| Author |
Topic:
[NRW] National Retcon Week 2008 (6-12th April)
|
Thrawn McEwok
Title: TFN EU Staff
Registered:
May '00
|
Date Posted:
4/1 4:35pm
Subject:
[NRW] National Retcon Week 2008 (6-12th April)
|
No, it's not a joke...
National Retcon Week is a (semi-)annual event here at TF.N, where you are all invited to offer creative reinterpretations of Star Wars canon.
It was a great success in 2005, a bit too much of a success in 2006.
In 2007, something seems to have gone wrong, and it didn't happen properly. But we're back now, relocated from late summer to the second week of April...
That means you DO NOT POST YOUR RETCONS YET: wait until the week of 6th-12th APRIL. This post is just to tell you it's going to happen, and to get you all to start thinking.
Also, in a change from previous practice, we ask that you post your retcons in THIS thread (or maybe in a second thread we'll start up on the 6th - you'll see it anyway): do NOT start separate threads with individual retcons.
Thank you!
***
NRW: THE RULES
There are, really, no rules to National Retcon Week.
The basic expectation is that your retcon should offer a reinterpretation of something that we thought we knew about the whole vast Galaxy of Star Wars.
There are two basic situations where this is appropriate:
1.) A point where there's a known contradiction or puzzle to explain in the stories/"source material.
2.) Anywhere else in canon, where you think you can offer a new perspective on some aspect of the story, some incident, some character, whatever....
And a few more pointers:
3.) Try, where possible, to base your idea on canon evidence, and avoid contradicting the official continuity wherever possible. If you do dispense with something, try and provide an entertaining and coherent reason WHY.
4.) Keep it simple. Don't cram lots of different ideas into one retcon... unless that's the purpose of the retcon.
5.) You don't have to listen to my advice, though; other people may have different tastes from me. Read the old NRW threads (linked to at the top) to get a sense of what people have done before now.
6.) There is no rule 6!
***
There will, however, be winners in the following categories, chosen from all the, and announced after all the retcons have been posted:
Best Retcon
Most Likely Retcon
Most Unlikely Retcon.
***
So, remember... no retcons until the 6th... but, get thinking!!
- The Imperial Ewok
-----signature-----
A/T = OTP "To write one Solo twin as an angstbunny, Master Skywalker, might be considered unfortunate. To write BOTH that way looks like carelessness."
|
|
|
Quote Reply |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
|
Katana_Geldar
Title: Former CR Tasmania, AU
Registered:
Mar '03
|
Date Posted:
4/1 4:48pm
Subject:
RE: [NRW] National Retcon Week 2008 (6-12th April)
|
I thought retcon week was in August, good to see it back though!
-----signature-----
|
|
|
Quote Reply |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
|
Kaje
Registered:
May '05
|
Date Posted:
4/1 4:48pm
Subject:
RE: [NRW] National Retcon Week 2008 (6-12th April)
|
|
Oh hellz yes, NRW is back! Let's hope it doesn't become National Retcon Trimester like the last one did.
-----signature-----
"Alderaan shot first." - Dunc T'racen
|
|
|
Quote Reply |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
|
BobaMatt
Title: TFN EU Staff
Registered:
Aug '02
|
Date Posted:
4/1 5:03pm
Subject:
RE: [NRW] National Retcon Week 2008 (6-12th April)
- Date Edited:
4/1 5:44pm (1 edits total)
Edited By:
BobaMatt
|
I'm trying to track down my Noghri/Sith War Droid/Vader armor retcon, but maybe it wasn't made in one of those threads.
Not that I forgot the retcon.
edit: Does poking holes in agreed upon canon count?
-----signature-----
The Clone Wars is OT quality good. Really. Emperor Fel's badassery knows no bounds. As Father and Son (An AU RP) - SEEKING MANDOS...see profile for info. http://boards.theforce.net/role_playing_forum/b10328/28357048/p1/?10
|
|
|
Quote Reply |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
|
dp4m
Registered:
Nov '01
|
Date Posted:
4/1 5:43pm
Subject:
RE: [NRW] National Retcon Week 2008 (6-12th April)
|
Katana_Geldar posted: I thought retcon week was in August, good to see it back though!
There was a request made to have it during my birthday by me. So I used the last of my powers to make it so...
And it will NOT be a trimester.
-----signature-----
"Looks like you're about to get pwned" - Eric Cartman "Awarding experience points for cleverly and creatively generating an enjoyable experience. How warped is that?" - Darths & Droids
|
|
|
Quote Reply |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
|
Jedimarine
Registered:
Feb '01
|
Date Posted:
4/2 5:21am
Subject:
RE: [NRW] National Retcon Week 2008 (6-12th April)
|
Sweet...it's during my birthday too!
And yes...no trimester.
WE ARE GOING FULL TERM THIS TIME!
Giving birth to a 9lbs 4oz bundle of EU correction and clarification goodness!
Dp...since you requested this moved up event...I declare you to be Da NRW Baby Daddy.
-----signature-----
GO SEE "THE DARK KNIGHT"
|
|
|
Quote Reply |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
|
JediHobbit
Registered:
Mar '02
|
Date Posted:
4/2 5:32am
Subject:
RE: [NRW] National Retcon Week 2008 (6-12th April)
|
|
Shouldn't we wait for the paternity test?
-----signature-----
But they won't let me dream to live or live to dream.
|
|
|
Quote Reply |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
|
Jedimarine
Registered:
Feb '01
|
Date Posted:
4/2 5:37am
Subject:
RE: [NRW] National Retcon Week 2008 (6-12th April)
|
|
I heard they have a store-bought paternity test now...we could do it up cheap!
-----signature-----
GO SEE "THE DARK KNIGHT"
|
|
|
Quote Reply |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
|
JediHobbit
Registered:
Mar '02
|
Date Posted:
4/2 5:40am
Subject:
RE: [NRW] National Retcon Week 2008 (6-12th April)
|
|
Maury's going to be out of a job.
-----signature-----
But they won't let me dream to live or live to dream.
|
|
|
Quote Reply |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
|
BobaMatt
Title: TFN EU Staff
Registered:
Aug '02
|
Date Posted:
4/7 3:40pm
Subject:
RE: [NRW] National Retcon Week 2008 (6-12th April)
- Date Edited:
4/7 3:43pm (1 edits total)
Edited By:
BobaMatt
|
Um...bump? This started yesterday, people! Get cracking!
I'll start with something I posted a while back. It's not really a retcon so much as it is an examination of an assumed retcon. Many people refer to the "Vergere = Sith Retcon," and saw the end of the Legacy arc, "Claws of the Dragon" as confirmation. However, I believe the comic actually showed us the opposite. Vergere was not a Sith, and the Sith did not factor into her plans.
BobaMatt posted: I don't think anybody's done this yet, but I've been meaning to.
Why Legacy #18 Doesn't Actually Confirm Anything About Vergere We Didn't Already Know.
For the purposes of this exercise, we'll assume that everything Lord Krayt says about Vergere, everything he recalls about her, is the truth, and it all happened as he said it did. At absolute worst, he is lying by omission, but this is unlikely. I will analyze everything Krayt does say.
DARTH KRAYT: There were claims she herself was a student of Darth Sidious and fled the Galaxy when her attempt to kill him failed, but lies and truth were only means to an end for her. As I was to learn.
This is Krayt's first bit of narration about Vergere, and also the first indication he doesn't really believe her.
VERGERE: I sense a darkness in you.
HETT: And I, in you. Help me. We'll escape together.
Vergere sensing a darkness in Hett is obviously not surprising, nor does it contradict anything we know about her philosophy on the Force. Hett sensing darkness in her should not be surprising, as we all know what any right-thinking Jedi thinks about Vergere's approach to the Force. Just because she doesn't believe in the dark side doesn't mean she's immune from it. Hett's line is also telling: the darkness he feels in her leads to feelings of kinship. She doesn't deny her darkness, true, but then she doesn't know anything about A'sharad Hett, yet, so why reveal anything about herself? What she does know about him now, though, is that he likes the dark side. Useful.
VERGERE: Escape is out of the question. Would you be free? First, you must free your mind.
A powerful dark sider would be very receptive to Sith teachings, one can assume. If what she has to offer is run of the mill Sith-hood, then the bit about freeing his mind may not be necessary.
VERGERE: Accept your pain. Allow it to feed your dark anger -- learn to invite its grip.
Essentially no different from her torture of Jacen, except here she makes explicit references to the darkness of it all. (Still no mention of a dark side, of course, just "darkness in you" and "your dark anger.") Why reference darkness if she's not a Sith? Because Vergere is a teacher, and the only things she knows for sure about A'sharad Hett right now are that he's Sharad Hett's son, and that he's more than okay with darkness.
KRAYT: Her manner was oblique at first, full of half-truths, deceptions, and denials, but my Sith trained senses could see past her evasions. She claimed to have been trained by the Emperor -- Darth Sidious -- himself.
He sifted her lies from truth, he says, and yet still says "she claimed to have been" instead of "she was." Krayt does not believe her, and he only brings up her Sith-hood when he's on the topic of lies. What's more, he makes reference a bit earlier to her frequent visits, but leaves out everything she says to him except that she trained with Palpatine. The fact that she mentions knowing Palpatine is likely meant to impress him and give her credibility. We don't know what else she's been telling him.
KRAYT: Vergere taught me to use the agony of the Embrace of Pain to open myself to the dark side.
This one's sticky, but it's not necessary that this is actually what Vergere said, only that this is what she was actually doing; that is to say, it's possible that even though Vergere may not have believed using the Embrace of Pain would lead Krayt to the dark side - as she doesn't believe in a dark side and used the Embrace of Pain on Jacen Solo - it doesn't change the fact that that's what she was, in effect, doing.
KRAYT: Power without purpose is meaningless. The galaxy is chaotic. Order must be imposed because it will never be chosen.
VERGERE: The Vong spies speak of a new Jedi Order being created by the son of Anakin Skywalker -- by the son of Vader.
KRAYT: The Jedi will not do it. A new order of Sith must be created in secret.
When Krayt speaks of order and peace in the galaxy, Vergere speaks of the Jedi. Krayt is the one that brings up the Sith, and it's to disagree with Vergere's argument that the Jedi are the road to order. Again: Vergere suggests to the budding Krayt that the Jedi can restore peace and order from chaos.
KRAYT: My Order will be many but they will be one. The Order itself above all. Power magnified by its focus.
VERGERE: That will take time and Skywalker's Jedi will grow stronger. Lord Bane said that power cannot be shared. That there must be only two -- one with power and the other to crave it.
Vergere's line here will naturally be cited as Sithly, and Krayt may well have taken it that way, but I'd like to offer an alternate paraphrase: "Don't be silly. By the time you do that, you won't be able to beat Luke's Jedi anyway. Besides, we all know that the Sith don't work like that, so stop this nonsense about Sith and listen to me."
KRAYT: When they began, the Sith were many. Bane changed the rules and changed the Sith -- now I will change them again!"
VERGERE: "You cannot follow my path if you are walking your own. When I find my disciple perhaps I will share your philosophy with them. And now -- goodbye.
Again, it will be said that she abandons him because he will not follow the Rule of Two. I posit that she abandons him because she realizes nothing she says is going to make him change his mind. Word choice may be important here, too: John chose the noun "disciple" rather than the very Sithly "apprentice." It connotes deeper teaching, and what's more it connotes that it is her own teaching that she's sharing, not another's.
In conclusion, nothing in this issue proves that Vergere was following some sort of Sithly agenda.
In fact...it would seem to illustrate the opposite. Vergere believes that the Jedi are the road to Order, and that the Sith are doomed to failure. There was no dark alterior motive in the NJO. Vergere was what she said she was, and she was just trying to bring the Jedi to her way of thinking, as she believed it would make them better Jedi. Lumiya's lies and manipulation are based on the fact that the Jedi are all too ready to believe that she was a Sith, anyway, based on their dogma.
Is this a retcon in and of itself? Not really. But it is the first evidence we have, in canon, to contradict the supposed "Vergere = Sith Retcon."
-----signature-----
The Clone Wars is OT quality good. Really. Emperor Fel's badassery knows no bounds. As Father and Son (An AU RP) - SEEKING MANDOS...see profile for info. http://boards.theforce.net/role_playing_forum/b10328/28357048/p1/?10
|
|
|
Quote Reply |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
|
Ulicus
Registered:
Jul '05
|
Date Posted:
4/7 3:45pm
Subject:
RE: [NRW] National Retcon Week 2008 (6-12th April)
|
Great stuff, Matt.
I was going to say: "But what about the bit where she says she might share Krayt's philosophy with her disciple?"
Then I realised that this could be read as: "I'll tell him you're out there, and I'll sick him and the rest of the Jedi on you"
-----signature-----
Recipient of Golden Ewok™ Trip Cares
|
|
|
Quote Reply |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
|
beccatoria
Title: 181st Imperial Discussion Group host
Registered:
Dec '06
|
Date Posted:
4/7 3:50pm
Subject:
RE: [NRW] National Retcon Week 2008 (6-12th April)
|
Matt - awesome!
Not disimilar from my own thoughts on the issue way back, but much more clearly arranged than I could have managed. Thanks for posting that!
-----signature-----
legatus imperatoris britanniæ superior REMEMBER: DARTH MAUL: SHADOW HUNTER DISCUSSION STARTS IN NOVEMBER! Han's a girl, so I got a Golden Ewok.
|
|
|
Quote Reply |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
|
BobaMatt
Title: TFN EU Staff
Registered:
Aug '02
|
Date Posted:
4/7 3:54pm
Subject:
RE: [NRW] National Retcon Week 2008 (6-12th April)
- Date Edited:
4/7 3:58pm (1 edits total)
Edited By:
BobaMatt
|
|
Actually, Uli, I took it as condescendion. And thanks Bec!
-----signature-----
The Clone Wars is OT quality good. Really. Emperor Fel's badassery knows no bounds. As Father and Son (An AU RP) - SEEKING MANDOS...see profile for info. http://boards.theforce.net/role_playing_forum/b10328/28357048/p1/?10
|
|
|
Quote Reply |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
|
beccatoria
Title: 181st Imperial Discussion Group host
Registered:
Dec '06
|
Date Posted:
4/7 4:03pm
Subject:
RE: [NRW] National Retcon Week 2008 (6-12th April)
|
Matt - good point about condescension: I'd never looked at it that way.
Though it does occur to me that Vergere teaches Hett and he chooses to use the dark side to survive the Embrace of Pain. So, the next Force user we know she has access to, what does she do? Take away the Force. So that Jacen didn't have the ability to use the dark side to survive.
I'm not sure if we can attribute a motivation to that, but certainly it's a change in operating procedure that I would very much like to look at as learning from her previous experiences. It almost looks as though she doesn't want Jacen to learn the same things as Hett learned.
-----signature-----
legatus imperatoris britanniæ superior REMEMBER: DARTH MAUL: SHADOW HUNTER DISCUSSION STARTS IN NOVEMBER! Han's a girl, so I got a Golden Ewok.
|
|
|
Quote Reply |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
|
Nobody145
Registered:
Feb '07
|
Date Posted:
4/7 4:05pm
Subject:
RE: [NRW] National Retcon Week 2008 (6-12th April)
|
Yeah, great analysis. I remember when that issue came out, and I loved how that Legacy issue fits the current canon of Vergere being Sith but is just ambiguous enough that Vergere might not be Sith as well. And I'd prefer that to the current canon, but can't do anything about that... yet. And its always hard to tell when Vergere's being sarcastic or just mean.
Now I just wish I could think of something else to try and retcon, hm....
-----signature-----
Don't mind me, I'm nobody important.
|
|
|
Quote Reply |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
|
Ulicus
Registered:
Jul '05
|
Date Posted:
4/7 4:06pm
Subject:
RE: [NRW] National Retcon Week 2008 (6-12th April)
- Date Edited:
4/7 4:07pm (1 edits total)
Edited By:
Ulicus
|
beccatoria posted:
Though it does occur to me that Vergere teaches Hett and he chooses to use the dark side to survive the Embrace of Pain. So, the next Force user we know she has access to, what does she do? Take away the Force. So that Jacen didn't have the ability to use the dark side to survive.
I'm not sure if we can attribute a motivation to that, but certainly it's a change in operating procedure that I would very much like to look at as learning from her previous experiences. It almost looks as though she doesn't want Jacen to learn the same things as Hett learned.
My dear pseudosis... you are so awesome!
No more mazing for a while.
-----signature-----
Recipient of Golden Ewok™ Trip Cares
|
|
|
Quote Reply |
Active Topic Notification |
Private Message |
Post History
|