Senate Abortion: Why not?

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct...9-story.html&usg=AOvVaw3pbcJrpFi-rXvP93qI8j6D

But...but...I though the video was edited to mislead?!

Guess not.

 

That's because it was. Planned Parenthood was not prosecuted by the Orange County District Attorney and is not paying anything. I know you don't like to read the Fake News of the L.A. Times, but it's a pretty short article.

 

Uh huh. It was Okeefe's organization that filed the law suit and it was from their investigation. Planned Parenthood will be next. The house of cards is falling. PP sold to these companies.

 

Violent Violet Menace's edit (8:56 PM CET):

This entire post was one sentence that was a lewd comment directed to J-rod, suggesting that he gets sexual pleasure from news that anti-abortionists might characterise as a "win" (the word "win" is mine, Darth Guy's sentence was different). Conferring with fellow JCC mod, heels1785, I suggested that the post was distasteful and did not contribute anything of substance, to which he agreed, and I subsequently removed the post's content.

 

You're conflating two different things. Planned Parenthood's transactions with these companies vs these companies' transactions with "pharmaceutical companies and academic institutions" all over the world. The videos you're referring to didn't show anything about the latter, they only showed conversations with Planned Parenthood employees.

 

Cool. Glad the new board software doesn't say which mod edited a post and whoever just wrote "Snip" didn't feel the need to identify themselves or identify the reason for the edit. @JoinTheSchwarz

 

He said something about J-Rod ****ing off his pro-life boner (and it was glorious). From the purple text, I'm guessing Merk made the edit.

 

Merk is still a mod?? And he's making unidentified edits in forums he doesn't moderate?

 

This is why you're least missed.

 

Done by VVM according to tapatalk


Would be nice to know who actually does the modding without having to resort to an app

 

Thanks @FatBurt. Glad VVM is still doing a bang up job of following the rules around here. At least he didn't edit @Darth Guy to make it look like he was agreeing with J-Rod this time.

 

Don't mods need some kind of warrant to enter someone's post and confiscate its contents? I'd be happy to serve on a clandestine magistrate panel of some kind so that mods can come to me when they need a warrant lest they be accused of unreasonable seizure of someone's content. When a member has questions I can verify whether a proper warrant was issued in the case provided they fill out the proper freedom of information request (6-9 month processing time). This way I can be more powerful than a mod without any other responsibilities for policing content.

 

Not only does he not need a warrant for the removal of contents, but he sold said contents to Big Pharma.

 

Hey VVM, while you're going around liking posts in here, do you want to put a reason for the edit and identify yourself in the post you edited?

 

The new forum software allows mods to send a notification to the one whose post is edited, with a link to which post it is and who edited it. Darth Guy knows that I edited it.

 

but this is exactly why we need checks and balances. The rule of ****ing law.

 

Because it's murder.

 

ROTS is your favourite SW film. You fully endorse child murder. And cinematic murder.

 

And no one else reading the thread does, nor do they know the reason for the edit.

 

How do the rest of learn from his mistakes if you don't explain yourself?

 

I also want to read all redacted posts.
@JoinTheSchwarz, make it happen

 

I would also like to know what the post said!


My memory isn t what it used to be.

 

Beezel would do a better job than whatever bozo who currently holds the position.