Author Topic: George Lucas wusses out, cuts Jar Jar's lines
Go-Mer-Tonic 
Registered: Aug '99
8199_Han Solo
Date Posted: 1/19/06 11:41am Subject: RE: George Lucas wusses out, cuts Jar Jar's lines
Exactly. If you go by What Lucas has uniformly said time and time again, Jar-Jar's role was reduced because the story centers in on the key players, and all side characters go to the wayside.

He also says he was never interested in pleasing the people who didn't like Jar-Jar.

It's also interesting to note that when TPM came out on DVD, it had more Jar-Jar added to it than the theatrical version. Hardly the actions of a person who is taking the Jar-Jar backlash to heart.

 

-----signature-----
"...that’s not my job, to make people like my movies. They either like them or they don’t. That’s completely out of my hands.” -Lucas
"At least I will have finished what I set out to do, and at least they will have been good to me." -Lucas
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
CJedi72 
Registered: Sep '05
8208_ANH Poster
Date Posted: 1/19/06 5:47pm Subject: RE: George Lucas wusses out, cuts Jar Jar's lines
Go-Mer-Tonic posted:
CJedi72, I do agree that Lucas didn't realize that the classic trilogy had really been more about Vader than Luke while he was making it. As mentioned in the preceeding part of the article, it was Joseph Campbell who pointed it out to him.

He had his outline for what would happen in the prequels regarding Vader and Anakin. At one point he wasn't sure they were going to be the same guy, but the story of the fallen Jedi was always there.

Lucas says that when he set out to create a modern myth consciously, he found things very difficult, but when he just wrote his story without concsiously trying to place mythological aspects he found that a lot of them just grew spontaneously out of what he was doing.

He felt the story started to almost write itself after a while, so it's no suprise that he would not realize where fate had taken things until after he had finished the classic trilogy.

I still don't see this as a lie or contradiction. Because even if he had only noticed that after ROTJ, it was something that had always been there in the classic trilogy. So the story -has- always really been about Anakin, it just didn't hit Lucas until the half way point.




This is where I disagree, cause Lucas could have easily made the PT story about the fall of the republic as the main story, and the characters are all a part of it. Instead he made the PT Anakins story with the fall of the republic tying into that.

If he chose to do the PT as the the first idea, he could have basically done the same story as TPM, AOTC, and ROTS, but it would focus less on Anakin as the main player, just a player. He wouldn't have been locked into a ten year old Anakin in TPM, or have to take out key scenes in ROTS that didn't deal with Anakin (Rebellion, Force Ghost Issue, etc.)

By making the trilogy about Anakin, he had to focus on him in every story, but could have just as easily made three movies as the republic falls, the sith take over, and the process, Anakin is a great jedi and turns because he was seduced by Palpatine, to save his wife Padme, and finally fight his longtime friend ObiWan. Nothing changes, just the focus of the movies from Anakin to the galaxy.

It could have still had a true 6 movie arc, It would have just been a 6 movie macro story of the SW universe, rather than a 6 movie micro story of Anakin Skywalker.

I think after the OT, Lucas could have gone two ways, and it probably hit him sometime after ROTJ, I could make this into a story of Anakin Skywalker as his rise, fall, and redemption, just as he could have substituted the Anakin for the Republic vs Empire, and to me, it would have the same players, but be more like the original SW, where it would be more of a macro story.

You guys pick, what would you have rather seen, Macro or Micro?

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Get_in_Gear 
Registered: Nov '04
7389_WED Treadwell Droid
Date Posted: 1/19/06 6:08pm Subject: RE: George Lucas wusses out, cuts Jar Jar's lines
Jar Jar, as Lucas said at the time, was created partly because he was pushing the boundaries with CGI.
He really wanted to see if he was capable of creating a totally CGI character and having him interact on the same level as the human actors for TPM.

Now, the problem is, some people leave it at that and presume that Jar Jar was just put in there for this reason alone - to serve the technology.
That is obviously not the case.
It could have been anyone who was CGI - in fact, plenty of other characters were totally CGI, but much of the pre-publicity focused on Jar Jar because he had the most screentime.

People seem to neglect the fact that Jar Jar was, regardless of how he was realised, still an integral part of the narrative.
This whole issue of symbiosis is a theme that is returned to throughout the saga - especially in ROTS where we have Padmé dying as Anakin "dies"... as the Republic dies.
And so on.
He is supposed to be goofy and annoying - that is part of the point.

The village idiot can be a powerful ally.
The other Jedi cannot see it - "Master, why do you keep dragging these pathetic life forms along with us?"
Qui-Gon Jinn is different.
He sees things differently to the other Jedi. When he helps Jar Jar, we have to see how Jar Jar is a character we ourselves would struggle to bring ourselves to help, because he is clumsy, misguided, foolish and goofy.
But still QGJ helps him, and the Naboo end up with an army to fight the Trade Federation because of it. Obi and QGJ end up with a bongo ride to Theed becuase they initially help him.

We already saw this happening with the Ewoks in ROTJ - befriend the little teddy bears and you can overthrow the Empire, it's a theme Lucas keeps returning too. Originally it was the Wookiees.
It needed to be restressed in TPM, because symbiosis was being expanded on - it's importance to the nature of the Force is key to the PT.

Once that had been done, Jar Jar could take a backseat.
Light relief was not needed for AOTC - it was supposed to be a darker film.
ROTS even more so.

It is only natural that Jar Jar's role withers - he simply has nothing to do, narratively. He served his purpose in TPM.
His one vaguely noteable scene in ROTS was dropped because it simply wasn't needed.

 

-----signature-----
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Get_in_Gear 
Registered: Nov '04
7389_WED Treadwell Droid
Date Posted: 1/19/06 6:27pm Subject: RE: George Lucas wusses out, cuts Jar Jar's lines
CJedi72 posted:

This is where I disagree, cause Lucas could have easily made the PT story about the fall of the republic as the main story, and the characters are all a part of it.


I don't think that was ever going to happen.
It was always going to be about Vader.
He's said that since the late 70s - that's all he's ever revealled about the prequels: that we learn where Vader come from, what happened between Vader and Kenobi.
All the Vanity Fair quote says is that Lucas didn't realise exactly how biographical the OT was once he saw it with hindsight.

"You know, Star Wars was a success, but I didn't have any idea then what was going on. I didn't know whether I was even going to be able to make the next two films. I had taken two thirds of the original script and thrown it away. In my mind, I was saying 'Gee, if this is a really big hit, then I can make a movie out of all the early material that I developed.' Empire and Jedi were what the first film was supposed to be[...] All the prequel stories exist: Where Darth Vader came from, the whole story about Darth and Ben Kenobi, and it all takes place before Luke was born. - Lucas, Rolling Stone, 1983

CJedi72 posted:
Instead he made the PT Anakins story with the fall of the republic tying into that.


I'm pretty sure Anakin was always going to be the focus. He has no reason to make a film about the Republic. As you point out - he realised in 1988 exactly what was at the core of his films, why would he ever have rejected that in favour of a film about the Republic?

CJedi72 posted:
If he chose to do the PT as the the first idea, he could have basically done the same story as TPM, AOTC, and ROTS, but it would focus less on Anakin as the main player, just a player. He wouldn't have been locked into a ten year old Anakin in TPM, or have to take out key scenes in ROTS that didn't deal with Anakin (Rebellion, Force Ghost Issue, etc.)


CJedi72 posted:
I think after the OT, Lucas could have gone two ways, and it probably hit him sometime after ROTJ, I could make this into a story of Anakin Skywalker as his rise, fall, and redemption


Like I said, Lucas has always talked about the PT in terms of Vader's history.
It just didn't hit him how every nuance of the OT fed into Vader's story until he had exorcised himself of them.

CJedi72 posted:
You guys pick, what would you have rather seen, Macro or Micro?


I'd rather watch a film about humans, than a film about the backdrop to humans.
The Republic is just the frame - the story is about relationships, choices and redemption.
Always has been.
I'd rather see the picture than the frame.

 

-----signature-----
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Go-Mer-Tonic 
Registered: Aug '99
8199_Han Solo
Date Posted: 1/19/06 6:43pm Subject: RE: George Lucas wusses out, cuts Jar Jar's lines
Of course Lucas could have done it differently. I just think the kind of story he is trying to tell has to be told through the story of a few main characters. The hero's journey is integral to a traditional myth. He couldn't have just made this a historical recount from a galactic perspective, that would have been c-span.

I can see not liking it, but you can't expect Lucas to just take a 180° turn in his approach half way through.

Half of the point of the prequels is setting up Luke for his journey. While the whole 6 film saga is mostly Anakin's story, for the classic trilogy It is shown largely from Luke's perspective. Before, everyone knew Luke was the Hero, and therefore, we knew he would prevail. After seeing all the ways Anakin messed up, now it's not such a given. It adds more tension and drama to everything.

 

-----signature-----
"...that’s not my job, to make people like my movies. They either like them or they don’t. That’s completely out of my hands.” -Lucas
"At least I will have finished what I set out to do, and at least they will have been good to me." -Lucas
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
CJedi72 
Registered: Sep '05
8208_ANH Poster
Date Posted: 1/19/06 7:30pm Subject: RE: George Lucas wusses out, cuts Jar Jar's lines
Get_in_Gear posted:
CJedi72 posted:


[quote=CJedi72]You guys pick, what would you have rather seen, Macro or Micro?


I'd rather watch a film about humans, than a film [i]about
the backdrop to humans.
The Republic is just the frame - the story is about relationships, choices and redemption.
Always has been.
I'd rather see the picture than the frame.
[/i]

Like I said, you guys pick, I personaly would have liked to see it the other way, more in the tradition of the original SW. There is nothing wrong with us disagreeing on this issue.

For me, I don't find the story of Anakin Skywalker that interesting, and that is why I love the more macro parts of the Prequels more than the Anakin parts. SFor example: My favorite parts of TPM are when QuiGon and the party arrive on Coruscant, and you see Palpatine really get into action, thus I don't find the young Anakin parts on Tattoine to be as compelling as later in the movie. In AOTC, I love where Kenobi goes to Kamino, and learns of the Clones, and in a sense the downfall of the republic is sitting right in front of his face, thus I find the Anakin/Padme relationship not very compelling, not cause everyone thinks the dialogue is bad, but again when the prequels focus on solely Anakin, it just isn't as interesting to me.

Now, that doesn't say I don't like the personal story of the prequels, I just don't like that they focus solely on Anakin. In the original SW, the focus of the story was republic vs. empire, but it was the characters Luke, Leia, and Han that made it great, just as the PT needed to focus on Anakin, Padme, and Kenobi.

But one of the reasons I find ROTJ my least favorite of the three OT movies is it was the first one that really tackled the redemption or the focus on Darth Vader. Not until Cloud City and Vaders reveal to Luke does the saga go in a totally different direction than after ANH.

Now as I said, millions of fans love the story of Anakin Skywalker, but in saying that millions of fans who loved ANH & ESB, don't love ROTJ and the PT, because those four movies focus totally on Anakin.

So, whether people bash the PT for reasons all the time, my whole beef is the focus of the story in the end, the story of Anakin Skywalker as a main plot point of the saga, just isn't as interesting as other ways Lucas could have went with the story. Hence, why my two favorites are ANH & ESB, that ain't PT bashing, cause ROTJ is in there too.

Its just a simple disagreement guys, you guys love the internal story of Anakin Skywalker with the backdrop of the SW galaxy, and I like the SW galaxy, with the main players doing their part to restore peace. Just a simple disagreement.

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Go-Mer-Tonic 
Registered: Aug '99
8199_Han Solo
Date Posted: 1/19/06 9:26pm Subject: RE: George Lucas wusses out, cuts Jar Jar's lines
The tradition has always been to focus on the human drama, with the macro as the backdrop.

 

-----signature-----
"...that’s not my job, to make people like my movies. They either like them or they don’t. That’s completely out of my hands.” -Lucas
"At least I will have finished what I set out to do, and at least they will have been good to me." -Lucas
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
darthvaderv 
Registered: May '05
15585_Darth Vader
Date Posted: 1/20/06 8:05am Subject: RE: George Lucas wusses out, cuts Jar Jar's lines
Lucas obviously wimped out when it came to Jar Jar and ultimately listened to the majority of fans. I don't dislike the character but he is annoying.

 

-----signature-----
You are beaten, it is useless to resist!
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Go-Mer-Tonic 
Registered: Aug '99
8199_Han Solo
Date Posted: 1/20/06 8:40am Subject: RE: George Lucas wusses out, cuts Jar Jar's lines
Actually, it's pretty obvious he didn't care about the Jar-Jar backlash and instead had less Jar-Jar becuase that was his original plan.

 

-----signature-----
"...that’s not my job, to make people like my movies. They either like them or they don’t. That’s completely out of my hands.” -Lucas
"At least I will have finished what I set out to do, and at least they will have been good to me." -Lucas
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
darth-sinister 
Title: Manager Emeritus
Registered: Jun '01
24181_Palpatine Hologram
Date Posted: 1/20/06 11:33am Subject: RE: George Lucas wusses out, cuts Jar Jar's lines
People complained about Greedo shooting first, yet it's still there. People complained about Han stepping on Jabba's tail, yet it's still there. People complained about Jedi Rocks, but it's still there.

 

-----signature-----
Stewie: "Oh, this is an even bigger jackpot than when the Emperor
came up with the formula for great Star Wars dialouge."
Palpatine: "Something, something, something. Dark side.
Something, something, something complete."
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
CJedi72 
Registered: Sep '05
8208_ANH Poster
Date Posted: 1/20/06 11:43am Subject: RE: George Lucas wusses out, cuts Jar Jar's lines
darth-sinister posted:
People complained about Greedo shooting first, yet it's still there. People complained about Han stepping on Jabba's tail, yet it's still there. People complained about Jedi Rocks, but it's still there.


And when were they ever released in the movies after 1997? It is a big difference of putting the movies on screen, and getting people to the theater, and selling only one version of the OT DVD in 2004, where fans have been drooling for 7 years to have it, and would probably take anything at that time.

These were new movies, AOTC & ROTS, Lucas had to sell them to the public, the OT SE, though I hate the changes, I still bought it cause it was the only version out there, Lucas had me.

The prequels had to give me a reason to go, I had to want to see them. If Jar Jar had the same role in AOTC that he did TPM, I would have never seen it, cause for me personaly, he ruins every scene he is in TPM. For the OT SE DVD, I would have bought anything in 2004, cause I had to have them.

But see if Lucas ever would put out another edition of the OT DVD with more changes, I bet everyone who hates the SE now wouldn't buy them, cause they are waiting for the O-OT, and have already bought the 2004 DVD. You don't understand, for the all the people that hate the changes of the OT, and don't like the PT, the only way Lucas can get their money is release the O-OT. And that is a good part of the SW fanbase.

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
darth-sinister 
Title: Manager Emeritus
Registered: Jun '01
24181_Palpatine Hologram
Date Posted: 1/20/06 11:52am Subject: RE: George Lucas wusses out, cuts Jar Jar's lines
CJedi72 posted:
And when were they ever released in the movies after 1997? It is a big difference of putting the movies on screen, and getting people to the theater, and selling only one version of the OT DVD in 2004, where fans have been drooling for 7 years to have it, and would probably take anything at that time.

These were new movies, AOTC & ROTS, Lucas had to sell them to the public, the OT SE, though I hate the changes, I still bought it cause it was the only version out there, Lucas had me.

The prequels had to give me a reason to go, I had to want to see them. If Jar Jar had the same role in AOTC that he did TPM, I would have never seen it, cause for me personaly, he ruins every scene he is in TPM. For the OT SE DVD, I would have bought anything in 2004, cause I had to have them.

But see if Lucas ever would put out another edition of the OT DVD with more changes, I bet everyone who hates the SE now wouldn't buy them, cause they are waiting for the O-OT, and have already bought the 2004 DVD. You don't understand, for the all the people that hate the changes of the OT, and don't like the PT, the only way Lucas can get their money is release the O-OT. And that is a good part of the SW fanbase.



People will buy anything with Star Wars on it. They bought the 1994 editions, the 1997 versions, the 2000 editions (which only a new thing at the start) and both DVD sets. Let's not forget the laser discs. People will again buy the films if he puts out new changes. If Lucas were able to put out the 3-D versions, they'll watch them or buy them.

As to people going to see AOTC and ROTS, they were already going to go because it's Star Wars. Jar Jar had no impact. Spider-Man took in more money because people were waiting just as long to see him, as they were TPM. Add in the 9/11 elements, that the story takes place in NYC and features a heroic hero and you've got a good recipe for a hit. This summer had Batman Begins and Fantastic Four as major competition. All three did well, with ROTS taking the most money of the three films. War Of The Worlds did well, but didn't have as big repeat performence value as the others.

 

-----signature-----
Stewie: "Oh, this is an even bigger jackpot than when the Emperor
came up with the formula for great Star Wars dialouge."
Palpatine: "Something, something, something. Dark side.
Something, something, something complete."
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
CJedi72 
Registered: Sep '05
8208_ANH Poster
Date Posted: 1/20/06 12:07pm Subject: RE: George Lucas wusses out, cuts Jar Jar's lines
darth-sinister posted:



People will buy anything with Star Wars on it. They bought the 1994 editions, the 1997 versions, the 2000 editions (which only a new thing at the start) and both DVD sets. Let's not forget the laser discs. People will again buy the films if he puts out new changes. If Lucas were able to put out the 3-D versions, they'll watch them or buy them.

As to people going to see AOTC and ROTS, they were already going to go because it's Star Wars. Jar Jar had no impact. Spider-Man took in more money because people were waiting just as long to see him, as they were TPM. Add in the 9/11 elements, that the story takes place in NYC and features a heroic hero and you've got a good recipe for a hit. This summer had Batman Begins and Fantastic Four as major competition. All three did well, with ROTS taking the most money of the three films. War Of The Worlds did well, but didn't have as big repeat performence value as the others.


Don't get me wrong, there is a segment that will buy anything SW, you don't have an argument here. But there is an older fanbase that grew up with the OT, such as myself, who bought the OT DVD's in 2004, cause as I said we were craving them for years. Out of this part of the SW demographic, many don't like the PT, so will not be buying the supposed 6 disc saga set next year, and don't care for anymore SE OT changes. But there is one last DVD Lucas can take our money, the O-OT DVD. I know, because I am one of those fans, and I know alot fans that are my age that feel the same.

Remember the SE came out in 1997, and that is the year DVD took off, so Lucas was going to get our money on any DVD edition he put out first. But after that, its the originals or nothing. Again, I am not talking about every SW fan, but there is a huge older fanbase that will pay for one more release.

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
darth-sinister 
Title: Manager Emeritus
Registered: Jun '01
24181_Palpatine Hologram
Date Posted: 1/20/06 12:19pm Subject: RE: George Lucas wusses out, cuts Jar Jar's lines
Well, as has been said before, Lucas isn't interested in putting out the O-OT. It's been proven that he won't. He wouldn't let the original version of ANH be shown as a cinema presention of films that changed cinema throughout the years. Only the SE. He barred Sci-Fi, USA Network, FOX and other stations from showing those versions again. Only the SE's. Anytime the OT footage was shown in some type of deal, it was the SE's. I didn't get to see if he had the 2004 DVD's for when certain FOX stations were showing the OT, last spring. In late 2004, he said that he had the rights secured and no one will be able to undo what he has done. Or do a sequel. Or a remake.

Hell will have a hockey franchise before the THX Editions see the light of day. Regardless of the money he could get off of it, he has no desire to release it. The closest anyone will get is what's in the "Empire Of Dreams" documentry, "From Star Wars To Jedi" and the bootleg copies. Along with their old VHS and Laser Disc copies.

 

-----signature-----
Stewie: "Oh, this is an even bigger jackpot than when the Emperor
came up with the formula for great Star Wars dialouge."
Palpatine: "Something, something, something. Dark side.
Something, something, something complete."
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
CJedi72 
Registered: Sep '05
8208_ANH Poster
Date Posted: 1/20/06 12:25pm Subject: RE: George Lucas wusses out, cuts Jar Jar's lines
darth-sinister posted:
Well, as has been said before, Lucas isn't interested in putting out the O-OT. It's been proven that he won't. He wouldn't let the original version of ANH be shown as a cinema presention of films that changed cinema throughout the years. Only the SE. He barred Sci-Fi, USA Network, FOX and other stations from showing those versions again. Only the SE's. Anytime the OT footage was shown in some type of deal, it was the SE's. I didn't get to see if he had the 2004 DVD's for when certain FOX stations were showing the OT, last spring. In late 2004, he said that he had the rights secured and no one will be able to undo what he has done. Or do a sequel. Or a remake.

Hell will have a hockey franchise before the THX Editions see the light of day. Regardless of the money he could get off of it, he has no desire to release it. The closest anyone will get is what's in the "Empire Of Dreams" documentry, "From Star Wars To Jedi" and the bootleg copies. Along with their old VHS and Laser Disc copies.


As I have always said, you may be right and you may be wrong, but the debate was about whether people will buy anything SW related, and I have said that there is substantial fanbase that just want the O-OT on DVD, heck there is a web page where 80,000 people have signed it in support of it. Who knows if he will put it out, but as long as he doesn't, he won't be getting anymore money from me.

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History