Author Topic: E-11 blaster, weaker than the DC-15?
Dmasterman 
Registered: Dec '08
Date Posted: 4/14 9:57am Subject: E-11 blaster, weaker than the DC-15?
As we all know, the stormtroopers of the Empire, mostly use the E-11 blaster. But I recently heard that the E-11 was actually inferior to the previously used gun of the Galactic Republic/Empire, the DC-15 series of weapons.

Reading around, I have read that the reason the E-11's were issued was because they were more lethal to biological targets, as the DC-15 blue blaster bolts were made with "EMP" energies to combat droids.

But after further research, the E-11 seems to be more flawed than its previous gun. Inaccurate, has a lower rate of fire and doesn't pack the same punch as its previous gun.

So IF the DC-15 guns were stronger, why did the Empire change it?

Possibly for price reasons, similar to the weaker TIE fighter?

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Palp_Faction  689 posts
Registered: Feb '02
6026_Palpatine
Date Posted: 4/14 2:43pm Subject: E-11 blaster, weaker than the DC-15?
I expect it all came down to money. It's not as if the stormtrooper armour was very effective either was it? Couldn't even stop arrows fired by teddy bears. The Empire wasn't defeated by ewoks but by accountants!

 

-----signature-----
ROTS, ESB, ANH, AOTC, TPM, ROTJ
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
timmoishere  7785 posts
Registered: Jun '07
14706_AT-AT
Date Posted: 4/14 5:21pm Subject: E-11 blaster, weaker than the DC-15?
Stormtrooper armor does stop arrows, actually. It's just that some arrows penetrated at the armor's joints.

And a 30-pound rock falling on your head will knock you out even if you're wearing the most sophisticated helmet ever designed.

 

-----signature-----
Will do moose stuff for money.
Everything tastes better wrapped in bacon, especially bacon
11/20/2008: The day I married the most wonderful woman in the world.
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
MagicSpork  132 posts
Registered: May '04
6636_Alf Tyranus
Date Posted: 4/14 8:33pm Subject: E-11 blaster, weaker than the DC-15?
Yeah, the Empire was probably paying out of its ass for insurance premiums on the second Death Star after the first one got blown up, so they had to cut corners by going with the cheap guns. Plus, they had to settle all those lawsuits out of court by the families of all the people that got killed on the first Death Star. Don't even get me started on the administrative costs of hiring replacements for all the people that Darth Vader force choked to death...

 

-----signature-----
Hey...who's scruffy looking?!
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Chewgumma  2088 posts
Registered: Apr '09
50855_H1452: Dr. Who
Date Posted: 4/14 9:22pm Subject: E-11 blaster, weaker than the DC-15?
I was always under the impression that the Imperial army relied more on it's maneuverability rather than out and out strength, and that's why at the expense of power and range of the DC-15A and increased accuracy and power over the DC15S the E-11 became the standard issue blaster rifle. Then to back up the shock attacks of the main infantry you would have battalions armed with the bigger guns and E-Webs.

 

-----signature-----
I grew up on the street. No not the 'hood, the Sesame Street. grin
Behold the power of edit! Saviour of the moron! praying
Chewgumma for president! flag
JC Musketeer
Official Time Lord of the CCC!
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
jedibri  4109 posts
Registered: Jul '00
24124_Indiana Jones
Date Posted: 4/15 2:53am Subject: E-11 blaster, weaker than the DC-15?
Neither blaster helped them with their aim grin .

 

-----signature-----
Isaiah 41:13
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History