Author Topic: Why are people so shocked he killed the Younglings?
darth_frared 
Registered: Jun '05
8088_Marion Ravenwood
Date Posted: 12/31/05 3:08am Subject: RE: Why are people so shocked he killed the Younglings?
Werebantha posted:
JMN77 posted:
Yes, in the days before the PT we all knew Vader was a baddie and had previously helped wipe out the Jedi order, but until episode III I doubt few could have concieved of him murdering children. That is just a whole 'nother ball game altogether!I mean killing adult Jedi is one thing and hainus enough, but childre?? That's EVIL.


1) Vader was not a "baddie". rolling_eyes A "baddie" is,like, when Snidely Whiplash poses as Dudley Do-Right's horse.
DARTH VADER ordered his own daughter to be tortured, and killed his own underlings. He stood by as an ENTIRE PLANET was destroyed (I'm, uh...guessing that that would add up to billions of people (children included)).
2) HEINOUS...learn to spell. It helps those of us that are educated to at least make an attempt to try and take you, and your opinions seriously.
3) yeah, killing children is "EVIL". Are you trying to suggest that destroying an entire planet-full of people and strangling people with your mystically-attuned mind-force ISN'T "EVIL".
Adults are children that grew up.
stop being condescending.
what is your argument trying to accomplish?

it's a plain fact that we feel much less for people being destroyed in an abstract manner (like a planet being wiped out) than we feel for a very tangible idea (like the younglings slaughter) there is no scale that makes one more hideous and more atrocious than the other. it is really just how close we are to the person. and people have a strong reaction to the younglings scene even though we don't even see him do it, it's just conjecture and it's still powerful. it's strong becasue they can easily sympathize with a little kid and maybe they have kids themselves.
i think lucas put it there because it easily defies all rationalizations of how anakin just wants to save and be nice. and it also shows the lengths he will go to in order to get what he wants. much like abraham who would kill his own son to obey god.
in all the defenses of anakin that i write this one is pretty much beyond excuse but i still know where it's coming from.

 

-----signature-----
illegalise stupidity.
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
MystikalMaceWindu 
Registered: Feb '05
7899_Mace Windu
Date Posted: 12/31/05 4:57am Subject: RE: Why are people so shocked he killed the Younglings?
If people are shocked, (I say if, because I don't know any who are "shocked" because of it) then perhaps it's because the younglings are kids. As others have said, many people view kids as innocents, and rather defenseless, and so when an adult, such as Anakin, takes them out, it hits them harder. And I think parents probably take it harder than someone who doesn't have kids, or who doesn't have any relationship with kids.
I know of parents who are upset/moved when a kid goes missing, or is kidnapped even though he/she is not their kid, because they think about how THEY would feel if their own kid were the one missing. But when an adult goes missing, they're nowhere near as concerned.
And I do agree with your general point, although I don't know if I would so much call it a FACT, as I would call it a tendency.
I think the actual idea is that when people have an emotional connection to the situation, they're going to be more moved by it. Often most of us need something scaled down, seen on a smaller level -- we're often more moved by someone's individual story, than say, hearing that 50,000 people, or hundreds of thousands of people were killed. Same way that many of us can picture, say, 100 bucks easier than we can fathom millions of dollars.
But, to add to your point, there also is this idea -- that, the nature/context of a person who, say, goes missing or is killed can also contribute to how it moves us.
For example, I am not all that moved by the disappearance of Natalee Holloway, that blonde-haired, white young adult who went missing, whom received tons and tons of news coverage, completely out of scale, when there are hundreds and hundreds, or thousands, of others who likewise go missing, and don't receive one second of coverage. And so, why do I not care much about her going missing? Because of that out-of-whack coverage.
And I'm more moved and angered by the thought of, say, the nearly million innocent people who were slaughtered during warring in Rwanda in the mid-90s, and even more so because the world pretty much turned their backs and just blinked their eyes to the situation.
And also, say, about the dropping of two nuclear bombs on big cities in Japan wherein at least hundreds of thousands, likely millions of people were either killed instantly, or seriously deformed as a result. People are shocked and angered by the attack on the WTC and rightfully so, but in terms of numbers, the killing of innocents by the nuclear bombs was hundreds, thousands of times worse. So multiply the WTC attack by probably by many thousands and you get the dropping of the bombs.
I think there are times when we can see the magnitude of major mass killings, if we just open our mind to it. Yes, it can help to see it when we use a situation we know about and our moved by, but it's not always just about numbers.
So, to be clear, I'm not disagreeing with you, just saying, we can build on that idea, and also, it is possible to be moved by bigger numbers, and that people, such as me, are indeed moved by them.
ANYWAY, back to Anakin, I didn't view his killings of the Younglings as being worse than his killings of adult Jedi. I see it just as a part of his betrayal. It was just another part of his fall.
The worst that Anakin did was betray the Jedi, and the killing of the Younglings was just part of that betrayal.
It would have been better if GL didn't wimp out. I mean, GL didn't show Anakin killing ANY Jedi. When I saw Anakin marching up the steps of the Temple, that's what I was waiting to see, but yet again, GL wimps out, as he did when he cut away from Anakin killing the Tusken Raiders. But at least then, he showed Anakin killing some Tuskens.
Perhaps GL is species-ist? raised_brow
It's OK to show Anakin killing Trade Federation members and other aliens, but not Jedi?
GL missed out on a major cinematic coup de grace. It's what many of us SW fans have been waiting for since first hearing that Anakin helped to kill the Jedi.
It's too bad we didn't get a good director to handle Sith. I would have wanted to see Anakin stalking through the Temple with the Clone Troopers, just to see how evil he is, as he helps kill off Jedi, backed by hundreds of troopers, just stalking through, mercilessly.
And I would have wanted to see him kill the Younglings, too. But knowing that many people would freak out about that, perhaps show it in silhouette, either with shadows, or have him behind some semi-transparent curtain.


darth_frared posted:
Werebantha posted:
JMN77 posted:
Yes, in the days before the PT we all knew Vader was a baddie and had previously helped wipe out the Jedi order, but until episode III I doubt few could have concieved of him murdering children. That is just a whole 'nother ball game altogether!I mean killing adult Jedi is one thing and hainus enough, but childre?? That's EVIL.


1) Vader was not a "baddie". rolling_eyes A "baddie" is,like, when Snidely Whiplash poses as Dudley Do-Right's horse.
DARTH VADER ordered his own daughter to be tortured, and killed his own underlings. He stood by as an ENTIRE PLANET was destroyed (I'm, uh...guessing that that would add up to billions of people (children included)).
2) HEINOUS...learn to spell. It helps those of us that are educated to at least make an attempt to try and take you, and your opinions seriously.
3) yeah, killing children is "EVIL". Are you trying to suggest that destroying an entire planet-full of people and strangling people with your mystically-attuned mind-force ISN'T "EVIL".
Adults are children that grew up.
stop being condescending.
what is your argument trying to accomplish?

it's a plain fact that we feel much less for people being destroyed in an abstract manner (like a planet being wiped out) than we feel for a very tangible idea (like the younglings slaughter) there is no scale that makes one more hideous and more atrocious than the other. it is really just how close we are to the person. and people have a strong reaction to the younglings scene even though we don't even see him do it, it's just conjecture and it's still powerful. it's strong becasue they can easily sympathize with a little kid and maybe they have kids themselves.
i think lucas put it there because it easily defies all rationalizations of how anakin just wants to save and be nice. and it also shows the lengths he will go to in order to get what he wants. much like abraham who would kill his own son to obey god.
in all the defenses of anakin that i write this one is pretty much beyond excuse but i still know where it's coming from.

 

-----signature-----
Yoda and Mace Windu in 2008! A Unifying Force!
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
darth_frared 
Registered: Jun '05
8088_Marion Ravenwood
Date Posted: 12/31/05 7:04am Subject: RE: Why are people so shocked he killed the Younglings?
you're right. i shouldn't have stated it as fact but as tendency. blush

and what you say about rwanda and other events is spot on. i can't really add to it. i agree these things aren't about numbers. which is why it doesn't *truly* matter to me whether it's an entire planet or just a group of people. it matters both in that it shouldn't happen at all. i guess we agree on that. i just find comparing atrocities not very useful.

what we both talked about is empathy, the walking in somebody else's shoes. and that is evidently stronger when it's more of an individual story rather than mass killing. it seems part of human nature and not connected with a lack of feeling that when my dog dies i cry and sob for a while and earth quakes and tsunamis just sort of leave me numb.

what i disagree with is that we should have seen more bloodshed (or rather: bloodless shed) and that GL wimped out with these things. i found that he showed enough in a way, that left the matter more open to my imagination. in some way i would have liked to see hayden more in action with the sabre because he just looked good operating it. and at the same time i appreciate the lack of the action because it makes the matter more poignant than action-oriented. my compromise here is film the stuff and leave it as extra footage on the dvd tongue
i understand that he didn't want to make this about the slaughter itself, but about the betrayal.

 

-----signature-----
illegalise stupidity.
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
jedipadawanjoe14 
Registered: Jul '05
14703_Saesee Tiin
Date Posted: 12/31/05 11:46pm Subject: RE: Why are people so shocked he killed the Younglings?
how could you say that? it was so sad...that cute little boy "master skywalker there is too many of them, what are we going to do" AHHHHH nooooooooooooo!!

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
JMN77 
Registered: Sep '05
6296_Death Star II
Date Posted: 1/8/06 7:14am Subject: RE: Why are people so shocked he killed the Younglings?
Werebantha posted:
JMN77 posted:
Yes, in the days before the PT we all knew Vader was a baddie and had previously
helped wipe out the Jedi order, but until episode III I doubt few could have concieved
of him murdering children. That is just a whole 'nother ball game altogether!
I mean killing adult Jedi is one thing and hainus enough, but childre?? That's EVIL.


1) Vader was not a "baddie". rolling_eyes A "baddie" is,like, when Snidely Whiplash poses as Dudley Do-Right's horse.


Oh, OK Vader was Satan incarnate.... Better?

Werebantha posted:
2) HEINOUS...learn to spell. It helps those of us that are educated to at least make an attempt to try and take you, and your opinions seriously.


Yeah, again sorry. I can see that my inaccurate spelling of ONE word has
A) de-railed this entire thread, leaving it completely useless and
B) made you completely aware of my south central PA 'redneck' upbringing
where I never done did learnt anything right!
sorry for being inferior..... master Werebantha, please let me live... please
no gas chamber for us 'in here inferiors!


Werebantha posted:
3) yeah, killing children is "EVIL". Are you trying to suggest that destroying an entire planet-full of people and strangling people with your mystically-attuned mind-force ISN'T "EVIL".



No. (did I spell that right?)

****

 

-----signature-----
http://boards.outerrimsieges.com/
Release the Kracken..... GET THE SACRIFICE ON!
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
darth_frared 
Registered: Jun '05
8088_Marion Ravenwood
Date Posted: 1/8/06 7:22am Subject: RE: Why are people so shocked he killed the Younglings?
you crack me up! laugh

 

-----signature-----
illegalise stupidity.
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
YYZ-2112 
Registered: Sep '04
14953_Qui-Gon and Anakin
Date Posted: 1/8/06 9:38am Subject: RE: Why are people so shocked he killed the Younglings?
I think the youngling slaughter is shocking because children are inherently innocent. Even in a film like 'City of God' the actions these kids take are more due to lack of guidance than genuine evil. In the same way, no matter how Anakin (or the audience) feels about the Jedi, the children can't be held accountable for the Jedi. It would have been more plausible if the younglings had been captured and re-programmed, then sent home and monitored. That would have been a much subtler approach to them and still just as effective in maintaining Imperial domination. It would have made a nice bit of propaganda to see the Empire had 'rescued' these poor brainwashed kids from the clutches of the sinister Jedi.

I think Lucas chose to showcase this scene because he wanted to make it clear that the Sith are evil and the Jedi are not. The story can get a bit complicated for young viewers and he didn't want the Sith to be glorified on their own terms. This is also why Anakin was written to know what he's doing is wrong and not just choosing a path he feels is correct. later in the film he tries and defend his actions by talk of 'God and Country' so to speak, but in his heart he knows he's corrupted.

When Padme dies, he remains a Sith because he feels it's too late for him anyway. Personally, if it had been me, I'd have laid down on my sword once Padme had been lost because the entire motivation for turning (and really living) had just vannished.

 

-----signature-----
"You were right about one thing Master. The negotiations WERE short."
"Story is about principles, not rules. Anxious, inexperienced writers obey rules. Rebellious, unschooled writers break rules. Artists master the form." Robert McKee
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
RKMeibalane 
Registered: Sep '02
20453_Yoda and<br>Clonetrooper
Date Posted: 1/8/06 10:02am Subject: RE: Why are people so shocked he killed the Younglings?
Obi_Frans posted:
LavaCake posted:
It's not that we are surprised he did it. The shock comes from people who defend him for it.


Exactly


Who defended him for doing it?

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
RKMeibalane 
Registered: Sep '02
20453_Yoda and<br>Clonetrooper
Date Posted: 1/8/06 10:31am Subject: RE: Why are people so shocked he killed the Younglings?
Darth_Buddy_Lee posted:
yankee8255 posted:
Because children are relatively innocent and helpless, which is why most, if not all societies, afford them extra protection. Anakin killing them makes it far harder for people, me included, to believe he could be redeemed. He has crossed a line form which there is no turning back.


I for one don't think he is ever truly redeemed. Yes he does kill the emperor and bring balance to the force and save his son by sacrificing himself, but this one act does not serve as redemption for all of the atrocities that he committed. Yes he probably knew he would die when he made the decision, but it was still a slightly selfish decision in that he couldn't see his own son die, if it were any other Jedi, he would have just watched them die.

In the ROTJ novelization (I believe, although this could be from somewhere else), Yoda is the one that makes it possible for Anakin to become a ghost at the end and see his son. I don't believe this was done due to Anakin being redeemed, but was done for Luke. Luke deserved to see his father as a Jedi. And then Anakin can drift back into the madenning abyss that all Sith are destined for.


Anakin was redeemed in ROTJ. Lucas says so. End of discussion.

Furthermore, speaking as a Christian, I can tell that nobody ever completely atones for the mistakes they make during the course of a lifetime. Furthermore, the act of parent sacrificing himself for his child is not selfish even in the slightest bit. I'm twenty three years old, and I'm finding myself giving more and more thought to having children of my own, and I can tell you even now that there is nothing I wouldn't do if one of my children were in trouble. That's not selfishness. It's what loving a child is all about.

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
RKMeibalane 
Registered: Sep '02
20453_Yoda and<br>Clonetrooper
Date Posted: 1/8/06 10:38am Subject: RE: Why are people so shocked he killed the Younglings?
darth-sinister posted:
voodoopuuduu posted:
In the ROTJ novelization (I believe, although this could be from somewhere else), Yoda is the one that makes it possible for Anakin to become a ghost at the end and see his son. I don't believe this was done due to Anakin being redeemed, but was done for Luke. Luke deserved to see his father as a Jedi. And then Anakin can drift back into the madenning abyss that all Sith are destined for.

I dont think retaining your identity can be classified as a redemption from hell. The only real purpose to retaining your identity after death is to help the living.



Lucas said that Anakin can never redeem himself for all the crimes he's committed. He can never right the wrongs. But he can stop being evil. He can stop the horror. He can take the last bit of goodness and destroy the Dark Lord, which takes his life as well. In the end, he does a final act of good which redeems him in a sense. He becomes a good man again and dies. As I've said, redemption has many definitions. One is to come back from a state of decline. Another is return to one's good favor. Meaning that if someone sees you a certain way, then you should meet those expectations. In the end, that's what happens. Anakin proves Luke is right, by becoming a good man again and saving his son. He does the impossible by the Jedi and Sith standards, which allows Yoda and Obi-wan to help him to retain his identity. Anakin is redeemed by his children. They bring out the best in him.


Agreed. Redemption does not mean that one is absolved of his crimes. Anakin paid for mistakes with his life. Redemption means that one can earn the forgiveness of those he loves through compassion and selflessness. Anakin acted out of compassion for his son, and therefore was redeemed. Does that mean his crimes were nothing? Absolutely not. What Anakin's actions did mean, however, was that he learned from his mistakes and sought to put a stop to the acts of evil that he had participated in up to that point.

I don't mean to sound condescending here, but I think it's worth reiterating something that Lucas has said over and over again: Anakin was redeemed in ROTJ. He was the Chosen One. If people have a problem accepting that, then don't watch the film.

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
The_Chibi_Kiriyama 
Registered: Nov '05
7898_Anakin Skywalker
Date Posted: 1/8/06 3:27pm Subject: RE: Why are people so shocked he killed the Younglings?
I think this scene in particular is one of the few criticisms of ROTS that I have. Anakin has a short amount of time to kill all of the Jedi in the Temple, rend the Order to shreds and take down the CIS. So logically instead of being shown killing Jedi in a good siege like what Yoda and Obi-Wan were shown doing as they attacked the remaining Temple beseigers, he takes a break to kill the Younglings? Yup, because that's a task that only a Dark Lord of the Sith can undertake. This wasn't David vs. Goliath, this was Ant Colony vs. Human-with-unusually-large-boot. He was one of the best Jedi to ever serve in the order and here he is doing something that a normal footsoldier would have had equal difficulty doing.

Cin Drallig? Threatless. Jedi Knights? Pennies in a bucket. Younglings? Most fearsome foes this side of the Galaxy! No fights showing his growing Force adeptness, no saber combat, no commanding scenes of him ordering around the Clones. No, this was all replaced by a paltry attempt to make Vader intensely evil in the span of ten seconds. And then Lucas makes comments about how the Star Wars films are meant for children? This being the same film where people are decapitated, young Padawans are shot to death and a man chokes his pregnant wife unconcious over a stupid one-sided rivalry with his mentor (thus rendering the majority of the plot redundant and useless)?

Come on; Lucas could have portrayed this scene with just as much power as the others using the Troopers, and showing Vader wasting his time killing unarmed young Force sensitive children depleted whatever sympathetic feelings I had. It's not like his plot development would have been grievously hindered had he not done it. I personally laughed my butt off when I saw him burn to a crisp. I think Lucas wanted me to feel sorry, but by this time he already Force Choked Padme and my patience with his stupidity had grown thin. Thumbs way down on the execution and relevancy of this scene.

 

-----signature-----
Notice my name? Yeah, I'm obsessed with something other than Star Wars-
BATTLE ROYALE!
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Ruthio 
Registered: May '05
Date Posted: 1/8/06 4:09pm Subject: RE: Why are people so shocked he killed the Younglings?
The_Chibi_Kiriyama posted:
I think this scene in particular is one of the few criticisms of ROTS that I have. Anakin has a short amount of time to kill all of the Jedi in the Temple, rend the Order to shreds and take down the CIS. So logically instead of being shown killing Jedi in a good siege like what Yoda and Obi-Wan were shown doing as they attacked the remaining Temple beseigers, he takes a break to kill the Younglings? Yup, because that's a task that only a Dark Lord of the Sith can undertake. This wasn't David vs. Goliath, this was Ant Colony vs. Human-with-unusually-large-boot. He was one of the best Jedi to ever serve in the order and here he is doing something that a normal footsoldier would have had equal difficulty doing.

Cin Drallig? Threatless. Jedi Knights? Pennies in a bucket. Younglings? Most fearsome foes this side of the Galaxy! No fights showing his growing Force adeptness, no saber combat, no commanding scenes of him ordering around the Clones. No, this was all replaced by a paltry attempt to make Vader intensely evil in the span of ten seconds. And then Lucas makes comments about how the Star Wars films are meant for children? This being the same film where people are decapitated, young Padawans are shot to death and a man chokes his pregnant wife unconcious over a stupid one-sided rivalry with his mentor (thus rendering the majority of the plot redundant and useless)?

Come on; Lucas could have portrayed this scene with just as much power as the others using the Troopers, and showing Vader wasting his time killing unarmed young Force sensitive children depleted whatever sympathetic feelings I had. It's not like his plot development would have been grievously hindered had he not done it. I personally laughed my butt off when I saw him burn to a crisp. I think Lucas wanted me to feel sorry, but by this time he already Force Choked Padme and my patience with his stupidity had grown thin. Thumbs way down on the execution and relevancy of this scene.




^ I completley agree man. Anakin could of oredered a few clones to take out the kids but he personally goes and does it himself. Its almost like we get nothing Vader killing adults, but we are suppose to feel sorry for him killing kids that could of been killed by his clones? Its almost like Anakin got his ass beat by jedi downstiars, and then came up to make up for it by kill Younglings.

I pretty sure he killed the jedi babies [they had to have been in the temple]. I mean the general movegoers didn't feel sorry for him, they felt like "Ya, Obi-wan just kicked that nuts ass!".

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Mandalore_X 
Registered: Apr '05
19975_Dash Rendar
Date Posted: 1/8/06 10:28pm Subject: RE: Why are people so shocked he killed the Younglings?
[quote=OnyxRose What did you all think he was doing those twenty years, whittling wood animals?[/quote]Qoute of the freaking year.

 

-----signature-----
Yo.
May the Force be with you.
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
darth-sinister 
Title: Manager Emeritus
Registered: Jun '01
24181_Palpatine Hologram
Date Posted: 1/8/06 11:07pm Subject: RE: Why are people so shocked he killed the Younglings?
Lucas didn't want to show Anakin's skills. He wanted to show how damn evil Darth Vader was. How far he was willing to go to protect his loved ones. We're not supposed to be cheering Vader on. We're supposed to be condeming him, just as we were originally supposed to in 1977.

 

-----signature-----
Stewie: "Oh, this is an even bigger jackpot than when the Emperor
came up with the formula for great Star Wars dialouge."
Palpatine: "Something, something, something. Dark side.
Something, something, something complete."
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
The_Chibi_Kiriyama 
Registered: Nov '05
7898_Anakin Skywalker
Date Posted: 1/8/06 11:32pm Subject: RE: Why are people so shocked he killed the Younglings?
But that's not the point I wanted to make. The scene diminished his persona by making it seem that he had somehow advanced into the Dark Side irrevocably by killing the Younglings, when in fact he had been lured in way in advance. That was 10 seconds that could have been better allocated showing a clearer shot of his fight with Cin Drallig or a miscellaneous group of Jedi. Whereas Obi-Wan proved his purpose as a good duelist by making spicy cajun stew out of Grievous with his own weapon, Anakin is shown killing random children to save his wife and his own unborn children...wait...I'm sorry. I was talking about what made him important enough for the film to revolve around. That's a REALLY bad example. So Lucas tried to show him being evil? Remind me how choking your spouse to death after spending hours fighting against Jedi and Neimodians alike for her well-being doesn't do this already? And then we have the Anakin/Obi-Wan duel itself. Obi-Wan has a kill from Grievous under his belt, and what does Anakin have for his track record? A short scene where he seemingly avoids fighting most of the Jedi and kills defenseless children in order to save his own children. Because that makes sense. I don't know, I just feel that the movie showed how evil he was. The scene was, as I stated before, unnecessary to the rise of Vader.

 

-----signature-----
Notice my name? Yeah, I'm obsessed with something other than Star Wars-
BATTLE ROYALE!
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History