oz_skipp posted: But seriously, if I brought 10, 20, 50 people onto these boards to join up and post a few times and then vote for me, would that be fair? This is what we're trying to avoid.
leektar posted: ... yet it looks as though my voice in who I would like to run this group will not be heard as I'm unable to attend RL meetings.... quite interesting.
leektar posted: The people who voted in the last election were FAR MORE active here than those who remain yet are being treated like foreign invaders.
leektar posted:I can only assume that I am one of the people that you are referring to here, as I have only been a member for approx 12 months, (it may be a little less than that) Skipp.
leektar posted:To be fair, I've been involved in the Star Wars community here in South Australia longer than you (or most here for that matter) have Skipp,
leektar posted:I'm sorry, but to me, they are the core members of this group, not those that pop up once in a blue moon),
leektar posted:yet it looks as though my voice in who I would like to run this group will not be heard as I'm unable to attend RL meetings....
leektar posted:For me, it wasn't about Star Wars - it was about joining in something tat e-i was involved in (maybe even to do things as a family with e-i jnr) and the friendships that had evolved from these events.
leektar posted:The people who voted in the last election were FAR MORE active here than those who remain yet are being treated like foreign invaders. These people were largely the backbone & driving force behind this place but that seems to have been forgotten somehow. It looks like history is being overwritten.
Obi-Wan_Toddi posted:leektar posted: ... yet it looks as though my voice in who I would like to run this group will not be heard as I'm unable to attend RL meetings.... quite interesting. That is interesting. So you were able to attend events before, but now you're unable to. Is there a reason you cannot attend, as you have been able to in the past?
Obi-Wan_Toddi posted:[quote=leektar] So you are saying that those people who currently post on SAFF aren't as active as those who have now left? If there's one thing to be said for the people who are currently posting on SAFF, is that they haven't left. Regardless of what SAFF goes through, they don't leave. There have been tough times for SAFF, but these people still stay and support it.
oz_skipp posted:Whilst I'm not one for trying to 'one up' others, I was at the first PARSEC meeting 10+ years back and have been involved in some form or another ever since. If you've been around doing stuff for longer with EI, great. But I've been a fan for the better part of the last 27 years and have loved most of the community based stuff. Until lately that is but everything has its ups and downs.
oz_skipp posted: So, to move this discussion forward, I ask, what is a reasonable number of events to attend over a 12 month period (noting that both costumed and non-costumed/informal events count)? One? Two? Three?
Equal Opportunity Act s5 Definitions posted:"impairment" means intellectual impairment or physical impairment; "intellectual impairment" means permanent or temporary loss or imperfect development of mental faculties (except where attributable to mental illness) resulting in reduced intellectual capacity; "physical impairment" means— (a) the total or partial loss of any function of the body; or (b) the total or partial loss of any part of the body; or (c) the malfunctioning of any part of the body; or (d) the malformation or disfigurement of any part of the body, whether permanent or temporary, but does not include intellectual impairment or mental illness;
leektar posted: Now Toddi, please don't try to play dumb - as the newly nominated CR, you know why I can't attend any RL events any more, and, if you don't, if you are ever lucky enough to have a family of your own, maybe then you will realise......
leektar posted: You took a break from the boards when M-S originally took over as CR