Author Topic: Should the Rebels have lost the Battle of Endor?
Alpha-Red 
Registered: Apr '04
18200_TIE Fighter
Date Posted: 2/22 12:01pm Subject: Should the Rebels have lost the Battle of Endor? - Date Edited: 2/22 12:04pm (1 edits total) Edited By: Alpha-Red
Aside from the fact that it would make much more sense to have an Imperial victory, magically giving the Rebels an easy victory over a more powerful enemy just cheapens what happens in the Death Star throne room. Palpatine constantly uses the seemingly inevitable Rebel defeat to tap into Luke's anger and turn him to the dark side. But if the Rebels were to win anyway, then what point is there for Luke to even consider turning? It all becomes a psychological mind game rather than an actual temptation. Now if the Rebels were to lose in space and be forced to surrender, then it adds more to symbolism to when Luke finally throws down his lightsaber, that he would sooner accept defeat rather than give in to the dark side.

Furthermore, it means that the outcome of the lightsaber duel would actually have an effect on what's going on outside. Once Vader throws Palpatine down the reactor shaft, that leaves Luke in a position to order all Imperial forces to stand down. Or if that isn't convincing enough, Vader himself could give that order to Piett and Jerjerrod as his last act before dying.

 

Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
TwiLekJedi 
Title: Classic Trilogy & YJCC Manager
Registered: Jun '01
46247_TFN Turns "10"
Date Posted: 2/22 2:20pm Subject: RE: Should the Rebels have lost the Battle of Endor?
So, the Throne Room Stuff gives the Rebels their cheap victory instead of the Endor Stuff? That's still the same result.

The Throne Room Stuff still matters either way because it saves Anakin and is Luke's final test as a Jedi.

 

-----signature-----
We do what we must
Because we can
For the good of all of us
Except the ones who are dead
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Darth_Davi 
Registered: Jul '05
17804_Jedi
Date Posted: 2/22 2:57pm Subject: RE: Should the Rebels have lost the Battle of Endor?
Even if we are generous, and assume that Vader issues the withdraw command, AND that all of the Imperial forces listen, you still have the Death Star to deal with. You can't leave it in the hands of the Imperial Forces, nor does the Alliance fleet have enough personnel to leave even a skeleton crew on board. Granted, it would have been useful to still have the Death Star during the YV invasion in the EU, but for the movies, you would have to ask what happens to it. The rebel victory does not cheapen the throne room battle, either. There were two different fights going on, you had Rebels v. Imperials, and you had Jedi v. Sith. The throne room didn't win the war for the rebels, but it did serve to defeat the Sith. Luke's battle was not the Rebellion's battle. Once Luke started Jedi training, he was serving an even higher purpose than the Rebellion. Two separate, distinct battles going on, both needed to be resolved.

 

-----signature-----
What the hell is an Aluminium Falcon?
Oh, I'm sorry, I thought my Dark Lord of the Sith could protect a thermal exhaust port thats only two meters wide!
It wasn't even fully paid off yet!
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
BigBoy29 
Registered: Dec '04
6883_Chance Cube
Date Posted: 2/22 7:13pm Subject: RE: Should the Rebels have lost the Battle of Endor? - Date Edited: 2/22 7:14pm (1 edits total) Edited By: BigBoy29
Darth_Davi posted:
Even if we are generous, and assume that Vader issues the withdraw command, AND that all of the Imperial forces listen, you still have the Death Star to deal with. You can't leave it in the hands of the Imperial Forces, nor does the Alliance fleet have enough personnel to leave even a skeleton crew on board. Granted, it would have been useful to still have the Death Star during the YV invasion in the EU, but for the movies, you would have to ask what happens to it. The rebel victory does not cheapen the throne room battle, either. There were two different fights going on, you had Rebels v. Imperials, and you had Jedi v. Sith. The throne room didn't win the war for the rebels, but it did serve to defeat the Sith. Luke's battle was not the Rebellion's battle. Once Luke started Jedi training, he was serving an even higher purpose than the Rebellion. Two separate, distinct battles going on, both needed to be resolved.


OMG rolling_eyes ... that's rich.

 

-----signature-----
Lando: "She saved me at the Battle of Tannabe".
Han: "Hey remember, I won her fair and square."
Lando: "She was mine before she was yours, she was mine before she was yours ..."
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
voodoopuuduu 
Registered: Mar '04
16253_Watto
Date Posted: 2/22 10:57pm Subject: RE: Should the Rebels have lost the Battle of Endor? - Date Edited: 2/22 10:58pm (1 edits total) Edited By: voodoopuuduu
The Death Stars never stood a chance.
On the first one, they leave a hole as big as a womp rat to the reactor core.
On the second improved one, they leave a hole you can fly the millenium falcon thru.
What kind of a suicidal maniac was designing those things anyway ??? shock


Binks Bros Construcion Company ??? laugh

 

-----signature-----
Winner CT Trivia Challenge 44, Winner PT Trivia Challenge 10 , 13, 14
Joint-Winner CT Trivia Challenge 49 and 50
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
TwiLekJedi 
Title: Classic Trilogy & YJCC Manager
Registered: Jun '01
46247_TFN Turns "10"
Date Posted: 2/23 4:21am Subject: RE: Should the Rebels have lost the Battle of Endor?
BigBoy29 posted:
Darth_Davi posted:
Even if we are generous, and assume that Vader issues the withdraw command, AND that all of the Imperial forces listen, you still have the Death Star to deal with. You can't leave it in the hands of the Imperial Forces, nor does the Alliance fleet have enough personnel to leave even a skeleton crew on board. Granted, it would have been useful to still have the Death Star during the YV invasion in the EU, but for the movies, you would have to ask what happens to it. The rebel victory does not cheapen the throne room battle, either. There were two different fights going on, you had Rebels v. Imperials, and you had Jedi v. Sith. The throne room didn't win the war for the rebels, but it did serve to defeat the Sith. Luke's battle was not the Rebellion's battle. Once Luke started Jedi training, he was serving an even higher purpose than the Rebellion. Two separate, distinct battles going on, both needed to be resolved.


OMG rolling_eyes ... that's rich.


huh? What's wrong with that?

 

-----signature-----
We do what we must
Because we can
For the good of all of us
Except the ones who are dead
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Darthdias 
Registered: Aug '04
13768_Tarkin and Vader
Date Posted: 2/23 6:41am Subject: RE: Should the Rebels have lost the Battle of Endor?
well, to be fair, voodoopuuduu , it wasn't finished yet. happy

 

Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Darth_Davi 
Registered: Jul '05
17804_Jedi
Date Posted: 2/23 9:50am Subject: RE: Should the Rebels have lost the Battle of Endor?
I don't think Bigboy29 understands what I was saying...Had Luke been only serving the Rebellion, he would have stayed on Endor and helped Han & Leia destroy the shield generator. His actions in turning himself in to Darth Vader, and then consequently going before the Emperor had nothing to do with the battle between the Empire and the Rebels. With the shield generator's destruction, the Death Star, with Vader and the Emperor aboard, was going to be blown up anyway. His going there did not advance the Rebel mission. Luke actions were completely independent of the Rebel mission, he turned himself in for personal reasons, to try to convince his father, Anakin Skywalker, to cast away the Darth Vader persona that he had been wearing for the last 23 years, and to defeat the Sith. Luke was not trying to defeat the heads of the Imperial State. He was trying to defeat the Sith Lords. That they happen to be the same people is merely coincidence. Luke's mission as a Jedi Knight was to defeat the Sith, not to defeat the Empire. For Luke, the battle between the Jedi and the Sith was more important to him than the battle between the Rebels and the Empire. If that wasn't the case, he would have stayed on Endor and helped with the shield generator. His Jedi status represents a higher calling than being a Commander in the Rebellion forces. In fact, his actions probably could have warranted a court martial. A Commander, with detailed knowledge of the mission, and Rebel command structure willingly turn himself into the enemy? Borsk Fey'lya may have even considered it treasonous...Yet, Luke was serving the Force by his actions, even if it meant potentially compromising the Rebel mission.

THUS, he was serving a higher purpose than the Rebellion.

 

-----signature-----
What the hell is an Aluminium Falcon?
Oh, I'm sorry, I thought my Dark Lord of the Sith could protect a thermal exhaust port thats only two meters wide!
It wasn't even fully paid off yet!
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
BigBoy29 
Registered: Dec '04
6883_Chance Cube
Date Posted: 2/23 3:12pm Subject: RE: Should the Rebels have lost the Battle of Endor?
Darth_Davi posted:
I don't think Bigboy29 understands what I was saying...Had Luke been only serving the Rebellion, he would have stayed on Endor and helped Han & Leia destroy the shield generator. His actions in turning himself in to Darth Vader, and then consequently going before the Emperor had nothing to do with the battle between the Empire and the Rebels. With the shield generator's destruction, the Death Star, with Vader and the Emperor aboard, was going to be blown up anyway. His going there did not advance the Rebel mission. Luke actions were completely independent of the Rebel mission, he turned himself in for personal reasons, to try to convince his father, Anakin Skywalker, to cast away the Darth Vader persona that he had been wearing for the last 23 years, and to defeat the Sith. Luke was not trying to defeat the heads of the Imperial State. He was trying to defeat the Sith Lords. That they happen to be the same people is merely coincidence. Luke's mission as a Jedi Knight was to defeat the Sith, not to defeat the Empire. For Luke, the battle between the Jedi and the Sith was more important to him than the battle between the Rebels and the Empire. If that wasn't the case, he would have stayed on Endor and helped with the shield generator. His Jedi status represents a higher calling than being a Commander in the Rebellion forces. In fact, his actions probably could have warranted a court martial. A Commander, with detailed knowledge of the mission, and Rebel command structure willingly turn himself into the enemy? Borsk Fey'lya may have even considered it treasonous...Yet, Luke was serving the Force by his actions, even if it meant potentially compromising the Rebel mission.

THUS, he was serving a higher purpose than the Rebellion.



Darth Davi ... where on earth are you coming to this conclusion? Luke turned himself in to plead with his dad to come back to reality. Nowhere in the movie can you assume that he wanted to kick ass on the Sith and destroy them.
Where are you getting this?

 

-----signature-----
Lando: "She saved me at the Battle of Tannabe".
Han: "Hey remember, I won her fair and square."
Lando: "She was mine before she was yours, she was mine before she was yours ..."
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
voodoopuuduu 
Registered: Mar '04
16253_Watto
Date Posted: 2/23 7:02pm Subject: RE: Should the Rebels have lost the Battle of Endor?
Darthdias posted:
well, to be fair, voodoopuuduu , it wasn't finished yet. happy


But, Darth Stewie was told it was an aesthetic choice by the architect. laugh

 

-----signature-----
Winner CT Trivia Challenge 44, Winner PT Trivia Challenge 10 , 13, 14
Joint-Winner CT Trivia Challenge 49 and 50
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Darth_Davi 
Registered: Jul '05
17804_Jedi
Date Posted: 2/23 7:04pm Subject: RE: Should the Rebels have lost the Battle of Endor? - Date Edited: 2/23 7:21pm (2 edits total) Edited By: Darth_Davi
You mean besides everything that Yoda and Obi-Wan Kenobi told him? The parts about destroying the Sith? The whole training in TESB, where Yoda trains Luke specifically to defeat the Emperor and Vader, who conveniently enough, happen to be the two Sith Lords in question?

Luke turning himself in to Imperial forces was not part of the Rebel plan to destroy the shield generator. Luke does it anyway, abandoning his mission with the Rebels, in favor of pursuing a personal mission. He put his personal goals ahead of the Rebellion goals. Perhaps you assume that there is only one meaning of destroy...When Luke successfully converts Anakin back, did that action not destroy one of the Sith? Darth Vader was destroyed, and in his place, Anakin Skywalker reemerged. His reemergence as Anakin then directly led to Darth Sidious being destroyed. Luke accomplishes his mission.

Any military commander who intentionally surrenders himself to the enemy, outside of mission parameters, clearly has to be putting something ahead of the mission. The goal of the Rebels on Endor was to destroy the shield generator, so the space fleet could move in on the Death Star. That's it. Yet, Luke, who was a part of that Rebel group, abandons everyone, to pursue his own private mission. Luke surrendering was not part of the mission, he was going off on his own. Luke Skywalker stopped being Rebel Commander, and acted as Luke Skywalker, Jedi Knight. Did his surrendering help the Rebels on Endor? No. In fact, with the presence of a Jedi, its entirely likely the job would have been accomplished far smoother. Did Luke's surrendering to Vader help the space fleet? No. Who did it help though? It helped the cause of the Jedi. Luke was a Jedi. They were Sith. Luke abandons his mission on Endor in favor of confronting Vader and the Emperor. Just because you automatically assume that destroying the Sith means killing the Sith, is not really my problem. The Sith cease to be, as a direct result of Luke's actions. Actions that went completely against the mission on Endor. Luke was trained by Yoda and Obi-Wan Kenobi to defeat the Sith. That was kind of the whole purpose of Luke being a Jedi. Neither thought Anakin could be redeemed, that Luke could turn Anakin back was only an added bonus, one that only Luke thought worth pursuing, not part of Yoda or Kenobi's plan. They trained Luke to defeat both the Emperor and Vader. When Luke turned himself in to Vader, he knew that Vader would bring him before the Emperor. This is why he already attempts to turn Vader while still on the surface...clearly, if he could convince Anakin Skywalker to cast off the dark side ahead of meeting Palpatine, two Jedi going against Palpatine have better odds than he would have had by himself. Do you seriously believe that once Luke converted Anakin back, that he wouldn't have made an attempt to kill Palpatine, had he not been crippled by the lightning? Look at the facts.

Luke is trained as a Jedi Knight by Yoda and Obi-Wan Kenobi, both of whom tell him that his father is beyond redemption, and that it is his job to defeat Vader and the Emperor.

Luke abandons his mission on Endor, to confront Vader, which conveniently puts him in a position to challenge the Emperor.

Luke destroys one of the Sith, his father, by turning him back to the light side.

That converted ex-Sith destroys the other Sith by throwing him down a shaft.

End result? Both Sith are destroyed. One physically, one mentally/philosophically.

Luke did this as a Jedi, combating the evils of the Sith, not as Commander Skywalker, combating the evils of the Empire. Luke's identity was that of a Jedi, not as a Rebel Commander. Jedi is who Luke is, Commander in the Rebel military is just his job. The Death Star, with the Emperor on it, was going to be destroyed anyway. However, it was the responsibility of the Jedi to defeat the Sith. Had Luke stayed on Endor, the Sith still would have been destroyed, but not in a way that validates the sum of Luke's training. Others could have done it, but, as the sole living Jedi in the galaxy, Luke knew it was his responsibility to.

Luke's battle with Vader and Palpatine was that of a Jedi against Sith, not Rebel Commander against Imperial leaders. How you fail to see this, I cannot fathom.

 

-----signature-----
What the hell is an Aluminium Falcon?
Oh, I'm sorry, I thought my Dark Lord of the Sith could protect a thermal exhaust port thats only two meters wide!
It wasn't even fully paid off yet!
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
BigBoy29 
Registered: Dec '04
6883_Chance Cube
Date Posted: 2/23 10:50pm Subject: RE: Should the Rebels have lost the Battle of Endor?
Darth_Davi posted:


Luke's battle with Vader and Palpatine was that of a Jedi against Sith, not Rebel Commander against Imperial leaders. How you fail to see this, I cannot fathom.



That was not the bone of contention, DD.

It was your assertion that Luke's mindset was on destroying the SITH on DS2. I still don't think that was his plan.

 

-----signature-----
Lando: "She saved me at the Battle of Tannabe".
Han: "Hey remember, I won her fair and square."
Lando: "She was mine before she was yours, she was mine before she was yours ..."
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Darth_Davi 
Registered: Jul '05
17804_Jedi
Date Posted: 2/24 8:03am Subject: RE: Should the Rebels have lost the Battle of Endor?
And yet that is exactly what gets accomplished, isn't it? His former Jedi Masters trained him to do exactly that...I just think you are hung up on how you are defining "destroy". If Luke merely wanted to talk to daddy again, he could have done so while still on Endor. Yet, he willingly goes with Vader to the Death Star, where he knows he will be taken to the Emperor. Luke gets what he wants...the only Jedi in the galaxy in the same room as the only two Sith in the galaxy. Luke throws down his lightsaber not because he refuses to kill his father. He does it because he realizes that he is angry, that Palpatine has successfully manipulated him to the point that he is using the dark side to do it. It wasn't the act, it was the attitude. Luke would have struck down his father if he deemed in necessary. He tried to convert him back, but that is just a case of hoping for the best, and planning for the worst. Luke knew going in that if he failed to talk his father into turning back, that he might be forced to kill him. He had a duty as the only Jedi in the galaxy to try to eliminate the Sith, one way or another. And what happens? When Luke enters the Death Star, there are two Sith. When Luke leaves the Death Star, there are none. Mission accomplished.

 

-----signature-----
What the hell is an Aluminium Falcon?
Oh, I'm sorry, I thought my Dark Lord of the Sith could protect a thermal exhaust port thats only two meters wide!
It wasn't even fully paid off yet!
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
TwiLekJedi 
Title: Classic Trilogy & YJCC Manager
Registered: Jun '01
46247_TFN Turns "10"
Date Posted: 2/24 11:37am Subject: RE: Should the Rebels have lost the Battle of Endor?
Though what with his constant refusal to kill his own father, I think it's safe to say that destroying the Sith wasn't his primary objective. He went to Vader just to make him turn back to the Light Side. He was disappointed that Darth "then my father is truly dead" Vader takes him to the Emperor - he didn't count on it.
"When Luke enters, there are two Sith Lords, when he leaves there are none" is more of a correlation, really. All the time spent on the Death Star (except when he swings at the Emperor) is used to try to redeem Vader. Luke didn't destroy the Sith, Anakin did. Solely because of Luke, but that doesn't make it Luke's mission. In fact, he seemed to care little about the Emperor's presence either way.

 

-----signature-----
We do what we must
Because we can
For the good of all of us
Except the ones who are dead
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
BigBoy29 
Registered: Dec '04
6883_Chance Cube
Date Posted: 2/24 12:11pm Subject: RE: Should the Rebels have lost the Battle of Endor?
TwiLekJedi posted:
Though what with his constant refusal to kill his own father, I think it's safe to say that destroying the Sith wasn't his primary objective. He went to Vader just to make him turn back to the Light Side. He was disappointed that Darth "then my father is truly dead" Vader takes him to the Emperor - he didn't count on it.
"When Luke enters, there are two Sith Lords, when he leaves there are none" is more of a correlation, really. All the time spent on the Death Star (except when he swings at the Emperor) is used to try to redeem Vader. Luke didn't destroy the Sith, Anakin did. Solely because of Luke, but that doesn't make it Luke's mission. In fact, he seemed to care little about the Emperor's presence either way.


Yep.

And your assertion that Luke was dissapointed ... that Vader cuffed & stuffed him, and took him to DS2 ... is how it comes across in ROTJ.

Nowhere ... I mean nowhere do I get the sense that Luke is rubbing his hands together with a smirk, thinking "My plan to destroy the Sith is all coming together now!"

 

-----signature-----
Lando: "She saved me at the Battle of Tannabe".
Han: "Hey remember, I won her fair and square."
Lando: "She was mine before she was yours, she was mine before she was yours ..."
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
TwiLekJedi 
Title: Classic Trilogy & YJCC Manager
Registered: Jun '01
46247_TFN Turns "10"
Date Posted: 2/24 12:45pm Subject: RE: Should the Rebels have lost the Battle of Endor?
Yeah, he didn't manipulate events Palpatinesque so that his capture would guarantee the downfall of the Sith.

But I'd still call the whole Vader business a "higher purpose than the Rebellion"

 

-----signature-----
We do what we must
Because we can
For the good of all of us
Except the ones who are dead
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History