darth_paul posted:Lord_NoONE posted:I recognize that she was asked a question. The answer, however, was not a necessary answer. In fact, her comments were non-responsive to the simple question that was asked.No, they weren't. She was asked if Dumbledore ever fell in love himself. Her assertion that he was gay was a lead-in to her answer that he was in love with Grindelwald. It was wholly pertinent. Now, she could always have chosen not to answer the question. But answering this question was no different from answering all the other questions she was asked; she didn't decline to answer any of them, and was only evasive when that child asked about the goats. Telling us who Dumbledore was in love with isn't any more information than revealing that Neville and Hannah Abbot married; was that, similarly too much information? I honestly wouldn't mind if she didn't answer as many questions as she does; we're finding out a lot about the world that it wouldn't hurt the world not to know. But I see no reason for her to avoid this question when she deals with all the others. -Paul
Lord_NoONE posted:I recognize that she was asked a question. The answer, however, was not a necessary answer. In fact, her comments were non-responsive to the simple question that was asked.
NYCitygurl posted:One thing -- Neville and Hannah Abbot? What happened to Luna? I thought the two of them would get together.
scarus_multus2 posted:Not really appropriate.
NYCitygurl posted:Ah, haven't read much of any of the released stuff. Don't worry Not ban-worthy or anything, just be careful with comments that might offend someone
Darth-Ghost posted:She has tons of money and publicity, she doesn't need anymore and doesn't come across as wanting more either. Besides, this "Dubledore is gay" news will probably HURT sales more than anything.
