Author Topic: How did Vader deflect those blasts with his hand on Bespin?
d_arblay  420 posts
Registered: May '05
24220_Anakin and Obi-Wan
Date Posted: 5/7 4:51am Subject: How did Vader deflect those blasts with his hand on Bespin? - Date Edited: 5/7 4:56am (1 edits total) Edited By: d_arblay
Black-Tiger posted:
I myself like dark, serious and dramatic.


So do I. But I think its more important as a film fan to try and embrace and appreciate all styles of filmmaking. A dark, serious movie is no better on paper than a light-hearted, funny one just for stylistic sake. Schindler's List is not automatically better than School Of Rock on paper alone. Often people seem to think otherwise.

 

-----signature-----
My own "Complete Saga" trailers: http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=CDF92B3798BD4675
Hope you enjoy!
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
TaunTaunHerder  448 posts
Registered: Oct '07
14777_Binary Sunset
Date Posted: 5/7 9:47am Subject: How did Vader deflect those blasts with his hand on Bespin? - Date Edited: 5/7 9:50am (1 edits total) Edited By: TaunTaunHerder
He's really powerful and strong in the Force.

The same way he pulled the gun from Han's hand.

The same way he levitated fruit.

The same way he somehow kept his lightsaber
blade activated when he chucked it at Luke on the second Death Star.

He's a powerful dude.

What else do you need to know?

 

Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
TaunTaunHerder  448 posts
Registered: Oct '07
14777_Binary Sunset
Date Posted: 5/7 10:12am Subject: How did Vader deflect those blasts with his hand on Bespin? - Date Edited: 5/7 10:21am (1 edits total) Edited By: TaunTaunHerder
According to the EU, his robotic hands were actually made from the smelted remains of IG-88's great-grandfather, an almost indestructible battledroid that met his demise in combat with Qui-Gon Jinn and Count Dooku (back when he was a good guy). The parts were sold to scrap merchants throughout the galaxy and eventually ended up in the possession of Watto who later sold the melted slag to Palpatine.

...nah, I just made that up, but you'd almost believe it, right?

Posted by Morpha2
---------------------------------------------------

Um, no. I didn't believe you because "melted slag" is molten metal, not scrap metal that has cooled off and solidified. No one would try to sell metal before it has time to cool off. It's really hot.

And, Senator Palpatine wouldn't spend his time purchasing scrap metal. He's trying to take over the galaxy. He had other things on his mind.

Anakin wasn't with Palpatine after his hand got cut off. He had it replaced somewhere , we know not where, before he married Padme on Naboo. Then he got some.

Palpatine was on Coruscant with Dooku at the time.

talk_hand

 

Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Arawn_Fenn  10329 posts
Registered: Jul '04
46079_Darth Plagueis
Date Posted: 5/7 3:09pm Subject: How did Vader deflect those blasts with his hand on Bespin?
TaunTaunHerder posted:
The same way he somehow kept his lightsaber
blade activated when he chucked it at Luke on the second Death Star.


That's one thing the PT era left out... except for the video games.

 

-----signature-----
"You're both from strange little backwater planets. You both have odd powers. You're male and she's female. What more do you need?
Believe me, buddy, if I were you, I'd go right up there and ask her if she wants to ride on my rancor." - Han Solo
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Gary_Buchenara  393 posts
Registered: Apr '09
8068_R5-D4
Date Posted: 5/7 9:43pm Subject: How did Vader deflect those blasts with his hand on Bespin?
Intriguing discussions about critical responses to the various films. It'll be interesting to see how the PT goes long term. Don't know how typical I am, but I saw the OT at 6 and the PT at 7 and I did at the time and still do much prefer the OT, particularly ANH and TESB. As you get older you start to see the flaws in them more, but it seems to me that those films transcend the flaws far more than the PT does. I think the involvement of many other crucial people and the chemistry between them make the difference.

I'm way off topic, but this has been interesting.

 

Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Empire-Maker  663 posts
Registered: Aug '03
13866_Darth Vader
Date Posted: 5/8 4:40pm Subject: How did Vader deflect those blasts with his hand on Bespin?
Vader uses the force to guide the blasts to his hand where they are half absorbed and half deflected by the metal in his hand.

This is what I had always figured, and since I have this scene as my avatar I figured that a response by me was needed.

P.S. If Vader's shoulder armor can deflect a lightsaber (TESB) then surely the metal that is his hand can defect a piddly blaster bolt.

 

-----signature-----
Six...count em' SIX users watching me can't be wrong!
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
d_arblay  420 posts
Registered: May '05
24220_Anakin and Obi-Wan
Date Posted: 5/8 4:53pm Subject: How did Vader deflect those blasts with his hand on Bespin?
Empire-Maker posted:
Vader uses the force to guide the blasts to his hand where they are half absorbed and half deflected by the metal in his hand.

This is what I had always figured, and since I have this scene as my avatar I figured that a response by me was needed.

P.S. If Vader's shoulder armor can deflect a lightsaber (TESB) then surely the metal that is his hand can defect a piddly blaster bolt.


applause

 

-----signature-----
My own "Complete Saga" trailers: http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=CDF92B3798BD4675
Hope you enjoy!
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Arawn_Fenn  10329 posts
Registered: Jul '04
46079_Darth Plagueis
Date Posted: 5/8 9:30pm Subject: How did Vader deflect those blasts with his hand on Bespin?
Perhaps notably, in CN III Vader deflects I-5's lasers with the Force before they even contact his hand.

 

-----signature-----
"You're both from strange little backwater planets. You both have odd powers. You're male and she's female. What more do you need?
Believe me, buddy, if I were you, I'd go right up there and ask her if she wants to ride on my rancor." - Han Solo
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Dark--Helmet  294 posts
Registered: Apr '03
6456_Yoda - Concentraaaate!
Date Posted: 5/8 9:58pm Subject: How did Vader deflect those blasts with his hand on Bespin? - Date Edited: 5/8 10:10pm (1 edits total) Edited By: Dark--Helmet
d_arblay posted:
It wasn't initially regarded to be the classic it is now, it has become that, through an element of sentimentality. The evidence is there. When I argue there is a case for this I believe it is justified.

The "best of lists and awards" that you speak of for ESB are ALL retrospective.



It's not sentimentality, because many of the best movies of all time didn't become the classics that they are till some time had passed.Movies get reevaluated the SW movies are far from the first movies that this has happened to.All of Empires accolades are not retroactive it's always been a well liked movie,if I remember right,it won the peoples chose award,hugo,saturn,bafta and oscars.And was highly thought of before the SE came out.




d_arblay posted:
Take out Vader's revelation and I think you would have a movie that nobody outside the core-fan base would remember that well. It took ROTJ, the resolution, Vader's redemption and a new generation of fans before Empire became the very highly-regarded film it is today. Don't get me wrong, I think its a good movie. But I do think its overrated (especially when people label it "flawless"). No crumby acting? "Two fighters against a Star Destroyer?"... ~"Good! Our first catch of the day." I could go on...




No way man!,theres so many iconic and epic moments in that movie other then the father bit.

Vader,Han and Yoda are some of the most popular characters ever,they are at there best in empire.
The iconic Imperial March,
The icon Darth Vadar that everybody thinks of first in there head is the one from empire(badass,with the deep voice, awesome look, choking people and bossing everybody around)
The script is the best of all the movies, so is the score, the acting and the visuals are the best as ANH is older and Jedi looks like a made for TV movie
Leia and Han love story
Yoda and Luke are the best scenes in SW,
The first(and best)well done lightsabre fight.
ROTJ was always looked at as a disappointment at being the squeal to empire.

It's true that no movie is flawless but all favorite movies get built up like that by there fans.” No crummy acting" isn't an absolute term, it’s just a blanket statement for bad acting in general. Of course there’s bad acting(dialogue) in SW and Empire but there’s not lots of it.Thats why the movies have lasted this long. The acting,dialouge and characters where put together so well just like any of the all time classics. The first one is iffy but there’s nothing wrong with~"Good! Our first catch of the day."


d_arblay posted:
But it was the most successful sequel of all time in terms of box-office. Whether there was a conscious effort to "dumb down" ROTJ or not, I personally don't see it. The movie's themes are still dark - they kept it dialogue heavy. They did change director and that’s possibly the one big difference noticeable between the two films. But dumbing it down to the same degree that you cite Batman Returns and Batman Forever as examples? Its not even of much relevance whether they did or didn't because, looking at the end result, of all the first 3 films, ANH is actually the least adult-orientated - and people don't seem to have a problem with that.



If you can't see the dumbing down in ROTJ then I don't know what to say.I would say ANH is more adult oriented than Jedi. Batman Forever and ROTJ are full of so much goofiness it drowns out the dark themes in both movies.


d_arblay posted:
Taking a statistical look at how the films are judged without retrospect you only have to look at the excellent "Secret History Of Star Wars" which shows quite clearly how the PT and OT films were received by the critics (fans reactions aren't recordable for the OT so much in the days before the internet). But if you read it you'll clearly see the Prequels scoring much higher than the OT. Yet the Special Edition releases were then met with much better reviews than they were originally. Essentially the same films - with something important called sentimentality. Its not a flawed argument.



PT scores higher then the OT on original release because The SW Franchise has already had it's reevaluation as being a great classic movie series. It’s a known commodity now. People know what they have, it’s not a surprise. The PT also has many more reviews to pull from and many of them being fan boys.

I'm sure for some people sentimentality came into it but for most people it's what has happened to many other movies, they get reevaluated as time goes on, people didn't realize what they had at the time and then they will sit up and take notice years later. Roger Ebert has done it a couple of times that I know of. He realized his old review from years ago wasn't how he felt now about the movie. It doesn't really have anything to do with being a kid.Terminator,Casablanca,The Good The Bad and The Ugly where good movies when I was younger and there still good movies now. Just about every Saturday morning cartoon I watched wasn't very good and was a toy commerical.People aren't stupied,they know what was good and bad as older people.



d_arblay posted:
Most of the critics these days were children when they saw them. Wait for the backlash - because there will be one - when kids of today turn into the movie critics of tomorrow. I guarantee you that the PT will be given a status of equal, if not higher regard by those people who watched the films 1-6. I've only met a few people who have done this, children and adults included, but not one of them picks ESB as their favorite of the 6.


I would be interested to know which of the critics that matter where kids when they saw them. How do you know this info? I’ll make a friendly bet with you, I bet that backlash will not happen.ANH and Empire are on all those best of lists now with Kane,Gone w/Wind,Godfather 1& 2,2001 etc etc and once your in that rare air you become cinematic canon and don't ever leave that company.OT characters are on best of list and are entrenched in pop culture. The whole complete SW sage 1-6 clashes with itself and doesn't work as a whole and when those kids get older grow they will see it just like they did w/the OT. That’s not to surprising to me, Empire is hurt the most by the PT,but like many SW fans when they get older you can see how good empire is. I’ve never seen a poll with adults polled that ANH or Empire don't finish at 1.


d_arblay posted:
One of the key themes in Star Wars has ALWAYS been how the underdog can win - you think the ewoks taking on the stormtroopers is less believable than the Rebel Alliance fleet defeating the Empire's? I don't. It's about primitive cultures vs the technologicaly advanced, and a sign that sometimes technology aint always the smartest. I suppose you would have no problem with preset traps if they were Wookiee traps? It's all irrelevant anyway as its made fairly clear to me throughout the fight that the Ewoks get their asses kicked for the most part - much like the Gungans in Episode 1 - their role is to provide a distracting battle while the key element is happening elsewhere (mainly Han and Leia's attempts to get inside the Bunker). ONLY when Chewie takes over the imperial walker does the game change. Suddenly, through the element of surprise the rebels are able to take out 3 or more of the Empire's most dangerous weapons by use of this alone and it sends quite a lot of the stromtroopers into a retreat. How are they meant to defend against an Imperial Walker attacking them?! Without this, the rebels would never have won the battle.


All the battles are pretty unbelievable in Jedi but at least the Alliance Fleet was on some type of equal footing.The themes are cool they just need to be better exacuted.The preset traps aren't good no matter who they are. The battle doesn't focus enough on the rebel troops using the Ewok distraction.Arrows,the club weapons and bolos shouldn't work on stormtroopers.The battle looks pretty even and troop to troop fighting was favoring the ewoks,which shouldn't be happening with no effective weapons and only a handful of human fighters.Ewoks aren't physically a match because how awkward the actors look and move in the ewok suits.That's why wookies would have been better, they are a credible threat to Stormtroopers.TPM battle is a little bit different because there using quit a bit of equal footing technology against the Droids.Through Gungans fist fighting the droids is a little much as well. They could use any number of tank busting weapons they have or maybe republic gunships to beat the chicken walkers.These guys took on advanced robots, Jedi and other advanced cultures, they could have done any number of things.




ON TOPIC:That just seems like to complicated of an answer.The movie is about all the amazing things the force can do.Han draws his gun fires almost straight at vaders chest,Vader then brings his hand up blocks 3 shots(if I recall) and deflects them then blocks a 4th with his other hand then pulls Hnas blaster to him with the original blocking hand all in one motion.In the script if I recall, Vader uses the same hand to deflect and pull the blaster to him.That was the big head and shoulder piece that deflects the lightsabre blow,not his hand because then in ROTJ Luke cuts Vader's hand off easy.You'll notice the lightsabre blow to Vader's shoulder,Luke chops Vaders hand off and when Luke gets shot on the sailbarge they all scream in pain but when Vader chooses to put his hand in the line of fire,not a word.

It's the force.






 

-----signature-----
TheForce.net where your opinion and honest reaction to something isn't really how you feel it's just your lack of understanding and hatred of George Lucas.
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
d_arblay  420 posts
Registered: May '05
24220_Anakin and Obi-Wan
Date Posted: 5/9 3:57am Subject: How did Vader deflect those blasts with his hand on Bespin?
Arawn_Fenn posted:
Perhaps notably, in CN III Vader deflects I-5's lasers with the Force before they even contact his hand.


I think we're still searching for the answer of why more Jedi don't do it. Why do they use lightsabers to block blaster fire from enemies? Even if they have their lightsaber out for attack purposes it would still give them more of chance to use their free hand to block the laser fire. They have two hands and only one lightsaber in most cases. To me its a slightly silly notion. The force doesn't make Jedi Superheroes and it wouldn't work for the story if it did.

 

-----signature-----
My own "Complete Saga" trailers: http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=CDF92B3798BD4675
Hope you enjoy!
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Grand_Moff_Jawa  4737 posts
Registered: May '01
20018_Jawa
Date Posted: 5/9 6:24am Subject: How did Vader deflect those blasts with his hand on Bespin?
As a young kid, I always wondered why Vader didn't deflect the blasts with his lightsaber. Although using his hands was very cool.

 

-----signature-----
"I can't abide those Jawas... disgusting creatures"! - C3PO
This sig line is [FABULOUSO!]
www.outerrimsieges.com
"It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring." -- Carl Sagan
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Black-Tiger  420 posts
Registered: Nov '08
13617_Darth Maul
Date Posted: 5/9 6:24am Subject: How did Vader deflect those blasts with his hand on Bespin?
Have you ever thought it might be an ability only the most powerful Force users can do, like Vader, Yoda and Palpatine?

 

Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Arawn_Fenn  10329 posts
Registered: Jul '04
46079_Darth Plagueis
Date Posted: 5/9 6:45am Subject: How did Vader deflect those blasts with his hand on Bespin?
Especially given that Yoda can repel lightning with his hands while Mace seems to need a lightsaber.

 

-----signature-----
"You're both from strange little backwater planets. You both have odd powers. You're male and she's female. What more do you need?
Believe me, buddy, if I were you, I'd go right up there and ask her if she wants to ride on my rancor." - Han Solo
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
d_arblay  420 posts
Registered: May '05
24220_Anakin and Obi-Wan
Date Posted: 5/9 7:05am Subject: How did Vader deflect those blasts with his hand on Bespin? - Date Edited: 5/9 7:09am (1 edits total) Edited By: d_arblay
I don't buy that. Mace HAD his lightsaber out already. As did Obi-Wan in AOTC. It made perfect sense for them to deflect it with their lightsabers. Mace was caught off-guard by the decisive lightning blows by Palpatine (his arm HAD just been cut off) as was Luke in ROTJ (no prior knowledge) and then Yoda (for no apparent reason in ROTS). You either have the power of the force or you don't. Yoda never uses his hands to deflect laser blasts and he is amongst the most powerful. Qui-Gon never does it either. I HAD also already addressed the difference between a laser blast and a lightning attack. Lightning attacks do not pierce the skin. Yoda does not stop them, he absorbs them and redistributes them. You can't absorb a laser blast. We need to stop romanticising Vader as some collosus just because he's dressed in black and can strangle some Imperial officers. Palpatine is the greatest Sith. Yoda is the greatest Jedi. Vader ends up as neither (never fulfilling his potential on either side). He's a pretty pathetic individual in the end.

To finalise my views on this, I reckon even were you to ask Lucas how Vader was deflecting those blows in ESB he would simply shrug his shoulders. He wouldn't care. Debating it to this degree is really pointless as the answer will never be known. Its a fictional universe. Its whatever we (as individual viewers) want to believe. And I would rather believe it is because he is partly a machine - those parts disconnected from humanity and his feelings at this point in the story. If anyone can find a reason not to believe this theory, I'm glad to hear it. I haven't heard one in 3 pages of debating thus far.

 

-----signature-----
My own "Complete Saga" trailers: http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=CDF92B3798BD4675
Hope you enjoy!
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Arawn_Fenn  10329 posts
Registered: Jul '04
46079_Darth Plagueis
Date Posted: 5/9 7:10am Subject: How did Vader deflect those blasts with his hand on Bespin? - Date Edited: 5/9 7:13am (1 edits total) Edited By: Arawn_Fenn
d_arblay posted:
We need to stop romanticising Vader as some collosus just because he's dressed in black and can strangle some Imperial officers.


We're not.

We're romanticizing him because he has the highest midichlorian count in recorded history.

d_arblay posted:
You either have the power of the force or you don't.


It's not that simple. There are levels of Force ability. After Luke throws away his lightsaber he attempts to block the lightning but fails.

 

-----signature-----
"You're both from strange little backwater planets. You both have odd powers. You're male and she's female. What more do you need?
Believe me, buddy, if I were you, I'd go right up there and ask her if she wants to ride on my rancor." - Han Solo
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History