TheForce.net Jedi Council
Yarael Poof thanks Sau-Den!
Author Topic: After Effects Memory Question
storm8105 
Registered: Jun '08
6513_Obi-Wan Kenobi
Date Posted: 7/19 9:12am Subject: After Effects Memory Question
When I start up AE i get this screen

http://www.flickr.com/photos/28717702@N05/2682829920/

Specifically I'm concerned about the "3% used of 2045M" part. Is there a way to change the memory after effects uses to better accommodate hd footage, and if so how, what settings do you recommend etc.

 

-----signature-----
Commander Coriander Salamander And 'Er Singlehander Bellylander
http://youtube.com/user/storm8105
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
TaunTaunHerder 
Registered: Oct '07
14777_Binary Sunset
Date Posted: 7/19 1:44pm Subject: RE: After Effects Memory Question

I think it's just telling you how much disk space
After Effects is taking up on your hard drive.

I don't think it will effect how much video footage you can import
into After Effects or what you do with the footage after you import it.

 

Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
storm8105 
Registered: Jun '08
6513_Obi-Wan Kenobi
Date Posted: 7/19 3:07pm Subject: RE: After Effects Memory Question - Date Edited: 7/19 3:07pm (1 edits total) Edited By: storm8105
yeah, but i originally installed AE when I had only 1/2 a gig of ram. then it said 12% or something like that. I then installed 2 gigs of ram (or 2048 mb) and now it says 3% of 2045, which leads me to believe its not talking about my hard drive.

i only ask because AE is taking forever to render my new hd footage, which is uncompressed and so its larger than it needs to be, but...

 

-----signature-----
Commander Coriander Salamander And 'Er Singlehander Bellylander
http://youtube.com/user/storm8105
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
FX_guy 
Registered: Jun '02
44378_Fan Films - Pink Five
Date Posted: 7/19 3:15pm Subject: RE: After Effects Memory Question
That number on startup represents the percentage of RAM being used by other programs when AE loads.

So when you added four times the RAM, the number went down to 1/4 its former size.

AE is telling you that it sees 97% of the RAM is available. This is a good thing.

Look for the indicator that says how much RAM is being used when you're actually rendering, there should be a constant tally on the screen as the render progresses.

 

-----signature-----
http://www.pinkfive.com
Morbid and creepifyin' I got no problem with.
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
storm8105 
Registered: Jun '08
6513_Obi-Wan Kenobi
Date Posted: 7/19 6:31pm Subject: RE: After Effects Memory Question
So i guess there's no easy boosting the performance cry . o well. Thanks for the help.

 

-----signature-----
Commander Coriander Salamander And 'Er Singlehander Bellylander
http://youtube.com/user/storm8105
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
TrowaGP02a 
Registered: Dec '04
7874_Gabe
Date Posted: 7/20 1:01am Subject: RE: After Effects Memory Question - Date Edited: 7/20 1:06am (1 edits total) Edited By: TrowaGP02a
2 GIGS of ram = 2054 MB of RAM (approx.). AE is using 3% currently when it starts up, not a bad this. When you had less RAM AE needed to use a bigger % of it to run, now it needs a smaller percent, but probably the same amount. Try going under your memory and performance controls inside of AE's menus, disk caches may help your AE run faster if you have a lot of extra HD space you can use as virtual ram.

If you have more than 2 GB of RAM, AE on Windows XP (which it looks like you're using) can only naturally use 2 GB of RAM even if you have more installed. You can open your boot.ini settings and change it to add a "/3GB" so that you can get a virtual extra gig out of the performance like so:

[boot loader]
timeout=30
default=multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)partition(2)\WINNT
[operating systems]
multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)partition(2)\WINNT="????" /3GB


*where "????" is your operating system. Information can be found on the Microsoft website or by typing "AE 3 gig switch XP" or something along those lines into Google.


 

-----signature-----
There must be some way out of here.
Said the Joker to the Thief.
There's too much confusion here.
I can't get no relief.
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Ryan_W 
Title: Fan Films: Emmy-Winning Lightsaber Geek
Registered: Aug '01
44357_Fan Films - Ryan vs Dorkman
Date Posted: 7/20 1:26am Subject: RE: After Effects Memory Question
Not to heap more technical concerns on you, but in looking at your screengrab I noticed something else that you may need to be concerned about as well:

 

-----signature-----
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Vidina 
Registered: Jan '06
44334_Darth Maul
Date Posted: 7/20 5:43am Subject: RE: After Effects Memory Question
good point, even 6.5 is TONS better.
CS3 is a bit slow, but it's a hell of a lot more optimized than 7 ever was.

 

-----signature-----
Originally registered 9/13/03 - eLto
http://twitter.com/Vidina
http://www.youtube.com/tomellingsen
Video Tutorials:
http://www.aurellia.net
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
bobaandy123 
Registered: Jan '05
6893_Atari 2600, ESB
Date Posted: 7/20 6:26pm Subject: RE: After Effects Memory Question
The /3GB flag is great, but I find it breaks several other 3D apps I run.

 

-----signature-----
"I know the movies! Why don't Spielberg?!"
~Michael “Dorkman” Scott, Geekza! Episode 50
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
storm8105 
Registered: Jun '08
6513_Obi-Wan Kenobi
Date Posted: 7/21 12:12pm Subject: RE: After Effects Memory Question
Ryan_W posted:
Not to heap more technical concerns on you, but in looking at your screengrab I noticed something else that you may need to be concerned about as well:



from the rvd website
"The film’s effects were accomplished via Adobe AfterEffects, version 5.5 at the time" hugs

also, why is 6.5 so much better? (i have the standard versions, so no motion tracking)

 

-----signature-----
Commander Coriander Salamander And 'Er Singlehander Bellylander
http://youtube.com/user/storm8105
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Vidina 
Registered: Jan '06
44334_Darth Maul
Date Posted: 7/21 12:20pm Subject: RE: After Effects Memory Question
As far as I can remember, 6.5 had much more features and was a whole lot more optimized for XP than 6.0 was. It was also the best version until CS3 came along wink

 

-----signature-----
Originally registered 9/13/03 - eLto
http://twitter.com/Vidina
http://www.youtube.com/tomellingsen
Video Tutorials:
http://www.aurellia.net
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
bobaandy123 
Registered: Jan '05
6893_Atari 2600, ESB
Date Posted: 7/21 12:40pm Subject: RE: After Effects Memory Question
storm8105 posted:


from the rvd website
"The film’s effects were accomplished via Adobe AfterEffects, version 5.5 at the time" hugs




You don't need a very advanced piece of software to make a mask and then blur it out...

 

-----signature-----
"I know the movies! Why don't Spielberg?!"
~Michael “Dorkman” Scott, Geekza! Episode 50
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Ryan_W 
Title: Fan Films: Emmy-Winning Lightsaber Geek
Registered: Aug '01
44357_Fan Films - Ryan vs Dorkman
Date Posted: 7/21 4:15pm Subject: RE: After Effects Memory Question
storm8105 posted:
Ryan_W posted:
Not to heap more technical concerns on you, but in looking at your screengrab I noticed something else that you may need to be concerned about as well:



from the rvd website
"The film’s effects were accomplished via Adobe AfterEffects, version 5.5 at the time" hugs

Yeah, that was over 5 years ago.

 

-----signature-----
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
DVeditor 
Title: Evil Overlord (manager)
Fan Films & Icons

Registered: Dec '01
8081_ILM
Date Posted: 7/21 6:46pm Subject: RE: After Effects Memory Question
I lol'd.

I can vouch for anything newer than 6.0 as well, though if that's what you have then use it!

 

-----signature-----
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
storm8105 
Registered: Jun '08
6513_Obi-Wan Kenobi
Date Posted: 7/22 9:43am Subject: RE: After Effects Memory Question
I do have 6.5 as well, but some annoying errors have kept me from using it too often. I think I'll try reinstalling and see what happens. Obviously 6.5 is still pretty old but with my limited cashflow is was what I could afford. thanks everyone for the help.

 

-----signature-----
Commander Coriander Salamander And 'Er Singlehander Bellylander
http://youtube.com/user/storm8105
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Vidina 
Registered: Jan '06
44334_Darth Maul
Date Posted: 7/23 10:54am Subject: RE: After Effects Memory Question
bobaandy123 posted:
storm8105 posted:


from the rvd website
"The film’s effects were accomplished via Adobe AfterEffects, version 5.5 at the time" hugs




You don't need a very advanced piece of software to make a mask and then blur it out...


Not everyone in here makes only lightsabers.




..

Wait, who am I kidding, that's exactly what everyone in here does. In fact, we should just rename this to "The Lightsaber Boards"

 

-----signature-----
Originally registered 9/13/03 - eLto
http://twitter.com/Vidina
http://www.youtube.com/tomellingsen
Video Tutorials:
http://www.aurellia.net
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History