Author Topic: Galactic Basic Standard = English or not?
EJA 
Registered: Apr '07
Date Posted: 4/26/07 1:16pm Subject: Galactic Basic Standard = English or not?
I suppose I should start off with introduing myself to you all: Hello, I am a very new member to this board and I am in search of some good SW-related discussion.

In searching through the older topics in these forums, I've come across a few discussing the huge similarities between the languages of Galactic Basic Standard and English. The languages appear to be phonetically the same, one such example being the name of Admiral Daala's Star Destroyer from one of the novels, the 'Night/Knight Hammer'. It's better described in more detail elsewhere, but I would just like to know how these two languages came to be so alike. And before anyone starts saying that it's all fictional and doesn't matter, I'd like to quote someone on the Wookieepedia site: "It's a fictional universe dominated by the principle of realism." Things like this, in my opinion, are worthy of discussion.

I am of the opinion that the humans of the GFFA originated on Earth, i.e. some ancient alien race took early humans from their home planet and dumped them in the GFFA, most likely on Coruscant. Unfortunately, that hardly helps us much with the language issue. The precursor to current Basic, Old Galactic Standard, is said to have been a mixture of early human tongues, Durese, and Bothese. Modern Basic, its sucessor, is said to have come into use with the addition of the Dromnyr language....but my question is, HOW HAS BASIC COME TO BE PRACTICALLY IDENTICAL TO ENGLISH?!?! And then there's words recognised on Earth but aren't English (A lot of French terminology is used in the novel YODA: DARK RENDEZVOUS).

One admittedly outlandish theory I've recently concocted is that some unknown, incredibly advanced, god-like beings have manipulated the development of various languages throughout the GFFA so that it strongly resembles the speech of Earth humans (though allowing for some exceptions, with words like "Moff", "Darth", etc). Okay, opinions, anyone?

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
dp4m  36462 posts
Registered: Nov '01
13878_Luke Skywalker Dark Empire
Date Posted: 4/26/07 1:23pm Subject: RE: Galactic Basic Standard = English or not?
Basic has never been confirmed to be English and even scrubbed out in the SE of the films to not reference English at all.

 

-----signature-----
"Looks like you're about to get pwned" - Eric Cartman
"Awarding experience points for cleverly and creatively generating an enjoyable experience. How warped is that?" - Darths & Droids
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
SuperWatto  5872 posts
Registered: Sep '00
45743_Azzameen Crest
Date Posted: 4/26/07 1:26pm Subject: RE: Galactic Basic Standard = English or not?
If you're going down that road...

It isn't remarkably similar... It's the same. It's late 20th/early 21st century English and American English. It's impossible that it has been used in the GFFA since the beginning; it would have changed too much by now. The fact that it's the same - and that the English in KOTOR is also the same - cannot mean anything else then that it's transcribed. If not... Well, then how do you explain the movies ending up on celluloid? The comics on your bookshelves?

 

-----signature-----
Christmas destroyer
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Darth-Legacy 
Registered: Jan '07
6642_42
Date Posted: 4/26/07 1:29pm Subject: RE: Galactic Basic Standard = English or not? - Date Edited: 4/26/07 1:33pm (2 edits total) Edited By: Darth-Legacy
EJA posted:
I am of the opinion that the humans of the GFFA originated on Earth some ancient alien race took early humans from their home planet and dumped them in the GFFA, most likely on Coruscant.


It should be the other way around, Humans of Earth originated in the GFFA, i.e. Outbound Flight from 25,000 BBY.
laugh thinking praying

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Darth_Davi  2030 posts
Registered: Jul '05
17804_Jedi
Date Posted: 4/26/07 1:37pm Subject: RE: Galactic Basic Standard = English or not?
Umm...is this a serious question? George Lucas speaks English. He wrote a script in English. He hired English speaking actors to act in his movie with English dialogue. Then his company hires English speaking authors to continue story, English speaking game designers to make games based on his story, etc. It stands to reason that he wrote the script in English because it makes it so us fans could understand the words. This is true for most science fiction stories. The humans in Star Trek, coincidently speak English too...they try to say that you can understand everyone because universal translators or whatever, but if a space universe is created by an English speaking author/filmmaker, chances are REAL good that at least the humans in that universe speak English, so we can understand it all. Sure, Star Wars was translated into French, Japanese, Spanish, German, etc, but, lets be honest. English speaking people are/were his intended audience. By having Han, Luke, Leia etc all speak English, and clearly disguising it as "basic", it gives us a reference point to share with those characters. If a sci-fi epic were to come out of the Hong Kong filmmaking scene, assume that the humans in it all speak a dialect of Chinese. Star Wars speaks English because its creator does.

 

-----signature-----
What the hell is an Aluminium Falcon?
Oh, I'm sorry, I thought my Dark Lord of the Sith could protect a thermal exhaust port thats only two meters wide!
It wasn't even fully paid off yet!
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Darth_Shpydar  1061 posts
Registered: Oct '06
40102_Anakin
Date Posted: 4/26/07 1:39pm Subject: RE: Galactic Basic Standard = English or not?
I agree with dp and Watto -- just because it is English to us (the "viewing" audience), doesn't mean it actually is English. Much in the same way that a film may depict a conversation in a foreign language as being spoken in English for the sake of the audience -- for some reason "Roots" springs to mind, which depicted the African slaves speaking in their native tongue, but for the sake of the series, was presented to the audience as if they were speaking English.

So in essence, it's not English and doesn't necessarily even resemble English. They're speaking Basic -- whatever that language may actually be. It's just being presented via English for the sake of the audience's understanding.

 

-----signature-----
"You will try."
"From my point of view, the Jedi are evil!"
"It was a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away. Either you buy it or you don't!" -- Eric Forman
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
dp4m  36462 posts
Registered: Nov '01
13878_Luke Skywalker Dark Empire
Date Posted: 4/26/07 1:41pm Subject: RE: Galactic Basic Standard = English or not?
A good example is The Hunt for Red October.

The Russians are clearly speaking Russian, but McTiernan switches their language over to English for us (the English-speakers) the understand mid-scene until they meet up with actual Americans, at which point they switch back to Russian until speaking actually in English.

happy

 

-----signature-----
"Looks like you're about to get pwned" - Eric Cartman
"Awarding experience points for cleverly and creatively generating an enjoyable experience. How warped is that?" - Darths & Droids
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
EJA 
Registered: Apr '07
Date Posted: 4/26/07 1:46pm Subject: RE: Galactic Basic Standard = English or not?
But what about the fact that the Basic word for 'Knight' sounds the same as the Basic word for 'Night', as it does in English? And then there's character names like Skywalker, Solo, Ben, etc. There are also planet names that originate on Earth, such as Coruscant. How do we account for this?

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
dp4m  36462 posts
Registered: Nov '01
13878_Luke Skywalker Dark Empire
Date Posted: 4/26/07 1:50pm Subject: RE: Galactic Basic Standard = English or not?
EJA posted:
But what about the fact that the Basic word for 'Knight' sounds the same as the Basic word for 'Night', as it does in English? And then there's character names like Skywalker, Solo, Ben, etc. There are also planet names that originate on Earth, such as Coruscant. How do we account for this?


There's a word for Knight in Japanese that, when translated into English, sounds exactly like Night.

How is this a problem?

Canonically, Basic != English.

 

-----signature-----
"Looks like you're about to get pwned" - Eric Cartman
"Awarding experience points for cleverly and creatively generating an enjoyable experience. How warped is that?" - Darths & Droids
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Rogue_Follower  8535 posts
Title: Manager:
• Lit

Registered: Nov '03
6468_Blackhole
Date Posted: 4/26/07 2:09pm Subject: RE: Galactic Basic Standard = English or not?
Basic is "translated" into English so we can understand things, otherwise it'd be pretty pointless. Take the example of some films that are translated from English into other languages: names, dialogue, and voices are all changed so that the local audience better understands the intent and meaning behind them. Tolkien did the same thing with Lord of the Rings, and even wrote a section in one of his books about it, IIRC. Whether or not "knight" and "night" are homophones in Basic is irrelevant; that's how they were "translated", presumably carrying over a similar pun from the "original Basic."

Why not ask why they use the metric system or SI units? (And they use the English system every once in a while as well, which is another little anachronism.) Or how humans, ducks, horses, assorted other Earth-based flora and fauna, slang, and customs got to the GFFA from our Solar System, let alone traveling back to "A Long Time Ago"? There's no good answer, save that you're supposed to suspend your disbelief and move along.

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Master_Shan  719 posts
Registered: Oct '05
14531_Bastila Shan
Date Posted: 4/26/07 2:26pm Subject: RE: Galactic Basic Standard = English or not? - Date Edited: 4/26/07 2:29pm (1 edits total) Edited By: Master_Shan
As Rouge Follower explained Galactic Basic is Translated to English for our convieniance, in universe Galactic Basic is a competely alien language that we wouldnt understand.

This explains how it stays constant, despite millenia of use.

If you read the introduction of "Tales from Jabba's Palace" it says quite plainly "All dialouge overheard and retold from these accounts were spoken in Galactic Basic and various Galactic languages then translated for your convieniance." or something to that affect.

I dont have access to my copy ATM so if some one could check for me...

 

-----signature-----
"The Chancellor loves power. If he has any other passion, I have not seen it." - Mace Windu
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
QuentinGeorge  4759 posts
Registered: Dec '03
48582_Kaan (60609)
Date Posted: 4/26/07 2:27pm Subject: RE: Galactic Basic Standard = English or not?
I should note there are many puns which are translated across languages. Look at the Dutch edition of the Discworld for some particularly good examples or, indeed, the English version of the Asterix comics.

 

-----signature-----
Yar
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
EJA 
Registered: Apr '07
Date Posted: 4/26/07 2:29pm Subject: RE: Galactic Basic Standard = English or not?
dp4m posted:
EJA posted:
But what about the fact that the Basic word for 'Knight' sounds the same as the Basic word for 'Night', as it does in English? And then there's character names like Skywalker, Solo, Ben, etc. There are also planet names that originate on Earth, such as Coruscant. How do we account for this?


There's a word for Knight in Japanese that, when translated into English, sounds exactly like Night.

How is this a problem?

Canonically, Basic != English.


What I was referring to was the instance in one of the earlier Bantam novels where Daala has a Star Destroyer called the 'Night Hammer', but when it's used to attack the Jedi on Yavin IV, she renames it 'Knight Hammer', thereby proving that the two words sound the same in her native language, otherwise the pun wouldn't exist. It can't just simply be translated into English.

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
QuentinGeorge  4759 posts
Registered: Dec '03
48582_Kaan (60609)
Date Posted: 4/26/07 2:31pm Subject: RE: Galactic Basic Standard = English or not?
Yes it can, as I've pointed out above.

 

-----signature-----
Yar
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Rogue_Follower  8535 posts
Title: Manager:
• Lit

Registered: Nov '03
6468_Blackhole
Date Posted: 4/26/07 2:36pm Subject: RE: Galactic Basic Standard = English or not? - Date Edited: 4/26/07 2:47pm (1 edits total) Edited By: Rogue_Follower
Indeed. It doesn't have to be a direct translation, so long as the meaning and/or impact of the joke are similar.

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Lord_Hydronium  6273 posts
Title: Literature Gardener
Registered: Jun '02
15597_Vergere
Date Posted: 4/26/07 2:37pm Subject: RE: Galactic Basic Standard = English or not? - Date Edited: 4/26/07 2:39pm (2 edits total) Edited By: Lord_Hydronium
Abel Peña wrote an interesting essay on the use of the word "consecrate" in SW. Long story short, while it exists in English, according to The Truce at Bakura Sourcebook it doesn't exist in Basic.

For the Knight/Night Hammer thing, imagine that in the "real" Basic version, it was actually something like Dark Hammer/Jedi Hammer, and the Basic word for "Dark" is something like "Jehdai". When they "translate" it, they pick the two words in English closest in meaning that still preserve the pun. Tolkien wrote a whole bunch of notes on "translating" Westron to English for Lord of the Rings (published in The Peoples of Middle-Earth), and talks about the same sort of idea on preserving meanings and puns. Very interesting stuff, if you're into linguistic quirks like that.

 

-----signature-----
Great midis have little midis
Swimming round inside 'em
And little midis have lesser midis
And so ad infinitum.
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History