Author Topic: Romancing the Empire--- Will the Empire remain Evil or Turn Good?
QuentinGeorge 
Registered: Dec '03
48582_Kaan (60609)
Date Posted: 2/11/08 2:20am Subject: RE: Romancing the Empire--- Will the Empire remain Evil or Turn Good?
They did themselves a disfavor by rebelling against the monarch instead of Lord North.

It's all a bit academic...most of Parliament was initially quite sympathetic to the Colonies - part of the reason the Crown fought the war so terribly. Duke Grafton and William Pitt refused to be commisioned - Lord North had to be forced to. Then again, had George Washington been given the promotion he asked for, its very likely he would have fought with the Loyalists, or if John Adams hadn't deliberately sabotaged Dickinson's "olive branch" petition to undermine the moderates things would have gone very differently.

 

-----signature-----
Yar
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Rouge77 
Registered: May '05
6464_Anakin Solo
Date Posted: 2/16/08 3:02pm Subject: RE: Romancing the Empire--- Will the Empire remain Evil or Turn Good? - Date Edited: 2/16/08 3:04pm (2 edits total) Edited By: Rouge77
Sinrebirth posted:
The Empire wasn't necessarily about the suppression of everyone and everything. It was, fundamentally, about maintaining Order. In places it fell heavier than others, simply because it needed to. Affording the same rights to rebels on Mon Calamari and then good citizens on Corulag doesn't work.


Of course it does. It's the basis of every decent society.

And we have to remember that as much as the average supporter of the Empire thought that the Empire was about Order, it was in reality foremost about the rule of the Sith over the galaxy. Creating an authoritarian theocracy. (And every government, except some utopian anarchist ones, is basically about order. There's just the "small" difference of how the different governments try to sustain an orderly society.)

Sinrebirth posted:
You'll note that BDZ', genocides and slavery only took place against those that opposed it.


That's usually what happens... Governments rarely commit genocides and enslave populations that support them. But that doesn't justify the crimes that the Empire did. It's like saying that the Mob kills only those that oppose it.

Sinrebirth posted:
I really don't see, bar the excesses, how the Empire was evil, evil, evil. It resisted the NR for almost as long as it ruled unopposed - nearly two decades of Empire before the organised Rebellion came together, and just as long of the NR fighting it. Something inherently 'evil' doesn't get supported for half of it's lifetime.


You mistake support for acquiescence and fear. Was Nazi Germany not evil because it was "supported" for 12 years. Soviet Union? Imperialistic or Feodal states? Etc.

And as the new material shows - and the Live TV series will probably show even more of this - there was organized resistance to the Empire probably from day one of it's existence and that organized resistance survived throughout the Dark Times.

Sinrebirth posted:
Sure, there's a degree of the populace simply turning around and running to the strongest power nearby, and a degree of the populace not caring, but there is also an overwhelming degree of the populace simply preferring the Empire even as late as 17 BBY - a quarter of the Galaxy, per the Cracken's Threat Dossier, remained sided with it, and, militarily, the Empire was decimated.


Local ruling elites put in power or dependent of the Empire, fearful of losing their position and perhaps their lives if their worlds would come under the rule of NR.

Sinrebirth posted:
The ease in which the GA has slipped into a police state, and the fact the Remnant, when it gave it's citizens the choice to leave and thus gave it's populace the choice to dissolve the New Order in 19 BBY, didn't vanish overnight - and in-fact subsequently grew in size over the next century - suggests that there is a wellspring of support for empire and totalitarianism.


The Nazis are always with us?

Sinrebirth posted:
Something which couldn't have happened if the Empire was inherently a nasty piece of work.


It was. The Empire was a creation of the Sith. And canonically, Sith = Evil.

 

-----signature-----
Recipient of the Confederation Ewok with "Rebel Yub"® Action!!
Kill Ben Skywalker, the new Jar-Jar!
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
GrandAdmiralJello 
Title: Mod of Olympus
•EUC
•JCC

Registered: Nov '00
44644_Imperial Laurels
Date Posted: 2/16/08 3:36pm Subject: RE: Romancing the Empire--- Will the Empire remain Evil or Turn Good?
If a Sith Lord painted a picture, would it be inherently evil?

 

-----signature-----
SPQR
Vates Jυλιαδις
Moribus antiquis res stat Romana virisque - Ennius
Tu regere imperio populos, Romanæ, memento; hæ tibi erunt artes;
pascisque imponere morem, parcere subjectis et debellare superbos - Virgil
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Rouge77 
Registered: May '05
6464_Anakin Solo
Date Posted: 2/16/08 4:00pm Subject: RE: Romancing the Empire--- Will the Empire remain Evil or Turn Good?
This is all too easy: Nazi Germany created by Hitler was evil, the paintings he made are not.

In the case of the Sith Lord this might be the same case, but perhaps not: There might be a Dark Side taint in the picture that could influence people who look it.

 

-----signature-----
Recipient of the Confederation Ewok with "Rebel Yub"® Action!!
Kill Ben Skywalker, the new Jar-Jar!
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
LtNOWIS 
Registered: May '05
16494_Clone Assault
Date Posted: 2/16/08 4:40pm Subject: RE: Romancing the Empire--- Will the Empire remain Evil or Turn Good?
I think WEG established that Palpatine's books were pretty innocent. The Book of Anger and The Weakness of Inferiors were going to be part of a young adult fantasy series, sort of like Harry Potter, except a little longer.

 

-----signature-----
A little bit about me: http://tinyurl.com/bnmcck flag
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Master_Starwalker 
Title: Manager Emeritus
Registered: Sep '03
47761_Darth Millenial
Date Posted: 2/16/08 6:27pm Subject: RE: Romancing the Empire--- Will the Empire remain Evil or Turn Good?
laugh

 

-----signature-----
"Imaginary is the future. Always now, even eternity will be." - Yoda
"We can never obtain peace in the outer world until we make peace with ourselves." - The 14th Dalai Lama
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
BobaMatt 
Title: TFN EU Staff
Registered: Aug '02
47935_Luke Skywalker - Dark Side
Date Posted: 2/16/08 9:23pm Subject: RE: Romancing the Empire--- Will the Empire remain Evil or Turn Good?
Rouge77 posted:
It was. The Empire was a creation of the Sith. And canonically, Sith = Evil.

I don't understand this at all. I mean, you keep drilling away at this point, but I don't understand why it's supposed to make sense. Perhaps if you explained your stance? Empire is not a Sith form of government any more than it is a British or a Spanish form of government. It's merely a form of government.

 

-----signature-----
DUNE - Chronicles of the Imperium RP
http://boards.theforce.net/non_star_wars_role_playing/b10755/29433346/p1/?11
As Father and Son (An AU RP)
http://boards.theforce.net/role_playing_forum/b10328/28357048/p1/?10
Emperor Fel's badassery knows no bounds.
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Master_Starwalker 
Title: Manager Emeritus
Registered: Sep '03
47761_Darth Millenial
Date Posted: 2/16/08 11:34pm Subject: RE: Romancing the Empire--- Will the Empire remain Evil or Turn Good?
I'm assuming 'The Empire' = Palpatine's Empire.

 

-----signature-----
"Imaginary is the future. Always now, even eternity will be." - Yoda
"We can never obtain peace in the outer world until we make peace with ourselves." - The 14th Dalai Lama
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Sinrebirth 
Title: Sith Emperor of the SWC
Registered: Nov '04
48116_Jacen Solo (41909)
Date Posted: 2/17/08 6:39am Subject: RE: Romancing the Empire--- Will the Empire remain Evil or Turn Good?
Rouge77 posted:
Of course it does. It's the basis of every decent society.

And we have to remember that as much as the average supporter of the Empire thought that the Empire was about Order, it was in reality foremost about the rule of the Sith over the galaxy. Creating an authoritarian theocracy. (And every government, except some utopian anarchist ones, is basically about order. There's just the "small" difference of how the different governments try to sustain an orderly society.)


Even our current society applies different rights to those whom are terrorists or not. The Empire, which is further down the line than countries within our world order, whatever that line may be to you, is hardly going to be much different.

And arguably so, yes, but if everyone believes it's about Order, a thousand people believe it's about Sith hegemony, and a few thousand believe it's about power, then what is the Empire about? In reality?

Let's say a darksider wrote the Ruusan Republic Constitution, was killed, and the Constitution continues regardless for a millennium. Does that make the Ruusan Republic evil?

What Sidious intended for the Empire - a Sith magocracy - never came about. It didn't even come particularly close. Take out the thousands who believe it's about Sith hegemony or power, and what do you have? The mainstream Empire from 12 ABY at the earliest, and definately from 19 ABY in relation to the Remnant.

It becomes an entity dedicated to Order.

Rouge77 posted:
That's usually what happens... Governments rarely commit genocides and enslave populations that support them. But that doesn't justify the crimes that the Empire did. It's like saying that the Mob kills only those that oppose it.


Justification here is a slippery word. The Separatists under Grievous killed billions. The Separatists survived the Clone Wars in places, the Separatists became the Rebellion, until their presence wasn't felt...

Hasn't the justification been justified? The Empire could justify this as a war against Separatist holdouts, or rebels seeking to bring back the horrors of the CIS and/or Republic - the latter allowing it's own share of genocides to occur.

Rouge77 posted:
You mistake support for acquiescence and fear. Was Nazi Germany not evil because it was "supported" for 12 years. Soviet Union? Imperialistic or Feodal states? Etc.

And as the new material shows - and the Live TV series will probably show even more of this - there was organized resistance to the Empire probably from day one of it's existence and that organized resistance survived throughout the Dark Times.


At what point did the Nazi Party become elected by support, or elected by fear? The fear rose, yes, but at what point did the support vanish? When it lost, obviously. No matter the power of the State - Imperial, Nazi, Communist - it needs some support to work because governments don't survive if they're 100% feared. It's an untenable situation.

Rouge77 posted:
Local ruling elites put in power or dependent of the Empire, fearful of losing their position and perhaps their lives if their worlds would come under the rule of NR.


What Empire?

From 10 ABY there wasn't one. In 12 ABY a third of the Galaxy was Imperial. Why didn't the populations of those worlds raise up and remove them if they were so bad. Between 10 ABY and 12 ABY there was no Empire to depend upon, or be loyal to - if it was such a terrible thing, it would have been gone.

All of them? Hundreds of thousands of individual worlds? Trillions of people? And the Empire, as of the Battle of Endor, absorbed Imperial elements and reconfigured them because it needed them to retain continuity in government. As seen in Wedge's Gamble.

Rouge77 posted:
The Nazis are always with us?


If the Nazis are a large chunk of the GA populace, yeah.

Rouge77 posted:
It was. The Empire was a creation of the Sith. And canonically, Sith = Evil.


Canonically, Sith = Evil, but Sith =/= Empire.

Sith = Sith Empire.

Sith =/= the First Galactic Empire.

Sith =/= Imperial Remnant.

Sith =/= Second Galactic Empire.

If they weren't separable, then we would see Lumiya fighting Imperials in 25 ABY, the Empire fighting Sith in 130 ABY, the Empire existing without the Sith from 12 ABY to 127 ABY.

 

-----signature-----
Darth Insipid
Kueller is Palpatine Reborn not_talking
Proud Fan of the Tragedy of Jacen Solo
FotJ is the new Dark Empire cool
"Heaven would be hell without you" rose for my fiance!
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Rouge77 
Registered: May '05
6464_Anakin Solo
Date Posted: 2/17/08 7:01am Subject: RE: Romancing the Empire--- Will the Empire remain Evil or Turn Good?
BobaMatt posted:
I don't understand this at all. I mean, you keep drilling away at this point, but I don't understand why it's supposed to make sense. Perhaps if you explained your stance? Empire is not a Sith form of government any more than it is a British or a Spanish form of government. It's merely a form of government.


Because it's the same government, it's the same Empire! It claims to be the same Empire! That's why! The Empire before Endor, reborn Palpatine's Dark Empire, Imperial Remnant and Fel Empire claim to be the same Empire. The government structure, whether in 40 ABY or 137 ABY, is based on that created by a Sith. The symbols of the government are the same also. So it's not about the form of government, it's about the continuity of the government, continuity of the idea of this particular Empire. (And Empire is a Sith form of government in Star Wars. The Old Sith Empire, Revan's Sith Empire, the New Sith Empire of Darth Ruin, the different versions of Palpatine's Empire and now the part of the Empire ruled by Darth Krayt.)

 

-----signature-----
Recipient of the Confederation Ewok with "Rebel Yub"® Action!!
Kill Ben Skywalker, the new Jar-Jar!
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
BobaMatt 
Title: TFN EU Staff
Registered: Aug '02
47935_Luke Skywalker - Dark Side
Date Posted: 2/17/08 8:38am Subject: RE: Romancing the Empire--- Will the Empire remain Evil or Turn Good?
Rouge77 posted:
Because it's the same government, it's the same Empire!

Run by different people, 150 years later after they've gone through reform after reform and tons of changes. It's not the same Empire. It ceased to be the same Empire when they lost their Sith Emperor, the NR weeded out their crazy warlords, they reorganized into the Remnant and decided it would be cool to respect the GA and cooperate with it.
Rouge77 posted:
It claims to be the same Empire! That's why!

It claims to have continuity with it in a certain manner of speaking, but it doesn't claim to uphold Palpatine's legacy. In fact, it seems to strive against it.
Rouge77 posted:
The Empire before Endor, reborn Palpatine's Dark Empire, Imperial Remnant and Fel Empire claim to be the same Empire.

If it hasn't been proven to you over and over again that an organization's past does not necessarily reflect its present or its future, then there's no helping you. There was a bad king, and now there's a new king - what's more, the king is of a new dynasty, which in monarchies was tantamount to massive reform, anyway. The Fel Emperor has nothing to do with the ancient, terrible Palpatine throne.
Rouge77 posted:
The government structure, whether in 40 ABY or 137 ABY, is based on that created by a Sith.

But what's inherently evil about a government structure? It's not like the constitution of the Moff council involves torturing babies or anything - the actions of individual Moffs notwithstanding.
Rouge77 posted:
The symbols of the government are the same also.

Except for Sith.
Rouge77 posted:
So it's not about the form of government, it's about the continuity of the government, continuity of the idea of this particular Empire.

And the idea seems to have been, "Y'know, the only thing wrong with the old Empire was the people who ran it."
Rouge77 posted:
(And Empire is a Sith form of government in Star Wars. The Old Sith Empire, Revan's Sith Empire, the New Sith Empire of Darth Ruin, the different versions of Palpatine's Empire and now the part of the Empire ruled by Darth Krayt.)

That doesn't preclude the existence of a benevolent Empire, especially considering the number of benevolent monarchies in the EU.

 

-----signature-----
DUNE - Chronicles of the Imperium RP
http://boards.theforce.net/non_star_wars_role_playing/b10755/29433346/p1/?11
As Father and Son (An AU RP)
http://boards.theforce.net/role_playing_forum/b10328/28357048/p1/?10
Emperor Fel's badassery knows no bounds.
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Sinrebirth 
Title: Sith Emperor of the SWC
Registered: Nov '04
48116_Jacen Solo (41909)
Date Posted: 2/17/08 8:49am Subject: RE: Romancing the Empire--- Will the Empire remain Evil or Turn Good?
Rouge77 posted:
(And Empire is a Sith form of government in Star Wars. The Old Sith Empire, Revan's Sith Empire, the New Sith Empire of Darth Ruin, the different versions of Palpatine's Empire and now the part of the Empire ruled by Darth Krayt.)


If I may...

Infinite Empire

Azure Imperium

Ssi-Ruuvi Imperium

Esselian Empire

Hiromi Empire

Vagaari Empire

Nope.

 

-----signature-----
Darth Insipid
Kueller is Palpatine Reborn not_talking
Proud Fan of the Tragedy of Jacen Solo
FotJ is the new Dark Empire cool
"Heaven would be hell without you" rose for my fiance!
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Rouge77 
Registered: May '05
6464_Anakin Solo
Date Posted: 2/17/08 8:56am Subject: RE: Romancing the Empire--- Will the Empire remain Evil or Turn Good? - Date Edited: 2/17/08 8:59am (2 edits total) Edited By: Rouge77
There hasn't been a real - instead of a facade state like CIS - lead by the Sith which wouldn't have been an Empire. And of those Empires on the list, the most of which know anything of significance at all can be said to have been mostly evil - like the Infinite Empire, the Ssi-Ruuvi Empire and the Vagaari Empire.

Hutts had their own Empire too and it was evil. So, whenever we get to see a closer look at an Empire in EU, the Empire in question is more or less evil and never good.

 

-----signature-----
Recipient of the Confederation Ewok with "Rebel Yub"® Action!!
Kill Ben Skywalker, the new Jar-Jar!
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
BobaMatt 
Title: TFN EU Staff
Registered: Aug '02
47935_Luke Skywalker - Dark Side
Date Posted: 2/17/08 8:59am Subject: RE: Romancing the Empire--- Will the Empire remain Evil or Turn Good?
Which, again, doesn't preclude the possibility of a non-evil Empire.

 

-----signature-----
DUNE - Chronicles of the Imperium RP
http://boards.theforce.net/non_star_wars_role_playing/b10755/29433346/p1/?11
As Father and Son (An AU RP)
http://boards.theforce.net/role_playing_forum/b10328/28357048/p1/?10
Emperor Fel's badassery knows no bounds.
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Rouge77 
Registered: May '05
6464_Anakin Solo
Date Posted: 2/17/08 9:00am Subject: RE: Romancing the Empire--- Will the Empire remain Evil or Turn Good?
BobaMatt posted:
Which, again, doesn't preclude the possibility of a non-evil Empire.


Yes, and there might be good Sith too. whistling

 

-----signature-----
Recipient of the Confederation Ewok with "Rebel Yub"® Action!!
Kill Ben Skywalker, the new Jar-Jar!
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History