Author Topic: George Lucas dialogue dilemma.
mastersith69 
Registered: Mar '05
40309_Palpatine
Date Posted: 1/9/06 6:47am Subject: RE: George Lucas dialogue dilemma.
i dont know how lucas came to that answer because it doesnt make sense for padme to say obiwan wants to help because at no point does obiwan state he wants to help anakin, just simply gives the impression he has to kill anakin. also on the commentary i did notice that lucas said padme could never live with him i think that he said at the end when they were talking right before the duel. it might o just been bad voice editing because they edited all those guys voices on the commentary track.

i think it would of been nice to hear only lucas talking the whole time unedited.

 

Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
RebelScum77 
Title: Manager Emeritus
Registered: Aug '03
18918_Aayla Secura
Date Posted: 1/9/06 7:11am Subject: RE: George Lucas dialogue dilemma.
TheCRZA posted:
Are you serious? Palpatine at least held to his ideals.
Anakin turned his back on everything...
And what does he do to redeem himself 23 years later?
He turns his back on everything again.
He had it coming.


Are you serious?
Ignoring the "tuning his back on everything again" comment... just because YOU think he had it coming does not mean that Obi-Wan would have killed Anakin if he stopped what he was doing and expressed regret at what he had done, if he abandoned the dark side. The Jedi do not kill defenseless people, no matter what they've done. And Obi-Wan loved Anakin. It's not like this would be easy by any stretch, but Obi-Wan would not kill him out of vengence.

 

-----signature-----
CHEAP SLIT!!
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Get_in_Gear 
Registered: Nov '04
7389_WED Treadwell Droid
Date Posted: 1/9/06 10:29am Subject: RE: George Lucas dialogue dilemma.
Jokerisdaking posted:
In the commentary of ROTS GL say that once Padme learned what Anakin had done that even though she loved him she would never be able to live with him, yet on Mustafar, even though she is aware of his crimes, she asks if they could still just leave togethor and find some place to live totgethor in peace. Thoughts on this? I hate it when GL contradicts himself.


So where is the problem?
Padmé does not truly believe and accept what Anakin has done until she goes to Mustafar and sees how he has changed for herself.

 

-----signature-----
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
darth_frared 
Registered: Jun '05
8088_Marion Ravenwood
Date Posted: 1/9/06 10:45am Subject: RE: George Lucas dialogue dilemma.
TheCRZA posted:
I can't speak to the naivete of Obi Wan,
but if I learned that my apprentice
had been living a lie to me for
God knows how long in addition
to the fact that his hands were
still red with blood of the Jedi younglings,
I don't think I could just trust him.
dead on.

rebelscum posted:
Of course not. It's not that simple. But if on Mustafar Anakin suddenly had a moment of realization and put down his saber, I don't think Obi-Wan would turn his back on him. Who knows what would happen after that, but I have a very hard time believing that Obi-Wan, Padme or Yoda would wash their hands of the Chosen One. The Clone Wars EU, if you subscribe to it, is filled with examples of forgiveness. Yoda tells Dooku that he and the Light side will always welcome him back, despite everything he's done, including engineering a war that killed far more people than Anakin did. Obi-Wan feels conflict in Asajj Ventress and does not stop believing she can come back to the Light, even when she appears to have no good in her. That is the Jedi way. It can never excuse or make up for all the people they've killed, but they can still come back and become a good person once more.
so EU aside (which i don't read etc, so no clue) do we see ANY PT jedi EVER considering the notion of a sith turning back? i think we don't. so, by sheer likelihood it's impossible to think that obi-wan would have taken him back, warts and all.
and by what he did (without jedi indoctrination and all) who in their right mind would just go, alright, you made a mistake. seriously, who would? who would trust him again?
he knows no one could hence he must absolutely trust the new doctrine and have it work in his favour. no benefit of doubt.

 

-----signature-----
illegalise stupidity.
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
darth-sinister 
Title: Manager Emeritus
Registered: Jun '01
24181_Palpatine Hologram
Date Posted: 1/9/06 11:57am Subject: RE: George Lucas dialogue dilemma.
I'll answer frared first. In the eu, a number of Jedi think it's possible to come back. Yoda thought he could bring back Dooku. Obi-wan thought he could bring back Ventress. Mace thought he could help Depa Bilba (sp). Nomi Sunrider and Cay Qel-Droma thought they could bring Ulic Qel-Droma back. Quinlan Vos did come back from the Dark Side, as did Aayla Secura. Vodo-Siosk Baas though that he could bring back Exar Kun. But in the films, none of the Jedi believe it's possible. Mostly based on past experiences with the Sith and those who didn't turn back, when the Jedi tried to help them.

Obi-wan loves Anakin. He has compassion for his student, friend, brother. He wants to help him. He doesn't want to kill him, because he doesn't feel right about doing it. Dispite all that he has done, he doesn't want to do it. He refuses to kill Anakin at the end, because he will not kill an unarmed man who is helpless. But he cannot help him either. He has accepted that for all intents and purposes, that Anakin Skywalker is dead. Even before he sliced his limbs off. That is why he only refers to him as Darth Vader to both Luke and during the confrontation on the Death Star. Luke knows that his father was evil. But he still forgives him for his crimes. Even years later when he finally learns the full details of what happened from Artoo's recordings, Luke still forgives his father. Even when he sees his father choke his mother and sees the death of the Younglings.

Padme cannot accept the notion that Anakin might have become a monster. So she goes to Mustafar for the sake of her family, to see if he has changed. She knows that Obi-wan isn't going to help him, but if she can get Anakin to stop, then maybe he could consider it. She's too attached to Anakin. And when she sees that he has changed, she wants nothing more to do with him.

 

-----signature-----
Stewie: "Oh, this is an even bigger jackpot than when the Emperor
came up with the formula for great Star Wars dialouge."
Palpatine: "Something, something, something. Dark side.
Something, something, something complete."
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
darth_frared 
Registered: Jun '05
8088_Marion Ravenwood
Date Posted: 1/9/06 12:15pm Subject: RE: George Lucas dialogue dilemma.
it's nice you took the time with this, sinister, but from what i see in the films, no jedi is brought back to light.

again, obi-wan might love him to a tee and all, it has nothing to do with the indoctrination as presented in the films: destroy the sith we must. no negotiating, no nothing, we fight until they or we are dead. i don't see any jedi ever properly attempting to bring someone back or even just mention it. i think your point about obi-wan and how much he loved is among the longest debated in this forum. so.. i don't think you can claim any authority over what obi-wan feels.
sinister posted:
Padme cannot accept the notion that Anakin might have become a monster. So she goes to Mustafar for the sake of her family, to see if he has changed. She knows that Obi-wan isn't going to help him, but if she can get Anakin to stop, then maybe he could consider it. She's too attached to Anakin. And when she sees that he has changed, she wants nothing more to do with him.
i don't think i debated that. i just discussed if obi-wan, in his right mind, would seriously consider turning anakin back. and i don't see how he, in his right mind, would.
it would fly in the face of his hurt feelings and his integrity and much else he has to say, alright boy, you messed up but there's no reason i shouldn't trust you again.
it'd make no sense. in that scene. in that situation. on mustafar.

 

-----signature-----
illegalise stupidity.
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Get_in_Gear 
Registered: Nov '04
7389_WED Treadwell Droid
Date Posted: 1/9/06 12:34pm Subject: RE: George Lucas dialogue dilemma.
Obi: "Don't do it!"

Don't make me kill you.
That is the only reading of that line that makes any sense to me...

If Anakin had not have jumped, he would not have lost his limbs.
But he was always going to jump wasn't he - that's the key.
"Always on the move."
So it doesn't really hinge on whether a Jedi has ever felt a Jedi can be saved from the Dark Side, for me, it hinges on whether a Sith would ever, in himself, be big enough to come back.
And Anakin does, ultimately, come back.
So anyone who believes and hopes he can, is right.

 

-----signature-----
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
darth-sinister 
Title: Manager Emeritus
Registered: Jun '01
24181_Palpatine Hologram
Date Posted: 1/9/06 12:34pm Subject: RE: George Lucas dialogue dilemma.
darth_frared posted:
it's nice you took the time with this, sinister, but from what i see in the films, no jedi is brought back to light.


With Maul, there is question as to whether he is a Sith or not. Neither Jedi recognizes him. With Dooku, Yoda fights him, but never tries to kill him or not. He just has to stop him from fleeing Geonosis. Same with Obi-wan. It's only Anakin who wants to make Dooku pay for his crimes. Mace doesn't go to kill Palpatine until the Dark Lord tricks him into doing it. Any rehabilitation could've occured while he was in custody.

With Anakin, Obi-wan doesn't want to kill him. He never answers Padme when she asks. He tells Yoda that he won't do it. He talks to him instead of fighting. He even tries again before the duel ends.

darth_frared posted:
again, obi-wan might love him to a tee and all, it has nothing to do with the indoctrination as presented in the films: destroy the sith we must. no negotiating, no nothing, we fight until they or we are dead. i don't see any jedi ever properly attempting to bring someone back or even just mention it. i think your point about obi-wan and how much he loved is among the longest debated in this forum. so.. i don't think you can claim any authority over what obi-wan feels.


It's pretty clear. Obi-wan loves Anakin. We see it throughout AOTC and ROTS. In ANH, he talks fondly of the good man that he once was and not the monster he became. We have Lucas who says that they both know that a fight is coming, but they don't want to do it. And Stover who goes out of his way to describe Obi-wan's state of mind throughout the confrontation.

darth_frared posted:
i don't think i debated that. i just discussed if obi-wan, in his right mind, would seriously consider turning anakin back. and i don't see how he, in his right mind, would. it would fly in the face of his hurt feelings and his integrity and much else he has to say, alright boy, you messed up but there's no reason i shouldn't trust you again.
it'd make no sense. in that scene. in that situation. on mustafar.



We will never know how Obi-wan would've dealt with Anakin, if he had been willing to listen. There is no right or wrong way to bring someone back. You just do it. Luke only had the benefit of not being hated and Vader's guilt for his crimes. Otherwise he'd be toast.

 

-----signature-----
Stewie: "Oh, this is an even bigger jackpot than when the Emperor
came up with the formula for great Star Wars dialouge."
Palpatine: "Something, something, something. Dark side.
Something, something, something complete."
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
darth_frared 
Registered: Jun '05
8088_Marion Ravenwood
Date Posted: 1/9/06 1:00pm Subject: RE: George Lucas dialogue dilemma.
Get_in_Gear posted:
Obi: "Don't do it!"

Don't make me kill you.
That is the only reading of that line that makes any sense to me...

If Anakin had not have jumped, he would not have lost his limbs.
But he was always going to jump wasn't he - that's the key.
"Always on the move."
So it doesn't really hinge on whether a Jedi has ever felt a Jedi can be saved from the Dark Side, for me, it hinges on whether a Sith would ever, in himself, be big enough to come back.
And Anakin does, ultimately, come back.
So anyone who believes and hopes he can, is right.
i love the rhetoric behind don't do it. and the one behind, had anakin not jumped, he might still have his limbs.

please!!!!!

why is there no doubt as to anakin jumping but lots upon lots of doubt as to obi-wan wanting to kill him?

why is there no doubt anakin would follow his new and exciting agenda and no doubt obi-wan had to also follow his jedi agenda? why is there no possibility for obi-wan to simply renounce his agenda and not fight? that's right, because he was stuck in it as well.

anyone is right who hopes he can come back? because this is what happened? are you serious?

you know, what this depends on? on empathy. has obi-wan ever felt quite as helpless and hopeless as anakin? if he has there's a chance he thinks he can come back.

not on mustafar, not in that scene. there aren't even any wounds healing, let alone scars developing.

 

-----signature-----
illegalise stupidity.
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Get_in_Gear 
Registered: Nov '04
7389_WED Treadwell Droid
Date Posted: 1/9/06 1:36pm Subject: RE: George Lucas dialogue dilemma.
I'm not sure I follow, Frared...
Maybe I wasn't clear in my post.

Obi-Wan has been sent to Mustafar with the singular goal of killing Anakin Skywalker.
He gets himself in a position to complete this mission.
All he needs now is for Anakin to make the rash mistake of trying to jump that gap, and he will have done what he was sent to do.
But what does he say?
"Don't do it!"
Do you think that is a warning? A threat?
I don't - it is a plea. Listen to his voice.

It makes sense to me that, when in a position which he himself recognises as a victory ensuring advantage, Obi could only tell Anakin not to try that jump because he does not want to kill him.
I can't see another reason.
Now whether you believe that this is because Obi's issue is with Anakin's death, or his own having to carry out the act of killing is pretty irrelavent to the fact that Obi offers Anakin mercy.
If I "don't want to kill", then I "want to preserve", surely?
"Allow to live", at the very least.

Those are the facts - Obi is in a position to kill Anakin.
He is there to kill Anakin.
Yet he pleads with Anakin not to make him kill him.
Why - just so that he can stop to work out an easier, less harrowing way to kill Anakin?
"Don't do it - it's too hard for me this way. I've won. Surrender, and I'll take you back to the temple for death by lethal injection."

The other point I was getting at was, that it doesn't matter - because Anakin did jump, and in the state he was in, was bound to jump.
My craic about him "not losing his limbs", I think you may have misunderstood.
I was merely pointing out the catch 22 situation.
The only thing that would have prevented Anakin from jumping, would have been for him to be a more level-headed person
And if he was more level-headed and rational, then he may not have turned to the Dark Side to begin with.
So - hypothetically - the Anakin who would not make that jump, was the one who would not have been fighting Obi in the first place.
If you catch my drift...

Whether Obi wants to save Anakin or not, at that juncture, is irrelavent, because an Anakin who shows the calmness, clarity and focus NOT to jump, is one who possibly can be saved.
Only the things which Obi may want to save Anakin from are the things which will make Anakin jump.
Lacking that clarity is part of the reason Anakin needs saving in the first place.
Does that make sense - it's kind of hard to express?

That's all I was saying...

happy

 

-----signature-----
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
darth_frared 
Registered: Jun '05
8088_Marion Ravenwood
Date Posted: 1/9/06 1:50pm Subject: RE: George Lucas dialogue dilemma.
well, you say it's all in anakin's hands and all i say is, it's in obi-wan's hands, too. and the way he pleads is guaranteed to make anakin jump. that is, however, just my opinion.

it's check mate (never too solid with chess analogies, though blush )

Whether Obi wants to save Anakin or not, at that juncture, is irrelavent, because an Anakin who shows the calmness, clarity and focus NOT to jump, is one who possibly can be saved.
Only the things which Obi may want to save Anakin from are the things which will make Anakin jump.
Lacking that clarity is part of the reason Anakin needs saving in the first place.
Does that make sense - it's kind of hard to express?


uh, okay. i think we are sort of on the same page...
it looks like you make an interesting and twisted case here...
and it's something i haven't thought of. not really in this way. but it's true. anakin's deeds aside, you simply wouldn't want to have him around much the way he is on mustafar.

 

-----signature-----
illegalise stupidity.
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Get_in_Gear 
Registered: Nov '04
7389_WED Treadwell Droid
Date Posted: 1/9/06 1:59pm Subject: RE: George Lucas dialogue dilemma.
Okay, I'm glad I made more sense that time.

darth_frared posted:
well, you say it's all in anakin's hands and all i say is, it's in obi-wan's hands, too. and the way he pleads is guaranteed to make anakin jump. that is, however, just my opinion.


Do you think, at that point, there was anything Obi could have said or done to prevent Anakin jumping?
Just curious...
And what do you feel about Obi and Ani's dialogue before the fight begins - just bravado, a formality, or do you think Obi is actually trying to reason with Anakin?

 

-----signature-----
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
darth_frared 
Registered: Jun '05
8088_Marion Ravenwood
Date Posted: 1/9/06 2:13pm Subject: RE: George Lucas dialogue dilemma.
an easy challenge: grin

no, they shouldn't have come to the point of having to fight at all. and there was probably nothing that could prevent it (althought that is saying the outcome is fixed and we are debating fixed outcomes elsewhere, right? wink )

the intervention should have happened before that. but there's no possible interventionist around. obi-wan is too involved. padme is too involved.

the easy answer to having somebody calm down (which i think is the obvious objective to the whole thing) would be to ask questions. loads. not appear all threatening in the first place (preps he should have put down his saber visibly) and install the element of betrayal. all of this is horribly wrong.

to answer your question: yes, he is trying to reason with him but he just never gets it right. can i go back to the empathy? it means that you go back to what it felt like for you to be in inner turmoil. and honestly, obi-wan has never properly been there, has he? and if he has (say with maul) it doesn't inform his style on mustafar. he is all accusations and lecture. this is never, i guarantee, never ever going to work. it will continue to make anakin even angrier.

but then, the crux of all this: he has no serious agenda to calm him down. which is all the rage when you are trying to intervene.

padme does her best but there is something about anakin which i think makes him always look for praise from obi-wan.

it's just entirely and beautifully ****ed up.

 

-----signature-----
illegalise stupidity.
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Jokerisdaking 
Registered: Dec '05
16492_Anakin Skywalker
Date Posted: 1/11/06 1:30pm Subject: RE: George Lucas dialogue dilemma.
If Kyp Durron, Revan and many other Jedi cangot off for thei crimes with just a slap on the wrist then why not Vader?

 

-----signature-----
Danger, I laugh in the face of danger, then I hide until it goes away.
Tarkin, not Vader, destroyed Alderaan.
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
TheCRZA 
Registered: May '05
40330_Obi-Wan Kenobi
Date Posted: 1/11/06 3:39pm Subject: RE: George Lucas dialogue dilemma.
The Jedi do not kill defenseless people, no matter what they've done. And Obi-Wan loved Anakin. It's not like this would be easy by any stretch, but Obi-Wan would not kill him out of vengence.

Mace was stopped mid-swing by Anakin while attempting
to kill Palpatine. Palpatine was disarmed, and Mace
assumed he was killing an defenseless man,
and rationalized that he was too dangerous to be
left alive.
Whether Palpatine was defenseless or not can and has
been debated ad naseum, but Mace THOUGHT he was defenseless,
so you are incorrect there.

Prior to that, Anakin, a fully trained Jedi Knight,
kills Dooku who is completely defenseless
and quite literally unarmed.

So I don't see from where you are forming this opinion.

because YOU think he had it coming does not mean that Obi-Wan would have killed Anakin if he stopped what he was doing and expressed regret at what he had done, if he abandoned the dark side

But see, Anakin had been turning dark right under Obi Wan's nose since
AOTC. And Ben had no idea. So not only can Kenobi not trust Anakin,
he cannot trust his read of Anakin. How could he know that
Anakin would turn back if he could not sense he turned in the first place.

Even as he watched the holo of Anakin slaying Younglings,
Obi Wan was blindsided.

I think he has it coming because he has it coming.
It's called taking responsibility for your actions,
or taking your own medicine.

EDIT: A followup question for you, your plain fullness:
Do you think if Yoda had managed to disarm Palpatine
that he would have picked up his saber for him for
a fair fight, or went for the kill, as Mace attempted?

 

-----signature-----
"When I give food to the poor,
I am a saint.
When I ask why the poor have no food,
I am a communist."
-Hélder Câmara
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History