__________If I start this topic with an example,I think the Tv Show "Robin of Sherwood" from the early eighties's gonna be a good beginning.In the series,Michael Pread starred at the screen as Robin of Loxley (aka Robin Hood).After the end of the 2nd season,when the character portrayed by Michael Pread died,a new Robin (Robert of Huntingdon) emerged and claimed the name of Robin Hood (he was portrayed by the actor Jason Connery;Sean Connery's son).It was a successful tv show,and in my opinion,the main reason of its success came from giving the character Robin Hood a different and a new sight.And it wasn't just the character of Robin Hood which changed,but also the athmosphere of the story,the characters,the places...In fact,I may prefer to call it a "Re-Imagined Robin Hood",and the idea of creating a new R.H. universe that no one's ever seen appeared terrific.Until the beginning of the show,the audience had used to see Robin Hood in the sixties-style...A R.H. who always smiles,happy/positive-looking townsfolk and a consructive/shining sight for the places of the story.When the tv show hit the screen,it didn't just surprise the audience,but created a new,gothic and misty athmosphere from zero as well as the "Crossbow" tv show which was made at the same period of time.It was about the story of William Tell,and like Robin of Sherwood,it gave a very different spectacle for William Tell and the medievel athmosphere where the story took place.There were some scenes and dialogues in both tv shows which made them appear in a mysterious way and I do believe same mold of these scenes/dialogues might appear so cool for the SW tv show if it would be consructed on a dark background.(By the way,some of the actors that took part in Robin of Sherwood series also acted in the original/prequel SW trilogy.The actor that played Boba Fett (Jeremy Bulloch) in the classic movies acted as "Edward of Wickham" in the tv show.And in the show,John Abineri;who played the god-like character "Herne",appeared in a short role in E1.) As far as I remember;in one of the episodes of the show,a barber comes to shave Sheriff.At the haircut scene,the barber accidentally hurts him and he threats the barber by bidding "it is your Sheriff whom you shave,not a rabbit",and tells him that he'd be punishing him by cutting his fingers if he made that mistake again.Those assortment of dialogues were increasing the thrilling dose of the series.And some mysterious characters (like Herne) make the episodes appear in a darker way.In fact,the show has some common parts with the old SW trilogy.There are band of rebels hiding in a secret place in both SW and RoS.In RoS,a mysterious character named "Herne/Lord of the Trees" appears to Robin from time to time to give him advices as well as Ben Kenobi who shows himself to Luke.Before Ben is killed by Vader,he helps Luke in a normal-person form,but after his death,he appears as a spiritual image and continues to be his mentor.In RoS,Herne also appears to Robin sometimes in human form,sometimes as a supernaturel image.At E4,Ben gives Luke a light saber,and tells him that it was an elegant weapon used by Jedi Knights for generations.In the show,Herne gives a sacred sword named "Albion" to Robin in his struggle against the Nottingham Sheriff.Considering the Live-Action Series take place in the "dark times" (as mentioned by Ben Kenobi in E4),those things'd be useful for the show.I mean there'll be a rebellion,some rebels who hide in a secret place (as well as RoS) and a tyrant ruler who oppresses the galaxy.If there'd be remaining Jedi (there "must" be),it'd be so cool to see them takin' advices from the spiritual form of the Jedi Masters,not from the Jedi who lived in the same era,but also the Jedi who'd lived centuries ago in the galaxy before them.If the story is 'bout the "dark times",there should be some rulers/barons/counts/landlords instead of the top commanders who seizes the citizens of their territories for private gain like the nobels of RoS.There's just "one" territory in RoS,but in SW,there's not just one territory,considering that the story takes place in a "galaxy",there should be plenty of territories devoured by the rulers,and that's a great advantage for the story to expand,ain't I right?And like RoS;it'd be so cool to see misty places in the show for the audience to feel the dark/pessimistic athmosphere of the show.And there were same kind of dark/foggy places in the show "Crossbow" as well.In the show,Will Lyman stepped in the role of "William Tell",and Jeremy Clyde acted as the ruthless governer "Gessler".I admire both Lyman and Clyde (I do want to see Gessler type rulers/imp. commanders in the live-action show),and there are also some dialogues/scenes that make the series appear darker as well as RoS.At the pilot episode of the show,soldiers of Goverment Gessler come to Tell's village.They put a hat (which is a symbol of King's Authority) on a wooden column at the public space of the town,and order the villagers to kneel before the hat when they pass near it.A hermit refuses to do their bidding and tells them "I only kneel before god,not before a hat" and says (to townsfolk) "kneel only before god,don't listen to those devils".Then the soldiers begin to beat the hermit and make him kneel before the hat by force.And after the dispute,a top commander comes to Gessler's mansion and explains him 'bout the agitations in the village.He says to Gessler that a priest had refused to kneel before the hat,and then had been beated by the soldiers.Gessler asks "before,or after he was arrested?".(The word shows the authoritical power of his.) He (the commander) says "I thought it wouldn't be wise to arrest a priest",then Gessler demands "do not ever think,just do my biddings".(I wish to see same kind of dialogues in the live-action as well.) And then,at the town,the people irraparably obey the order and kneel before the hat when they pass near it.Then suddenly,Tell's son Mathew (who's impressed by the rebellious minds of the village) comes to the centrum where the hat is hung.He yells the townsfolks to stop kneeling before it.No one listens to him as if life and time have stopped in the town.(The scene gives a gothic/pessimistic athmosphere to the show and I "do" want to see those kind of scenes in the SW series.)He takes the hat and throws it to the ground.When the soldiers begin to beat him,Tell interferes.After a short conflict,Tell and his son are captured as prisoners.The soldiers take them to the open carnival at the castle where the Noblemen,the King and Gessler enjoy themselves.When Gessler explains the King about the fight,he (the King) demands to make an amusement from it.Gessler takes an apple from the refhreshment table and puts it above Mathew's head who's tied up to a pillar at the area of the carnival.Mathew moves his head to drop the apple.When it drops,Gessler grasps the apple and he threatens Mathew by bidding "if you move again,I will put the apple not to your head,but right into your mouth."And-in-that-scene,when Gessler talks,the fire in the area reflects to his face and makes him appear more ruthless and evil.Man,Clyde acts so terrific that it makes me think as if he's gonna step out of the television screen and put the apple above my head...  ) Jeremy Clyde,along with Will Lyman make a perfect duo in the scene as well as at the show in general.By Gessler's demand,he takes a crossbow and shoots the apple above Mathew's head.Tell appears to be "different" from the style that the audience got used to know him from before-made productions 'bout Tell.(One of the actors of the show had appeared as William Tell in the screen before Lyman.) His wavy hair style,his clothes,his manners;and not just his manners,but the other characters' too.And those I've mentioned are not the only differences that surprises the audience,but the back-musics (made with modern instruments) of the show.There were also cool soundtracks made for RoS as well.They were performed by the Irish music band "Clannad" and the songs are included in the album "Legend".(I've listened the album so many times;it's terrific,and gives me the feeling of the show.) And if the live-action includes differences,(from my opinion) it has to "surprise" the audience not by scenes/story,but with the music as well.In the movies,John Williams handle the soundtracks in a perfect way,but instead,I do wish to see something else in the show.Ok,classical music sounds good,but the series might include a different kind of music along with classical type.For example,a new age group/artist (like Clannad,Enya) might handle the soundtracks.And it would sound good to get out of the usual molds.In '88-made Western Movie "Young Guns";the movie opened with an electric guitar-made instrumantel music,it appeared so cool,and I also heard rock-style music pieces throughout the movie.It was the first Western Movie that included e. guitar sounds,and as far as I remember,such a thing had never been tried before in the Westerns,it was a "creative idea" that gave a different-than-usual appearance to the character of ""Billy the Kid" (portrayed by Emilio Estevez),and a very different perspective to the "Wild West" notion.(In the movie,Terence Stamp acted as Billy the Kid's boss;"John Tunstall".He also appeared in the prequel SW trilogy.) In BSG (Re-Imagined), a kind of new age-type music plays before the beginning of the show and it sounds so cool.The old BSG Show included classical music made by Stu Philips.After the old show,when watching the re-imagined series,altough I got to hear classical music,I didn't regard it as stranger;instead,I also liked it a lot and it gave a different appearance to the show.The opening style of the series might change as well as the music.In SW films,a Star Wars Logo appears in the beginning,and a text follows it.The logo along with the text may be "kinda-tradition",but they're not "must".I mean,a different SW logo along with a new type of music (a re-im. BSG type) might surprise the audience.When I wached the "Clone Wars" at the cinema,I was surprised by the opening part,it (and also the music) was more different than the usual style,and I liked it.But of course if the action scenes appear fast/mixed/complicated,those differences might not mean anything.For example,in the movie of "Troy",I've noticed some unnatural appearing action scenes,and I want to mention 'bout.Altough I admire Brad Pitt (he's terrific in "Interview with the Vampire","Legends of the Fall" and "Meet Joe Black";he has a natural-acting style for his own),the action scenes were unnecessarily complicated.In the movie,when Paris (Bloom) duels with Menelaus,in-a-scene;when the audience sees from Paris' perspective,Menelaus hits his shield again and again with the sword,and in-the-scene;it (the sword) looks like a child's plastic toy rather than a sword.And also in a scene,where Achilles takes over the Temple of Apollo with his mercenaries;until he throws his sword to the guard's face,he fights with the sword as if it has no weight.In my opinion,if the action/duel scenes appear in a serious way,the audience must feel the weight of the sword and the fighting scenes have to be slower.Achilles is like a "Terminator" rather than a warrior.In the movie,it sounds like; "I'm Achilles.I was sent by Skynet to be at that time,at that location.My primary mission is to conquer Troy,and my secondary mission is to protect Patroclus.I've detailed files about sword and spear using.My armour is like a part of my body;a metal part over skin-endorsed skeleton.Briseis,come with me if you want to live.Altough I'm a machine,I've an emotionel chip in my head;the more I harm innocent,the more I become human.Hasta la vista,Hector.All of you wait for me in the shore while I'm conquering Troy by myself.I will be back..." ) At the end of the movie,I would expect Axl Rose come out of the big wooden horse instead of the soldiers.After those "tiring" action/duel scenes,the city of Troy deserved a surprise midnight concert rather than a surprise midnight assault,huh?... ) (By the way,I'm so happy for the re-union of "Guns'n Roses" as well as "New Kids on the Block".) And via "Troy",I want to give an example for the evolving-expedition of action scenes and how they become unnecessarily fast/unnatural/complicated like the ones in the "Matrix Trilogy"...At the middle of the movie when Achilles comes in front of the walls of Troy and calls Hector (Bana) for a duel,the city's door opens,Hector gets out,and after a short conversation,they begin to make a duel.But when I watch the duel,it looks so unnatural to me;and when I watch the previous-made movies which include sword-duels,I notice the difference.As an ex.,let's take the first movie of Highlander series.At the end of the movie,Connor Mc Leod and Kurgan make a sword duel at a deserted/empty factory.When I compare the duel scenes of the two movies,I easily notice the difference.At the duel scene of Highlander,the sword-motions look more unmixed,more serious and natural.The swords are not used like a child's plastic toy,they appear more "heavy"/serious.And it's not just the swords that give importance to the duel,but the appearance of the backscene;and it might sound odd,but also the clothes on the characters;even the sports shoes that Connor wears.Beyond the "realistic-duel" scene,there's also "creativity" in the movie.But in Hector/Achilles duel scene;the director gives importance only to the character/sword-motions (and they appear mixed) instead of the other factors.If you have both movies in your collection,you can also see the difference.First put the movie "Troy" in your player and come to the "Hector/Achilles" duel scene.When the scene ends,put "Highlander" in your player and set its timer to "Connor/Kurgan" duel scene.You have to watch "Troy" first to notice the difference in a better way.(And don't think in the wrong way,despite the exaggarated action scenes,Troy is a good movie;it has extremely-good screenshots for the places where the events take place and each actor (especially Brian Cox) does his/her part in a best way,I'm just makin' a comparison.) You'll see how natural it looks,and by comparing those duel scenes,you'll percieve how unrealistic/complicated the action scenes have become.
__________When Christopher Nolan made the movie "Batman Begins",it gave Batman a new style,a different appearance.It was a well-made movie,neverthless,it contained unnecessarily-extreme action scenes as well.In the film,after Batman rescues Rachel from Arkham Asylum,he escapes the policeman by driving his vehicle above the roof-tops,and also his vehicle goes forward by breaking the walls and crushing the cars.There are also those kinds of scenes in the "Dark Knight".Ok,Heath Ledger appears to be magnificient/terrific in the movie,but there were some unnatural action scenes which decreased the standarts of the movie.At one of the first scenes of the film,when Batman confronts the villains at the garage,he bends the gun barrel of a rifle which's used by one of the Batman-imitations.And also at the beginning of the scene,Batman's vehicle comes out of nowhere by breaking a wall.From Nolan's perspective,they are both "action-based" Batman movies rather than "comic-based" types.And if I consider it in that way,I prefer to see natural-appearing action scenes as well as the ones in the adventure films.For ex.,as far as I remember;in the "Dirty Harry" movies,Clint Eastwood wasn't chasing criminals via driving his car above roof-tops,or he wasn't bending rifles with his hands... ) In my opinion;they were hard-to-believe action scenes,and another mistake in "Batman Begins" is;after I watch the movie;I don't want to watch the 89/Burton-made movie,because the action scenes of Nolan's movie anti-motivates me to turn back to the pre-made films.But if it happens to be a movie-universe,than all the series must support each other and be in a harmony even if Nolan's movies are re-imagined/beginning from zero types.When I watch a Batman movie,it must motivate me to watch the other films,and with this "passing",the "movie universe" grows stronger,or otherwise,it becomes weaker step by step.That's why (in my opinion) "Batman Begins" is better than "The Dark Knight".It's a team-work,like a Basketball Match.Basketball is a team sport which consists of 5 players.Each player does his best with the help of the other four.If one player refuses the support of the others and tries to do everything on his own;the team looses the match.And that's what Nolan did in the "movie universe".He refused the support of the pre-made movies by putting unnecessarily-extreme/mixed/crowded action scenes in them.Altough he's an excellent director (and I have a great respect to him),that was a mistake.And in the sequel movie,Christopher Nolan take this mistake one step further and he refused the support of the "comic-universe" by lessering the "comic-athmosphere" dose of the movie to the least point.To be honest,when I watch the movie "The Dark Knight",it doesn't motivate me to read Batman comics,besides the comics do not motivate me to watch the movie.Unfortunately,the source of that problem comes not from comics,but from the movie itself.I do wish C. Nolan didn't do that mistake and refuse the support of "team-work" in the 3rd Batman movie.Creating a "different-than-ever/re-imagined universe" might be made without refusing the support of other/previous things made 'bout it.And adapting a movie from a "universe",especially from a huge-universe like Batman's is a very big advantage.Why not use it?When I watched the second trailer of T4,there were bullet-shooting weapons instead of the laser-shooting rifles.In the previous movies,the wars in the future-Los Angeles scenes were made by the laser-s. weapons.I'm sure Mc G's gonna do a great movie,but I hope he doesn't do the same mistake,and I do wish the new film didn't anti-motivate me to watch the previous ones.If so,as I've told before,the "Terminator Universe" is gonna get weaker step by step.And as far as I know,T4 will be the first movie of a trilogy comin' up,so he (Mc G) must be very careful at that point.And I also do want to say that at the "Dark Knight",the transformation of Harvey Dent to Two-Face happens so quickly.I'd expect it to happen slower/"heavier",but instead;he's persuaded (by Joker) very easily,and becomes berserk right away.After makin' a conversation with Joker,he suddenly walks out of hospital as a villain.It reminds me E3 of Star Wars.In the movie,after Anakin looses the duel he makes with Obi-Wan,the Emperor finds him nearly-dying/lying in the ground at Mustafar.The medical-team gets him to the hospital,and after a short/easy operation,with his clothes dressed upon him quickly,he suddenly becomes Darth Vader.Man,it happens to be too easy rather than "heavy",desn't it?In E6,when Luke talks to Ben at Degobah (after the death of Yoda),Ben tells Luke;"Your father was seduced by the darkside of the force.He seems to be Anakin Skywalker,and became Darth Vader.When it happened,the good man who was your father was destroyed."But in E2 and E3 (except the end of it) he doesn't seem to be Anakin,instead;he "is" Anakin,ok,he makes a good friendship with Palphatine,he respects him (Palphy),but he still is Anakin,not Vader,and he gets turned too quickly,that seems unrealistic to me.If Vader shows on the LAS,I wish to see some contradiction within him;I mean becomin' Vader is not an obstacle for Anakin to have complicated feelings,it also would give a "heavier" appearance for him,and this would cover some deficit parts 'bout transformation of Anakin to Vader in E3.
__________ At the 4th movie of Indiana Jones;"The Kingdom of the Crystal Skull",Steven Spielberg also did same mold of mistake (Christopher Nolan's mistake) by destroying the athmosphere of "Indy Universe".The previous 3 films had the "kinda-fantastic tale" perspective,but the 4th is different in some ways,'cause of that difference;the movie doesn't motivate me neither to watch pre-made Indy movies nor to read Indiana Jones comics,and also reading Indy Comics/watching pre-films do not motivate me to watch the movie.As I've told above,the "Basketball Game" requires a "team-work",and if you look it in that way,Spielberg is a perfect "team-captain",so he needn't refuse the support of "team-work"...And besides;I expected to see "labor-made" things instead of "computer-made" ones.For ex.,through the end of the film;there's an obelisk-like opening/transforming thing.When it gets to motion,I'd prefer it to be a work-made stuff;that would be a more serious appearance for the movie and it would look much more "heavy".And also Indy's whip motions,the insects were made by the computer effects,but in the pre.-films,they were very natural and in a great harmony with the athmosphere of the movies.I do want to see "hand/labor-made" places and things in the live-action SW series,that's one reason why the original trilogy was better than the prequel one.Nowadays,all science-fiction productions include computer-made/unnatural appearing/effortless things in general,and among those productions,(I'm sure that) seeing natural appearing places/vehicles/creatures like the ones in the old-trilogy would be a very great reference for the live-action.Ain't I right?.............And by the way,while I was mentioning about Indy movies,it's reminded me something,not so related with the topic,but I do want to tell about.In the 2nd Indy movie,"The Temple of Doom",I've noticed three possibly-vanished scenes,and I do want to write them.The first scene is;when Indy and his friends along with village man make their way through the Pankot Palace via elephants;approaching to the palace,they see two fiend-like statues.Indy gets close to them,and he sees the markings on them made by human blood.And when Short-Round gets close and asks "Indy,what are you looking at?",Indy says to him "don't come up here".And-in-the-next-scene;we see Short-Round turning his back to Indy and standing still as if it's forbidden to look at the statues.After we see Shorty,the villagers take the elephants and run scarely.And-in-that-scene,Shorty rouses Indy's suitcase aside him without looking back/without moving.When Willie draws near to Indy and says something,Shorty still doesn't get close to Indy,looks at Indy without moving his body backwards,he just (finally) turns his head back.In the scene,does Indy tell Shorty to turn his back to prevent him from seeing the bloody statues?Might that be a vanished scene?And the 2nd possibly-vanished scene is;in the middle of the movie;when Indy,Willie and Short-Round find the hidden temple below,they witness a Thuggee ceremony.After the end of the ceremony,Indy gets down to the ritual-hall,than he walks towards the mine-dungeon.After he disappears,Willie asks Shorty "where's he going?",and suddenly the Thuggee attack them.Even though they hold Shorty,he checks the Thuggee to help Willie escape.And-in-the-background,we see Willie escaping.Then after several scenes,she appears as a sacrifice victim while Indy is staying motionless in the influence of Mola Ram.But what happens before those 2 scenes?I think after Wllie escapes,she finds a secret passage which leads her to the palace,and she gets caught there by the Thuggee.If there's a palace controlled by a secret-remaining cult,and if there's a huge temple below the palace;there must be so many secret passages to go back and forth.And after Indy lets the kids free in the dungeon,we see the children running in the rooms and gardens of the palace.That "possibly-vanished" scene explains how the children get to the palace after they survive from the temple.Finally,the 3rd scene is (I'm sure it's a vanished scene);when Shorty escapes from the dungeon,he climbs above straight to the ritual hall,and there he finds Indy,he (Shorty) runs to Indy and says "wake up Dr. Jones,wake up",and at-the-background-of-the-scene we see two Thuggee;one is holding his wrist with his hand,and the other one holding his belly.Probably,when Shorty approaches Indy,two Thuggee try to stop him,one of them holds Shorty,and he bites his wrist,after he (Shorty) gets free,the other Thuggee comes close to catch him,and he kicks the other Thuggee's belly and runs to Indiana Jones.When he runs to Indy,we see him more close to the Thuggee who holds his belly,so that makes it certain that Shorty kicks his belly after he bites the other one's wrist.Those are the scenes that I've percieved,and as far as I know,Harrison Ford doesn't use any stunts for the action scenes in the movies he acts,and that doubles my respect to him.There's an Indy tagline;"If adventure has a name,it must be Indiana Jones".Considering that Harrison Ford acts in the action scenes by himself,might the tagline be; "If adventure's name is Indiana Jones,its true origin comes from Harrison Ford"?.......... ) I've also percieved something in another movie,in a Star Trek movie;"First contact".At the movie,when Data gets captured by the Borgs;he resists them and says "your affects to break the encryption codes will not be successfull,nor will your attempts to assimilate me in your collective",and the Borg Queen bids "brave words,I heard them before,from thousands of species from thousands of worlds,since long before you were created.But now,they're all Borg." Marvel Comics once (long before "First Contact") published a series of comic books 'bout SW which was consisted of nearly 110 issues.And in one of the issues (in the early-published ones) there happened to be a funeral for a species called "Borg".I mean;the Borgs are also mentioned in the SW universe,and when the Borg Queen says to Data "I heard them before,from thousands of species across thousands of worlds,since long before you were created";might she meant that once the Borgs had gone to "a galaxy far,far away..."?I think that's a dispatch for SW.Do the makers of Star Trek want to make a crossover between the two Science-Fic. Universes?And is it one of the reasons why the movie's name is "First Contact"?...By the way,when it comes to comics,from my opinion,the SW comic "Purge" might be an excellent beginning point for the live-action.The athmosphere of the story is so dark,like the way I want the L.A. to be.Adam Hughes' work is magnificent,he's such a great artist.I've read the comic,but I will read it again and again,it's great in general.
__________Well,after all,it gives me a great feeling to be accepted as a family member by the authorities and members of this site and write those above.And,finally,anyone who's reading that,I'm gonna ask for a small request.Turn the pages of your agendas nearly 35 years before...Until that time (-35),there weren't any effective Science-Fiction films existed except few ones (as I know from the people older than me.) Then suddenly,there happened to be a great explosion of Sci-Fic productions as if someone had put a bomb.Someone "indeed" put an effective bomb.That someone was George Lucas and the bomb he put was Star Wars:A New Hope.But instead of a bomb,the movie was also an "Open-School" which gave lust,hope and courage for movie makers to invent fascinating ideas.It also changed everything in the movie history for good.There was no going back from that moment,and who'd want to go back and refuse the opportunities of a new era in Sci-Fic?With the courage they'd taken from this "Open-School",the directors/producers made excellent things.In the year of '79,Star Trek;a nearly-dead "universe" emerged again by the movie "ST:The Motion Picture" and it continued to "boldly go" whence it left off.(And I wonder how the 11th ST movie's gonna be;it'd be so cool to see Sylar as Mr. Spock.) A tv show called "Battlestar Galactica" hit the tv screen in 1978;it was about the struggle between humans and machines (which were created by a reptilian-race that extincted),and it had so many resemblances with SW.In my opinion,it was a successful derivative of SW;and now,BSG's derivative,a Re-im. BSG shows itself on the screen.SW had a lot of reflections,and the best one among them was the '83-made movie "Krull".It was a fascinating movie and due to no sequel was made for a successful production such as this,I was frustrated a lot.(As far as I know,it has no sequels.) The "Open-School" that I've mentioned had opened a way for many productions;those I've written are three of the many.
__________When the LAS appears on TV,it'll be a production which carries the legacy of SW,and because of it,it's gonna have the right to lay claim to the best reward of all.I watch the Award Ceremonies,I've a great respect to the nominees and winners of the Awards,but the greatest prize a production may ever get comes from the audience,and that prize is to be permenant;to stand strong against the test of time.And the way to grasp that prize is to get in the "Arena of Kings".Once the LAS gets in the "Arena",it's gonna make a competition with the major tv shows such as Star Trek:The Classic Series,Terminator:SCC,Prison Break,Star Trek:TNG,Lost,BSG (78-made),Robin of Sherwood,Carnival,Stargate SG-1,The X-Files,Re-Im. BSG (I respect Michael Hogan so much as an actor,he suits to the role for a top-commander of a huge space-ship so well),Caprica (It hasn't hit the screen yet,but I presume it's gonna air at the same time period as LAS.) A production which carries the legacy of a saga such as Star Wars,has its right to become the "Best-Ever",to be the most permanent and grasp the prize of "King of Kings".........................
-----signature-----
"Yes,we're tired.Yes,there's no relief.Yes,the Cylons keep coming after us time after time after time...And yes,we are still expected to do our jobs!" - Carnal Tigh/BSG,S1/E3 (33)
|