Nordom posted: Darth_Davi posted:That is part of the reason I go with the addiction definition. In addiction, the addicted may genuinely want to quit, but lack the strength. Someone who wants to quit smoking will tell people they are quitting, ask for help to quit smoking, but when push comes to shove, they still smoke. Vader is kind of like that. He wants out, doesn't want to be the Emperor's lackey any more, even expresses that desire to Luke...he just lacks the strength to actually do it until Palpatine is in the process of killing Luke. I agree that there is an element of addiction with Vader, he can't let go of his anger and hate because he needs it in some way. But there is still the question of why Luke would instanly do whatever the Emperor says if he had killed Vader. Unlike Anakin, Palpatine did not have much to offer Luke. Power? Luke had never expressed a desire to be all-powerfull, like Anakin. Saving his friends? Luke probably thought they were dead or dying at this stage and one of the people he was trying to save he wound up killing (Vader). A position within the Empire? Again Luke never express an interest in commanding others or wanting loads of money or a posh palace. Why wouldn't Luke just attack Palpatine with all he got? Regards Nordom
Darth_Davi posted:That is part of the reason I go with the addiction definition. In addiction, the addicted may genuinely want to quit, but lack the strength. Someone who wants to quit smoking will tell people they are quitting, ask for help to quit smoking, but when push comes to shove, they still smoke. Vader is kind of like that. He wants out, doesn't want to be the Emperor's lackey any more, even expresses that desire to Luke...he just lacks the strength to actually do it until Palpatine is in the process of killing Luke.
Darth_Davi posted:If Dark Side empowered Luke resists him, he tortures him with lightning like we see until Luke submits, or something like that.
Darth_Davi posted:From his point of view, all Luke has to give in a fight would not be close to enough to defeat Palpatine, so let him try, fail, and realize the hopelessness of it all.
Darth_Davi posted:xx_Anakin_xx posted:Well the idea that Vader "must" obey his master condraticts with his desire for Luke to join him and overthrow Sidious - unless Vader also felt that would somehow be in line with obeying his master (based on Sith philosophy that dictates that killing his master was what he was supposed to do - but the point was to become powerful so one is ready to stand in the shoes of a master, not to get another who is powerful and gang up on the master, so...) That leads me to believe that Vader was simply rationalizing the conflict he felt. A part of him agreed with Luke, but another part of him didn't want to jump sides, he wanted Luke to join him on his side. That is part of the reason I go with the addiction definition. In addiction, the addicted may genuinely want to quit, but lack the strength. Someone who wants to quit smoking will tell people they are quitting, ask for help to quit smoking, but when push comes to shove, they still smoke. Vader is kind of like that. He wants out, doesn't want to be the Emperor's lackey any more, even expresses that desire to Luke...he just lacks the strength to actually do it until Palpatine is in the process of killing Luke.
xx_Anakin_xx posted:Well the idea that Vader "must" obey his master condraticts with his desire for Luke to join him and overthrow Sidious - unless Vader also felt that would somehow be in line with obeying his master (based on Sith philosophy that dictates that killing his master was what he was supposed to do - but the point was to become powerful so one is ready to stand in the shoes of a master, not to get another who is powerful and gang up on the master, so...) That leads me to believe that Vader was simply rationalizing the conflict he felt. A part of him agreed with Luke, but another part of him didn't want to jump sides, he wanted Luke to join him on his side.
Arawn_Fenn posted: "He could destroy us." "You can destroy the Emperor. He has foreseen this."