Author Topic: Did the Empire build Two Death Stars before the events of A new hope?
DARTH_BELO  754 posts
Registered: Nov '03
6963_Death Star
Date Posted: 6/2 9:16pm Subject: Did the Empire build Two Death Stars before the events of A new hope?
DarthIktomi posted:
DARTH_BELO posted:
DarthIktomi posted:
Believe me, TDAB (Those Damn Anderson Books) need a lot of retcon. I mean, Stackpole did a pretty good start, with the one objection all of us had to the, which can be summed up as:

Luke: Kyp, you destroyed an entire star system!
Kyp: I know, I'm sorry. I killed my brother. But I was under Exar Kun's influence.
Luke: Well, you've been to the dark side and back. Nobody's ever done that, except for my father and myself. I say we make you a Jedi Master!
Other Jedi: Sith-kriffin son of a Hutt (insert your own Star Wars curses)

(Sometimes I can't help but think Luke unconsciously thinks of Kyp as his son and wants to be a better father than his own. I know, it's not too difficult, since Vader tried to kill him and tortured Leia on more than one occasion.)

Anyway, obviously, Death Star is basically a giant retcon of TDAB.



confused ...K...well, anyways, I LIKED it.

KJA has a history of bad continuity. It's really not his fault on the DS, TOTJ (retconned by the Ruusan Reformation), or a Jedi more powerful than Luke. It is his fault for the weird Luke/Tionne chemistry in YJK, since he admits to knowing about Luke/Mara but says he couldn't hint to it.

Believe me, in light of the prequels, we're going to get a lot more retcon. For starters, the Jedi we knew had relationships. The prequel-era Jedi don't.


Maybe I'm confused, but...

There really wasn't anything indepth about Luke or any Jedi really, in The Death Star. It was all from the perspective of people serving the Empire. And I didn't really notice any issues with continuity. At least not with the films, anyways.

 

-----signature-----
There are NO trilogies - only ONE SAGA...
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
DuracellEnergizer  368 posts
Registered: Apr '09
14798_Luke Skywalker
Date Posted: 6/3 9:28am Subject: Did the Empire build Two Death Stars before the events of A new hope?
CaptainYossarian posted:
the idea of a second Death Star being built in a period of 3-4 years is still a problem; it goes beyond credibility that anything the size of a moon could be built in such a short period of time.


Even for a galaxy-spanning empire with masses of resources and man-power that they can invest in the project?


Personally, yes, I think so.

 

-----signature-----
Episode I Reimagined : The Beginning http://boards.theforce.net/the_saga/b10476/30317264/p1/?1
=======================================
If KOTOR was any good, it'd be a book. not_talking
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
DarthIktomi  1380 posts
Registered: May '09
19073_Luke and Mara Family
Date Posted: 6/3 6:29pm Subject: Did the Empire build Two Death Stars before the events of A new hope?
Eh? No. I'm saying TDAB were full of contradictions. We got KOTOR to show us exactly when the Jedi stopped marrying, and an eponymous novel for all the Death Star stuff. And all sorts of other retcons for the pre-prequel EU.

It's okay. It's just because Lucas was sloppy, and we can't excommunicate anything.

 

Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
DARTH_BELO  754 posts
Registered: Nov '03
6963_Death Star
Date Posted: 6/3 9:57pm Subject: Did the Empire build Two Death Stars before the events of A new hope?
...oh.

 

-----signature-----
There are NO trilogies - only ONE SAGA...
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History