Author Topic: George Lucas' new live -action TV-series?
novajoe23  95 posts
Registered: May '06
47885_Zayne Carrick
Date Posted: 7/5 9:18pm Subject: George Lucas' new live -action TV-series?
TaradosGon posted:
My understanding is that 2 BBY is when the Rebellion was formally declared when Bail, Mon Mothma, and some EU character (I forget his name) pooled their resources together and pledged their devotion to the cause.

Rebellious acts existed prior to that, but were disorganized without any governing body providing coordination.

What is seen in the ROTS cut scenes is the beginning of these politicians coming together to challenge Palpatine's power, but it was done so peacefully, nobody was committing to open rebellion at that point. Palpatine at that point in time had a large backing in the senate, and came to power legally.

Yeah, you're right. The deleted scene was just the beginnings of rumblings in the Senate, and the signing of the "Delegation of 2000." The actual forming of the Rebellion took place in the video game The Force Unleashed, and was basically inadvertently started by the main character of that game, Galen Marek. His family crest was used as the symbol that we know the Rebellion by. In the game they sign the "Treaty of Corellia." That was in 2 BBY, and that's when the Rebel Alliance officially starts, with Bail Organa, Mon Mothma, and Garm Bel Iblis being the major players.

I can't believe some of the things that this guy is saying, and actually believing them to be true. I'm surprised someone with such limited knowledge of the EU, or the use of the term "Clone Wars" vs. "Clone War," actually found his way to these Forums and actually frequents them. There's just one Clone Wars. Just because it's plural, doesn't mean that there has to be another one; it's an umbrella term for everything that happened between 22 and 19 BBY. Besides, names can change from what Yoda originally said. World War I was originally called the Great War, but was changed when there was another World War.

Finally, as I said before, many of the events that you are referring to have already been fleshed out in various Expanded Universe media. It would be, to a degree, a waste of time on the show to simply adapt something that was someone else's idea. No one needs to see the movies taking up actual episodes in order to "develop characters." If they want to know about the characters, they can simply tune their televisions to Spike and watch the movies themselves. It's not that difficult, and it wouldn't waste episodes in the actual show proper.

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
brainwash  85 posts
Registered: Jan '09
Date Posted: 7/5 9:42pm Subject: George Lucas' new live -action TV-series?
The start of the rebellion would be a great foundation for the TV series, especially using the Death Star plans heist as some kind of finale that leads into Ep IV.

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
nett40  115 posts
Registered: Jul '09
14733_Millennium Falcon
Date Posted: 7/6 12:18am Subject: George Lucas' new live -action TV-series? - Date Edited: 7/6 12:53am (2 edits total) Edited By: nett40
Gry Sarth posted:
nett40 posted:
I never said it had to be a full blown all out rebellion to begin with, I specifically said the emerging rebel Alliance. That would be small pockets of resistance on various worlds (incl. Alderaan) meeting and conspiring in secret against the Empire. Leading to draconian measures, taken against their homeworlds by the Moffs of the Empire, if discoverd.

You did say that you wanted full blown rebellion. You've been on and on about the fact that this show needs huge battles and clear cut good vs. evil motifs. You can't get that unless you have the full blown rebellion going on. What you mentioned now, wanting an emerging rebel movement, with small pockets of resistance and localized skirmishes is what everybody else has been advocating and you've been arguing against. The Rebel Alliance is only formed a couple of years before Yavin, but that doesn't mean there weren't all sorts of resistance groups popping about (and why not, resistance groups formed by the shadier side of society).

On the Aldreaan thing, bear in mind that we don't really have any knowledge on what that situation is. The planet could have no weapons simply because it decided to take a pacifist stand when faced with the Empire's oppression, it doesn't necessarily means it was brought to its knees in a bloody war against the Empire.


I've said I wanted to see Huge battles between the Seperatist holdouts and the emerging rebels on one side and the Empire on the other... I simply don't buy the rolling over and play dead attitude, expected from the thousands of Seperatist systems.

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
nett40  115 posts
Registered: Jul '09
14733_Millennium Falcon
Date Posted: 7/6 12:51am Subject: George Lucas' new live -action TV-series?
novajoe23 posted:
I can't believe some of the things that this guy is saying, and actually believing them to be true. I'm surprised someone with such limited knowledge of the EU, or the use of the term "Clone Wars" vs. "Clone War," actually found his way to these Forums and actually frequents them. There's just one Clone Wars. Just because it's plural, doesn't mean that there has to be another one; it's an umbrella term for everything that happened between 22 and 19 BBY. Besides, names can change from what Yoda originally said. World War I was originally called the Great War, but was changed when there was another World War.

Finally, as I said before, many of the events that you are referring to have already been fleshed out in various Expanded Universe media. It would be, to a degree, a waste of time on the show to simply adapt something that was someone else's idea. No one needs to see the movies taking up actual episodes in order to "develop characters." If they want to know about the characters, they can simply tune their televisions to Spike and watch the movies themselves. It's not that difficult, and it wouldn't waste episodes in the actual show proper.


Yes, I understand that the Expanded Universe media, has the answer (sometimes more than one) to all questions regarding Star Wars. Because EU was the only developing thing for about 20 years, when the whole franchise was put on hold by GL.

But, nevertheless I felt when I saw STAR WARS back in the 70'ies, that Obi Wan Kenobi meant more than just one single conflict, when he said: "Yes, I fought in the Clone Wars, like your father."

Apparantly what's said or done in the movies and now TCW-series, isn't that important to the Expanded Universe media. They already have their timeline, from the 80'ies and 90'ies. Be it right or wrong, and no matter what GL might say or do to convince people that nothing has been written in stone yet. I've never read a single Star Wars book only some comic-books from the 80'ies. The timeline in those were sketchy at best.

What conflicts happened between 22 and 19 BBY, other than the Clone War(s) between the CIS and the Republic? confused

No offense, but concerning the apparant lack of knowledge, concerning the use of the plural term on this forum speaks for it self!

Was the Gulf Wars one or more conflicts that occured between 1991 and 2003? If your gramar is blured, then your understanding of the world around you also gets blured. Just because a writer back in the 80'ies or 90'ies made a mistake and completely misunderstood the scope of the Clone Wars. Doesn't it mean that that mistake has to be respected and repeated over and over again.

Sorry for the long text... raised_brow

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
nett40  115 posts
Registered: Jul '09
14733_Millennium Falcon
Date Posted: 7/6 12:56am Subject: George Lucas' new live -action TV-series?
brainwash posted:
The start of the rebellion would be a great foundation for the TV series, especially using the Death Star plans heist as some kind of finale that leads into Ep IV.


That would be a great foundation, yes. peace

But most people in here don't want that, apparantly beatup

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Gry Sarth  1919 posts
Title: Moderator: LACWAC
Registered: Jun '99
14536_Wedge Antilles
Date Posted: 7/6 2:56am Subject: George Lucas' new live -action TV-series? - Date Edited: 7/6 3:04am (2 edits total) Edited By: Gry Sarth
What irks me most about your viewpoint, nett40, is that apparently you don't want this new series to tackle new issues. You don't want it to focus on anything that we haven't seen before. Basically what I'm hearing from you is that you want to merge Ep3 to Ep4, not create a new era in between. You want an extension of the Clone Wars (or a 2nd Clone War, whatever) on one end and an advancement of the full-fledged Rebellion on the other end, so that the show can focus on just these two things, without the need to create a new original galactic dynamic in between. Come on, we have some 18 years between Ep3 and Ep4, isn't it conceivable that in the middle of this period you would have neither Separatist holdouts nor organized Rebellion? Couldn't it focus on something NEW? I'm not talking about policemen chasing purse-snatchers, I'm just saying I have faith on GL to come up with something new and compelling that fits the timeframe.

 

-----signature-----
If it weren't for bad luck I'd have no luck at all.
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
nett40  115 posts
Registered: Jul '09
14733_Millennium Falcon
Date Posted: 7/6 3:50am Subject: George Lucas' new live -action TV-series? - Date Edited: 7/6 4:27am (3 edits total) Edited By: nett40
Gry Sarth posted:
What irks me most about your viewpoint, nett40, is that apparently you don't want this new series to tackle new issues. You don't want it to focus on anything that we haven't seen before. Basically what I'm hearing from you is that you want to merge Ep3 to Ep4, not create a new era in between. You want an extension of the Clone Wars (or a 2nd Clone War, whatever) on one end and an advancement of the full-fledged Rebellion on the other end, so that the show can focus on just these two things, without the need to create a new original galactic dynamic in between. Come on, we have some 18 years between Ep3 and Ep4, isn't it conceivable that in the middle of this period you would have neither Separatist holdouts nor organized Rebellion? Couldn't it focus on something NEW? I'm not talking about policemen chasing purse-snatchers, I'm just saying I have faith on GL to come up with something new and compelling that fits the timeframe.


I have great faith in GL and I TOO WANT TO SEE NEW THINGS and tackle new issues. But I would also very much like this series to bind the old with the new.

I find that GL has an golden opportunity to turn Star Wars into a classic Flash Gordon kind of adventure. Full of different characters and visits to brand new worlds every other week.

But as I have said, or at least tried to explain the one does not exclude the other. Did the re-release in 1997 of the Old Trilogy prevent the Prequels from being all new and different from the Old Trilogy.

I've suggested you start with the familiar, add to it and expand the whole Universe and timeframe.

I'm the one advocating a new take on the Prequels, to make the whole franchise more than it was. With new TV-episodes and with new heroes mixed in. So that all can relate to the show, not just those who had had enough of the Clone Wars era and are feed up with Jedi and lightsabers, as some described it.

I like the Star Wars movies, especially the original versions, but TCW opened my eyes for many of the qualities which are found in the Clone Wars era. But, which haven't been answered yet (Alderaan, Kashyyk and Mon Calamari), to me the conflict between good and evil didn't end with ROTS.

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
koonfan  522 posts
Registered: Oct '08
48244_Plo Koon (42209)
Date Posted: 7/6 3:57am Subject: George Lucas' new live -action TV-series?
Gry Sarth posted:
Couldn't it focus on something NEW? I'm not talking about policemen chasing purse-snatchers, I'm just saying I have faith on GL to come up with something new and compelling that fits the timeframe.

Speaking for myself, I feel that it's increasingly harder to come up with something actually 'new' these days, even from the perspective of reimaginings such as Grievous being a moustache-twirler-in-space. And of course, people feel safe in the familiar and pleasant. XD

Still, although I'm not exactly big on the LAS (preferring cartoons to live shows does that to a guy XD), I do agree with your faith in GL and the people responsible for this project. I'm sure they'll do a great job of capturing various themes which can be inferred but were never really seen. As several others have mentioned, you've got the 'living in dark times' angle, and the various forms of 'survival' stories that could be told.

Although Star Wars IS most famous for space-fairy-tales, epic battles, and Jedi, it is also MASSIVE in its scope and allows for almost ANY type of story to be told, as mentioned by various other users. The LAS would be a great vehicle to tackle the less exposed stories, seeing as the movies, several videogames, and The Clone Wars have done the more obvious ones, namely Jedi, Sith, space battles, and starfighters.

 

-----signature-----
Season 2: Preview-free since episode three! =D
This is Star-Wars-Galaxy-of-Adventure, not Star-Wars-Galaxy-of-Angst
“Only a diseased mind thinks Plo Koon is the best character."-George Lucas
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
nett40  115 posts
Registered: Jul '09
14733_Millennium Falcon
Date Posted: 7/6 6:23am Subject: George Lucas' new live -action TV-series? - Date Edited: 7/6 6:25am (2 edits total) Edited By: nett40
I have heard that the length of each TV-episode is going to be one-hour. dancing

This is good news, cause then you would only have to cut the existing movies of the PT into half, and then add them into the series. If you add a few deleted scenes and new takes with the heroes, characters, of the new show/series then you would only need to use 6 or 7 TV-episodes out of approx. 20 in the 1st Season on this era. thinking

The prime focus will be the emerging Rebellion against the Empire, maybe in a Flash Gordon kind of style peace

BAD NEWS... IT SEEMS VADER IS OUT... I'M DEVASTATED shock doh! cry

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Drewton  316 posts
Registered: Jan '09
49174_Darth Malak (91109)
Date Posted: 7/6 6:58am Subject: George Lucas' new live -action TV-series?
nett40 posted:

This is good news, cause then you would only have to cut the existing movies of the PT into half, and then add them into the series. If you add a few deleted scenes and new takes with the heroes, characters, of the new show/series then you would only need to use 6 or 7 TV-episodes out of approx. 20 in the 1st Season on this era. thinking




Your idea's dead, son. Accept it.

 

-----signature-----
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Gry Sarth  1919 posts
Title: Moderator: LACWAC
Registered: Jun '99
14536_Wedge Antilles
Date Posted: 7/6 7:42am Subject: George Lucas' new live -action TV-series? - Date Edited: 7/6 7:58am (2 edits total) Edited By: Gry Sarth
nett40 posted:
I have heard that the length of each TV-episode is going to be one-hour. dancing
This is good news, cause then you would only have to cut the existing movies of the PT into half, and then add them into the series. If you add a few deleted scenes and new takes with the heroes, characters, of the new show/series then you would only need to use 6 or 7 TV-episodes out of approx. 20 in the 1st Season on this era. thinking
The prime focus will be the emerging Rebellion against the Empire, maybe in a Flash Gordon kind of style peace
BAD NEWS... IT SEEMS VADER IS OUT... I'M DEVASTATED shock doh! cry

Why are you suddenly taking four-months old rumors as gospel? Since the beginning of your rant you've been only too quick to disregard everything we've told you that had been said about the series in favour of your own vision, why stop now?

nett40 posted:
I've said I wanted to see Huge battles between the Seperatist holdouts and the emerging rebels on one side and the Empire on the other... I simply don't buy the rolling over and play dead attitude, expected from the thousands of Seperatist systems.

It's not a "rolling over and playing dead attitude", it's just "suffering a crushing defeat". In any war, one side eventually loses and is forced to accept defeat. There are several ways to win a war, one of them is to eliminate your enemies' means of waging it. When the Separatists lost all of their soldiers and war machines in one swoop, that's what happened. Any loyal sentients willing to keep on fighting wouldn't even have a tank or starfighter to use, they were all droids! They had no alternative but to concede defeat. The Seps are not religious fanatics or something like that to keep on fighting till the last man, prefering death to surrender, they just thought they'd get a better deal by breaking away from the Republic. It's not so unthinkable for them to accept being brought into the newly created Empire with very little resistance.

 

-----signature-----
If it weren't for bad luck I'd have no luck at all.
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
nett40  115 posts
Registered: Jul '09
14733_Millennium Falcon
Date Posted: 7/6 8:46am Subject: George Lucas' new live -action TV-series? - Date Edited: 7/6 9:00am (3 edits total) Edited By: nett40
Gry Sarth posted:
nett40 posted:
I have heard that the length of each TV-episode is going to be one-hour. dancing
This is good news, cause then you would only have to cut the existing movies of the PT into half, and then add them into the series. If you add a few deleted scenes and new takes with the heroes, characters, of the new show/series then you would only need to use 6 or 7 TV-episodes out of approx. 20 in the 1st Season on this era. thinking
The prime focus will be the emerging Rebellion against the Empire, maybe in a Flash Gordon kind of style peace
BAD NEWS... IT SEEMS VADER IS OUT... I'M DEVASTATED shock doh! cry


Why are you suddenly taking four-months old rumors as gospel? Since the beginning of your rant you've been only too quick to disregard everything we've told you that had been said about the series in favour of your own vision, why stop now?


My rant! shock Too quick to disregard everything I was told! worried Your own vision! cry

Well, back to earth... If someone had given a better link than Wookiepedia or simple hear say, one might have listened. But when your being talked down to, then I for one have a hard time, accepting such criticism.

However, A kind person told me were I could find actual NEWS about this topic. I went there, and to my surprise most of what I've been saying seems to be in the TV-show.

HOWEVER, DARTH VADER ISN'T IN IT... doh! beatup cry

But who knows what 2nd Season will bring, if ratings are low... thinking

Gry Sarth posted:
nett40 posted:
I've said I wanted to see Huge battles between the Seperatist holdouts and the emerging rebels on one side and the Empire on the other... I simply don't buy the rolling over and play dead attitude, expected from the thousands of Seperatist systems.

It's not a "rolling over and playing dead attitude", it's just "suffering a crushing defeat". In any war, one side eventually loses and is forced to accept defeat. There are several ways to win a war, one of them is to eliminate your enemies' means of waging it. When the Separatists lost all of their soldiers and war machines in one swoop, that's what happened. Any loyal sentients willing to keep on fighting wouldn't even have a tank or starfighter to use, they were all droids! They had no alternative but to concede defeat. The Seps are not religious fanatics or something like that to keep on fighting till the last man, prefering death to surrender, they just thought they'd get a better deal by breaking away from the Republic. It's not so unthinkable for them to accept being brought into the newly created Empire with very little resistance.


Their Army wasn't lost it was turned of. What is turned of can be turned on again. A little like a computer. However, a dead Jedi or soldier cannot be re-activated.

Btw. Armored Assault Tanks could be used by ordinary sentient beings and the CIS had loads of those.

By turning the 3 movies of the Prequel Trilogy into 6 or 7 One-hour TV-episodes, to start the TV-series up with something familiar, so to speak. That way, as I've been advocating you could better bring the new characters of the new series into context, with already known universe. An Imperial Admiral here, a Rebel wannabe there and a whole lot of frustrated Seperatists sitting on an arsenal of deadly toys, on thousands of worlds out there in the Outer Rim. Just imagine what pirate scum might do, if they laid there hands on just a tiny fraction of those weapons. skull

All this would certainly validate good material for a SHOW. peace

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Gry Sarth  1919 posts
Title: Moderator: LACWAC
Registered: Jun '99
14536_Wedge Antilles
Date Posted: 7/6 9:17am Subject: George Lucas' new live -action TV-series? - Date Edited: 7/6 9:36am (4 edits total) Edited By: Gry Sarth
nett40 posted:

My rant! shock Too quick to disregard everything I was told! worried Your own vision! cry

Well, back to earth... If someone had given a better link than Wookiepedia or simple hear say, one might have listened. But when your being talked down to, then I for one have a hard time, accepting such criticism.
However, A kind person told me were I could find actual NEWS about this topic. I went there, and to my surprise most of what I've been saying seems to be in the TV-show.
HOWEVER, DARTH VADER ISN'T IN IT... doh! beatup cry
But who knows what 2nd Season will bring, if ratings are low... thinking


If you actually think that MTV movie blog is a more reliable source than wookieepedia, which is under constant scrutiny of caring Star Wars fans, then you really shouldn't complain if you get talked down to. But anyway, maybe now you understand that when people were shooting down your ideas, they were doing it based on a fair amount of fairly reliable information that has been released for the past several months. They were just talking about things that were common knowledge to any Star Wars fan who's been paying attention, it's not their responsibility to supply you with all the news links to prove what they're talking about. The most you can expect is a link to wookieepedia, where everything we know about the show has been neatly condensed for people who don't want to go through the trouble of following the news.

And on that note, could you point me to the news site where it says the show will feature a re-edited prequel trilogy, huge galactic battles, Separatist holdouts anachronistically joining the Rebel Alliance to fight the Empire and the whole thing will be like the old Flash Gordon serial?

nett40 posted:
Their Army wasn't lost it was turned of. What is turned of can be turned on again. A little like a computer. However, a dead Jedi or soldier cannot be re-activated.

Do you really think the Emperor is so stupid that he didn't confiscate the deactivated droids before anyone could find a way to hack into them? It's preposterous to imagine he would allow all the frustrated Separatists to remain "sitting on an arsenal of deadly toys". A pirate coming across a container of droids and using them to wreak some havoc is quite possible, but that's nothing like the "2nd Clone Wars" that you're suggesting

nett40 posted:
Btw. Armored Assault Tanks could be used by ordinary sentient beings and the CIS had loads of those.

Yes, they would still be able to use AATs, geonosian fighters and Mankvim-814 fighters. But they wouldn't be able to use Hailfire droids, Tank droids, Droid Gunships, Homing Spider droids, Tri-Droids, Dwarf Spider droids, Octuptarra Droids, Droid Bombers, Vulture droids, Hyena Bombers, Tri-Fighters, etc, etc... I still say it would be suicidal for them to stage a resistance at this point. And the Separatists are NOT suicidal, they are bureaucrats and merchants.

 

-----signature-----
If it weren't for bad luck I'd have no luck at all.
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
novajoe23  95 posts
Registered: May '06
47885_Zayne Carrick
Date Posted: 7/6 12:54pm Subject: George Lucas' new live -action TV-series?
Sorry, but I can't deal with the nonsense being thrown around by nett40 in this thread any longer. Gry Sarth, I leave it up to you to hold out against his wacky, unsubstantiated ideas.

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Gry Sarth  1919 posts
Title: Moderator: LACWAC
Registered: Jun '99
14536_Wedge Antilles
Date Posted: 7/6 1:01pm Subject: George Lucas' new live -action TV-series? - Date Edited: 7/6 2:06pm (2 edits total) Edited By: Gry Sarth
Oh, I've just about had enough myself. It was interesting at the beginning but now it's starting to feel more like I'm, I don't know...
nett40 posted:
...I'm trying to explain physics to sheep... cry

 

-----signature-----
If it weren't for bad luck I'd have no luck at all.
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History