Lord_Ogli posted:Maybe Dumbledore captured a death eater, gave him some polyjuice potion and was controling him witht the Imperious curse as a decoy
JediNemesis posted:How much you want to bet that's a spell that Snape spent a lifetime wanting to use on someone. Seeing Harry cast it properly made him realize that perhaps the boy DOES have talent. I hadn't thought of that. "For Enemies"? Wonder if young Severus spent lessons itching to rip holes in James Potter?
mandragora posted:I won't believe that Snape will turn out to be on Voldemort's side until I read a definitive confirmation in book 7 for one reason that to me is crucial: Harry Potter (much like Star Wars) is a mythological tale, and it's primary target audience are children and young adolescents. And as such, the messages conveyed are the decisive issue. Now what would these messages be if Snape turned out to be on Voldemort's side? It would mean that Dumbledore was a fool for trusting a former death eater, and it cost him his life. And the messages implied would be: - Don't give someone who once fell for the dark side and tells you he will change his life a second chance. - Never trust anyone who's taken the wrong path before ever again. - Evil once, evil forever. These shouldn't and cannot be the implications conveyed in one of the most popular contemporary mythological tales, when it comes to me.
AmberStarbright posted:I think Snape is good, basically for the reasons above. Especially when Dumbledore was bad to sound like he was pleading with Snape, he isn't the type of man to beg for his life.
Darth-Ghost posted: "I never think in terms of What am I going to teach them? Or, What would it be good for them to find out here?" -- J.K. Rowling