Author Topic: Characters that certain authors don't get.
Quiet_Mandalorian  8380 posts
Registered: Apr '05
40335_Boba Fett
Date Posted: 2/8/07 8:16am Subject: RE: Characters that certain authors don't get.
Charlemagne19 posted:
I never assumed that everyone on Mandalore was trained in wearing the armor and so on as Karen Traviss has retconned.
Except that she didn't. Attack of the Clones: The Visual Dictionary which was published rather a while before Karen began writing Star Wars material quite openly implies that all Mandalorians undergo warrior training.

Charlemagne19 posted:
It's more the case of all those wars pretty much slaughtering them all to an extremely small amount.
I wouldn't exactly call inflicting casualties of twenty to one on your opponents "getting slaughtered". Certainly, they've been decimated in battle more than a few times, but never in the sort of one-sided way your statement would seem to imply.

Charlemagne19 posted:
Traviss' articles would seem to apply to the entire race too when it seems much more clear by other sources that the Mandalorians like those under Spar were sort of the Society of Creative Anachronism as Mandalorians go.
*sighs*

No, Charles, that's just your own unique (and rather bizarre) interpretation of it all.

JEDI-KILLER_17 posted:
Might as well say it...

Traviss + Ben = Crizzap
Can't say I agree. She's probably done Ben the best out of all the authors so far.

Lord_Riven posted:
Mara post NJO. (barring Betrayal which I haven't read). Either that or motherhood has made her into a whiny, insecure woman who doesn't even trust her husband.
Oh? And when has she not been like that?

The portrayal of Mara in Bloodlines made perfect sense from a logical standpoint, which might be why some people find it jarring because in general it seems as though no one else's personality ever changes in the GFFA over the years at all.

dizfactor posted:
There is no story of Anakin's fall. Anakin was never "up" to begin with. The Jedi are the ones who fall, because they are increasingly blind to the degree to which they are willing to cut corners and use unethical means towards what they (increasingly falsely) believe to be just ends.
No, the problem was whole sense of Jedi ethics in the first place and way it had been structured since the Ruusan Reformations. They’d constructed for themselves a fatally flawed utopianist understanding of the galaxy and how they could make it the way they wanted it to be, and it finally fell apart as it was doomed to when they were presented with the twin challenges of training a boy who had had a life outside of their heavily cloistered world and having to fight an actual war in which things got broken and people died.

The problem was not cutting corners, but rather that those corners existed in the first place.

SuperSaiyaMan12 posted:
R. A. Salvadore and NJO Authors: The Young Jedi Knights, Luke, Leia, Mara, and Han.
Kevein Anderson and everything in the GFFA.

By the way, we need some sort of statute of limitations of samurai comparisons.

I mean, really.

 

-----signature-----
Fey'la was right! Bring Asyr Sei'lar to justice!
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Charlemagne19  26812 posts
Registered: Jul '00
6408_Jedi Outcast
Date Posted: 2/8/07 8:23am Subject: RE: Characters that certain authors don't get.
No, Charles, that's just your own unique (and rather bizarre) interpretation of it all.


Spar builds his new Mandalore out of Former Deathwatch, Security guards, and policemen.

Gee, that implies that Mandalore is just crawling with guys in armor...

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Quiet_Mandalorian  8380 posts
Registered: Apr '05
40335_Boba Fett
Date Posted: 2/8/07 8:33am Subject: RE: Characters that certain authors don't get. - Date Edited: 2/8/07 8:35am (1 edits total) Edited By: Quiet_Mandalorian
Charlemagne19 posted:
Spar builds his new Mandalore out of Former Deathwatch, Security guards, and policemen.

Gee, that implies that Mandalore is just crawling with guys in armor...
The obvious implication is that Spar was looking for recruits with some amount of combat experience, not any old Joe Mando with a set of plates.

 

-----signature-----
Fey'la was right! Bring Asyr Sei'lar to justice!
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Charlemagne19  26812 posts
Registered: Jul '00
6408_Jedi Outcast
Date Posted: 2/8/07 8:59am Subject: RE: Characters that certain authors don't get.
Quiet_Mandalorian posted:
for recruits with some amount of combat experience, not any old Joe Mando with a set of plates.


Yes. Given the extreme rarity of Mandalorian Armor as given by most sources....

One tends to think that there's a tiny minute amount of Mandalorians with combat training (probably about normal for a world) and far far far far far far far far far less so with Mandalorian battle armor let alone Mandalorian battle armor training.

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Corporate_Jedi  201 posts
Registered: Mar '02
40701_Anakin
Date Posted: 2/8/07 9:02am Subject: RE: Characters that certain authors don't get. - Date Edited: 2/8/07 9:17am (3 edits total) Edited By: Corporate_Jedi
Quiet_Mandalorian posted:

No, the problem was whole sense of Jedi ethics in the first place and way it had been structured since the Ruusan Reformations. They’d constructed for themselves a fatally flawed utopianist understanding of the galaxy and how they could make it the way they wanted it to be, and it finally fell apart as it was doomed to when they were presented with the twin challenges of training a boy who had had a life outside of their heavily cloistered world and having to fight an actual war in which things got broken and people died.

The problem was not cutting corners, but rather that those corners existed in the first place.



That "flawed" understanding kept the Republic largely at peace for almost a thousand years, which given the size and scope of the Old Republic was an incredible feat. The fact that they did so is made even more impressive considering there was no standing army or navy post-Russan to help them with that mandate. Instead an Order of ~10,000 beings did it with largely no assistance other than the underwhelming Judicial Branch, some unarmed diplomatic cruisers, and the Force.

In my opinion it was when the Jedi Order STOPPED following its own guidelines that they fell into disarray. Anakin should never have been trained, Qui Gon's dying wish or not. He was too old, and full of fear. Or at the very least Anakin needed a great deal more time in the Temple with the other children under Yoda's watchful eye as opposed to running around the galaxy with Obi-Wan. They should never have become generals either. Used by the Republic to assist with diplomacy, on special missions, or to protect the populace but not as frontline commanders. Whatever happened to Battle Meditation and using the Force to forsee events? What about tracking down the Sith Lords still out there?

Which is why in the end I blame GL (and to pull this post on target and topic) for not getting the characters he wrote about before. The promise of Ep I (which with some judiscious editing is a pretty good movie) was completely betrayed in Ep II. Where suddenly Jedi stopped being Jedi and everyone forgot who they were.

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
rhonderoo  41701 posts
Title: Former Head Admin
Registered: Aug '02
48917_Padme (719093)
Date Posted: 2/8/07 9:11am Subject: RE: Characters that certain authors don't get.
dizfactor posted:
Charlemagne19 posted:
Jude Watson: Anakin Skywalker is not a puppy torturing psychopath before Episode III.


Perhaps in AOTC, you missed his crazed and irrational outbursts, his thoroughly creepy (*cough* stalker *cough*) obsession with Padme, and that little incident where he happens to massacre an entire village. You know, the one time he's left entirely alone, with no supervision and no real chance of repercussions. If character, as they say, is who you are when no one's watching, than Anakin's an unhinged, bloodthirsty maniac.

I'm sorry, I can't blame any EU authors who came after AOTC for portraying Anakin as a deranged psychopath with few redeeming values, if any, because the Anakin Lucas gave us was a deranged psychopath with few redeeming values, if any.

The ones who worked between the releases of Episodes I and II have no real excuse for portraying him that way, but since their portrayals ended up coinciding with the way he was portrayed later, it all worked out.

Kwenn posted:
Unfortunately, pretty much every Anakin story, possibly bar that Episode I Adventures comic, has him doing something that's a little on the dark side.


Which is entirely consistent with the only real time Lucas showed us his vision of an adult, supposedly "light side" Anakin.

Kwenn posted:
Where's the heroic friend Obi-Wan remembered,


Obi-Wan's looking at the past through rose-colored glasses, and I would argue that it's because he's avoiding dealing with his own culpability and that of the Jedi Council in creating Vader.

The Jedi Council is like a coach who pushes steroids on their star athlete and pretend not to notice the health problems they're causing him. Anakin's like Dirk Diggler in Boogie Nights - used until he falls apart by an organization that only really cares about him because he's so well-endowed.

They all knew Anakin was a nutcase. They had to. None of them really liked him, none of them trusted him. They had deep reservations about his commitment to the Jedi Code, to his suitability for training. Obi-Wan kind of liked him, kind of felt responsible/sorry for him, and so he made excuses for him, and the others just turned up their noses a little but let things slide.

Why? Because of the midichlorians in his blood, because the Sith had returned, because of the prophecy, and ultimately because of the war.

They were using him. He was a dangerous loose cannon, and they tolerated it because they wanted him to be their weapon against the Sith. They just did the cold, hard math and concluded that they needed him on their side.

And, you know, once the war started, he was just so damn good at killing things they needed killed. As I've said before, the only problem is that once the war was over, he didn't stop killing, and the tool that the Jedi created was used against them.

I mean, look at the account of the Jedi Council meeting from the Clone Wars cartoon when they decide what to do with him. A few members of the Council worry that he hasn't been adequately tested, and specifically, that he hasn't faced the Dark Side within himself, but ultimately their concerns are hand-waved away.

You know why? Because they knew in their hearts that he would fail the test, but they didn't want to admit it to themselves, because if they admitted it to themselves, they'd have to stop using him in battle.

And we know that the whole Council meeting was a sham anyway, a rubber stamp on a decision that had already been made privately by Yoda and Mace Windu. And what prompted them to make that decision? Anakin's performance in the Battle of Praesitlyn - because of his prowess in battle.

There is no story of Anakin's fall. Anakin was never "up" to begin with. The Jedi are the ones who fall, because they are increasingly blind to the degree to which they are willing to cut corners and use unethical means towards what they (increasingly falsely) believe to be just ends.

If the OT is a story about the triumph of humanism and compassion over the military industrial complex, the prequels are the story of the road to Hell being paved with good intentions, specifically of the tendency to tolerate the atrocities and moral shortcomings of one's own side in the name of some nebulous higher purpose. They're so focused on fighting for the Republic that they barely notice that it's already the Empire in all but name. They're so focused on fighting against the Sith that they don't notice that they're actually fighting for them ("To fight the empire is to be infected by its derangement" and all that). And they're so willing to ignore the cancer eating through Anakin Skywalker because he's so damn useful to them that it ultimately consumes them too.

You could say they use Anakin despite the obvious dangers because it seems like the easy way to accomplish what they want. He seems like a powerful tool but really, the solution he presents is only quicker, easier, more seductive...

Kwenn posted:
or the striking, grand figure who took in life with a wink that Anakin himself recalls at the end of his life?


I'm sure that's how he thought of himself. Idi Amin thought he was a pretty suave guy, too.


Wrong. I can't even begin to start with this whole post except to say, "Bravo, Kwenn." There's just a lot wrong or rather, I'll say, misunderstood about the character of Vader/Anakin unless you don't pay particular attention to the character or his motivations, or anything that Lucas says about him and along with that...human nature exaggerated mythologically to tell a tale. But I digress...

Watson butchered not only Anakin (Remember TPM? Anakin wasn't born with a mask on and didn't start having trouble until his late teens and with a lot foreshadowing that could been enacted upon...), Obi-Wan, Qui-Gon and most movie characters. But she does get the Jedi right. They're pretty blind, deaf, and dumb most of the time in her books. I perfer to see the overworked Jedi, the manipulated Anakin and the down-trodden Obi-Wan... she gave us an alternate universe all about Ferus. The original Skywalker of George's universe.

No comment on Zahn and Vader. He does get Anakin right, though.

And Denning and Luke, heck even Mara... or anyone but Han, Leia and the squibs... Yeah.

I thought Vader was in the right place in Dark Lord. Anakin was peeking through until Palpatine managed to totally eradicate him by the end of the book. And Vader certainly wasn't whining when he killed seven wookies, numerious Jedi and obliterated what's his face, the throw away Jedi at the end.

 

-----signature-----
DT421 love
FYI: You don't deal with me. I deal with you.
Damned right the Jedi's fire has gone out of the universe. I was the bad-ass Class C extinguisher who snuffed them.
- @darthvader (Darth Vader on Twitter)
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Charlemagne19  26812 posts
Registered: Jul '00
6408_Jedi Outcast
Date Posted: 2/8/07 9:24am Subject: RE: Characters that certain authors don't get.
I think it's more a case that George Lucas has a very good idea about where he wants the story to go but has a problem realizing it on screen unlike with the original trilogy. What Lucas WANTED with Anakin was that he's a very troubled young man, controlling, and emotional but fundamentally a good person. What he got was Hayden's performance. Let's spread around the blame a bit.

I still think of Matt Stover's Revenge of the Sith as exactly what Lucas wanted from the movies.

Speaking of which, what exactly was Dooku supposed to be if not the elitist snob that Stover wrote him as?

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Quiet_Mandalorian  8380 posts
Registered: Apr '05
40335_Boba Fett
Date Posted: 2/8/07 9:33am Subject: RE: Characters that certain authors don't get.
Charlemagne19 posted:
Yes. Given the extreme rarity of Mandalorian Armor as given by most sources....
...Outside of Mandalorian possession.

Charlemagne19 posted:
One tends to think that there's a tiny minute amount of Mandalorians with combat training (probably about normal for a world) and far far far far far far far far far less so with Mandalorian battle armor let alone Mandalorian battle armor training.
One would have to disagree.

Corporate_Jedi posted:
That "flawed" understanding kept the Republic largely at peace for almost a thousand years, which given the size and scope of the Old Republic was an incredible feat.
But in the end, no more than a long slide towards decay and destruction. A slow and peaceful death, until the seizure right at the very last that finally made the corruption plain to all.

It was inevitable, really.

 

-----signature-----
Fey'la was right! Bring Asyr Sei'lar to justice!
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
MistrX  1520 posts
Registered: Jun '06
14536_Wedge Antilles
Date Posted: 2/8/07 9:41am Subject: RE: Characters that certain authors don't get.
Quiet_Mandalorian posted:

Corporate_Jedi posted:
That "flawed" understanding kept the Republic largely at peace for almost a thousand years, which given the size and scope of the Old Republic was an incredible feat.
But in the end, no more than a long slide towards decay and destruction. A slow and peaceful death, until the seizure right at the very last that finally made the corruption plain to all.

It was inevitable, really.


Funny, that sounds remarkably like how Kreia describes the Mandalorians.

And just like the Mandos, the Jedi never quite reached their death and became stronger for it.

 

-----signature-----
We are well and truly forked
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
BobaMatt  14519 posts
Title: TFN EU Staff
Registered: Aug '02
47935_Luke Skywalker - Dark Side
Date Posted: 2/8/07 9:42am Subject: RE: Characters that certain authors don't get. - Date Edited: 2/8/07 9:44am (1 edits total) Edited By: BobaMatt
Quiet_Mandalorian posted:
JEDI-KILLER_17 posted:
Might as well say it...

Traviss + Ben = Crizzap
Can't say I agree. She's probably done Ben the best out of all the authors so far.

Lord_Riven posted:
Mara post NJO. (barring Betrayal which I haven't read). Either that or motherhood has made her into a whiny, insecure woman who doesn't even trust her husband.
Oh? And when has she not been like that?

The portrayal of Mara in Bloodlines made perfect sense from a logical standpoint, which might be why some people find it jarring because in general it seems as though no one else's personality ever changes in the GFFA over the years at all.

I agree on both counts, here, and would have to say your final point about personality change is what makes it so hard for most people to accept any arc in these characters. It makes sense that Vader would be depressed to begin with. It makes sense that Luke would become less rash and more willing to "think precisely" as he gets older. It makes sense that Mara, Jedi training aside, would deny the evidence staring her in the face. It makes sense - and given Ben's earlier characterizations in the DNT, not inconsistent - that Ben's clinging to Jacen. Psychological complexities and nuances should not necessarily be left out of SW.
Quiet_Mandalorian posted:
Corporate_Jedi posted:
That "flawed" understanding kept the Republic largely at peace for almost a thousand years, which given the size and scope of the Old Republic was an incredible feat.
But in the end, no more than a long slide towards decay and destruction. A slow and peaceful death, until the seizure right at the very last that finally made the corruption plain to all.

It was inevitable, really.

Perhaps inevitable, but not the Jedi's fault. I would say, given their beliefs, standing by the Republic and seeking to fix it and restore it is a more legitimate decision than abandoning it.

 

-----signature-----
DUNE - Chronicles of the Imperium RP
http://boards.theforce.net/non_star_wars_role_playing/b10755/29433346/p1/?11
As Father and Son (An AU RP)
http://boards.theforce.net/role_playing_forum/b10328/28357048/p1/?10
Emperor Fel's badassery knows no bounds.
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
LastOneStanding  1491 posts
Registered: Nov '04
20930_Boba Fett<br>Unleashed Figure
Date Posted: 2/8/07 10:10am Subject: RE: Characters that certain authors don't get.
I've got to say that I liked Traviss' portrayal of Ben, too. Frankly, I found many of the Ben moments to be what made me want to keep reading Bloodlines.

 

-----signature-----
Recipient of the Plush Prophet of the Dark Side Award
Plus, if you make yourself into a hot little bonzai, you can pull a badass Jedi boyfriend.-BobaMatt
Roan Fel = Emperor Tubby- C19
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Quiet_Mandalorian  8380 posts
Registered: Apr '05
40335_Boba Fett
Date Posted: 2/8/07 10:11am Subject: RE: Characters that certain authors don't get. - Date Edited: 2/8/07 10:32am (3 edits total) Edited By: Quiet_Mandalorian
MistrX posted:
Funny, that sounds remarkably like how Kreia describes the Mandalorians.

And just like the Mandos, the Jedi never quite reached their death and became stronger for it.
Exactly. peace

BobaMatt posted:
I agree on both counts, here, and would have to say your final point about personality change is what makes it so hard for most people to accept any arc in these characters. It makes sense that Vader would be depressed to begin with. It makes sense that Luke would become less rash and more willing to "think precisely" as he gets older. It makes sense that Mara, Jedi training aside, would deny the evidence staring her in the face. It makes sense - and given Ben's earlier characterizations in the DNT, not inconsistent - that Ben's clinging to Jacen. Psychological complexities and nuances should not necessarily be left out of SW.
Absolutely. It's really quite iritating how there seems to be this resistance to characters changing over time and with experience when, logically, they should.

BobaMatt posted:
Perhaps inevitable, but not the Jedi's fault. I would say, given their beliefs, standing by the Republic and seeking to fix it and restore it is a more legitimate decision than abandoning it.
Yes, I'm just saying that the way in which they chose to go about restoring it was not perhaps the best one, and I think the RotS novelization makes the same argument to some extent with Yoda's confrontation of Palpatine. thinking

 

-----signature-----
Fey'la was right! Bring Asyr Sei'lar to justice!
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
sabarte  3056 posts
Registered: Sep '05
13620_Solar Sailor
Date Posted: 2/8/07 10:24am Subject: RE: Characters that certain authors don't get.
Charlemagne19 posted:
I think it's more a case that George Lucas has a very good idea about where he wants the story to go but has a problem realizing it on screen unlike with the original trilogy. What Lucas WANTED with Anakin was that he's a very troubled young man, controlling, and emotional but fundamentally a good person. What he got was Hayden's performance. Let's spread around the blame a bit.

I still think of Matt Stover's Revenge of the Sith as exactly what Lucas wanted from the movies.

Speaking of which, what exactly was Dooku supposed to be if not the elitist snob that Stover wrote him as?



Well, for one, Stover's take on Dooku took up way more of the book than necessary and didn't satisfactorarily explain anything. Having read everything from Open Seasons and the AOTC novelization through Dark Rendezvous and Labyrinth of Evil, it just made me go 'what? That's not right!'. Particularly since we'd had Dooku POV in the last two books I mentioned, and they'd had access to the ROTS script too. It annoys me that Stover's IMHO inferior take is the one that people are pointing to now.

It's probably something vaguely resembling -Lucas's- take on the character, but since people like you seem to be insisting that Lucas got Anakin wrong...I prefer the take of the other authors mentioned.

It's not even a necessary characterization curveball. If all Dooku-POV scenes had been cut or replaced with another POV, IMHO it would have been a better book.

Stover's take took out space that could have been spent on making the second half of the book less rushed, added very little to the book, detracted from general EU continuity and seems to have been motivated primarily by a desire to gloss over favorite son Kenobi getting his butt kicked by giving Dooku PoV.

There is nothing in his characterization of Dooku at all that makes me think 'this person was a respected Jedi for 70 years'. It requires the Jedi Council to be profoundly idiotic to suspect nothing whatsoever, given that they're mostly alien and can, you know, sense emotions and all.

A lot of the characterization is messed with in order to fit Dooku's final begging spree. Which was cut because, you know, it wasn't in character. (OK, it was probably cut because Chris Lee was not thrilled about filming the scene, but I think it was a good choice)

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
rhonderoo  41701 posts
Title: Former Head Admin
Registered: Aug '02
48917_Padme (719093)
Date Posted: 2/8/07 11:25am Subject: RE: Characters that certain authors don't get.
It looked to me like Lucas pretty much got what he wanted out of Anakin in the movies, but he went too far with how to get him there. And Hayden's performance was as good as anyone's, many people were able to come to the same conclusion I was about that, and the character of Vader. No need to spread blame where it doesn't belong, especially not in ROTS. I do think Stover was able to tell it better given he had more time an the ability to give us the character's introspection. But that's with the written word vs. any movie. There were only slight differences like Lucas chose Anakin as the Jedi Padme thought she could trust, Stover chose Obi-Wan. In the end, it was neither. tongue

Just like I love Denning's Han and Leia but can see how he gets Luke and Mara so wrong, I think a lot of perception comes from how descriminating you are and if you're a fan. He's a fan of Leia and Han, so he'll understand them better.

 

-----signature-----
DT421 love
FYI: You don't deal with me. I deal with you.
Damned right the Jedi's fire has gone out of the universe. I was the bad-ass Class C extinguisher who snuffed them.
- @darthvader (Darth Vader on Twitter)
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Charlemagne19  26812 posts
Registered: Jul '00
6408_Jedi Outcast
Date Posted: 2/8/07 11:31am Subject: RE: Characters that certain authors don't get.
Quiet_Mandalorian posted:
...Outside of Mandalorian possession.


Because they've been crushed by the Jedi Knights and are almost extinct. Yeah.

Quiet Mandalorian posted:
One would have to disagree.


*Dodos and Dinosaurs pass by Quiet_Mandalorian*

Cause, if everyone has combat training there's no point in choosing cops.

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History