main
side
curve
  1. In Memory of LAJ_FETT: Please share your remembrances and condolences HERE

Lit MACLUNKY -- The Lit Forum Maclunky Thread, v3

Discussion in 'Literature' started by Point Given , Sep 12, 2015.

  1. DARTH_MU

    DARTH_MU Jedi Master star 4

    Registered:
    Feb 9, 2005
    Well they made a huge announcement city wide vote that were known by these white supremacist crazies well in advance.
    And what did they achieve? The state court stayed the statue removal for 6 months due to a historical society took the issue to court. It's staying for at least 6 months due to historical value. A scum killed an innocent person. The victim could be living right now. I thought everyone was for saving lives so much they want to surrender the first time they could.
    I am not defending white supremacy here. I am defending equality. And Trump gets condemned?! for not blaming the right enough? What is he supposed to do as US president? He already said blame is on all sides. Is he supposed to say All hail non white supremacy?
    And mods, should someone want to continue this line of discussion (I don't) Maybe move these comments down to the JC Community US Policy thread? This thread is for Literature social.
     
  2. Point Given

    Point Given Manager star 7 Staff Member Manager

    Registered:
    Dec 12, 2006
    A social thread is a catch-all thread. There's nothing off topic about this line of discussion. If you don't want to participate in this particular discussion, then don't participate. But that doesn't mean the rest of us won't.
     
  3. fett 4

    fett 4 Chosen One star 5

    Registered:
    Jan 2, 2000
    This is an off topic thread for the lit forum. I don't see why we can't talk about it but let's be clear. Star Wars is about a fight against Space Nazis. We are discussing real Nazis and what they are doing now in 2017
     
  4. anakinfansince1983

    anakinfansince1983 Skywalker Saga/LFL/YJCC Manager star 10 Staff Member Manager

    Registered:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Yes, Trump is supposed to condemn white supremacy. Full stop. Because there is no "b...bu...but" statement that can be made here. The very definition of "defending equality" is condemnation of white supremacy.

    If (general) you view a condemnation of white supremacy as "all hail non-white supremacy"--or view white supremacy as a belief system that is worth any sort of glossing over or respect--you are part of the problem.
     
    Ulicus , Vthuil, Mia Mesharad and 8 others like this.
  5. DARTH_MU

    DARTH_MU Jedi Master star 4

    Registered:
    Feb 9, 2005
    He's supposed to condemn supremacy, which he did by saying blame is on all sides. He's not supposed to condemn whites or a political spectrum (alt-right).
     
  6. starfish

    starfish Chosen One star 5

    Registered:
    Oct 9, 2003
    It's not that hard to condemn white supremacists Mu, and this is not the first time Trump has failed to do so.
     
  7. Point Given

    Point Given Manager star 7 Staff Member Manager

    Registered:
    Dec 12, 2006
    He absolutely is supposed to condemn a political spectrum when it is horrible, such as the alt-right. This is the same guy who complains about socialism all the time. Now you're going to sit there and say he shouldn't condemn the alt-right? Unbelievable.
     
  8. Senpezeco

    Senpezeco Jedi Grand Master star 4

    Registered:
    Apr 27, 2014
    Pray tell, what form of supremacy was being advocated by the counter-protestors?
     
  9. vncredleader

    vncredleader Force Ghost star 5

    Registered:
    Mar 28, 2016
    I don't think you understand what the left is about. We are not people who wanna stand down. Look at Ferguson. BLM has faced down fing tanks. It is not on us if some ahole wants us to surrender. You wanna know what we call someone who tries to get people to do something by making an example via fear? That is called terrorism. We do not kneel to terrorists. if they wanna show how evil they are that is not on the people they hurt, that is on them for hurting them.

    Also the president saying all sides is wrong cause all sides where not wrong in what went down. One side had armed militia and ran a civilian over, the other peacefully protested when at gunpoint and after a flat out terrorist attack. As US president he should openly oppose the LITERAL NAZIS KILLING THE PEOPLE HE IS SUPPOSED TO BE STANDING UP FOR. If someone shot you in cold blood and all you did was throw one punch in self defense and a police officer made a statement that said "it is tragic that there was violence on both sides" would you feel all right?

    This clown of a president had a panic attack over Obama not referring to a terrorist attack as having been done by "radical Islam" and yet when white supremacists commit a terrorist attack on HIS SOIL he refuses to identity that it was white supremacists. Also "non-white supremacy"? If that is what you think the left is about then you REALLY don't get it. Equality does not mean talking around the fact that an america based radicalized white supremacist group that worships him, killed one of the people he is supposed to represent.
     
  10. anakinfansince1983

    anakinfansince1983 Skywalker Saga/LFL/YJCC Manager star 10 Staff Member Manager

    Registered:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Just because it is worth repeating: He absolutely is supposed to condemn the alt-right. The alt-right are not just another "political spectrum" whose ideas deserve to be heard respectfully, such as libertarians or your standard Republicans. The alt-right are white supremacists and neo-Nazis.

    And please show me anywhere in this discussion where it is suggested that Trump should "condemn whites."

    Condemning white supremacy is not "condemning whites" any more than condemning anti-Semitism is "condemning non-Jews" or condemning misogyny is "condemning men."

    Want a real example of racism against white people, it's not BLM or any other such group that white supremacists like to use as a boogeyman--it's the idea that condemning white supremacy equals "condemning white people."
     
  11. vncredleader

    vncredleader Force Ghost star 5

    Registered:
    Mar 28, 2016
  12. Darth_Duck

    Darth_Duck Chosen One star 5

    Registered:
    Oct 13, 2000
    "Nazis are bad" should be the easiest statement for a politician to make.

    Sent from my SM-G386W using Tapatalk
     
  13. Charlemagne19

    Charlemagne19 Chosen One star 8

    Registered:
    Jul 30, 2000
    Trump accepted the KKK's endorsement....well, one of the KKK's endorsements.

    I think that pretty much said where he stood on the issue.

    I don't see why anyone would be surprised otherwise.
     
  14. Senpezeco

    Senpezeco Jedi Grand Master star 4

    Registered:
    Apr 27, 2014
    He could do what Roosevelt did, which was addressing and condemning the Nazi movement by name.
     
  15. vncredleader

    vncredleader Force Ghost star 5

    Registered:
    Mar 28, 2016
    Yeah a bunch have said it in the past few hours, it's almost as if Trump's refusal to say those words is telling of something.......[face_thinking]
     
    Vthuil, mnjedi, fett 4 and 1 other person like this.
  16. Charlemagne19

    Charlemagne19 Chosen One star 8

    Registered:
    Jul 30, 2000
  17. Ghost

    Ghost Chosen One star 8

    Registered:
    Oct 13, 2003
    It bears repeating... the "Alternative Right" (now the Mainstream Right because of Trump's election) is all about White Supremacy. They focus on Christianity and Patriarchy too, but Race is a dominant feature. The KKK in recent decades has shifted to being anti-immigrant (especially Latino) and anti-Muslim. What is Trump known for? The Ban and the Wall. This is a pattern.

    [​IMG]
     
  18. Charlemagne19

    Charlemagne19 Chosen One star 8

    Registered:
    Jul 30, 2000
    I remember the exact moment when I realized my Southern heritage was awful. When I saw Confederate flags being flown with Nazi ones and not a damn person cared or noticed.

    Admittedly, I was eleven.
     
  19. vncredleader

    vncredleader Force Ghost star 5

    Registered:
    Mar 28, 2016
    On a slightly bright note, it is good to see how on some level this has really shown where people stand. The Nazis are not even tip toeing which is scary but it also makes the rest of us more united in a way. I mean I am a bit less depressed right now cause all of us here are very much taking a stand openly. it is a bit of optimism to be found in so much fear and tragedy.
     
  20. GrandAdmiralJello

    GrandAdmiralJello Comms Admin ❉ Moderator Communitatis Litterarumque star 10 Staff Member Administrator

    Registered:
    Nov 28, 2000
    One would think "I am against actual Nazis" is literally the easiest stand to take and the lowest possible bar.

    But I guess not.
     
  21. Charlemagne19

    Charlemagne19 Chosen One star 8

    Registered:
    Jul 30, 2000
    For a kind of silver lining, the racist side of the support of the Alt-Right and certain politicians caused them all to come out into the light and cast aside their disguises to say what they really felt.

    What was good about this is they discovered, in fact, much of the country loathed and were disgusted by them rather than hiding behind a veneer of political correctness.

    The Empire and its supporters have shown their true colors.
     
    Jedi Ben and vncredleader like this.
  22. fett 4

    fett 4 Chosen One star 5

    Registered:
    Jan 2, 2000
    We will see what happens come the next election. You see in the last I wouldn't have dreamt that a man who'd openly boasted about groping women and had done the whole Birther nonsense and who then openly got into a verbal fight with a Family of a dead soldier could possibly be elected President. I was proven wrong :(
     
  23. Charlemagne19

    Charlemagne19 Chosen One star 8

    Registered:
    Jul 30, 2000
    My general election coverage doesn't actually make me feel that bad about the Trump election because I can pretty much point to exactly what caused Hillary to lose the election. The four states which went for Obama that didn't go for her were all the ones in America's Steel Belt (i.e. the Rust Belt) which have been suffering steady industrial and economic decline for decades. Trump made many promises (none of which have been fulfilled but he's tried to pass his anti-environmental regulation off as) to help repair the suffering in those regions. Hillary, notably, declined to campaign in some. She was, correctly, viewed as a candidate of foreign policy when the USA felt we needed a domestic candidate.

    As such, I generally believe Trumps election was born from the economy versus nativism, though he certainly got the nativist vote.
     
  24. anakinfansince1983

    anakinfansince1983 Skywalker Saga/LFL/YJCC Manager star 10 Staff Member Manager

    Registered:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Michigan went for Sanders in the primary, but people who offered to campaign for Clinton there were turned down, because "everyone knows Hillary Clinton." She was a horrible campaigner when she ran against Obama in 2008 and she was a horrible campaigner last year. She would prioritize states that she thought she needed and just write off the rest as done deals, which is really arrogant, and in 2008 Terry McAuliffe admitted that's what they were doing. "We're focusing on states that would be big electoral college wins."

    The one area where Trump and Sanders agreed was the promises about bringing jobs back to the Rust Belt.
     
  25. Charlemagne19

    Charlemagne19 Chosen One star 8

    Registered:
    Jul 30, 2000
    Another area Hillary failed at was when she did remove Sanders from the running, she failed to co-opt any of his policies to get his very angry independent base going to her. She continued her exact same policies as before when much of the electorate was fired up for "change."

    Trump also, for all his reputation as an awful human being, also has a reputation as a man famous for reinvigorating real estate. There were also other promises which have not been met like increasing the amount of free health care available when the current coverage amounts to, "better than a bare bulb."

    So yeah.

    It's also a note Trump generally won by a few field goals rather than touchdowns in almost every state. It, like George W. Bush's "win" (I use quotations because there's still many questions about election fraud--real election fraud not "alternative fact" election fraud) over Al Gore, could have gone another way with minor changes.