| Author |
Topic:
Atomfilms rejected Dark Resurrection
|
lord_atilak
Registered:
Sep '05
|
Date Posted:
4/29 5:47pm
Subject:
Atomfilms rejected Dark Resurrection
|
We are very sorry to hear that our film Dark Resurrection has been rejected.
We have subdivided the movie in 7 parts like revelation... with english subtitle... but..
the motivation of reject?
"Thank you for contacting Atom Entertainment, Inc.
Due to the high volume of submissions we receive, we are unable to
respond to individual questions about why a film was not selected. The
most common issues are story, length, pacing and copyright infringement.
We?re sorry we can't be more specific than that!
Regards,
The AtomFilms Team"
:-( :-( :-(
|
|
|
Quote Reply |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
|
Laszlo
Registered:
Nov '06
|
Date Posted:
4/29 6:30pm
Subject:
RE: Atomfilms rejected Dark Resurrection
|
|
Bah, I never liked AtomFilms. Nuts to them.
-----signature-----
|
|
|
Quote Reply |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
|
Daramin_of_The_Way
Title: Spokane Fan Force Chapter Rep
Registered:
Oct '04
|
Date Posted:
4/29 7:51pm
Subject:
RE: Atomfilms rejected Dark Resurrection
|
Sorry to hear about that.
However, I think that Dark Resurrection will do just fine without the exposure on Atom Films.
-----signature-----
Jesus loves you all!
"The first time we were rehearsing these fights we started making the sound effects of the lightsabers.
We kind of looked at each other and said, 'Ok we have to stop that."
Liam Nesson on lightsaber fighting
|
|
|
Quote Reply |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
|
Evil-Henchman
Registered:
Jul '04
|
Date Posted:
4/29 8:01pm
Subject:
RE: Atomfilms rejected Dark Resurrection
|
|
When's Part 2 coming out?
-----signature-----
"Warned you we tried. Listen you did not. Now screwed we all will be."
"Why are there no lumberjacks in the city?"
"Ninja kick the damn rabbit!"
|
|
|
Quote Reply |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
|
RasBat
Registered:
Dec '02
|
Date Posted:
4/30 1:58am
Subject:
RE: Atomfilms rejected Dark Resurrection
- Date Edited:
4/30 2:00am (1 edits total)
Edited By:
RasBat
|
|
that's really bad! sorry to hear man! Threads of Destiny might hit the same problem when it comes to Atomfilm.
-----signature-----
|
|
|
Quote Reply |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
|
littlewaves
Registered:
Apr '08
|
Date Posted:
4/30 12:59pm
Subject:
RE: Atomfilms rejected Dark Resurrection
|
high time there was a better "official" star wars fan film site than atom films.
any ideas?
Shame youtube doesn't have options for higher quality streams
|
|
|
Quote Reply |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
|
DarthRicmu
Registered:
Jul '05
|
Date Posted:
4/30 2:43pm
Subject:
RE: Atomfilms rejected Dark Resurrection
|
littlewaves posted:
Shame youtube doesn't have options for higher quality streams
Would you calkl Atomfilms High quality then??? Pink Five - couch couch
-----signature-----
http://www.ricardo-musch.com Need Visual Effects???? Mail/PM me!!! Visual Effects artist on Star Wars Obscure Origin Compositor on Star Wars Threads of Destiny
|
|
|
Quote Reply |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
|
FX_guy
Registered:
Jun '02
|
Date Posted:
4/30 3:57pm
Subject:
RE: Atomfilms rejected Dark Resurrection
|
DarthRicmu posted:
Would you calkl Atomfilms High quality then??? Pink Five - couch couch
I'm not sure what that means, but I lauched when I read it...
-----signature-----
http://www.pinkfive.com Morbid and creepifyin' I got no problem with.
|
|
|
Quote Reply |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
|
Laszlo
Registered:
Nov '06
|
Date Posted:
5/1 6:02am
Subject:
RE: Atomfilms rejected Dark Resurrection
|
littlewaves posted:
Shame youtube doesn't have options for higher quality streams
Stage 6 is gone but Vimeo has been hosting my 29 min film for a couple weeks at near-DVD quaility.
-----signature-----
|
|
|
Quote Reply |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
|
VaporTrail
Registered:
May '02
|
Date Posted:
5/1 6:06am
Subject:
RE: Atomfilms rejected Dark Resurrection
|
Yeah, Vimeo's pretty nice so long as you can keep your video under 500mb at a decent quality.
This'll be a challenge in my future.
-Vaportrail
-----signature-----
|
|
|
Quote Reply |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
|
Klix
Registered:
Mar '04
|
Date Posted:
5/1 6:12am
Subject:
RE: Atomfilms rejected Dark Resurrection
|
DarthRicmu posted:
Would you calkl Atomfilms High quality then??? Pink Five - couch couch
You said it. 
|
|
|
Quote Reply |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
|
Laszlo
Registered:
Nov '06
|
Date Posted:
5/1 7:17am
Subject:
RE: Atomfilms rejected Dark Resurrection
|
VaporTrail posted:
Yeah, Vimeo's pretty nice so long as you can keep your video under 500mb at a decent quality.
This'll be a challenge in my future.
Yea a half hour for Toronto Cybercide comes out ok because it wasn't filmed with HD in mind. I think Dark Ressurection Part 1 was about 40 minutes which I think is long enough to chop into two 20 minute chapters of decent quality.
-----signature-----
|
|
|
Quote Reply |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
|
keithabbott
Registered:
Aug '98
|
Date Posted:
5/1 11:07am
Subject:
RE: Atomfilms rejected Dark Resurrection
|
|
That is a shame. Are there any sub-titled films foreign films on AtomFilms site? Just curious if the fact you didn't dub the lines might be an issue.
-----signature-----
Producer, Rise of Nobility: http://www.starwarsfanworks.com/riseofnobility.html Sound Engineer: Eclipse SE, Return of Pink Five volumes 2-3, Star Wars: A Rising Threat Personal: http://www.myspace.com/keithabbott TK1210, Garrison Tyranus
|
|
|
Quote Reply |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
|
Jedsithor
Registered:
Oct '05
|
Date Posted:
5/1 1:20pm
Subject:
RE: Atomfilms rejected Dark Resurrection
|
|
I thought there was a rule that if you had a film on their site, you couldn't post it anywhere else? Maybe that's why they rejected it.
-----signature-----
|
|
|
Quote Reply |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
|
FX_guy
Registered:
Jun '02
|
Date Posted:
5/1 1:36pm
Subject:
RE: Atomfilms rejected Dark Resurrection
- Date Edited:
5/1 2:10pm (1 edits total)
Edited By:
FX_guy
|
They actually dropped that requirement last year - or the year before last, I forget which.
But even when it was a requirement, all it meant was that other online copies had to be taken offline once the film became an Atomfilms finalist. Pink Five was hosted here at TFN and on iFilm long before it was accepted by Atomfilms, to name just one example.
There's no telling exactly what Atomfilms will choose as a finalist, but a film that's both subtitled and far longer than their preferred length is probably at a disadvantage, no matter how good the overall quality may be. Short and funny is their usual preference, and not just for the SW contest, but for their site overall.
But what they choose one year may not necessarily be the same the next - Pink Five was rejected the first time it was submitted, and accepted the following year even though it was the exact same film. There's no harm in submitting Dark Resurrection again later, 'cause you just never know.
-----signature-----
http://www.pinkfive.com Morbid and creepifyin' I got no problem with.
|
|
|
Quote Reply |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
|
Fraught
Registered:
Mar '08
|
Date Posted:
5/2 3:01am
Subject:
RE: Atomfilms rejected Dark Resurrection
|
|
Anyone know what the stand point is to using the Star Wars score in amateur work for the Atom Films SW Competition? I just thought if they are happy to do that mashup thingy... then using the score wouldn't be a problem?
-----signature-----
|
|
|
Quote Reply |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
|
