Jedi Council Forums - Lit discussion (continued from JC Suggestions thread)

Locked Topic | Read Only Topic | Previous Active Topic | Next Active Topic

« 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 - Previous | Next | Reload

Author	Topic: Lit discussion (continued from JC Suggestions thread)
Excellence Registered: Jul '02	Date Posted: 12/23/08 9:57pm Subject: RE: Lit discussion (continued from JC Suggestions thread)
	You couldn't be more mistaken. Literature of today and recent year is very easy going. We can call each other almost anything up to and including blue painted imbeciles and get joked right back without offense taken. I've not noticed any newcomers being ignored or pounced upon. -----signature----- Rock-a-by baby, on the treetop, Beaming with pride, the filth they hold, But when the wind blows, my temper implodes, High above a pit, filled with sharkticons, Down will come hardcover addicts, beaming no more. ©
	Locked Topic \| Active Topic Notification \| Private Message \| Post History
Robimus Registered: Jul '07	Date Posted: 12/23/08 10:57pm Subject: RE: Lit discussion (continued from JC Suggestions thread)
	Master_Keralys posted: It's a place for serious discussion of the EU. If that's not your cup of tea, well, you might try a different vendor for your tea. Sorry, I should have responded to this in my earlier post but it took me a while to think on it and a hideous day of work. It's a place for serious discussion, except for the satire threads, the satiric pictures, the fun had in the Social Thread, etc..... I think you overstate your case a bit here. There are a ton of fun aspects to Lit, sometimes too much for my tastes . We've discussed the satire threads at length by PM and I'm completely fine with their inclusion with a warning in the thread title. Just, lets not say "Lit is for serious discussion, period", because it simply isn't. There is room for discussion of almost anything, Hoojibs to Gungans, Lizard Monkeys to Natasi Daala. Some subjects are serious, some are kinda fluffy and some are down right funny. -----signature----- I am forever seeking the damutek of Hooley Krekk Oh, woe! Oh, misery! Oh, unhappiness. Hooley Krekk where are you? . http://www.cccomiccon.com http://www.actionfigurenews.ca
	Locked Topic \| Active Topic Notification \| Private Message \| Post History
Trip Registered: Dec '03	Date Posted: 12/23/08 11:10pm Subject: RE: Lit discussion (continued from JC Suggestions thread)
	Rob - it's possible to be definitely, objectively wrong, and when this happens, it's kind of unreasonable to expect people to agree to disagree or to try and meet you in the middle. Not everything's a matter of opinion. -----signature----- RIP Jacen's Crotch 1991 - 2008
	Locked Topic \| Active Topic Notification \| Private Message \| Post History
MsLanna Title: CR GSFF Central = Offizieller Burger Brater Registered: Jul '05	Date Posted: 12/24/08 3:30am Subject: RE: Lit discussion (continued from JC Suggestions thread)
	Merry Christmas. headdesk Keralys - Before I answer, I'd like a word on my post from the 18th. Why the Sith did nobody reply to that? Excellence posted: You couldn't be more mistaken. Literature of today and recent year is very easy going. We can call each other almost anything up to and including blue painted imbeciles and get joked right back without offense taken. I've not noticed any newcomers being ignored or pounced upon. Nobody said it was for real all over Lit; it's a feeling users not posting there a lot get. Personally, I didn't find the O66 Thread easy-going at all. Other threads are definitely nicer. Trip posted: Rob - it's possible to be definitely, objectively wrong, and when this happens, it's kind of unreasonable to expect people to agree to disagree or to try and meet you in the middle. Not everything's a matter of opinion. Of course, you'd have to believe in objective reality for that. I know many people do. Unfortunately, I don't. -----signature----- I give up. Fett is great. Member of the waadas'dar Club. Cuyir adate jate, bal droten ori'dush Proud Master and buir'ika of Commander_Ducky. My New Title: Lords and Ladies of the Empire
	Locked Topic \| Active Topic Notification \| Private Message \| Post History
Dingo Title: JCC Manager Registered: Apr '01	Date Posted: 12/24/08 4:35am Subject: RE: Lit discussion (continued from JC Suggestions thread)
	Given I have to start work early in the morning I should already be in bed, so this is more of a drive-by post than I prefer. Ms Lanna, while I personally appreciate the fact that there are more people saying that they have views that there are things that could be improved in Lit to make it a better forum and more welcoming to all fans (especially so I don't look like a lone voice in the wilderness), I have to echo the general gist of MK's last post or two. You have said what's bothering you about Lit, but it doesn't need to be repeated ad naseum and getting into a semantics or viewpoint debate with other users. The whole reason I even brought the discussion up in the first place was because of suggestions on things that could be done, and rightly MK has said more than once that it's useless getting into a complaint-fest and that if people want to add to the thread it should be in the vein of what other things can be done (by mods and users alike) to improve the atmosphere. MK, I do have a PM with your name on it about a few of the things, but like you and school-work I've been snowed under while acting as senior-of-department. Hopefully things will be quiet over the next couple of days at work that I can put it together. -----signature----- You want someone to hurt like you, You want to share what you've been through. "Well, this couldn't get much worse." "I'm afraid that's a failure of imagination."
	Locked Topic \| Active Topic Notification \| Private Message \| Post History
Trip Registered: Dec '03	Date Posted: 12/24/08 5:45am Subject: RE: Lit discussion (continued from JC Suggestions thread)
	MsLanna posted: Of course, you'd have to believe in objective reality for that. I know many people do. Unfortunately, I don't. I see. Say, that's a nice icon you've got there. Rebel starbird, right? -----signature----- RIP Jacen's Crotch 1991 - 2008
	Locked Topic \| Active Topic Notification \| Private Message \| Post History
Master_Keralys Title: Manager Emeritus Registered: Oct '03	Date Posted: 12/24/08 8:08am Subject: RE: Lit discussion (continued from JC Suggestions thread)
	Rob - yes, you're right of course; there are "non-serious" things going on in Lit. It would thus perhaps be more accurate to say that Lit is a place defined by the serious discussion that goes on there. That's what separates it from other boards. Is that perhaps a better way of phrasing it? And of course, you'll note that even the satire threads are pretty deeply rooted in the community's sense of deep discussion: they're much rarer, and function as relief from it, rather than a dominant theme for many threads. I don't think we actually disagree here. My point was that the characterizing feature of Lit as compared to other places is its potential for (actualized more often than not) serious discussion. MsLanna - I didn't respond in detail to your 12/18 post, just as I didn't respond in detail to either your or Ceillean's posts after that in detail. I responded to the gist of your post, because that seemed a better use of my time. Dingo - I look forward to the PM. Trip, while I appreciate the sentiment, and see what you're getting at, perhaps it would be better to take the conversation about the importance of continuity and objective reality to PMs? Thanks. I'll try and get together some of the information on what exactly we're doing in the next couple of days (though most of it you all already know, just we'll slowly have more and more details). As I said, we're always open to suggestions of how to improve. Repeating ad nauseum the same complaints won't fix anything however, so if we don't have any such suggestions, I think it's time to drop a few of the subjects and move forward. -----signature----- God made man. Man rejected God. God became the man Jesus Christ, died and rose again to life, saving man from himself. The craziest story ever told. The truest.
	Locked Topic \| Active Topic Notification \| Private Message \| Post History
Jedi Ben Registered: Jul '99	Date Posted: 12/24/08 11:31am Subject: RE: Lit discussion (continued from JC Suggestions thread) - Date Edited: 12/24/08 11:34am (1 edits total) Edited By: Jedi Ben
	To me complaining that the Mindor thread isn't sufficiently book-focused when the book is not yet officially out seems to miss the point. Better the thread have some rather than no activity. As to the buying debate, that's actually opened up an interesting tangent on level of popularity of SW in countries - I'm quite certain it won't overstay its welcome either; but for those of us in the UK, with a release date of 22 Jan - posters are inevitably going to ask others where they got their copy and it's only goo manners to tip 'em off. As to posting in Lit, there's no rule that says you have to be frequent and consistent. My posting activity waxes and wanes considerably depending on what's going on, there's times when I post little because there's little of interest. I don't see that as an indication of the health of the forum. -----signature----- Excellence: "You are the forum's Quick Ben." SW EU fans: John Ostrander needs your help! http://www.comix4sight.com
	Locked Topic \| Active Topic Notification \| Private Message \| Post History
Robimus Registered: Jul '07	Date Posted: 12/24/08 11:47am Subject: RE: Lit discussion (continued from JC Suggestions thread)
	Trip posted: Rob - it's possible to be definitely, objectively wrong, and when this happens, it's kind of unreasonable to expect people to agree to disagree or to try and meet you in the middle. Not everything's a matter of opinion. I'd agree, but I think the case for what is correct can be presented politely with facts. You've corrected me in the past like in the Dark Empire Thread or the Thread about Fett killing Jedi, and I thanked you for it. That said there are a ton of instances where Star Wars facts don't add up. Source Book A paints things one way while Source Book B goes the exact opposite route. That said I've run into a few folks in Lit who are never wrong, they have it all figured out, and if new sources like the New Essential Chronology or the Ultimate Star Wars Visual Guide contradict their view then those sources don't count. Thats what I'm looking at with the agree to disagree type stuff. People just have to move along. I'd like sources of canon to add up as well, but they don't always do so. State your case, have your opponent state their case, discuss in brief and move along. No need to proclaim "I'm so right and your so wrong" when the facts clearly don't add up. -----signature----- I am forever seeking the damutek of Hooley Krekk Oh, woe! Oh, misery! Oh, unhappiness. Hooley Krekk where are you? . http://www.cccomiccon.com http://www.actionfigurenews.ca
	Locked Topic \| Active Topic Notification \| Private Message \| Post History
MsLanna Title: CR GSFF Central = Offizieller Burger Brater Registered: Jul '05	Date Posted: 12/24/08 1:16pm Subject: RE: Lit discussion (continued from JC Suggestions thread)
	thinks of better uses for her own time You know, I really miss that smiley that's waving goodbye. -----signature----- I give up. Fett is great. Member of the waadas'dar Club. Cuyir adate jate, bal droten ori'dush Proud Master and buir'ika of Commander_Ducky. My New Title: Lords and Ladies of the Empire
	Locked Topic \| Active Topic Notification \| Private Message \| Post History
dp4m Registered: Nov '01	Date Posted: 1/6 9:11am Subject: RE: Lit discussion (continued from JC Suggestions thread)
	As I've been gone for a while, I'm joining the party a little late but I can offer some thoughts. My MAIN problem with the Literature Forum is not the discusssions, nor the collective posting habits -- but rather certain individuals who make the experience either unfun, dangerous or just mind-bogglingly insane. Some of these I can give examples for and some I can't (due to board rules), but I'll do my best. The people who make it unfun are those who are basically there to poop on parades, constantly, not as a schtick and just because they can. Someone like Trip is there and has a lot of issues with much of the current EU and is generally a wet-blanket BUT it's because he honestly believes that it seems (in most cases ) or is very clear when he's fooling about as well as actually speaking up when he likes something. In the past, someone like vong333 would have been a good example of a true "wet blanket" in just negatively thread-crapping in most new product threads but even before I left that seemed to have been changing for a positive trend and I haven't seen anything to contradict that since I've been back. But that's generally one type of negative poster that could exist and, honestly, it's a hard one to deal with since there's usually no outright "rule" broken; it's more of a "detrimental to community" aspect (see also #3 below). The people who make it dangerous are the ones who are mostly gone. Advocating bashing an author's head in with a rock or suggesting that someone should have aborted them before being born is not only unacceptable but dangerous. From death threats on Bob Salvatore and Karen Traviss as well as threats of physical violence against the latter (with accompanying YouTube video of a Star Wars Galaxy scenario), that kind of thing should have no place in a discussion forum. I know this isn't tolerated by the mods and that it's cracked down upon when seen, I just want to bring it up here for folks from outside Lit who may not quite realize why it is we have to have a discussion like this every once in a while. Also, to my friends at sd.net who may read this and slag me some more: /wave The last group are the people who are mind-bogglingly insane with their posting. I don't mean McEwok-like conspiracy theories (which are bad if parroted as fact) or Excellence-like aphasia... I mean people who, on a discussion forum, don't understand concepts like "discussion" and "logic," though I will give them the benefit of the doubt on "forum." I am a strong-willed, strong-minded, very argumentative fellow (no, really!) but -- and here's the thing -- on non-subjective things if I am wrong (and it's been known to happen) I'll fess up, publicly, in the thread and say "Hey, I was wrong." It's called "conceding a point." And on the other side of the scale, we have the people who wouldn't know how to concede a point if they needed to poop it out after taking an Ex-Lax breakfast with a Metamucil chaser. Worse are the folks who combine that brilliant trait with the desire to change their argument (despite it being quoted in prior posts) when someone argues successfully against them. Considering it takes two people to have a discussion, if one side is unwilling to engage in a proper one... what's the point? What good can come of it? How is this conducive to a good environment on a discussion forum? And I would hazard a guess that in possibly some cases the users may not even realize they're doing it; probably not some combination of Darth Sidious and Lex Luthor masterminding a plot to destroy the Lit Forum, but more like Forrest Gump and just kinda there and not realizing it. Granted, that's me casting aspersion on motives again but I'm willing to try and give folks the benefit of the doubt again. **************************************************** Now, having said all of that, let me give some impressions of other smaller and probably not fixable things. 1) The quality of the product (NOTE: excludes comics) has had a very serious downturn recently, prior to Wild Space / Mindor. This goes back to some of what I was saying in my farewell thread, but either even-favored authors (Denning, Allston, Luceno) are having serious missteps trying to deal with LucasBooks desire for a product as a patch job (Millennium Falcon) or with serious storyline concerns (LOTF) or more-controversial authors are getting themselves in deeper with continuity-destroying novels (Traviss, Karpyshyn) -- which it's important to note is authorized by LFL (aka "it's not all their fault"). Many of the upcoming titles in the new contract SOUND good on paper, but other than the folks in group #3 above is there anyone who is looking forward to FOTJ without some serious reservations since many of the conhesiveness and plotting problems that have existed since the NJO (1999) haven't been fixed yet? 2) VIPs And in this I mean "real" VIPs, not folks like ex-mods, game hosts, etc. Most of the VIPs have gone away; the only ones who really remain are either the extraordinary strong-willed ones who can verbally kill you better than you can hurt them with your words (Stover), the comic folks (again, not my bag baby) or authorial mouthpieces who are not VIPs themselves (always a nice, awkward situation). I'd also wager that some are similar to early-Kathy Tyers and not "uncloaked" for any number of reasons. Every effort should be made to start cultivating relationships again but it can't happen in a vacuum and it can't occur in an environment where it won't work. But then you have the VIPs who, shall we say, don't help themselves. There's always been a couple over the years and I realize what I'm saying may not be popular but if you live by the fandom, you die by the fandom. This is obviously NOT a common scenario, but there are sometimes VIPs who antagonize the fandom. I've been on the receiving end and I'm fine with it 'cause I'm a relatively stable guy as these things go... but not everyone is me (for which all of you are now breathing large sighs of relief). It's a hard balance to strike since VIPs are public figures; we protect them here to the extent we are able to but obviously TF.n doesn't exist in the aforementioned vacuum. The internet is the internet. But we're getting a whole new slate of potential VIPs with the new contract and now would be a perfect time to try something... -----signature----- "Looks like you're about to get pwned" - Eric Cartman "Awarding experience points for cleverly and creatively generating an enjoyable experience. How warped is that?" - Darths & Droids
	Locked Topic \| Active Topic Notification \| Private Message \| Post History
s65horsey Title: EUC and Arena Moddess SW RSA Registered: Jun '06	Date Posted: 1/6 9:37am Subject: RE: Lit discussion (continued from JC Suggestions thread)
	I agree with most of dp4m's points. Here's the deal though: How do you moderate someone who isn't breaking any rules? The negativity is what drives me away from Lit, but you've stated that some people are very negative but not breaking rules. I mean, everyone is allowed their own opinion. Is this just something we need to ride out until we get better material released? Do we need to crack down on the insane posters and reign them in a little? a lot? I think the current mod team has done wonders with the VIP's and in cracking down on attacks on VIP's. I know some people disagree with their methods, sometimes stopping threads before they actually reach that point, but I like the proactive nature where they're preventing those horrible comments from even appearing on the boards. -----signature----- Corran Horn is mine. Get used to it. One of Hammer's Angels Has reverted to being a 14 yr old. YAY JOBROS and TWILIGHT! Just laugh at it.
	Locked Topic \| Active Topic Notification \| Private Message \| Post History
dp4m Registered: Nov '01	Date Posted: 1/6 9:49am Subject: RE: Lit discussion (continued from JC Suggestions thread)
	s65horsey posted: I agree with most of dp4m's points. Here's the deal though: How do you moderate someone who isn't breaking any rules? The negativity is what drives me away from Lit, but you've stated that some people are very negative but not breaking rules. I mean, everyone is allowed their own opinion. Is this just something we need to ride out until we get better material released? Do we need to crack down on the insane posters and reign them in a little? a lot? I think the current mod team has done wonders with the VIP's and in cracking down on attacks on VIP's. I know some people disagree with their methods, sometimes stopping threads before they actually reach that point, but I like the proactive nature where they're preventing those horrible comments from even appearing on the boards. Well, let me rephrase if I was unclear: there's nothing inherently wrong with negativity. Hell, I was very negative about the NJO and most of LOTF, O66, etc. (and I would have been for MF were I here). But it's not continuous thread-crapping, it's not anti-Mara postings in every thread that merely mentioned her name. As I had mentioned, vong333 would have been a good example of someone who was continuously negative but he's done a real good job of turning it around it seems. It's where it's continously a problem, continuously just being negative, just thread-crapping where it gets into "detrimental to the community" bit. I know KW and Dingo agree with me on those concepts (even if I was late to that party, for which I owe Josh an apology )... There are rules and there are community. Both need preserving and nurturing and sometimes what is detrimental to one is not within the boundaries of the other. -----signature----- "Looks like you're about to get pwned" - Eric Cartman "Awarding experience points for cleverly and creatively generating an enjoyable experience. How warped is that?" - Darths & Droids
	Locked Topic \| Active Topic Notification \| Private Message \| Post History
Jedi Ben Registered: Jul '99	Date Posted: 1/6 2:56pm Subject: RE: Lit discussion (continued from JC Suggestions thread)
	Re: Negativity One of the defining traits of fans - of any description, not just SW or EU - is the unwillingness to simply quit it, to give up and walk away. In that sense, the football team metaphor is reasonably fitting: Some supporters support their team through years of rubbish results, lost potential, squandered players, they'll rant to their mates in the pub about it but give it up? Unthinkable! And so it is with the EU, the line 'if you don't like it stop reading' says to me that that poster has no clue where they are posting or the people they're talking to - because it is not and never will be that simple. Some people like to vent, maybe they go too far but that's the Mods call to make; for some it's representative of them clinging on to a habit that they are nearly reluctantly walking away from - but aren't happy about it. Finally, for all the talk about negativity, it tends to be clustered around a few key areas/topics. Outside of those areas, how much is there really? Re: Community This was, I think, to a degree, lacking but is slowly improving. One of the barriers to it is the idea that to be a SW fan you must like all elements A-E and if you don't, you're not a true fan. No, just no - it's a rubbish concept and always an incendiary one that accomplishes little, but I haven't seen this expressed in Lit for a while - which is excellent. At the same time there's a bit more experimentation going on, people posing Qs and posting threads and people are asking for advice on details and getting helpful answers which builds a sense of community and shared interest. If there's one cloud on the horizon, I'd say it'll be the inevitable post-Mindor crash as subsequent books are perceived as failing to match it. -----signature----- Excellence: "You are the forum's Quick Ben." SW EU fans: John Ostrander needs your help! http://www.comix4sight.com
	Locked Topic \| Active Topic Notification \| Private Message \| Post History
GrandAdmiralJello Title: Emperor • EUC • JCC Registered: Nov '00	Date Posted: 1/7 7:31pm Subject: RE: Lit discussion (continued from JC Suggestions thread) - Date Edited: 1/7 7:32pm (1 edits total) Edited By: GrandAdmiralJello
	And so it is with the EU, the line 'if you don't like it stop reading' says to me that that poster has no clue where they are posting or the people they're talking to - because it is not and never will be that simple. But sometimes it is. To use that sports team example: I had a local sports team called the Anaheim Angels. I followed them since I was a child, through their pathetic years all the way up to their first ever World Series victory. The next year, the team was renamed "The Los Angeles Angels [of Anaheim]"--I felt like that was a slap in the face to the fans. They were trying to make more money, of course, and it was part of the team's new direction: but I couldn't stand it. Some fans told me that I was being disloyal, and that the team didn't exist for the fans but the other way around. Whatever, I disagreed. I could really say the same things about the EU. I stayed through NJO, and even past DN, but LotF just didn't do it for me. And while I will criticize it in private, I've refused to have anything to do with it otherwise. This includes complaining about it. Of course, if I'm silent, my voice won't get heard: but there are others who can do that better than I can, anyway. If a new EU product is good or interests me, I'll still buy it and talk about it. But I will not automatically buy any book or product just because it says "Star Wars" on the cover. But I still have the old EU to talk about. And there are the occasional interesting aspects of the old EU that get referenced in new material (although more often than not, LFL seems more interested in destroying the past than building up from it). So Lit's more of an antiquarian interest for me now, rather than the sort of cutting-edge posting I enjoyed during the NJO (and that people still did for LOTF and other new releases). A while ago, somebody called me a "one note poster" in Lit--that's only true insofar as I don't have many kind words about the current EU and no desire to discuss it as I still did during the NJO. I think there's room for both, though. There are a lot of people who love LOTF and although that's utterly incomprehensible to me, that's fine. Let them. I have no desire to tell them that they're misguided in their tastes, or anything of that sort. I do think it's valid to criticize the direction LFL and the EU has taken from an editorial/continuity perspective though, and I'd probably join in on those discussions if they didn't bore me so. -----signature----- SPQR Vates Jυλιαδις Moribus antiquis res stat Romana virisque - Ennius Tu regere imperio populos, Romanæ, memento; hæ tibi erunt artes; pascisque imponere morem, parcere subjectis et debellare superbos - Virgil
	Locked Topic \| Active Topic Notification \| Private Message \| Post History

« 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 - Previous | Next | Reload