Author Topic: George Lucas' new live -action TV-series?
nett40  115 posts
Registered: Jul '09
14733_Millennium Falcon
Date Posted: 7/5 7:32am Subject: George Lucas' new live -action TV-series? - Date Edited: 7/5 7:38am (2 edits total) Edited By: nett40
Again something taken out of a context!

Gry Sarth posted:
nett40 posted:
Isn't the show to be about the period between "Revenge Of The Sith" and "A New Hope"? If so then, my wish might come true!

How do you figure a re-edited prequel trilogy fits in the period that starts after the end of last prequel film? That's a bit of time-juggling that I would love to see explained...


The re-edited version of PT would be 12 of the 20 episodes of the 1st version of the LAS, leaves good room to present the heroes and villains of the Dark Times correctly... (8 episodes)

Gry Sarth posted:
nett40 posted:
To give a nice slow and familiar start to a new TV-series in a very competitive TV-environment.

You really think that after two film trilogies (one of which has at least two different editions), two animated Clone Wars series and countless other stories people still need more to be familiar with Star Wars in order to follow the upcoming LAS? I'm not talking hardcore fans here, hardcore fans will watch it whatever it is. It's the casual viewer who would be immediately turned off if they realized the series on TV is basically a stuffed and dragged version of the films they've already seen. Everybody knows the Empire is bad and the Jedi were wiped out, that's all the info you need to springboard the LAS.


After having discussed this, here on the thread, over and over again. I think that some people could need a little explaining before the show takes of. tongue

If you want to dive into the deep grey underbelly of STAR WARS, you'll need to know what the new characters did during the fall of the Old Order... Character building... That's my opinion!

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Gry Sarth  1930 posts
Title: Moderator: LACWAC
Registered: Jun '99
14536_Wedge Antilles
Date Posted: 7/5 7:41am Subject: George Lucas' new live -action TV-series?
nett40 posted:
Again something taken out of a context! The re-edited version of PT would be 12 of the 20 episodes of the 1st version of the LAS, leaves good room to present the heroes and villains of the Dark Times correctly... (8 episodes)

Nothing out of context about it. We all know the show is about the period between Ep3 and Ep4, and yet you're advocating a 1st season that's more than half situated years before that period. It just doesn't fit with what little we know for sure about the show.

nett40 posted:

If you want to dive into the deep grey underbelly of STAR WARS, you'll need to know where the new characters did during the fall of the Old Order... Character building... That's my opinion!

I'm all for character building. I just don't see why you need to retread old ground to do it. Isn't it more compelling to meet these new characters and slowly build their past through snippets of conversation and revealing moments? (I wouldn't even discard an occasional flashback).

 

-----signature-----
If it weren't for bad luck I'd have no luck at all.
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
nett40  115 posts
Registered: Jul '09
14733_Millennium Falcon
Date Posted: 7/5 7:44am Subject: George Lucas' new live -action TV-series? - Date Edited: 7/5 7:53am (3 edits total) Edited By: nett40
Gry Sarth posted:
nett40 posted:
The scrolling text at the beginning of a STAR WARS movie, is one of the most significant parts of the show, so it would be madness not to have the scolling text at the beginning of each TV-episode. Would it not?

No it wouldn't. The scrolling text is iconic and all, but it only really works in sparse doses. Anybody who's ever watched a couple of fan-films in a row know how the urge to just fast-forward the bloody thing increases dramatically after the first time it flows by. The problem with numbering the episodes in the classic Star Wars fashion is how would you fit dozens of episodes between III and IV? Episode 3.257 would look a little silly.


I like a optimist, but 3.257 episodes thats quite a succesfull show, lasting a couple of decades. beatup

Remember my whole idea is that the numbers should be removed from the movies, and used in the series instead. But, the numbers are not that important either. If you don't have numbers, then you can start randomly and add episodes as you go. The TCW doesn't have numbering and it hasn't lessened its quality.

However, I wouldn't have to say goodbye to the opening scroll text.

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Gry Sarth  1930 posts
Title: Moderator: LACWAC
Registered: Jun '99
14536_Wedge Antilles
Date Posted: 7/5 7:52am Subject: George Lucas' new live -action TV-series? - Date Edited: 7/5 8:03am (2 edits total) Edited By: Gry Sarth
nett40 posted:
I like a optimist, but 3.257 episodes thats quite a succesfull show, lasting a couple of decades. That's nonsense...

Episode 3.257 doesn't necessarily comes after Episode 3.256. It's just a fraction between two round numbers, and thus it is dependant on how many divisions you have between the one and the other. If the series lasted only 4 episodes and they were evenly spaced in time, then they would be called Episode 3.2, 3.4, 3.6 and 3.8. Which would be very silly, as I said before.

 

-----signature-----
If it weren't for bad luck I'd have no luck at all.
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
nett40  115 posts
Registered: Jul '09
14733_Millennium Falcon
Date Posted: 7/5 7:55am Subject: George Lucas' new live -action TV-series?
Gry Sarth posted:
nett40 posted:
I like a optimist, but 3.257 episodes thats quite a succesfull show, lasting a couple of decades. That's nonsense...

Episode 3.257 doesn't necessarily comes after Episode 3.256. It's just a fraction between two round numbers, and thus it is dependant on how many divisions you have between the one and the other. If the series lasted only 4 episodes and they were evenly spaced in time, then they would be called Episode 3.2, 3.4, 3.6 and 3.8. Which would be very silly, as I said before.


That's your idea, not mine - I wrote episode XVIII - How would you write episode 3.267 in Roman numerals??? nerd

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Gry Sarth  1930 posts
Title: Moderator: LACWAC
Registered: Jun '99
14536_Wedge Antilles
Date Posted: 7/5 7:59am Subject: George Lucas' new live -action TV-series? - Date Edited: 7/5 8:04am (2 edits total) Edited By: Gry Sarth
nett40 posted:
That's your idea, not mine - I wrote episode XVIII - How would you write episode 3.267 in Roman numerals??? nerd

It was not my idea. It was just the only way I could imagine fitting numbered episodes in order between Ep3 and Ep4, which is what you said you wanted. I didn't know you wanted to commit the sacrilege of removing the numbers from the films themselves.

Wow, you would like the numbers removed from the movies?! A LOT of people call the films just by their numbers, the whole campaign for Episode I was VERY number-centered, and you would have that just wiped out?

 

-----signature-----
If it weren't for bad luck I'd have no luck at all.
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
nett40  115 posts
Registered: Jul '09
14733_Millennium Falcon
Date Posted: 7/5 8:14am Subject: George Lucas' new live -action TV-series? - Date Edited: 7/5 8:46am (5 edits total) Edited By: nett40
Gry Sarth posted:
nett40 posted:
That's your idea, not mine - I wrote episode XVIII - How would you write episode 3.267 in Roman numerals??? nerd

It was not my idea. It was just the only way I could imagine fitting numbered episodes in order between Ep3 and Ep4, which is what you said you wanted. I didn't know you wanted to commit the sacrilege of removing the numbers from the films themselves.

Wow, you would like the numbers removed from the movies?! A LOT of people call the films just by their numbers, the whole campaign for Episode I was VERY number-centered, and you would have that just wiped out?


Didn't you read my opening idea!!!

1) Re-release the Old Trilogy in its original form. But with an option to choose the edited version on the disc, as well. The three movies should have the original covers from '77, '80 and '83. The movies should be without numbering.

2) Re-edit the PT, and turn the movies into parts/episodes of the 1st Season of the LAS. (depending on the length of each episode, but if they last 30 min. they'll become 12 episodes out of approx. 20)

3) Practically turn the LAS into something like the classic Flash Gordon show, that's what GL wanted to begin with.

Concerning people calling the movies by their numbers, I still call "Episode IV - A NEW HOPE": "Star Wars" or simply the "First One", although it's not episode I is it? However, it was the first movie! A bit confusing for the older generation, that grew up with these classic sci-fi movies.

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Gry Sarth  1930 posts
Title: Moderator: LACWAC
Registered: Jun '99
14536_Wedge Antilles
Date Posted: 7/5 8:27am Subject: George Lucas' new live -action TV-series? - Date Edited: 7/5 8:50am (2 edits total) Edited By: Gry Sarth
nett40 posted:
Didn't you read my opening idea!!!

Frankly, I didn't pay it much attention at first. It seemed like a load of nonesense and I didn't think it would lead to so much discussion. It's nice to have it summarized like that, cause usually people don't want to waste their time reading a big post that just doesn't seem worth it.

Of your three points, the only one I think might merit any consideration is the third one. However, it's a very vague statement. I, like most Star Wars fans, never really watched the old Flash Gordon serials, only knowing it from little clips here and there and what's been said about them. So when you say that the new show should be like it, it's hard to be sure what you mean by it. It has been argued that TCW is very much in the same serial spirit, but apparently that's not what you mean. I'm sure you don't mean it should have crappy effects... Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow seems like a direct homage to that kind of thing, but it follows the adventures of a fighter pilot...

 

-----signature-----
If it weren't for bad luck I'd have no luck at all.
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
nett40  115 posts
Registered: Jul '09
14733_Millennium Falcon
Date Posted: 7/5 8:39am Subject: George Lucas' new live -action TV-series?
Gry Sarth posted:
nett40 posted:
Didn't you read my opening idea!!!

Frankly, I didn't pay it much attention at first. It seemed like a load of nonesense and I didn't think it would lead to so much discussion. It's nice to have is summarized like that, cause usually people don't want to waste their time reading a big post that just doesn't seem worth it.

Of your three points, the only one I think might merit any consideration is the third one. However, it's a very vague statement. I, like most Star Wars fans, never really watched the old Flash Gordon serials, only knowing it from little clips here and there and what's been said about them. So when you say that the new show should be like it, it's hard to be sure what you mean by it. It has been argued that TCW is very much in the same serial spirit, but apparently that's not what you mean. I'm sure you don't mean it should have crappy effects... Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow seems like a direct homage to that kind of thing, but it follows the adventures of a fighter pilot...



No, no. Not like Sky Captain or TCW...

I'm talking about the series from the 40'ies or 50'ies, it was in black and white, about a couple of Earthlings adventures on an alien world, on which they were stranded. This world was governed by and EVIL EMPEROR through his immense war machine. Various different species and people inhabitet, this world and Flash Gordon slowly united them into a fully fledged resistance or Alliance, if you will, against this EVIL EMPIRE...

Isn't this what the Dark Times are supposed to be about? dancing

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Gry Sarth  1930 posts
Title: Moderator: LACWAC
Registered: Jun '99
14536_Wedge Antilles
Date Posted: 7/5 8:46am Subject: George Lucas' new live -action TV-series?
Not really. The scroll of Ep4 says that the Alliance has just won its first victory against the Empire. That means we don't get all-out rebellion and large battles until right before Ep4. Everything we've ever known about the Dark Times says it's the time when the Empire ruled supreme, swiftly crushing any glimmer of uprising and wiping away any memory of the Jedi. It's not a time of civil war (like what we could say it's what happens in the old Flash Gordon serial), it's a time of a flourishing dictatorship, it's the squeeze that will eventually lead to open rebellion.

 

-----signature-----
If it weren't for bad luck I'd have no luck at all.
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
nett40  115 posts
Registered: Jul '09
14733_Millennium Falcon
Date Posted: 7/5 8:53am Subject: George Lucas' new live -action TV-series? - Date Edited: 7/5 8:53am (1 edits total) Edited By: nett40
Gry Sarth posted:
Not really. The scroll of Ep4 says that the Alliance has just won its first victory against the Empire. That means we don't get all-out rebellion and large battles until right before Ep4. Everything we've ever known about the Dark Times says it's the time when the Empire ruled supreme, swiftly crushing any glimmer of uprising and wiping away any memory of the Jedi. It's not a time of civil war (like what we could say it's what happens in the old Flash Gordon serial), it's a time of a flourishing dictatorship, it's the squeeze that will eventually lead to open rebellion.


Yes, they have won their first victory. But, they must have tried to defeat Imperial forces before, and failed! And what about the Seperatist holdouts, they must have been crushed somehow. I would like to see these battles, eventhough the imps win all the time. Why had Alderaan given up its arms, it must have revolted against Empire at some time!

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Gry Sarth  1930 posts
Title: Moderator: LACWAC
Registered: Jun '99
14536_Wedge Antilles
Date Posted: 7/5 8:58am Subject: George Lucas' new live -action TV-series? - Date Edited: 7/5 9:04am (2 edits total) Edited By: Gry Sarth
nett40 posted:
Yes, they have won their first victory. But, they must have tried to defeat Imperial forces before, and failed! And what about the Seperatist holdouts, they must have been crushed somehow. I would like to see these battles, eventhough the imps win all the time. Why had Alderaan given up its arms, it must have revolted against Empire at some time!

Yes, we can have these small skirmishes, as I said before. We could have the last weak remnants of the Separatists being wiped out at the beginning of the series, and maybe the first rebel attempts against the Empire at the end of the series. But first, they couldn't be the huge battles you'd like to see, because, as I say, we don't have a proper war going on. And second, these things could only bookend the series, they couldn't be what the series is all about. Any Separatist holdouts would be wiped out shortly after Ep3 and any Rebel attacks would only take place right before Ep4, and yet the show is set right between these two points... I agree with you 100% on Alderaan, though. They really could explore this planet's history here, and there's no set timeline for it. The more we got to know Aldreaan's struggle, the more impact its explosion in Ep4 would have.

 

-----signature-----
If it weren't for bad luck I'd have no luck at all.
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
nett40  115 posts
Registered: Jul '09
14733_Millennium Falcon
Date Posted: 7/5 9:42am Subject: George Lucas' new live -action TV-series? - Date Edited: 7/5 9:57am (2 edits total) Edited By: nett40
Gry Sarth posted:
nett40 posted:
Yes, they have won their first victory. But, they must have tried to defeat Imperial forces before, and failed! And what about the Seperatist holdouts, they must have been crushed somehow. I would like to see these battles, eventhough the imps win all the time. Why had Alderaan given up its arms, it must have revolted against Empire at some time!

Yes, we can have these small skirmishes, as I said before. We could have the last weak remnants of the Separatists being wiped out at the beginning of the series, and maybe the first rebel attempts against the Empire at the end of the series. But first, they couldn't be the huge battles you'd like to see, because, as I say, we don't have a proper war going on. And second, these things could only bookend the series, they couldn't be what the series is all about. Any Separatist holdouts would be wiped out shortly after Ep3 and any Rebel attacks would only take place right before Ep4, and yet the show is set right between these two points... I agree with you 100% on Alderaan, though. They really could explore this planet's history here, and there's no set timeline for it. The more we got to know Aldreaan's struggle, the more impact its explosion in Ep4 would have.


Remember it was called the Clone Wars (plural) meaning more than one. The First Clone War, ended with the destruction of the Jedi Order and the formation of the Galactic Empire. The Second Clone War, could be the one against Alderaan, other disgruntled democratic worlds such as Naboo and the Seperatist holdouts of course. You have to look on this with open eyes, or else the show will be about nothing at all...

Imperial Captain: Scanning sector 20.10, report please...

Imperial Officer: Nothing to report, but a few smugglers our TIE's can take care of those.

Emperor Palpatine: Why do we maintain a quadro-zillion-trillion credits worth of Imperial Navy, if we only encounter small bands of pirates, local security forces and smugglers.

Admiral Ozzel: I don't know?

Emperor Palpatine: Scrap the damn Navy and keep two or three Mandators, they should the job!

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Gry Sarth  1930 posts
Title: Moderator: LACWAC
Registered: Jun '99
14536_Wedge Antilles
Date Posted: 7/5 9:53am Subject: George Lucas' new live -action TV-series? - Date Edited: 7/5 9:54am (1 edits total) Edited By: Gry Sarth
nett40 posted:
Remember it was called the Clone Wars (plural) meaning more than one. The First Clone War, ended with the destruction of the Jedi Order and the formation of the Galactic Empire. The Second Clone War, could be the one against Alderaan, other disgruntled democratic worlds such as Naboo and the Seperatist holdouts of course.

Your fan fiction is very interesting, but it just has no bearing on the Star Wars universe as we know it. The Clone Wars was the collection of battles fought between Separatists and Republic, from the Battle of Geonosis to the dimanstling of the Separatist Army following the death of Grievous and the CIS leaders. There's no 1st and 2nd Clone War, not in the Star Wars the rest of us knows...

nett40 posted:
You have to look on this with open eyes, or else the show will be about nothing at all...

That's exactly what I'm doing. You keep repeating that you want the show to be about either what the prequels were about (2nd CW) or what the classic trilogy was about (rebellion). How about opening our eyes and accepting that this show could be about... wow... something actually NEW! Wouldn't that be exciting! New villains, new heroes (tempered with old ones, sure, but new nonetheless) and a new overall scenario.

 

-----signature-----
If it weren't for bad luck I'd have no luck at all.
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
nett40  115 posts
Registered: Jul '09
14733_Millennium Falcon
Date Posted: 7/5 10:10am Subject: George Lucas' new live -action TV-series? - Date Edited: 7/5 10:53am (2 edits total) Edited By: nett40
Gry Sarth posted:
nett40 posted:
Remember it was called the Clone Wars (plural) meaning more than one. The First Clone War, ended with the destruction of the Jedi Order and the formation of the Galactic Empire. The Second Clone War, could be the one against Alderaan, other disgruntled democratic worlds such as Naboo and the Seperatist holdouts of course.

Your fan fiction is very interesting, but it just has no bearing on the Star Wars universe as we know it. The Clone Wars was the collection of battles fought between Separatists and Republic, from the Battle of Geonosis to the dimanstling of the Separatist Army following the death of Grievous and the CIS leaders. There's no 1st and 2nd Clone War, not in the Star Wars the rest of us knows...


Yoda to Kenobi, at the end of AOTC: "Victory you say... No, no victory... The vail of the Dark Side has fallen, begun the Clone War has..."

The Clone Wars, where the conflicts that established Palpatine's New Order!

The collection of battles fought between Northern and Southern States in North America during the 1860'ies, are not refered to as being the American Civil Wars. They're are just called the AMERICAN CIVIL WAR!!! nerd

Gry Sarth posted:
nett40 posted:
You have to look on this with open eyes, or else the show will be about nothing at all...

That's exactly what I'm doing. You keep repeating that you want the show to be about either what the prequels were about (2nd CW) or what the classic trilogy was about (rebellion). How about opening our eyes and accepting that this show could be about... wow... something actually NEW! Wouldn't that be exciting! New villains, new heroes (tempered with old ones, sure, but new nonetheless) and a new overall scenario.


Is it, really... Cause I want new heroes and villains as well, but if it's supposed to be in the Star WARS universe I would expect some fancy sci-fi battles!

But if the Clone War of the PT is the 2nd War! What would then constitute the 1st Clone War??? confused

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History