Author Topic: Who was right about the force??
2Irandrura 
Registered: Jun '08
Date Posted: 6/29 7:03pm Subject: RE: Who was right about the force??
Arawn_Fenn posted:
The Ashla/Boga(Bogan) material seemed to.


That was a myth Bane mentioned knowing, and one that at no point touches on the origins of the light or dark sides.

Arawn_Fenn posted:
1. The dark side is merely "the Force, unleashed".


I would say her teaching was this instead: the Force unleashed is nothing to fear. The dark side is not in the Force. The dark side is in you. Once you are aware of that, through self-knowledge and self-discipline, you have no reason to shrink from the unleashed nature of the Force.

Arawn_Fenn posted:
2. The Force is everything, and everything is the Force.


Indeed, that's in her teaching. Vergere has a very universalist view, whereby all is, ultimately, one. Note that Traitor does invoke movie evidence to support this view -

Traitor posted:
That was half an answer... but the other half kept wriggling, chewing at the inside of his skull. Because the Force was not just a tool. If the Yuuzhan Vong existed outside it, the Force must be less than he had been taught it was. Less than he knew it was. Because he knew, bedrock knew, knew beyond even the possibility of doubt, that the Force was not less than he'd been taught. It was more. It was everything. If the Force was only about life, how could it be used to pick up a rock, or a lightsaber, or an X-wing starfighter? To move something with the Force, you have to feel it. A piece of rock has more presence in the Force than a living Yuuzhan Vong. There was a mystery here, one that nagged at him.


It seems to be a nod to Yoda levitating the X-wing in ESB. The message is that the view that the Force is simply a thing created by life is too narrow. The Force is not a tool created by life.

Arawn_Fenn posted:
I see no evidence for this being the "traditional Jedi view"; in fact, it could be said that it conflicts with both ANH and TESB. It seems like an important enough point ( if true ) that Yoda or Ben might have mentioned it instead of sweeping it under the rug, no?


Arguably they did mention it.

Yoda, The Empire Strikes Back posted:
For my ally in the Force. And a powerful ally it is. Life creates it, makes it grow. Its energy surrounds us and binds us. Luminous beings are we, not this crude matter. You must feel the Force around you. Here, between you...me...the tree...the rock...everywhere! Yes, even between this land and that ship!


While he mentions life, he also explicitly says that the Force is in non-living objects, such as the rock. Clearly it is more complex than the Force simply being something peculiar to life. Obi Wan claimed that it binds the galaxy together, which is more than just life.

I think the distinction we need to make is this. The Force exists without life. However, life creates more Force. Life makes the Force grow and become greater. The Force is in everything... it's just in some things more than others.

 

Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Charlemagne19 
Registered: Jul '00
6408_Jedi Outcast
Date Posted: 6/29 7:07pm Subject: RE: Who was right about the force??
The Force is Eternity!


 

-----signature-----
Check out Halt Evil Doer!: The RPG setting for Super Heroes!
Halt Evil Doer PDF: http://tinyurl.com/555axt
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Arawn_Fenn 
Registered: Jul '04
46079_Darth Plagueis
Date Posted: 6/29 8:05pm Subject: RE: Who was right about the force??
2Irandrura posted:
I would say her teaching was this instead: the Force unleashed is nothing to fear. The dark side is not in the Force. The dark side is in you. Once you are aware of that, through self-knowledge and self-discipline, you have no reason to shrink from the unleashed nature of the Force.


Is this actually what we should consider a correct view? Is it even useful?

I have no problem with viewing the Force as fundamentally alignment-neutral. However, leaving the "evil" connotation of the word "dark" out of it, the dark side is fundamentally dangerous, and other sources have portrayed it as inherently corruptive. We assume Yoda's viewpoint in TESB to be based on accurate knowledge of thousands of years of Jedi history. Why does Yoda assert that "if once you start down the dark path, forever will it dominate your destiny"? Because of the corruptive nature of the dark side. Apparently no Jedi in the recorded history of the Order was able to use the dark side consistently without falling. It's like the One Ring in Tolkien. The Wise will not touch it. They know exactly what will happen.

2Irandrura posted:
Yoda, The Empire Strikes Back posted:
For my ally in the Force. And a powerful ally it is. Life creates it, makes it grow. Its energy surrounds us and binds us. Luminous beings are we, not this crude matter. You must feel the Force around you. Here, between you...me...the tree...the rock...everywhere! Yes, even between this land and that ship!


While he mentions life, he also explicitly says that the Force is in non-living objects, such as the rock. Clearly it is more complex than the Force simply being something peculiar to life. Obi Wan claimed that it binds the galaxy together, which is more than just life.


Yoda said that the Force was between the land and the ship. He never said that the "crude matter" in those objects was part of the Force.
Obi-Wan said it binds the galaxy together... not that it is the galaxy. That simply means that the Force permeates the galaxy. For if the Force is, in fact, everything, what else is left for it to bind?

 

-----signature-----
The world will look up and shout, "Save us." And I'll whisper: "No". - Rorschach
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Darth-Ghost 
Registered: Oct '03
23041_Anakin's Ghost<br>Hayden
Date Posted: 6/29 8:26pm Subject: RE: Who was right about the force??
I think Vergere was just reflecting the Buddhist view that separation is an illusion, everything we perceive is an illusion, and all reality is really one.

Interesting that maybe life doesn't create the Force, but just generates more of it and helps it grow, never thought of it like that before.

 

Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Arawn_Fenn 
Registered: Jul '04
46079_Darth Plagueis
Date Posted: 6/29 9:13pm Subject: RE: Who was right about the force??
Since Yoda and Ben both said that life creates the Force, I'm going with that.

 

-----signature-----
The world will look up and shout, "Save us." And I'll whisper: "No". - Rorschach
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Charlemagne19 
Registered: Jul '00
6408_Jedi Outcast
Date Posted: 6/29 9:41pm Subject: RE: Who was right about the force??
Arawn_Fenn posted:
Since Yoda and Ben both said that life creates the Force, I'm going with that.


True, thought they didn't say it CREATED the Force.

 

-----signature-----
Check out Halt Evil Doer!: The RPG setting for Super Heroes!
Halt Evil Doer PDF: http://tinyurl.com/555axt
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
2Irandrura 
Registered: Jun '08
Date Posted: 6/30 1:23am Subject: RE: Who was right about the force??
Arawn_Fenn posted:
Is this actually what we should consider a correct view? Is it even useful?



Judging from what Jacen learned, and his corresponding moment of enlightenment in The Unifying Force, it certainly seems to be, at the very least, useful.

Arawn_Fenn posted:
However, leaving the "evil" connotation of the word "dark" out of it, the dark side is fundamentally dangerous, and other sources have portrayed it as inherently corruptive. We assume Yoda's viewpoint in TESB to be based on accurate knowledge of thousands of years of Jedi history. Why does Yoda assert that "if once you start down the dark path, forever will it dominate your destiny"? Because of the corruptive nature of the dark side. Apparently no Jedi in the recorded history of the Order was able to use the dark side consistently without falling.


Though we must qualify Yoda's statement with the knowledge that redemption is possible. The dark side does not necessarily dominate a person's destiny, as it can be left. There are many examples of Force-sensitives using the dark side and turning away from it. Contrary to Yoda, there is always time to change.

After all, we must not shy away from the possibility that Yoda could be wrong. He has been wrong before. When judging sources, we must always consider the fallibility of canon characters.

Arawn_Fenn posted:
It's like the One Ring in Tolkien. The Wise will not touch it. They know exactly what will happen.


Vergere never advocated touching the dark side. I'm not sure why you bring it up. Vergere's teachings about the nature of the Force at no point state that it is acceptable to touch the dark side. Don't put words into her mouth.

Arawn_Fenn posted:
Yoda said that the Force was between the land and the ship. He never said that the "crude matter" in those objects was part of the Force.



He said to feel the Force in, among other things, 'the rock'. Rocks are not alive.

Arawn_Fenn posted:
For if the Force is, in fact, everything, what else is left for it to bind?


Itself.

Darth-Ghost posted:
I think Vergere was just reflecting the Buddhist view that separation is an illusion, everything we perceive is an illusion, and all reality is really one.



That's more Vedantic than Buddhist, though. wink

 

Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Ulicus 
Registered: Jul '05
41990_Duron Qel-Droma
Date Posted: 6/30 4:09am Subject: RE: Who was right about the force??
2Irandrura posted:

Vergere never advocated touching the dark side. I'm not sure why you bring it up. Vergere's teachings about the nature of the Force at no point state that it is acceptable to touch the dark side. Don't put words into her mouth.

From my understanding it appears that such is exactly what Vergere's teachings say and that's the point at which they fall down.

Vergere's definition of the Force is no different from the orthodox when looked at "properly"... but her ideas on how one can use the Force, however, are not orthodox in the least... nor are they correct. At least not on any practical level.

The dark side is a part of the Force (and Vergere doesn't deny that, but rather that it is dark in and of itself), because it is the "Force Unleashed". The Force unleashed/the dark side is too dangerous for people to use, even if they understand that what makes it "dark" comes from within themselves.

Ulicus from the Vergere thread posted:

Really, I tend to think that Vergere doesn't differ from Jedi Orthodoxy in regards to what the Force is. She just moves to different terminology because she (incorrectly) believes that there could be an individual unable to be corrupted by the dark side. The dark side is a useful way to describe the Force's natural tendency to completely kark up individuals who draw too heavily on its power... but the Force doesn't put the evil thoughts in your mind, it takes what is already there and accentuates it.

That's really all Vergere was saying (in Traitor, at least) and I don't get why it's so offensive. She didn't suggest that there was no external element to individuals being corrupted by the dark side, simply that what they become is based on what they are.

Where she's a bit silly is in believing that it's possible to shape an individual who has no innate darkness within their spirit for the Force to bring out. She wanted Jacen to be that individual and, at the end of the NJO, I think he was. Vergere's naive in that she seems to think "perfection" is a sustainable state.

Of course, the above is only my own interpretation.

Addition:

All Vergere really does is pose a question. This analogy will demonstrate:

“Bail Bogan is called a bad chef by everyone he encounters. He can rustle up food in double quick time – much quicker than Aalya Ashla - but it is always, without fail, vile. Yet, really, what right to we have to call him a bad chef? He has never been given anything but the worst ingredients… and it’s not exactly fair to expect him to work with something he has no access to. So, really, isn’t it more appropriate to suggest that Bail Bogan is not a bad chef so much as a man forced to prepare bad ingredients?”

As you an see, it would be nonsensical to suggest that Bail Bogan’s non-existence is implied by the above.

"There is no dark side" does not mean "what you call the dark side does not exist", it means: "I don't think you should call it the dark side."


And later:

Ulicus from the Vergere thread posted:

Vergere's wrong because she postulates that people can use the dark side, whatever you want to call it, and not be corrupted in practice. She's also wrong to assume that it is a requirement for true greatness.

She believes it's possible for what she considers the "living Jedi dream", to exist, a Galahad type figure that is utterly pure and thus unsusceptible to being transformed into an evil being. She wants to shift the emphasis of blame from the Force to the Force user - making individuals aware that it doesn't "take you over" so much as it unleashes and amplifies the evil within - but she doesn't actually put forward a different cosmology at all.

If such a "perfect being" could exist then, certainly, I think they could use what is called "the dark side" without having to worry. Such a being can never exist however - or if they can, they can't exist in such a state for long - and so, for all practical purposes, the fact of the Force twisting and further corrupting should be acknowledged as its dark side. Like it is.

Do I think Yoda is unaware that the root of what makes the dark side dangerous lies in the souls of sentient beings? No, he just realises that there is no practical benefit to telling up and coming Jedi this. As this board, and Jacen himself proves, it can lead to confusion and to a belief that the dark side does not exist, or that one need not fear the dark side as long as they have "good intentions". It makes more sense for Yoda to point to the dark side and say "fear that and keep away" rather than to point to people and say "fear yourselves and try to purge yourself totally of evil". I mean, which is the more likely to be achieved? wink

This is why Vergere is technically right to call the dark side the "lie" of the Jedi (even though she either does not understand, or does not agree with, the Jedi's rationale for calling it such), because - by the use of such terminology - they have pinned the majority of blame on the Force and this isn't "fair".

The dark side is not "innately" evil to anything but our own perspective. It twists, it corrupts and it transforms individuals into agents of evil... but it's not ITS fault that it does that, anymore than it would be gravity's fault that we'd go splat when we jumped off a hundred-foot building. That'd be our fault.

 

-----signature-----
Recipient of Golden Ewok™
Trip Cares
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Arawn_Fenn 
Registered: Jul '04
46079_Darth Plagueis
Date Posted: 6/30 3:07pm Subject: RE: Who was right about the force??
2Irandrura posted:
He said to feel the Force in, among other things, 'the rock'. Rocks are not alive.


Yoda posted:
You must feel the Force around you; here, between you, me, the tree, the rock, everywhere, yes. Even between the land and the ship.


The Force permeates the galaxy.

 

-----signature-----
The world will look up and shout, "Save us." And I'll whisper: "No". - Rorschach
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Arawn_Fenn 
Registered: Jul '04
46079_Darth Plagueis
Date Posted: 7/1 6:50am Subject: RE: Who was right about the force?? - Date Edited: 7/1 6:54am (3 edits total) Edited By: Arawn_Fenn
2Irandrura posted:
I would say her teaching was this instead: the Force unleashed is nothing to fear. The dark side is not in the Force. The dark side is in you. Once you are aware of that, through self-knowledge and self-discipline, you have no reason to shrink from the unleashed nature of the Force.


2Irandrura posted:
Vergere never advocated touching the dark side. I'm not sure why you bring it up. Vergere's teachings about the nature of the Force at no point state that it is acceptable to touch the dark side. Don't put words into her mouth.


Contradict yourself much?

 

-----signature-----
The world will look up and shout, "Save us." And I'll whisper: "No". - Rorschach
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
2Irandrura 
Registered: Jun '08
Date Posted: 7/1 7:18am Subject: RE: Who was right about the force??
Arawn_Fenn posted:
[quote=2Irandrura]The Force permeates the galaxy.


Exactly.

Arawn_Fenn posted:
Contradict yourself much?


Never. Read more closely.

2Irandrura posted:
I would say her teaching was this instead: the Force unleashed is nothing to fear. The dark side is not in the Force. The dark side is in you.


Those two quotes you made are entirely non-contradictory, and are in fact part of the same point. Vergere makes this point clearly in Traitor. The dark side is not part of the Force. The dark side (and the light side, for that matter) exists only in the wielder of the Force. Thus the power of the Force unleashed is nothing to fear. If it were, it would be true that the dark side is inherent to the Force and will corrupt the person who touches the Force too strongly. Vergere rejects that.

So, if a Jedi has conquered the dark side within himself, he has no reason to fear the Force. Remember, fear leads to the dark side. Why would a Jedi want to avoid communing with the Force more completely? Why would a Jedi want to avoid the Force's power unleashed? Only if they were afraid. Afraid of the Force; afraid of themselves with that much power; afraid of the darkness within them and their own corruptibility. But a Jedi must not fear. Fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate, hate leads to suffering. Do not fear the Force, and do not fear your own nature. Once, through the practice of self-awareness and self-knowledge, a Jedi's own self is in balance, that Jedi will no longer have anything to fear. The Force can only amplify what's already present in you. Are you afraid of yourself? No. Know yourself, know the Force, and act. That is Vergere's philosophy.

As such my statements are compatible. Vergere maintains that touching the dark side is unacceptable while simultaneously maintaining that the Force unleashed is nothing to fear.

 

Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Arawn_Fenn 
Registered: Jul '04
46079_Darth Plagueis
Date Posted: 7/1 7:39am Subject: RE: Who was right about the force??
When most people, including myself, refer to the "dark side", we are referring to something we know as the dark side of the Force. We're not talking about "the dark side that is in you". Vergere's so-called "point" that evil requires internal darkness -- really, you think? -- is not an interesting or revolutionary one. Her stance that the dark side is not inherently corruptive contradicts canon. The ultimate trajectory of NJO seems to demonstrate this.

The Force permeates the galaxy without being identical to the galaxy. An energy field is not the same thing as the matter in the galaxy.

BTW "everything is one" is a meaningless statement, and is not useful, much like the "dark side in you" emphasis.

Then again, what does one expect from a chickenhead?

 

-----signature-----
The world will look up and shout, "Save us." And I'll whisper: "No". - Rorschach
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
sithreaper 
Registered: Oct '04
14908_Mace Windu
Date Posted: 7/1 8:12am Subject: RE: Who was right about the force??
The Jedi order of the prequal era (well the 1000 years leading up to the prequal era) where right. Those thousand years where pretty quiet and despite the order been at its largest very few fell to the darkside. It took the most powerful, intelligent & cunning Sith Lord in history to bring the order to its knees & since prophecy’s by their very nature mean that events are preordained then the Jedi of the day where doomed from the start.

 

Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Irandrura 
Registered: Feb '07
Date Posted: 7/1 8:33am Subject: RE: Who was right about the force?? - Date Edited: 7/1 8:34am (1 edits total) Edited By: Irandrura
(2Irandrura is me. Profile trouble, now solved.)

Arawn_Fenn posted:
When most people, including myself, refer to the "dark side", we are referring to something we know as the dark side of the Force.


Which exists only as a consequence of the dark side in sentient beings, as Luke Skywalker agreed.

Arawn_Fenn posted:
We're not talking about "the dark side that is in you". Vergere's so-called "point" that evil requires internal darkness -- really, you think? -- is not an interesting or revolutionary one.


Of course it's not. I argued that quite strongly. Vergere's view is quite similar to the orthodox view held by the Old Jedi Order. Consider these two passages from MedStar: Jedi Healer

MedStar: Jedi Healer posted:
Barriss frowned. "Jedi refer to the 'light side' and the 'dark side,' but really, these are only words, and the Force is beyond words. It is not evil, just as it isn't good-it simply is what it is. Power alone doesn't corrupt-but it can feed corruption that already exists. A Jedi must constantly choose one path or the other.


Note that according to Barriss, who has never been portrayed as a radical or anything other than an exemplary Jedi, neither the light side or the dark side exist in the Force. More relevantly here, she says that power (so for our discussion, the Force unleashed) doesn't corrupt, but only feeds what corruption is already in the individual.

MedStar: Jedi Healer posted:
Had her previous experience truly been of the dark side? No, she decided. As she had also told Uli, the Force did not choose sides. But to wield that kind of power, no matter how noble the intent, would almost certainly lead to ruination-if not today, then tomorrow, or the day after. Each time, the temptation to use it would become more compelling, the reasons for doing so more justifiable. She could feel the truth of that to her core. That kind of power could not help but be addicting. It would consume anyone who was less than absolutely pure, less than all-wise, less than wholly selfless. Barriss was by no means a bad person, she knew that. But she was not perfect, and such contact with the Force on a regular basis needed perfection to survive uncorrupted.
Did it make sense to have the powers of a god, without the wisdom of a god?



For context, she's talking about her previous experience with bota, which triggered a state of extreme Force awareness and Force power. Notice how she practices self-awareness here, and how her conclusion reinforces the basic message of her earlier statement and Vergere's teachings: power is not inherently corruptive. Immense amounts of Force power are not inherently corruptive. All they can do is, as I said, 'amplify what's already present in you'. Barriss is self-aware enough to know that she isn't wise or strong-willed enough to resist that, and so, once she has achieved this revelation, she has nothing to fear from the dark side. And so, immediately afterwards -

MedStar: Jedi Healer posted:

He nodded and hurried away into the gathering gloom. She turned to go as well, but something stopped her. In that moment, Barriss felt something new rise within her, a certainty as strong and real as her journey to the center of the Force had been: she was a Padawan no longer.
And the knowledge of why welled in her, equally unmistakable:
You truly became a Jedi Knight on the day when you realized that you already were one.


This is in harmony with Vergere's teachings. Indeed, I would say, the reason for Jacen's fall to the dark side is that, after his moment of enlightenment in The Unifying Force, he came to assume that he was sufficiently pure to wield such total power, and in doing so, ceased to be. He lost that self-awareness.

Arawn_Fenn posted:
Her stance that the dark side is not inherently corruptive contradicts canon. The ultimate trajectory of NJO seems to demonstrate this.


The ultimate trajectory of the NJO demonstrates no such thing. The conclusion of the NJO dramatically vindicates Vergere's teachings. Remember how Jacen slew Onimi?

The Unifying Force posted:
What he found instead was formless, supple, and fathomless-an infinite emptiness, but as serene as a wind toppling trees to encourage new growth. A being of light, Jacen was drawing into himself all of Onimi's lethal compounds, neutralizing them and casting them out as sweat, tears, and exhalations. He understood at last why he had failed to catch Anakin's lightsaber when Luke had tossed it to him: he was never meant to catch it, because he had become the lightsaber. He had attained the ability to cut through any resistance in himself; to sever the bonds of preconception; to open a gaping hole into a reality more expansive than any he had ever dared imagine; to heal.
As his grandfather had done, he had broken through the apparent opposites that concealed the absolute nature of the Force, and found his way into an unseen unity that existed beyond the seeming separateness of the world. For a moment all the cosmic tumblers had clicked into place, and light and dark sides became something he could balance within himself, without having to remain on one side or the other.
The consciousness that was Jacen Solo was strewn across the vast spectrum of life energy. He had passed beyond choice and consequence, good and evil, light and dark, life and death. All that had been required of Jacen was complete surrender-a technique once mastered by the Jedi Order but at some point misplaced; transposed to an emphasis on individual achievement, which had opened a way to arrogance. In that the path was available to any who chose to seek and follow it, Jacen understood that the discovery was really a rediscovery.
[...]
Jacen realized that, in a sense, he had paraphrased Onimi. He had passed beyond the tradition of the Jedi Order into a more embracing reality. But instead of attempting to steal the authority of the gods, or to become a god, he had finally allowed himself to merge with the Force in its entirety and become a conduit for its raw power, which flowed through him like the thundering headwaters of a great river. The conjoining of the Force and his Vongsense enabled him to render himself small enough to follow Onimi wherever he went or attempted to hide; to counter Onimi's every action, and merge with his living vessel on a molecular level.
[...]
Jacen continued to stand firm, righting the world. He had become so powerful as to be dangerous to his own galaxy, for he could see clearly the temptations of the dark side and the desire to force one's will on others-to so completely dominate that all life would kowtow to him. He purged his mind of all pride and evil intent and entered a moment of unadulterated bliss, where he seemed to have unlocked the very secrets of existence. He knew that he would never again be able to reach this exalted state, and at once that he would spend the rest of his life trying.



This is the 'moment of enlightenment' that I mention, and it is a direct consequence of Vergere's teaching. Jacen's fall, throughout Dark Nest and LotF, is because he comes to misunderstand the teachings that brought him to that state of absolute oneness, and in searching for it again, he became corrupted. It's what I said above; where Barriss, through self-knowledge, was aware of her limitations and thus avoided the dark side, Jacen lost that self-knowledge and fell to the dark side.

Arawn_Fenn posted:
BTW "everything is one" is a meaningless statement, and is not useful, much like the "dark side in you" emphasis.


Is it meaningless? I guess I'll have to call a number of religious traditions. They'll be very sorry to hear that dogma expounded and explored for millennia is completely useless.

'Everything is one' is a meaningful statement. The very fact that we're debating its meaning would seem to demonstrate that it has meaning.

Arawn_Fenn posted:
Then again, what does one expect from a chickenhead?


I'm sorry? Are you attempting to insult Vergere, or me?

 

Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Manisphere 
Registered: Aug '07
46344_The Clone Wars: Rex (CC-7567)
Date Posted: 7/1 11:18am Subject: RE: Who was right about the force??
Irandrura posted:

Arawn_Fenn posted:
Then again, what does one expect from a chickenhead?


I'm sorry? Are you attempting to insult Vergere, or me?


I'm pretty sure he meant Vergere. She's the dark side chicken lady. wink

 

Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History