Author Topic: Was Sidious REALLY Darth Plagueis' apprentice?
Green_Destiny_Sword  4358 posts
Registered: Jun '01
Date Posted: 7/10/05 12:25pm Subject: RE: Was Sidious REALLY Darth Plagueis' apprentice?

R8Hitman posted:
How can he be the apprentice of a "legend" that the jedi would have known about and NOT be somewhere around Yoda's age?



This is the critical issue. I have been saying this since May. It's just not well-explained. Sidious must be over 1,000 years old if he is indeed the apprentice of Plagueis.

 

-----signature-----
"Like most things, I am nothing. It is the same for this sword, it's all simply a state of mind..." -- Li Mu Bai
"I don't think anyone anticipated the breach of the levees" -- President Bush blatantly lying to America.
www.downingstreetmemo.com -- The T
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
DUGGY  3646 posts
Registered: Apr '05
5995_Sebulba
Date Posted: 7/10/05 12:31pm Subject: RE: Was Sidious REALLY Darth Plagueis' apprentice?
Palpatine is no older than he appears to look. Palpatine say's to Anakin "It's not a story the Jedi would tell you" , that's because it is B.S . sure Plagieus was Palps master, and Palps did murder him. but he tells Anakin it is a legend , so Anakin will think it is a GREAT secret the Jedi have been keeping from him. and it helps him re establish to Anakin that the Jedi don't trust him. I doubt very much that Sidous/Palpatine is 1000 years old.

 

-----signature-----
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
-maynard-  968 posts
Registered: Jun '05
17261_Obi-Wan
Date Posted: 7/10/05 12:38pm Subject: RE: Was Sidious REALLY Darth Plagueis' apprentice?
r8hitman posted:
-maynard- posted:
just because the word legend is used, doesnt mean it happened hundreds of years ago.

Michael Jordan is a legend and he's only been retired for 7 years


Well like I said before, in order for the jedi to even know of the "legend of Plagueis" that would mean Plagueis was around "at least" a millenia before TPM.

Ki-Adi: "the sith have been extinct for a millenia"

So yes, in this case IT DOES mean that it happened hundreds of years ago.


I really dont get why this is an issue. the sith obviously werent extinct, so that quote is a false statement. There were sith there the whole time. Any age is possible, but its not because the word legend is used and because the Jedi think the Sith are dead.

Again, legend doesnt have to mean hundreds of years and the quote is wrong

 

-----signature-----
"Sand rough. You soft." Anakin portraying the 'cave man' archetype
(this is only funny if you think the archetype excuse for bad acting is lame)
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Green_Destiny_Sword  4358 posts
Registered: Jun '01
Date Posted: 7/10/05 12:40pm Subject: RE: Was Sidious REALLY Darth Plagueis' apprentice?
So Palpatine knows Anakin is worried sick about his wife dying and tells him about this "legend" and doesn't thik Anakin is going to look into it??? Remember, Palps doesn't tell Anakin that he is a Sith at that point. So Anakin's only recourse is to try and learn about this. It just seems like a very strange move to tell Anakin about a "legendary" Sith when he could easily ask Yoda about it. or any other Jedi, etc..

 

-----signature-----
"Like most things, I am nothing. It is the same for this sword, it's all simply a state of mind..." -- Li Mu Bai
"I don't think anyone anticipated the breach of the levees" -- President Bush blatantly lying to America.
www.downingstreetmemo.com -- The T
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
That_Wascally_Droid  10276 posts
Registered: Jul '01
Date Posted: 7/10/05 12:41pm Subject: RE: Was Sidious REALLY Darth Plagueis' apprentice?

r8hitman posted:
Darth Plagueis was supposed to be a "Sith Legend" that the jedi could have possibly known about


Where does it say that the Jedi knew anything about Plagueis?
'Did you ever hear the legend of Darth Plagueis the wise?'
'It's not a story the Jedi would tell you about.' Good. Plant more seeds of doubt and lies in Anakin's head. He already thinks they're lying and keeping things from him. But Palpatine never says, 'Go ask Yoda. They were drinking buddies.'
Palpatine himself calls it a Sith legend. He didn't out and out say he was a Sith at the time, so, he's not going to say 'Did I ever tell you the story of my Sith Master? Oops...'
What I don't understand is how people regularly assume everyone in the movie is lying to them. Unless they're lying, where it's undeniable proof cause it's said in the movie. Look at the Syfo Dyas debacle for example.
Then when these things are brought up, people who are obviously determined to hate this thing latch onto it and proclaim it a plothole (they get a dime from Kurtz for everytime they use that phrase you see).
But, if you're determined to see something some way, knock yourself out. I know what I think of the movie and have vague ideas through quotes, books, and interviews about what Lucas thinks of it, and that's more than good enough for me.

 

-----signature-----
As has been said: Don't **** with Kenobi wink
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Darth_Klakabush  547 posts
Registered: Jul '05
Date Posted: 7/10/05 2:12pm Subject: RE: Was Sidious REALLY Darth Plagueis' apprentice?
Plagueis could be thousands of years old, but that doesn't mean that Sidious is. Maybe, Plagueis kept himself alive with his powers for a long time, and trained many sith, killing them off until he found the strongest sith - Sidious. When he found the most powerful sith he could, he passed on all his knowledge, but then Sidious owned him while Plagueis was sleeping.

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
r8hitman  4085 posts
Registered: Mar '04
13617_Darth Maul
Date Posted: 7/10/05 2:30pm Subject: RE: Was Sidious REALLY Darth Plagueis' apprentice?
-maynard- posted:
r8hitman posted:
-maynard- posted:
just because the word legend is used, doesnt mean it happened hundreds of years ago.

Michael Jordan is a legend and he's only been retired for 7 years


Well like I said before, in order for the jedi to even know of the "legend of Plagueis" that would mean Plagueis was around "at least" a millenia before TPM.

Ki-Adi: "the sith have been extinct for a millenia"

So yes, in this case IT DOES mean that it happened hundreds of years ago.


I really dont get why this is an issue. the sith obviously werent extinct, so that quote is a false statement. There were sith there the whole time. Any age is possible, but its not because the word legend is used and because the Jedi think the Sith are dead.

Again, legend doesnt have to mean hundreds of years and the quote is wrong



doh!

you're not understanding what I'm saying.

Listen....the jedi believe the sith to be extinct right?

Ok, well if the sith are supposed to be extinct then in order for the jedi to even KNOW about Plageuis, Plagueis would have had to have been around BEFORE the "supposed" extinction of the sith.

Sidious asked Anakin had he ever heard the legend of Darth Plagueis the wise, and he also said that it is probably a story that the jedi wouldnt have told him, keep in mind that he's not saying that they dont know, but that they wouldnt have TOLD him about the legend.

So if I was a betting man, I'd bet it all on the fact that the jedi probably know of Plagueis.

Why would Sidious risk telling Anakin something that could have been proven to be false if Anakin simply "asked Yoda or another master about the legend"?

That definately wouldnt help Sidious' credibility if he was caught in an outright lie right off the top.

See what you're not understanding is that I'm not basing Plagueis' age on the word "legend"....I'm basing it off of the fact that the jedi didnt know about the sith still being active, but are supposedly supposed to know about "Plagueis the Wise".
raised_brow

This would require him to be "at least" a thousand years old.


Think about it.

 

-----signature-----
-you want answers? plain
-I think I'm entitled. plain
-You want answers? mischief
-I want the truth!! frustrated -YOU CANT HANDLE THE TRUTH!! angry
http://boards.outerrimsieges.com/
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
r8hitman  4085 posts
Registered: Mar '04
13617_Darth Maul
Date Posted: 7/10/05 2:36pm Subject: RE: Was Sidious REALLY Darth Plagueis' apprentice?
That_Wascally_Droid posted:

r8hitman posted:
Darth Plagueis was supposed to be a "Sith Legend" that the jedi could have possibly known about


Where does it say that the Jedi knew anything about Plagueis?
'Did you ever hear the legend of Darth Plagueis the wise?'
'It's not a story the Jedi would tell you about.' Good. Plant more seeds of doubt and lies in Anakin's head. He already thinks they're lying and keeping things from him. But Palpatine never says, 'Go ask Yoda. They were drinking buddies.'
Palpatine himself calls it a Sith legend. He didn't out and out say he was a Sith at the time, so, he's not going to say 'Did I ever tell you the story of my Sith Master? Oops...'
What I don't understand is how people regularly assume everyone in the movie is lying to them. Unless they're lying, where it's undeniable proof cause it's said in the movie. Look at the Syfo Dyas debacle for example.
Then when these things are brought up, people who are obviously determined to hate this thing latch onto it and proclaim it a plothole (they get a dime from Kurtz for everytime they use that phrase you see).
But, if you're determined to see something some way, knock yourself out. I know what I think of the movie and have vague ideas through quotes, books, and interviews about what Lucas thinks of it, and that's more than good enough for me.



Just because the it's a sith legend doesnt mean that only the sith knew about it....if that was the case then Palpatine would be exposing himself at that moment when he told him the story.

And I dont think Sidious would risk being caught in a lie when he's already so close in seducing Anakin to the darkside.

There must be "some" truth to this story....and if it's some truth to the story then he WOULD HAVE TO HAVE LIVED BEFORE THE SUPPOSED EXTERMINATION OF THE SITH









EDIT:
Darth_Klakabush posted:
Plagueis could be thousands of years old, but that doesn't mean that Sidious is. Maybe, Plagueis kept himself alive with his powers for a long time, and trained many sith, killing them off until he found the strongest sith - Sidious. When he found the most powerful sith he could, he passed on all his knowledge, but then Sidious owned him while Plagueis was sleeping.


^^This is a possibility.

But then if that's the case then it contradicts the history of the sith lords following in Bane's tradition of master taking on apprentice, and then apprentice overthrowing the master, taking on a new apprentice....etc.

If this was the case then there was only one sith lord master throughout that millenium(Plagueis).

 

-----signature-----
-you want answers? plain
-I think I'm entitled. plain
-You want answers? mischief
-I want the truth!! frustrated -YOU CANT HANDLE THE TRUTH!! angry
http://boards.outerrimsieges.com/
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
DUGGY  3646 posts
Registered: Apr '05
5995_Sebulba
Date Posted: 7/10/05 2:38pm Subject: RE: Was Sidious REALLY Darth Plagueis' apprentice?
See what you're not understanding is that I'm not basing Plagueis' age on the word "legend"....I'm basing it off of the fact that the jedi didnt know about the sith still being active, but are supposedly supposed to know about "Plagueis the Wise".


This would require him to be "at least" a thousand years old.


Think about it.



You are still assuming the Jedi know of Plaguies. Why can't he just be baiting Anakin?. it still has the same result. If the Jedi thought that the Sith were still extinct before TPM then , then they would not know who Plagiues is .because it would be lore that was passed down between Sith,and no Jedi could know. he say's the Jedi would not tell Anakin because he wants to feed Anakin's distrust of the Jedi. But i have know doubt that Plagieus was real and he was Palps Master. Palpatine just could not tell Anakin who he really was at this point of the movie. so he calls it a legend. simple.

 

-----signature-----
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
AlphaTrion-TJW  1015 posts
Registered: Sep '03
42925_Probe Droid
Date Posted: 7/10/05 2:40pm Subject: RE: Was Sidious REALLY Darth Plagueis' apprentice?
[quote=r8hitmanNo, but you need to be AT LEAST a thousand years old to be a sith that the jedi would know about.
[/quote]

NOt really. Could just be ego on the part of Palps. Hey could think that him and his master were so notable as Sith that the Jedi should know about them, if anything by rep alone.

Also it could have been a test. See how much Anakin/the Jedi knew before he spilled the beans to much and confirmed any evidense they might have on him.

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Sauron_18  3594 posts
Registered: Apr '05
23547_Anakin Skywalker
Date Posted: 7/10/05 2:42pm Subject: RE: Was Sidious REALLY Darth Plagueis' apprentice?
PLagueis is not a thousand years old, the most he could be is 200, Sidious calls it a legend and calls Plagueis the Wise just as little things to keep anakin from asking "how do you know". PLagueis was probably the apprentice of the apprentice of the apprentice of the apprentice of the apprentice of the apprentice of the apprentice of the apprentice of the apprentice of Darth Bane. This is roughly calculated, but thats about how many Sith Are probably between them, 9 sith, more or less.



And Palpatine IS from Naboo, where does it say?

The official Site:
http://www.starwars.com/databank/character/palpatine/index.html

And the New Essential Guide to Characters.

 

-----signature-----
San Hill is out there........hiding.......watching......
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
LANDOSKYWALKER  75 posts
Registered: Aug '03
7888_Lando
Date Posted: 7/10/05 2:43pm Subject: RE: Was Sidious REALLY Darth Plagueis' apprentice?
If I was Anakin I'd be like, "Gee Chancellor, you sure do know alot about the Sith." lol


I'd like to believe that Sidious is the apprentice of Plagueis. The wry smile on his face certainly seems to suggest it. It really doesn't matter either way.


 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
r8hitman  4085 posts
Registered: Mar '04
13617_Darth Maul
Date Posted: 7/10/05 2:47pm Subject: RE: Was Sidious REALLY Darth Plagueis' apprentice?
DUGGY posted:
See what you're not understanding is that I'm not basing Plagueis' age on the word "legend"....I'm basing it off of the fact that the jedi didnt know about the sith still being active, but are supposedly supposed to know about "Plagueis the Wise".


This would require him to be "at least" a thousand years old.


Think about it.



You are still assuming the Jedi know of Plaguies. Why can't he just be baiting Anakin?. it still has the same result. If the Jedi thought that the Sith were still extinct before TPM then , then they would not know who Plagiues is .because it would be lore that was passed down between Sith,and no Jedi could know. he say's the Jedi would not tell Anakin because he wants to feed Anakin's distrust of the Jedi. But i have know doubt that Plagieus was real and he was Palps Master. Palpatine just could not tell Anakin who he really was at this point of the movie. so he calls it a legend. simple.



I understand what you're saying, and I would agree with you if he told Anakin this story during that conversation when he revealed himself....but he told Anakin this story and "sent him on his way"....leaving Anakin more than enough time to find out if it was even "SOME" truth to what he was saying.

And if Anakin started investigating, and the legend WAS NOT TRUE, or was something that "only a sith lord would know about" then Sidious basically would have just exposed himself right then, and I dont think he did.

This story must be a story that could be proven, "without Sidious just saying outright, 'I'm a sith lord'. And if the story could've been proven then you have to assume the jedi know about it.....which makes Plagueis over a thousand years old.

 

-----signature-----
-you want answers? plain
-I think I'm entitled. plain
-You want answers? mischief
-I want the truth!! frustrated -YOU CANT HANDLE THE TRUTH!! angry
http://boards.outerrimsieges.com/
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Sauron_18  3594 posts
Registered: Apr '05
23547_Anakin Skywalker
Date Posted: 7/10/05 3:14pm Subject: RE: Was Sidious REALLY Darth Plagueis' apprentice?
Im just gonna repost this so its not ignored:

PLagueis is not a thousand years old, the most he could be is 200, Sidious calls it a legend and calls Plagueis the Wise just as little things to keep anakin from asking "how do you know". PLagueis was probably the apprentice of the apprentice of the apprentice of the apprentice of the apprentice of the apprentice of the apprentice of the apprentice of the apprentice of Darth Bane. This is roughly calculated, but thats about how many Sith Are probably between them, 9 sith, more or less.



And Palpatine IS from Naboo, where does it say?

The official Site:
http://www.starwars.com/databank/character/palpatine/index.html

And the New Essential Guide to Characters.

 

-----signature-----
San Hill is out there........hiding.......watching......
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
r8hitman  4085 posts
Registered: Mar '04
13617_Darth Maul
Date Posted: 7/10/05 3:27pm Subject: RE: Was Sidious REALLY Darth Plagueis' apprentice?
Sauron_18 posted:
Im just gonna repost this so its not ignored:

PLagueis is not a thousand years old, the most he could be is 200, Sidious calls it a legend and calls Plagueis the Wise just as little things to keep anakin from asking "how do you know". PLagueis was probably the apprentice of the apprentice of the apprentice of the apprentice of the apprentice of the apprentice of the apprentice of the apprentice of the apprentice of Darth Bane. This is roughly calculated, but thats about how many Sith Are probably between them, 9 sith, more or less.



And Palpatine IS from Naboo, where does it say?

The official Site:
http://www.starwars.com/databank/character/palpatine/index.html

And the New Essential Guide to Characters.




tired Yeah I read it the first time.

Maybe you should go back and read some of mine.

But my whole point was that I dont think Sidious would tell Anakin something that would put doubt in HIM if Anakin was to ask around and 'debunk' his story.

And like I said, if ONLY the sith were knowledgable of this "legend" then Sidious would be exposing himself once he tells the story.



And as far as your link goes, why dont you try this one...

http://www.starwars.com/databank/character/darthsidious/index.html

The man known as "Palpatine" is a facade....his history is not even worth mentioning because That's not REALLY who he is

So if you believe Palpatine's "history" then I guess you believe Superman/Clark Kent is really from Kansas then?? raised_brow

 

-----signature-----
-you want answers? plain
-I think I'm entitled. plain
-You want answers? mischief
-I want the truth!! frustrated -YOU CANT HANDLE THE TRUTH!! angry
http://boards.outerrimsieges.com/
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History