Author Topic: Was Ahsoka only added to appeal to young girls?
xx_Anakin_xx  1761 posts
Registered: Jan '08
45272_Cade Skywalker
Date Posted: 8/30/08 6:18pm Subject: RE: Was Ahsoka only added to appeal to young girls?
I liked her and I am not a young girl. I think she'll end up with a crush on Anakin too.

 

-----signature-----
I say we put together a 'kill squad' and assassinate
Darth Krayt. Who's with me?
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Vortigern99  6130 posts
Title: Manager Emeritus
Registered: Nov '00
6129_Anakin Skywalker
Date Posted: 8/30/08 9:03pm Subject: RE: Was Ahsoka only added to appeal to young girls?
I could kind of take or leave her; she was okay-ish without being especially impressive. I do like the way she holds her lightsaber, and clearly she can handle herself nicely. But she seems to be depicted as too strenuous of a bad*** to be entirely believable as a child/tween/padawan. It seems to me she should have got in more trouble, or had a harder time with her adversaries.

What I'm trying to wrap my mind around is how Yoda could have assigned Anakin, who is Kenobi's padawan, a padawan. For that matter, how could Kenobi, who early in the film speaks of "a new padawan", receive a second padawan? Did I miss something? Is Anakin no longer Kenobi's padawan? If so, why does Anakin call him "Master" and follow his orders in ROTS?

I'm so confused.

 

-----signature-----
"I knew from the beginning I was not doing science fiction.
I was doing a space opera, a fantasy film, a mythological piece,
a fairy tale."--George Lucas
My "Vader's Origins" thread:
http://boards.theforce.net/Classic_Trilogy/b10002/8708417/p1
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Azura 
Registered: Feb '08
23776_Jedi Academy
Date Posted: 8/31/08 6:32am Subject: RE: Was Ahsoka only added to appeal to young girls?
Vortigern99 posted:
I could kind of take or leave her; she was okay-ish without being especially impressive. I do like the way she holds her lightsaber, and clearly she can handle herself nicely. But she seems to be depicted as too strenuous of a bad*** to be entirely believable as a child/tween/padawan. It seems to me she should have got in more trouble, or had a harder time with her adversaries.

What I'm trying to wrap my mind around is how Yoda could have assigned Anakin, who is Kenobi's padawan, a padawan. For that matter, how could Kenobi, who early in the film speaks of "a new padawan", receive a second padawan? Did I miss something? Is Anakin no longer Kenobi's padawan? If so, why does Anakin call him "Master" and follow his orders in ROTS?

I'm so confused.


Anakin is no longer a padawan at this point, but a Knight, as indicated by his lack of a padawan braid. (The knighting ceremony was shown in Chapter 21 of the original Clone Wars cartoon.) He is therefore fully qualified to train a padawan, and said padawan will refer to him as "master" in honor of his role as teacher and mentor. However, he is not yet a full Master in rank, and will still defer to the seniority of Masters such as Kenobi and the other Council members.

I think the main source of confusion here is the dual usage of the term "Master":
1. as a relative rank, used in the same way we use the term "sir." This is used when any junior Jedi addresses a senior Jedi, such as a padawan addressing a Knight.
2. as an absolute rank, given to a Jedi who has successfully trained a padawan to knighthood, or who has otherwise proven himself through experience and accomplishments. This is the rank that gets denied to Anakin in ROTS.

 

-----signature-----
I reject your canon and substitute my own!
Hope for the best; prepare for the worst.
May the Force be with you. hugs
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
XCell  277 posts
Registered: Apr '04
48491_Shaak Ti (524091)
Date Posted: 8/31/08 8:46am Subject: RE: Was Ahsoka only added to appeal to young girls? - Date Edited: 8/31/08 8:54am (1 edits total) Edited By: XCell
JSnyder posted:
XCell posted:
Yeah it's kind of strange, Leia's Senator mom dressing in skimpier clothes than her, of her own free will. In AotC Padme seemed to be trying to be professional and not attract Anakin and all that.. and she does that by wearing all these sexy dresses around him?

Well, I got the impression that Pre-Clone Wars the style of dress would be similar to Renaissance England Nobility - refined dress, refined speech, more "civilized"; even her "peasant" clothing while traveling incognito was of high caliber.
Post Republic, everyone is subdued; dress becomes more plain and unassuming, language becomes more "common-man" and the population is turned into pseudo-clones with no individuality.

[quote]I see no reason for a little Jedi girl to be fighting a war in a tube-top and short skirt.

Jedi robes get in the way?[/quote]

I don't think the Renaissance fashion thing makes sense for it. Padme disguised herself as a plain handmaiden before, but in AotC she dresses up around Anakin and she's supposed to be 'uncomfortable' around him.
And Anakin and Obi-Wan fight in their Jedi robes well enough, so why not Ahsoka?
I'm not trying to make a big deal out of all this skimpy clothes stuff. It's not like it makes the rating any higher, it's just...well, cheap.

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
JSnyder  195 posts
Registered: Apr '05
6406_City
Date Posted: 8/31/08 9:14am Subject: RE: Was Ahsoka only added to appeal to young girls?
XCell posted:
I don't think the Renaissance fashion thing makes sense for it. Padme disguised herself as a plain handmaiden before, but in AotC she dresses up around Anakin and she's supposed to be 'uncomfortable' around him.

As a Senator and ex-queen, I doubt she has the equivalent of sweatshirt and sweatpants, since this is what you are seemingly trying to indicate she should be wearing to be discouraging. She has nice clothes (station actually requires even nicer clothes). Passerby on the "street" have nice clothes. The outer rim where the Republic has no influence has slavery and poor clothes. What is so hard to grasp here?

[quote]And Anakin and Obi-Wan fight in their Jedi robes well enough, so why not Ahsoka?
I'm not trying to make a big deal out of all this skimpy clothes stuff. It's not like it makes the rating any higher, it's just...well, cheap.[/quote]
Neither Obi-wan nor Anakin had robes in the movie.
It sounds like you are stretching for things to have issues with since it is no big deal to you.

 

-----signature-----
"I go online sometimes, but everyone's spelling is really bad, and it's... depressing."
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
beezel26  18124 posts
Registered: May '03
15809_Yoda
Date Posted: 8/31/08 9:46am Subject: RE: Was Ahsoka only added to appeal to young girls?
the boys fought without the robes. They mearly just hid themselves from plain site. Actually everyone does that to blend into a crowd. Plus you dont know what they are packing.

The girls arent seen fighting ever.

but, they are seen with midriffs cause I think its more or less a little sexist.

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
XCell  277 posts
Registered: Apr '04
48491_Shaak Ti (524091)
Date Posted: 8/31/08 12:26pm Subject: RE: Was Ahsoka only added to appeal to young girls? - Date Edited: 8/31/08 12:38pm (2 edits total) Edited By: XCell
JSnyder posted:
XCell posted:
I don't think the Renaissance fashion thing makes sense for it. Padme disguised herself as a plain handmaiden before, but in AotC she dresses up around Anakin and she's supposed to be 'uncomfortable' around him.

As a Senator and ex-queen, I doubt she has the equivalent of sweatshirt and sweatpants, since this is what you are seemingly trying to indicate she should be wearing to be discouraging. She has nice clothes (station actually requires even nicer clothes). Passerby on the "street" have nice clothes. The outer rim where the Republic has no influence has slavery and poor clothes. What is so hard to grasp here?

[quote]And Anakin and Obi-Wan fight in their Jedi robes well enough, so why not Ahsoka?
I'm not trying to make a big deal out of all this skimpy clothes stuff. It's not like it makes the rating any higher, it's just...well, cheap.

Neither Obi-wan nor Anakin had robes in the movie.
It sounds like you are stretching for things to have issues with since it is no big deal to you.[/quote]

Well, no need to make assumptions about me. My point was Anakin and Obi-Wan are fighting in the usual Jedi clothes which cover them. I just don't think the way Padme and Ahsoka are dressed fits with their character or the situations they're in. That's all.

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Vortigern99  6130 posts
Title: Manager Emeritus
Registered: Nov '00
6129_Anakin Skywalker
Date Posted: 8/31/08 5:39pm Subject: RE: Was Ahsoka only added to appeal to young girls?
Azura posted:
Anakin is no longer a padawan at this point, but a Knight, as indicated by his lack of a padawan braid. (The knighting ceremony was shown in Chapter 21 of the original Clone Wars cartoon.) He is therefore fully qualified to train a padawan, and said padawan will refer to him as "master" in honor of his role as teacher and mentor. However, he is not yet a full Master in rank, and will still defer to the seniority of Masters such as Kenobi and the other Council members.

I think the main source of confusion here is the dual usage of the term "Master":
1. as a relative rank, used in the same way we use the term "sir." This is used when any junior Jedi addresses a senior Jedi, such as a padawan addressing a Knight.
2. as an absolute rank, given to a Jedi who has successfully trained a padawan to knighthood, or who has otherwise proven himself through experience and accomplishments. This is the rank that gets denied to Anakin in ROTS.


Thank you for the explanation and clarification. I don't follow much EU, and I've only seen the first season CW cartoon, so I was out of the loop on Anakin's rise in status from padawan to knight. Thx again.

 

-----signature-----
"I knew from the beginning I was not doing science fiction.
I was doing a space opera, a fantasy film, a mythological piece,
a fairy tale."--George Lucas
My "Vader's Origins" thread:
http://boards.theforce.net/Classic_Trilogy/b10002/8708417/p1
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Amdrag 
Registered: Aug '08
6617_Yoda
Date Posted: 9/1/08 1:47am Subject: RE: Was Ahsoka only added to appeal to young girls?
Gallandro posted:
Go-Mer-Tonic posted:
I liked the character, and I'm an old dude. happy


Me too. I didn't find the character annoying at all. I found her to be A LOT like my youngest daughter who's 13. Her older sister (by a year) is an overachiever who excels at sports, academics... pretty much everything she puts her mind to. As a result my youngest has always found herself a bit in her sister's shadow (not in our home mind you), and there are always inevitable comparisons between the two from teachers, coaches, and peers. As a result she really, really tries hard to show that she is her own person and not like her sister at all.


My oldest is very respectful, somewhat shy initially and very reserved... my youngest is very boisterous, outgoing, and VERY opinionated... not in a disrespectful way mind you, but she wears her emotions on her sleeve. She works very hard to make sure people realize she is NOT her sister.

That's what I saw in Ashoka; a young girl struggling to prove her worth and to prove that she is worthy of the honor that's been bestowed on her. She can be somewhat pushy and very outspoken, but ultimately she understands her place. My favorite scene in the movie: 1) After the battle on Christophsis when Anakin gently berates her for her attitude, then praises her for how hard she fought, and finally explains that she may not be a good enough Padawan for Obi-Wan but she's good enough for him.

Good stuff... is it pandering to girls? Sure, I guess, but no more so than Star Wars panders to young boys in general...


Yancy


That is the problem I have with it. These are kids raised in a temple. They don't have these kind of personalities. She reminds me of my niece. Wouldn't exactly give her a lightsaber.

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
beezel26  18124 posts
Registered: May '03
15809_Yoda
Date Posted: 9/1/08 11:06am Subject: RE: Was Ahsoka only added to appeal to young girls?
Amdrag posted:
Gallandro posted:
Go-Mer-Tonic posted:
I liked the character, and I'm an old dude. happy


Me too. I didn't find the character annoying at all. I found her to be A LOT like my youngest daughter who's 13. Her older sister (by a year) is an overachiever who excels at sports, academics... pretty much everything she puts her mind to. As a result my youngest has always found herself a bit in her sister's shadow (not in our home mind you), and there are always inevitable comparisons between the two from teachers, coaches, and peers. As a result she really, really tries hard to show that she is her own person and not like her sister at all.


My oldest is very respectful, somewhat shy initially and very reserved... my youngest is very boisterous, outgoing, and VERY opinionated... not in a disrespectful way mind you, but she wears her emotions on her sleeve. She works very hard to make sure people realize she is NOT her sister.

That's what I saw in Ashoka; a young girl struggling to prove her worth and to prove that she is worthy of the honor that's been bestowed on her. She can be somewhat pushy and very outspoken, but ultimately she understands her place. My favorite scene in the movie: 1) After the battle on Christophsis when Anakin gently berates her for her attitude, then praises her for how hard she fought, and finally explains that she may not be a good enough Padawan for Obi-Wan but she's good enough for him.

Good stuff... is it pandering to girls? Sure, I guess, but no more so than Star Wars panders to young boys in general...


Yancy


That is the problem I have with it. These are kids raised in a temple. They don't have these kind of personalities. She reminds me of my niece. Wouldn't exactly give her a lightsaber.



Sorry but I doubt teenage jedi wouldn't be overachievers or something else.

Hey we have the sith you know. There is a reason for that.

Besides they would be bad just because someone else would be a bit better. And of course the kids would be a bit on the competitive side when it comes to using a lightsaber or using the force.

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
GARTH_MAUL  8269 posts
Title: LACWAC Manager & White Wizard
Registered: May '02
18631_Barriss Offee
Date Posted: 9/1/08 11:18am Subject: RE: Was Ahsoka only added to appeal to young girls?
I don't have any problem with them giving Ahsoka a personality, but I think, in the film at least, she goes a little too far over the line.

Somebody like Anakin gets away with it because he is the Chosen One, and obviously not all Jedi (Mace, we're looking at you) like him very much.

 

-----signature-----
Dustin + Tina = love 5 years of marriage
Obama given First Annual Montgomery Burns Award for Outstanding Achievement in the Field of Excellence
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
GringoFett 
Registered: Nov '08
Date Posted: 11/23/08 8:57pm Subject: RE: Was Ahsoka only added to appeal to young girls? - Date Edited: 11/23/08 9:31pm (4 edits total) Edited By: GringoFett
Jedi_Keiran_Halcyon posted:
Make a live-action Clone Wars movie all about Ashoka, starring Miley Cyrus.

I can see it now-- "Yoda Montana."

[quote]It will make more money than the other movies COMBINED.[/quote]

And turn the Universe to the Dark Side... I know I would, just so I could take my double-bladed lightsaber and CHOP HER FRICKING HEAD OFF, since I WOULD use my anger for just that moment-- in fact I'd sign a triplicate-contract with the Evil Midichlorians to consign myself to the Dark Side of the Force FOREVER, just for one chance to separate her huge annoying head from her spunky little body.

I'm thinking maybe Palpatine CREATED her for that reason, just like he created Anakin. She reminds me of EVERY annoying animal side-kick that gets paired up with EVERY character that becomes a cartoon; in this case it's Anakin Skywalker.
The problem is that she's not just the Jar-jar comic-relief who does everything wrong, she's a Mary Sue central character in who upstages all the main characters and saves the day each time-- while MOONING any hint of plausibility.

I also don't understand why Yoda could have disapproved of Anakin being trained as a Jedi, but approved this smart-mouthed, obnoxious, impulsive, insubordinate, suicidal upstart brat who goes against everything that Yoda stands for-- and who would get killed in 2 seconds if it wasn't for the Spielberg rule (i.e. that obnoxious kids save the world and can't get killed). Pehaps he thought Anakin could benefit from a taste of his own medicine? Like an ipecac-- she has that effect on me!

I would gladly be digested in the belly of the Sarlaac-pit for 1000 years, if only to watch her do the same. I'd rather be a life-sentence room-mate with Jar-Jar than to watch another SECOND of "Yoda Montana."
In fact my greatest pleasure in this lifetime, will be to cheer my lungs out when Palpatine throws Order 666 on her; you might think that the worst thing imaginable would be for them to CLONE her; but you'll change your mind when you see her "cloned" all right--- by the gunfire of a MILLION clones of Jango Fett.

Oh, did I mention that I HATE Ahsoka?

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Biddybot  240 posts
Registered: Aug '02
39903_Obi-Wan Kenobi
Date Posted: 11/24/08 11:45am Subject: RE: Was Ahsoka only added to appeal to young girls?
Definitely only added to appeal to young girls, which is dumb, because the best way to attract young female viewers to anything is to add a variety of hawt or otherwise appealing young guys to the cast. She annoys me because she's still coming off like an intersteller Bratz girl, one that's been 'bamf'd' from our world direct into the Star Wars universe, with all of the usual modern attitudes and sassiness intact. That's fine for a slightly crummy fanfic. From professionals, I expect a little more thought and effort put into tailoring any new character for his or her specific universe.

Also, what exactly was the point of making her a Togruta at all? They've done nothing with that aspect of the character whatsoever. Does anyone have a clue? I'm beginning to suspect that she's only a Togruta because it lets the series get away with presenting us with a young teen-age girl who looks to be heavily made up without actually being so, thereby averting the ire of some parents who might object to her appearance. If true, you can add a certain underhanded sleaziness behind the character's design to my list of why I don't care for Ahsoka (to date).

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
DVCPRO-HDeditor  1547 posts
Registered: Nov '06
47650_Darth Ben Kenobi
Date Posted: 11/24/08 12:01pm Subject: RE: Was Ahsoka only added to appeal to young girls?
I consider Ahsoka being female simply a way of keeping the series from becoming a "boys' only club." Seriously - how many female characters are there in the Saga? Leia, Padme and Ahsoka are the only ones with serious speaking roles. (Personally, I wouldn't want to live in a world where there were only men and machines. It would get boring pretty quick, don't you think?)

Her being a Torgruta is simply a way of adding to the aesthetic of the series. As there is no larger budget for animating an alien, as opposed to animating a human or a droid, Lucas decided to just make her an alien. I don't believe that there's any "underhanded sleaziness" to the move.

 

-----signature-----
"Murder is not a bannable offense here on TFN." ~ AdamBertocci
Let Me Google That For You: http://tinyurl.com/5p4arw
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Biddybot  240 posts
Registered: Aug '02
39903_Obi-Wan Kenobi
Date Posted: 11/24/08 12:41pm Subject: RE: Was Ahsoka only added to appeal to young girls?
DVCPRO-HDeditor posted:
(Personally, I wouldn't want to live in a world where there were only men and machines. It would get boring pretty quick, don't you think?)


Oh, I dunno... I quite enjoyed the days back when I was about the only woman in my trade, working on the flightlines surrounded by men and machines. batting

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History