a wormhole big enough to swallow a planet right?
|
Locked Topic |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
|
General Kenobi
Title: Comms Admin SW & Film Music Classic Trilogy
Registered:
Dec '98
|
Date Posted:
2/18 6:15pm
Subject:
RE: Did the Empire need the DS?
|
|
But then he wouldn't need a Death Star, would he?
|
Locked Topic |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
|
Darth_Laudrup
Title: Host: PT Trivia Challenge
Registered:
Jul '04
|
Date Posted:
2/18 7:36pm
Subject:
RE: Did the Empire need the DS?
|
THRAWNFAN posted: In the EU, it said the Emperor could create wormholes using the Force, so theoretically he could create a wormhole big enough to swallow a planet right?
that's why I find the EU so rediculous.
Peace
-----signature-----
I love Ellen Page: 5' 1" / 1.55 m tall and goddamn sexy.
|
Locked Topic |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
|