Author Topic: Guide to the Grand Army (Insider #84)
DarthMane2  2176 posts
Registered: Sep '03
42111_Colonel Vogel
Date Posted: 9/19/05 11:39am Subject: RE: Guide to the Grand Army (Insider #84)
KarenTraviss posted:
DarthMane2 posted:
KarenTraviss posted:
[quote=Corran_Fett]Not.Fair. plain angry

Would you mind to post the part about Null ARCs in here or is this forbidden? I just wanna know about these badasses cool


Seeing as it's in the public domain now...

My lovely Null boys were a prototype batch before the Alpha batch. The Kaminoans tried to get clever and enhance the Jango genome, and it didn't go quite as planned. Of the initial batch of 12, only six clone foetuses survived to full term.

Those six were trained by that ol' sweetheart Sergeant Kal Skirata. Two of them, N-10 (Jaing) and N-6 (Kom'rk) were the Clone Intelligence Units who located General Grievous. The lads were the best black ops men this side of the Black Stump, but completely off the wall and loyal only to Kal.

Damn, I'm proud of those boys! (Mad, bad and charming to know, to paraphrase Lady Caroline Lamb.)



There is more right?

And we have two Clones named after Great Mandalorians.


More of what? Nulls? Not in the feature.

But you know about Ordo.[/quote]

More Information.

 

-----signature-----
"Infidel defilers. They shall all drown in lakes of blood. Now they will know why they are afraid of the dark. Now they will learn why they fear the night."
"When in doubt,... attack"- George S. Patton
still Strad's #1 fan
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
KarenTraviss  2326 posts
Title: Author:
-Har d Contact
-Tri ple Zero
-LOTF

Registered: Mar '04
18193_Clone
Date Posted: 9/19/05 11:41am Subject: RE: Guide to the Grand Army (Insider #84)
CeiranHarmony posted:
As much as I love NARCs already I have to post some critique:

it seems the NARCs just copied their story from the ARCs. ARCs were a special batch before the regulars. now we have the NARCs before the ARCs with the same excuse as the ARCs had compared to the regulars. I hope there is more speciality about them than just this, otherwise they, though cool, seem to be just a copy of ARCs before the ARCs were made in universe.



I disagree with you completely. They're an enhanced genome that went wrong, and they're intel men. The ARCs are unaltered Jango. And they do different jobs.

You'll see in Triple Zero that they're not ARCs...

 

-----signature-----
Website: http://www.karentraviss.com
Blog: http://www.livejournal.com/users/karentraviss/
"Karen, put that stormie down at once!"
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Qu_Klaani  1559 posts
Registered: Mar '04
39890_Ki-Adi-Mundi
Date Posted: 9/19/05 11:47am Subject: RE: Guide to the Grand Army (Insider #84)
If theres only six of then then must be used very sparingly...so I take it the events of Triple Zero are pretty damned important?

 

-----signature-----
"Perhaps George Lucas should have copied the methods of Peter Jackson in order to make the otherworldly corruption of Anakin's soul more obvious to those who can't fill in the lines without slow-motion close-ups and pounding heart-beat sound effects"
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
CeiranHarmony  4490 posts
Registered: May '04
17274_Dark Apprentice
Date Posted: 9/19/05 11:50am Subject: RE: Guide to the Grand Army (Insider #84)
then I misunderstood it maybe, I will wait and see.

I just think, putting the NARCs chronologically before the ARCs seems like repeating what was done with the arcs compared to regulars chronologically, I hoped them to be made after them as special unit or something like that. that seemed odd to me. their job is ok, and I am looking forward to read about them.

 

-----signature-----
www.njoe.com (Govsec Author)
"Less is more!" Union
In Love with the Star Wars Atlas
Dark Horse: Star Wars: Invasion (best idea ever!!!)
My life is an Idiots Array, PURE SABBACC
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
KarenTraviss  2326 posts
Title: Author:
-Har d Contact
-Tri ple Zero
-LOTF

Registered: Mar '04
18193_Clone
Date Posted: 9/19/05 11:51am Subject: RE: Guide to the Grand Army (Insider #84)
Qu_Klaani posted:
If theres only six of then then must be used very sparingly...so I take it the events of Triple Zero are pretty damned important?


I think they are. It's quite...complicated.

 

-----signature-----
Website: http://www.karentraviss.com
Blog: http://www.livejournal.com/users/karentraviss/
"Karen, put that stormie down at once!"
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
DarthMane2  2176 posts
Registered: Sep '03
42111_Colonel Vogel
Date Posted: 9/19/05 11:53am Subject: RE: Guide to the Grand Army (Insider #84)
Any Mandalorian info?

 

-----signature-----
"Infidel defilers. They shall all drown in lakes of blood. Now they will know why they are afraid of the dark. Now they will learn why they fear the night."
"When in doubt,... attack"- George S. Patton
still Strad's #1 fan
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
KarenTraviss  2326 posts
Title: Author:
-Har d Contact
-Tri ple Zero
-LOTF

Registered: Mar '04
18193_Clone
Date Posted: 9/19/05 11:55am Subject: RE: Guide to the Grand Army (Insider #84)
CeiranHarmony posted:
then I misunderstood it maybe, I will wait and see.

I just think, putting the NARCs chronologically before the ARCs seems like repeating what was done with the arcs compared to regulars chronologically, I hoped them to be made after them as special unit or something like that. that seemed odd to me. their job is ok, and I am looking forward to read about them.


Maybe this helps set it in context. Real cloning has a very high failure rate. I'm a hard SF writer: I try to stick as much to real science as I can. So the Kaminoans would have had quite a few tries at getting the clones right, however good they were, with quite a few small test batches. And, being the cocky xenophobic sushi-heads that they are, they thought they knew best. And they got it wrong. They don't like talking about their failures. Bad for business.

One day, we'll see just how wrong they got it.

 

-----signature-----
Website: http://www.karentraviss.com
Blog: http://www.livejournal.com/users/karentraviss/
"Karen, put that stormie down at once!"
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Corran_Fett  3100 posts
Registered: Jan '05
45734_Boba Fett Silhouette
Date Posted: 9/19/05 11:58am Subject: RE: Guide to the Grand Army (Insider #84)
KarenTraviss posted:
One day, we'll see just how wrong they got it.


Sounds conspiratorial... raised_brow and interesting... and exciting... drooling

damn, I can't wait for TZ cry

...

 

-----signature-----
The other side of the NJO, featuring Mandalorians, Vong, and Peace Brigaders in a thrillride full of betrayal and intrigue...
When Few Stood Against Many | http://boards.theforce.net/b/b10477/25253415/
- http://corranfett.deviantart.com -
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
KarenTraviss  2326 posts
Title: Author:
-Har d Contact
-Tri ple Zero
-LOTF

Registered: Mar '04
18193_Clone
Date Posted: 9/19/05 11:59am Subject: RE: Guide to the Grand Army (Insider #84)
DarthMane2 posted:
Any Mandalorian info?


A little explanation of the Mandalorian ethic in training the men, and what made Jango's genome especially suitable - once some of the less favourable genes had been tinkered with.

 

-----signature-----
Website: http://www.karentraviss.com
Blog: http://www.livejournal.com/users/karentraviss/
"Karen, put that stormie down at once!"
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
CeiranHarmony  4490 posts
Registered: May '04
17274_Dark Apprentice
Date Posted: 9/19/05 12:15pm Subject: RE: Guide to the Grand Army (Insider #84)
KarenTraviss posted:
CeiranHarmony posted:
then I misunderstood it maybe, I will wait and see.

I just think, putting the NARCs chronologically before the ARCs seems like repeating what was done with the arcs compared to regulars chronologically, I hoped them to be made after them as special unit or something like that. that seemed odd to me. their job is ok, and I am looking forward to read about them.


Maybe this helps set it in context. Real cloning has a very high failure rate. I'm a hard SF writer: I try to stick as much to real science as I can. So the Kaminoans would have had quite a few tries at getting the clones right, however good they were, with quite a few small test batches. And, being the cocky xenophobic sushi-heads that they are, they thought they knew best. And they got it wrong. They don't like talking about their failures. Bad for business.

One day, we'll see just how wrong they got it.



right, but they had only ten years. and what seems odd and needs to be cleared up in my opinion is their schedule.

NARCs came before ARCs
ARCs came before regulars and RCs

how long did their testing take? we know the clones to be 10 years old by the time of AOTC. that means they started growing them at the time of TPM, but the DNA sample and the contract they got around that time, or 1 year to several months after TPM. between TPM and AOTC lie 10 years. so how can they be 10years old, if there was a testing stage? I don´t see it fit together.

we have in the Bounty Hunter game after TPM Jango's recruitment. months to a year post TPM

then months of testing only until they need to be ready. because Boba, ARCs in some novels (Cestus Deception f.e.) tell of their age and such stuff. so their growing had to start really soon after Jango's recruitment. and then we know ARCs came before the regular clones were made, and now NARCs even before ARCs... and all, regulars AND ARCs are 10 at the time of AOTC. so where to the NARCs fit in? much testing couldn´t have taken place, too less time for that or the clones must´ve aged faster and are younger than we are told in several sources.

how to clear this mess up? weeks to months are the only timeframe for the beginnings of cloning and testing.

or did they immediealty start 3 types of clones at the same time?

NARCs, ARCs and regulars

then later when the forst batches were grown enough they tested them and decided wich ones to keep? this seems fitting better. but, if it is like we are told, that one preceeded the other, the timing gets off.

explanations?

 

-----signature-----
www.njoe.com (Govsec Author)
"Less is more!" Union
In Love with the Star Wars Atlas
Dark Horse: Star Wars: Invasion (best idea ever!!!)
My life is an Idiots Array, PURE SABBACC
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
KarenTraviss  2326 posts
Title: Author:
-Har d Contact
-Tri ple Zero
-LOTF

Registered: Mar '04
18193_Clone
Date Posted: 9/19/05 12:22pm Subject: RE: Guide to the Grand Army (Insider #84)
CeiranHarmony posted:
KarenTraviss posted:
CeiranHarmony posted:
then I misunderstood it maybe, I will wait and see.

I just think, putting the NARCs chronologically before the ARCs seems like repeating what was done with the arcs compared to regulars chronologically, I hoped them to be made after them as special unit or something like that. that seemed odd to me. their job is ok, and I am looking forward to read about them.


Maybe this helps set it in context. Real cloning has a very high failure rate. I'm a hard SF writer: I try to stick as much to real science as I can. So the Kaminoans would have had quite a few tries at getting the clones right, however good they were, with quite a few small test batches. And, being the cocky xenophobic sushi-heads that they are, they thought they knew best. And they got it wrong. They don't like talking about their failures. Bad for business.

One day, we'll see just how wrong they got it.



right, but they had only ten years. and what seems odd and needs to be cleared up in my opinion is their schedule.

NARCs came before ARCs
ARCs came before regulars and RCs

how long did their testing take? we know the clones to be 10 years old by the time of AOTC. that means they started growing them at the time of TPM, but the DNA sample and the contract they got around that time, or 1 year to several months after TPM. between TPM and AOTC lie 10 years. so how can they be 10years old, if there was a testing stage? I don´t see it fit together.

we have in the Bounty Hunter game after TPM Jango's recruitment. months to a year post TPM

then months of testing only until they need to be ready. because Boba, ARCs in some novels (Cestus Deception f.e.) tell of their age and such stuff. so their growing had to start really soon after Jango's recruitment. and then we know ARCs came before the regular clones were made, and now NARCs even before ARCs... and all, regulars AND ARCs are 10 at the time of AOTC. so where to the NARCs fit in? much testing couldn´t have taken place, too less time for that or the clones must´ve aged faster and are younger than we are told in several sources.

how to clear this mess up? weeks to months are the only timeframe for the beginnings of cloning and testing.

or did they immediealty start 3 types of clones at the same time?

NARCs, ARCs and regulars

then later when the forst batches were grown enough they tested them and decided wich ones to keep? this seems fitting better. but, if it is like we are told, that one preceeded the other, the timing gets off.

explanations?


Yes, they had batches running at the same time. That would be sound procedure: otherwise they'd be placing an awful lot of faith in one template. We know they did, because the Alpha ARCs and the altered clones were produced very close together. They didn't wait for the ARCs to grow up fully before they decided they were a handful and switched to the other template.

 

-----signature-----
Website: http://www.karentraviss.com
Blog: http://www.livejournal.com/users/karentraviss/
"Karen, put that stormie down at once!"
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
CeiranHarmony  4490 posts
Registered: May '04
17274_Dark Apprentice
Date Posted: 9/19/05 12:28pm Subject: RE: Guide to the Grand Army (Insider #84)
then it works, thx happy

another question:

ARCs went to stasis because they were less obediant than regulars. do we have an exact date when that was?

I assume it could be after Alpha02 Spar left, going Rogue. But then we have ARC clones remembering geonosis battle in some clone wars novels, but we know they came out of stasis after that. so maybe, I assume, they were deployed on Geonosis in a small number, but put in stasis afterwards because of their too harsh and inobedient behaviour? possible or is there another explanation? or is the memory in the novel just declared wrong officially?

 

-----signature-----
www.njoe.com (Govsec Author)
"Less is more!" Union
In Love with the Star Wars Atlas
Dark Horse: Star Wars: Invasion (best idea ever!!!)
My life is an Idiots Array, PURE SABBACC
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
CeiranHarmony  4490 posts
Registered: May '04
17274_Dark Apprentice
Date Posted: 9/19/05 12:31pm Subject: RE: Guide to the Grand Army (Insider #84) - Date Edited: 9/19/05 12:33pm (1 edits total) Edited By: CeiranHarmony
but when they decided which batch (ARC or regular) to use and which not to use, they had to produce already huge numbers of both of them. but they had only 100 ARCs and millions of regulars? how does this get explained away then? they seem to have choosen already early how much to produce and which to favor? why? genetic reasons? tyranus wishes? so I assume ARCs wern´t meant as army but special forces only from the beginning. the race was between ARCs and NARCs, regulars were their choosen mainforce from the start then. right?

weren´t ARCs jangos wish personally if I recall right? not tyranus plans then. so maybe Jango wanted Spar to defect one day. hmm...

 

-----signature-----
www.njoe.com (Govsec Author)
"Less is more!" Union
In Love with the Star Wars Atlas
Dark Horse: Star Wars: Invasion (best idea ever!!!)
My life is an Idiots Array, PURE SABBACC
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Leto II  11842 posts
Registered: Jan '00
42114_Jones Attacked
Date Posted: 9/19/05 12:32pm Subject: RE: Guide to the Grand Army (Insider #84)
Qu_Klaani posted:
"Okay, let me answer this the other way, then. I have clone warships coming up in Triple Zero. All clone crew, with a Jedi. (For ballast, probably.) So I've given them their own flotilla, at least for what I like to think of as the HMS Fearless role."

Hmm, so do the Clones crew the Acclamators and other troop transports (along with some positions on warships as seen in RotS) while the rest of the fleet is gradually built up using veterans from sector navies/new recruits etc?

During the first months of the conflict (as we see in the Republic issues and in the Clone Wars video game), the lion's share of Acclamator crewers were indeed clones, accompanied by some "mundanes" -- likely holdovers from the old Republic Judicial Corps navy -- but largely staffed by nipplenecks. As the conflict progressed, we start seeing more and more "naturals" filling up the officer corps, to the point where, by Month 17, the mundanes outnumber the clones on the command deck; leading into Episode III, where there was nary a clone in sight.

It was once postulated by someone that the only real unusual thing about Thrawn's clones was that he was using them for everything, from fighter pilots to capital ship crewers to Imperial Army rifleman-gurkas; versus what we see in the early Clone Wars days, with the ground-pounders being exclusively clones (apart from local sector defense forces).

The third flick clearly illustrates how divergent Thrawn's philosophy truly was from the old-school doctrines, with the Republic churning out millions upon millions of foot-soldiers, piloting everything from LAAT gunships to ARC-170 starfighters to (presuambly) Palpatine's Theta-class shuttle, serving as crew members on assorted vehicles, acting as police forces on Coruscant, and even forming the core of Republic Military Intelligence.


KarenTraviss posted:
-Basilisk- posted:
Wow, my Insider actually arrived on time for once in the past few years, and here's my initial reaction to the GGAR: The GGAR is awesome and the most in-depth article I've ever seen on a military facet of Star Wars. There's a lot of great new information in here, including exactly who the Null ARCs are (finally!). It's nice to have a Command Structure breakdown for the GAR instead of leaving it to speculation like the Imperial and New Republic militaries have been. The article is bursting at the seams with continuity fixes that cover most of the major issues that I can think of. I throughly enjoyed the article. With this and an expanded HoloNet news article, Insider 84 is one of the best in recent memory.


Thank you! Your brown envelope of dollar bills is in the mail. wink

Please post mine in Nepalese rupees, the Somali shilling-crisis being what it is right at the moment, and me reluctant to downcovert without proper underwriting.

 

-----signature-----
"If there's one thing I hate, it's losing. If there's TWO things I hate,
it's losing and getting cancer."
- Kenny Powers
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Grand_Admiral_Gotti  136 posts
Registered: Aug '05
40081_Anakin Skywalker
Date Posted: 9/19/05 12:33pm Subject: RE: Guide to the Grand Army (Insider #84)
We have any pics of these "bad ass" clones???

link please

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History