Ulicus posted:Not for the finale. Caedus should have killed Luke in Sacrifice (or rather, Luke should have allowed himself to die Obi-Wan style to allow the rest of the Skywalker-Solo clan to escape) and then Jaina should have maimed Jacen in the finale. And then Ben Skywalker (annoying though he is) could have taken him out/redeemed him five years later. (Though Caedus killing Luke would only work if he was always presented as nigh invincible villain as opposed to what we got)
Charlemagne19 posted: So, in exchange for Jacen getting to be a villain and getting off scott free, we lose Mara *AND* Luke?
Ulicus posted:Charlemagne19 posted: So, in exchange for Jacen getting to be a villain and getting off scott free, we lose Mara *AND* Luke? No, just Luke. I wasn't advocating more than one character death in Sacrifice. (How is being maimed and then taken out getting off scott free? That'd be Caedus dead. I mean, even in the redemption scenario, it's not scott free, just a little more milk and cookies.)
Charlemagne19 posted: Does he serve prison time for murdering the Galactic Messiah?
SuperWatto posted:That does sound like a good story idea, a veritable EU celebration, but then you run into two new problems: 1. They can never go back in the timeline again and splice yet another new Darksider in Luke's prime 2. They can never again revive a forgotten Darksider!
TheLightSide posted:I think that it is hard to have a fallen Solo to be viewed as a Sith Lord. They have to make him almost Anakin Skywalker-like. Anakin becomes a Sith because he wants to save his wife's life. Jacen becomes a Sith because he wants to make his daughter Allana's life easier and free from strife. With Jacen Solo one cannot simply have Palpatine. Everybody is waiting for the next Palpatine in these novels, and it is simply not going to happen. The closest that we have come is a combination of Nom Anor/Shmirra/Onimi. Total ruthless individuals trying to enslave and kill. The Vong will destroy Barabel, Yevethan, whatever it takes.