Author Topic: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince ***Spoilers***
Vortigern99 
Title: Manager Emeritus
Registered: Nov '00
6129_Anakin Skywalker
Date Posted: 4/9 11:56am Subject: RE: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince ***Spoilers***
The problems with OotP lie in the screenplay, not the execution. It's the best-acted film so far, and the staging and editing are brilliant IMO. With Kloves returning to the script, HBP will certainly be a masterpiece.

 

-----signature-----
"I knew from the beginning I was not doing science fiction.
I was doing a space opera, a fantasy film, a mythological piece,
a fairy tale."--George Lucas
My "Vader's Origins" thread:
http://boards.theforce.net/Classic_Trilogy/b10002/8708417/p1
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Chancellor_Ewok 
Registered: Nov '04
20459_Dark Trooper
Date Posted: 4/10 8:20am Subject: RE: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince ***Spoilers*** - Date Edited: 4/10 8:31am (2 edits total) Edited By: Chancellor_Ewok
Vortigern99 posted:
The problems with OotP lie in the screenplay, not the execution. It's the best-acted film so far, and the staging and editing are brilliant IMO. With Kloves returning to the script, HBP will certainly be a masterpiece.


I agree. Yates nailed the look and tone of Phoenix, but the strong visuals were undermined by the script, which reduced the DA/Order/Death Eaters battle, the Twins' antics and the death of Sirius to almost nothing, which is a shame because Rowling gave us a spectacular running set-piece batte in the book. Fortunately, they made up for it with the Voldemort/Dumbledore battle, which was awesome.

 

-----signature-----
For more information about the crack spider's bitch contact the Canadian Wildlife Service in Ottawa.
I robbed the second largest bank in France using only a ballpoint pen
I killed a man with this thumb.
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Vortigern99 
Title: Manager Emeritus
Registered: Nov '00
6129_Anakin Skywalker
Date Posted: 4/16 10:09pm Subject: RE: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince ***Spoilers*** - Date Edited: 4/16 10:13pm (1 edits total) Edited By: Vortigern99
I just watched OotP again; this marks my 5th time (twice in the theater). It really does improve with every viewing -- and with every month that passes that I haven't read the book! Honestly, if I didn't know there was stuff missing I simply wouldn't miss it. The plot covers all the necessary bases, and the filmmaking crafts -- cinematography, editing, effects, performances, music -- are all superlative. I especially enjoy the expanded color palette employed here; with all the swirling blues and blacks, and pinks and purple undertones, it's very complex and moody. Also, what I initially perceived as short shrift to Sirius Black's death felt just right to me this time.

I know this is still a sticking point for some fans. But I noted that Harry gets boiling mad at the moment of Sirius' murder -- angry at Bellatrix whom he crucio curses. This anger seemingly allows Voldemort to enter his head, but Harry later defeats this possession by imagining all his friends and loved ones, including a living Sirius. (I believe these are all events unique to the film, and IMO they work really well.) Later, at the denouement, Harry is sad rather than mad, and Dumbledore is immediately apologetic; there just isn't any room in the film for Harry to smash things and scream at Dumbledore. Love saved him at the climax; it would seem foolish and immature to get angry now. Harry's accepting of Luna's outreach leads into the positive ending, in which Harry reiterates what Sirius inspired in him, and what his friends have been telling him all along: that they have to stand up and fight for what's important.

EDIT: To conclude, the tone and pacing of the movie allow for brief anger which proves to be the wrong choice for Harry, followed by sadness, and resolved via friendly outreach and hope for the future. All in all a fine fantasy film.

 

-----signature-----
"I knew from the beginning I was not doing science fiction.
I was doing a space opera, a fantasy film, a mythological piece,
a fairy tale."--George Lucas
My "Vader's Origins" thread:
http://boards.theforce.net/Classic_Trilogy/b10002/8708417/p1
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
NateCaauwe 
Registered: May '05
45236_5-25-77
Date Posted: 4/17 6:21pm Subject: RE: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince ***Spoilers*** - Date Edited: 4/17 6:24pm (3 edits total) Edited By: NateCaauwe
Vortigern99 posted:
I know this is still a sticking point for some fans. But I noted that Harry gets boiling mad at the moment of Sirius' murder -- angry at Bellatrix whom he crucio curses. This anger seemingly allows Voldemort to enter his head, but Harry later defeats this possession by imagining all his friends and loved ones, including a living Sirius. (I believe these are all events unique to the film, and IMO they work really well.) Later, at the denouement, Harry is sad rather than mad, and Dumbledore is immediately apologetic; there just isn't any room in the film for Harry to smash things and scream at Dumbledore. Love saved him at the climax; it would seem foolish and immature to get angry now. Harry's accepting of Luna's outreach leads into the positive ending, in which Harry reiterates what Sirius inspired in him, and what his friends have been telling him all along: that they have to stand up and fight for what's important.

I think Harry driving Voldemort out of his mind unintentionally was better.
Order of the Phoenix, Page 816 posted:
"If death is nothing, Dumbledore, kill the boy…"
Let the pain stop,
thought Harry. Let him kill us…End it, Dumbledore…Death is nothing compared to this…
And I'll see Sirius again…

And as Harry's heart filled with emotion, the creature's coils loosened, the pain was gone, Harry was lying facedown on the floor, his glasses gone, shivering as though he lay upon ice, not wood…

Also note then, that a few pages later he takes a portkey to Dumbledore's office, and less than 10 pages after all this he's destroying everything. Although I think it comes down to the differences between film and written word. In a book, you can leave out any mention of a subplot and bring it up much much later and it's still relevant (observe the locket from the beginning of OotP not coming into play until end of HBP or even into DH), whereas in a movie, the audience sorta needs to be reminded what characters are feeling or what's going on. Characters sometimes need to react to events sooner rather than later, otherwise people may tend to forget what their own reaction was (notice they added a scene in the HBP movie to remind people the wizarding world is at war).

I still feel we've been ridiculously cheated out of fascinating explanations from Dumbledore two movies in a row now. GoF we just got him staring into space going "Priori Incantatem…" and OotP gave us what everyone always knew anyway: that Harry and Voldemort have to fight it out in the end. The Lost Prophecy is one of my favorite chapters of all the books, and to see them literally throw everything but a few words out the window prompted an audible "WHAT THE ****?!" from me at the midnight showing. Essentially, to bring me back to what I quoted, they screwed themselves out of a brilliant venting scene (Harry's "Look at me!" earlier in the film made me excited to see him go all out later) by screwing up the possession scene…at least in my opinion.

 

-----signature-----
http://NateCow.com
http://PixelCorps.com
http://twitter.com/NateCow
"Never ask a man what kind of computer he uses.
If he's a Mac user, he'll tell you. If he's not, why embarrass him?" -Tom Clancy
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Count_Doodie 
Registered: May '06
41992_Lightsaber
Date Posted: 4/18 5:07am Subject: RE: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince ***Spoilers***
NateCaauwe posted:

I think Harry driving Voldemort out of his mind unintentionally was better.


gotto disagree. i really liked the way that the movie had harry step up at that point. instead of having him become a subject of his surroundings like in the book, the films showed him act of his own accord. it shows a bit of growth for the character who earlier in the film (and book) told everyone that most of his triumphs were just luck. it was an aspect that i missed in the book. in GoF harry stands up and faces voldemort and in OotP (book) i wanted him to go one step further. perhaps that was me wanting harry to grow up a little faster than JKR had him do. none of us can deny that by book 7 harry is all about stepping up as it were, and i dont mind that the film makers have him reach that point a little earlier.

Vortigern99 posted:
...if I didn't know there was stuff missing I simply wouldn't miss it. The plot covers all the necessary bases...Also, what I initially perceived as short shrift to Sirius Black's death felt just right to me this time.

But I noted that Harry gets boiling mad at the moment of Sirius' murder -- angry at Bellatrix whom he crucio curses. This anger seemingly allows Voldemort to enter his head, but Harry later defeats this possession by imagining all his friends and loved ones, including a living Sirius. (I believe these are all events unique to the film, and IMO they work really well.) Later, at the denouement, Harry is sad rather than mad, and Dumbledore is immediately apologetic; there just isn't any room in the film for Harry to smash things and scream at Dumbledore. Love saved him at the climax; it would seem foolish and immature to get angry now....
To conclude, the tone and pacing of the movie allow for brief anger which proves to be the wrong choice for Harry, followed by sadness, and resolved via friendly outreach and hope for the future. All in all a fine fantasy film.

it's nice to hear someone else say that as it's the song i've been singing since i saw the film in the cinema. which also means that i (and i accept that i may be in the minority here) thought that Goldenberg did a good job with the script and im a little bit afraid for HBP because Klovis is back...

-doodie

 

-----signature-----
dont laugh at me, i'm here to learn.
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Vortigern99 
Title: Manager Emeritus
Registered: Nov '00
6129_Anakin Skywalker
Date Posted: 4/18 1:37pm Subject: RE: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince ***Spoilers***
NateCaauwe posted:
    [from JKR's book] "And as Harry's heart filled with emotion, the creature's coils loosened, the pain was gone, Harry was lying facedown on the floor, his glasses gone, shivering as though he lay upon ice, not wood…"


... [T]hey screwed themselves out of a brilliant venting scene (Harry's "Look at me!" earlier in the film made me excited to see him go all out later) by screwing up the possession scene... at least in my opinion.[/


But either way, love appears to be the motivating factor. In the film Harry makes a conscious effort, as though creating a Patronus, to think of all the people he loves. In the book Harry kind of gives up; he surrenders, and then the thought of being reunited with Sirius in death stirs his emotions. It's an interesting literary moment, but the movie is more essentially heroic in this way, and as Count_Doodie has noted, prefigures Harry's "stepping up" later in the series.

NateCaauwe posted:
Although I think it comes down to the differences between film and written word. In a book, you can leave out any mention of a subplot and bring it up much much later and it's still relevant ... whereas in a movie, the audience sorta needs to be reminded what characters are feeling or what's going on....


Exactly. The movies are inherently different because they serve slightly different, in some cases very different, purposes. Once we see Harry actively employ his memories of his loved ones in order to drive out Voldemort, it would be like immature backpeddling if he then gets smashing angry with Dumbledore. He's already been smashing angry, or close to it, twice in this movie: once when he shouts at D, and once when Sirius dies, and he breaks free of Lupin to go after Bellatrix. Now, at the denoument of the film, he's past that. He's sad but not mad, and has taken Sirius' lessons -- about hope and positivity -- to heart.

NateCaauwe posted:
I still feel we've been ridiculously cheated out of fascinating explanations from Dumbledore two movies in a row now. GoF we just got him staring into space going "Priori Incantatem…" and OotP gave us what everyone always knew anyway: that Harry and Voldemort have to fight it out in the end. The Lost Prophecy is one of my favorite chapters of all the books, and to see them literally throw everything but a few words out the window prompted an audible "WHAT THE ****?!" from me at the midnight showing.


Well, my take on stuff like this is that the books still exist. You can still read those excellent, insightful or inspiring moments that for whatever reason have been excised or changed for the movies. All the necessary, pertinent information is still being conveyed in the dialogue. Priori incantatem will be explained in its proper context (probably in DH 2?). The full explanation of the Prophecy -- that Trelawney uttered it; that Neville might have been V's mark instead of Harry -- is fascinating backstory, but not required for a two-hour movie that has one central character and a whole host of supporting characters to deal with. Just as with PoA, it's not necessary to know that the Marauders Map was actually created by Sirius, James, Peter and Remus -- the first three of whom learned to be animaguses (animagi?) in order to comfort Lupin in his lycanthropy. The movie is still brilliant without this missing tidbit, as awesome as it is to know it. We aren't being "cheated", IMO, because that information is still available -- as a meme and as an experience you can repeat by re-reading the book, or imagining it for yourself.

 

-----signature-----
"I knew from the beginning I was not doing science fiction.
I was doing a space opera, a fantasy film, a mythological piece,
a fairy tale."--George Lucas
My "Vader's Origins" thread:
http://boards.theforce.net/Classic_Trilogy/b10002/8708417/p1
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Chancellor_Ewok 
Registered: Nov '04
20459_Dark Trooper
Date Posted: 4/18 1:48pm Subject: RE: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince ***Spoilers*** - Date Edited: 4/18 1:50pm (1 edits total) Edited By: Chancellor_Ewok
NateCaauwe posted:
They screwed themselves out of a brilliant venting scene (Harry's "Look at me!" earlier in the film made me excited to see him go all out later) by screwing up the possession scene…at least in my opinion.


I agree. Harry's upset, because Dumbledore hasn't even done Harry the courytesy of looking him in the face all year, the closest thing he has to a father is dead and oo top of that, Harry finds out that Dumbledore has been keeping important information from him right from the start and knows it. Harry is pissed at world and has every right to be. That have been made more clear in the film.

I also think they should have included the arguement in the hospital wing between Snape, Fudge, Dumbledore and McGonagall in GOF. It was brilliantly writtnel.

 

-----signature-----
For more information about the crack spider's bitch contact the Canadian Wildlife Service in Ottawa.
I robbed the second largest bank in France using only a ballpoint pen
I killed a man with this thumb.
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Katana_Geldar 
Title: Former CR
Tasmania, AU

Registered: Mar '03
15594_Dark Leia
Date Posted: 5/1 7:33pm Subject: RE: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince ***Spoilers***
Two pieces of news:

Suzanne Toase will play Alecto Carrow. I hope she's good at being furious wink

Deathly Hallows Part I will premiere 11/19/10. Nothing new as to the content.

 

-----signature-----
Lieutenant Gold 6 in EUDF
My Stormtrooper video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RC1bG40U0kc
Support celebration Australia! Sign the petition! http://www.petitiononline.com/COz/petition.html
Jacen and the two Vergeres http://www.freewebs.com/katana-geldar/
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Vortigern99 
Title: Manager Emeritus
Registered: Nov '00
6129_Anakin Skywalker
Date Posted: 5/1 11:10pm Subject: RE: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince ***Spoilers***
Wow, that means they're actually taking two years between HBP and DH1, rather than the standard 1.5 years of the last several movies:

SS - Nov 2001
CoS - Nov 2002
PoA - May 2004
GoF - Dec 2005
OotP - May 2007
HBP - Nov 2008
DH1 - Nov 2010
DH2 - ?

This is certain to be a quality production, and the flagship of the HP films.

 

-----signature-----
"I knew from the beginning I was not doing science fiction.
I was doing a space opera, a fantasy film, a mythological piece,
a fairy tale."--George Lucas
My "Vader's Origins" thread:
http://boards.theforce.net/Classic_Trilogy/b10002/8708417/p1
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Chancellor_Ewok 
Registered: Nov '04
20459_Dark Trooper
Date Posted: 5/4 9:44am Subject: RE: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince ***Spoilers*** - Date Edited: 5/4 10:47am (1 edits total) Edited By: Chancellor_Ewok
Vortigern99 posted:
This is certain to be a quality production, and the flagship of the HP films.


Agreed. I am expecting great things from Deathly Hallows. They should be able to include all of the Battle of Hogwarts, which is good, as its my favorite part of the series after the graveyard sequence at the end of Goblet of Fire.

 

-----signature-----
For more information about the crack spider's bitch contact the Canadian Wildlife Service in Ottawa.
I robbed the second largest bank in France using only a ballpoint pen
I killed a man with this thumb.
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
NateCaauwe 
Registered: May '05
45236_5-25-77
Date Posted: 5/4 1:18pm Subject: RE: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince ***Spoilers***
Count_Doodie posted:
NateCaauwe posted:

I think Harry driving Voldemort out of his mind unintentionally was better.


gotto disagree. i really liked the way that the movie had harry step up at that point. instead of having him become a subject of his surroundings like in the book, the films showed him act of his own accord. it shows a bit of growth for the character who earlier in the film (and book) told everyone that most of his triumphs were just luck. it was an aspect that i missed in the book. in GoF harry stands up and faces voldemort and in OotP (book) i wanted him to go one step further. perhaps that was me wanting harry to grow up a little faster than JKR had him do. none of us can deny that by book 7 harry is all about stepping up as it were, and i dont mind that the film makers have him reach that point a little earlier.


A little earlier? We're three movies too soon. His triumph over Voldemort in OotP was luck, just as before, and by the end of the film, Harry has everything figured out except for Horcruxes. What does he have left to learn about himself over HBP and DH?

 

-----signature-----
http://NateCow.com
http://PixelCorps.com
http://twitter.com/NateCow
"Never ask a man what kind of computer he uses.
If he's a Mac user, he'll tell you. If he's not, why embarrass him?" -Tom Clancy
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Count_Doodie 
Registered: May '06
41992_Lightsaber
Date Posted: 5/5 4:37pm Subject: RE: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince ***Spoilers***
NateCaauwe posted:
[quote=Count_Doodie][quote=NateCaauwe]A little earlier? We're three movies too soon. His triumph over Voldemort in OotP was luck, just as before, and by the end of the film, Harry has everything figured out except for Horcruxes. What does he have left to learn about himself over HBP and DH?


perhaps the movies will now concentrator more on harry learning about voldermort. who he was, how be became, how to defeat him etc. but im sure there's still room harry's character to grow.

in other news - no angsty tonks in HBP

-doodie

 

-----signature-----
dont laugh at me, i'm here to learn.
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Vortigern99 
Title: Manager Emeritus
Registered: Nov '00
6129_Anakin Skywalker
Date Posted: 5/5 5:25pm Subject: RE: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince ***Spoilers*** - Date Edited: 5/5 5:27pm (1 edits total) Edited By: Vortigern99
NateCaauwe posted:
A little earlier? We're three movies too soon. His triumph over Voldemort in OotP was luck, just as before, and by the end of the film, Harry has everything figured out except for Horcruxes. What does he have left to learn about himself over HBP and DH?


His "triumph" over Voldemort in OotP -- by which I guess you mean his driving You-Know-Who from his mind -- also happens in the book. The only difference is that Harry takes the initiative himself, actively thinking of those he loves -- which is of course Harry's secret weapon, and ties in with the Prophecy -- rather than simply stumbling on it by giving up and thinking of joining Sirius in death. I don't really see anything substantively different here from the way it's presented in the book, except, again, that it casts Harry in a more heroic light -- which is more in keeping with a series of fantasy-adventure films rather than books. As to the question of "what he has yet to learn for himself", I should think there is plenty left undiscovered, from 'Priori Incantatem', to the exact nature of his mother's protective spell, to Horcruxes, to the piece of Voldemort's soul lodged within him. This is to say nothing of the multiplicity of other unanswered questions, including Snape's part in all of this and of course the origins of Tom Riddle, which makes up the majority of the HBP backstory. Mysteries yet abound, giving us plenty to chew on through the next two films.

 

-----signature-----
"I knew from the beginning I was not doing science fiction.
I was doing a space opera, a fantasy film, a mythological piece,
a fairy tale."--George Lucas
My "Vader's Origins" thread:
http://boards.theforce.net/Classic_Trilogy/b10002/8708417/p1
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Katana_Geldar 
Title: Former CR
Tasmania, AU

Registered: Mar '03
15594_Dark Leia
Date Posted: 5/11 11:52pm Subject: RE: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince ***Spoilers***
Interesting News Item About HBP

it appears we may know now where the movie will start. And that will be in the office of the muggle PM!

How do I know this?

Teresa Mahoney, pictured left, has been cast as "Sofie" in "Boardroom - Opening Scene". This leads us to believe that Half-Blood Prince's opening may stay true to the book.

from http://www.mugglenet.com/, scroll about halfway down past the sidebars and there it is.

Of course, as well all know, this may be changed when they do the edit.

 

-----signature-----
Lieutenant Gold 6 in EUDF
My Stormtrooper video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RC1bG40U0kc
Support celebration Australia! Sign the petition! http://www.petitiononline.com/COz/petition.html
Jacen and the two Vergeres http://www.freewebs.com/katana-geldar/
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
timmoishere 
Registered: Jun '07
14706_AT-AT
Date Posted: 5/12 10:56pm Subject: RE: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince ***Spoilers***
Have we heard any casting news about Scrimgeour, though? Or the Muggle Prime Minister?

 

-----signature-----
What ain't no country I ever heard of. They speak English in What?
Vikings > Pirates > Ninjas
Everything tastes better wrapped in bacon, especially bacon
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History