Author Topic: A Fateful Bond: The Anakin/Obi-Wan Brotherhood Fan Thread V 2.0
AnakinLuver 
Registered: Feb '06
24162_Obi-Wan and Anakin
Date Posted: 7/16 7:41pm Subject: RE: A Fateful Bond: The Anakin/Obi-Wan Brotherhood Fan Thread V 2.0 - Date Edited: 7/16 7:56pm (1 edits total) Edited By: AnakinLuver
Oh, I think that's very true. The only argument which could be made is that Luke helped Anakin get to the position where he could choose, but I'm not saying Luke is the Chosen One or anything like that. He just ends up being the catalyst that forces Anakin to finally make the right decision.

Agreed. grin

Oh, I'm not arguing that Lucas doesn't hold authority. As he has said, if he wants to paint his house white he can paint it white. However, artistic theory says each person who views that house will see it in a different way. The house may look white to Lucas but it may look blue to someone else. For me it's not rampant fanboyism, as I'm not saying I've got the only valid take on the issue and I admit that far more people think that Vader is far weaker in the suit and that Luke is far weaker than any Prequel Jedi.

Beautifully said... there are too many sides to this argument to even begin to think who supposedly had the "correct" one... Personally for me... I don't think there is even a thing as canon. Sounds wierd doesn't it? Who says we have to take the movies as they are? There are way too many ways to intepret what events take place in these films. I don't think things are ever definite. peace Peace to you who think there is canon!!!

Don't underestimate Obi Wan. That's the mistake most fans make.

Obi Wan defeated Grevious, when that dude beat several Jedi Masters, at once. He defeated maul as a mere Padawan, after his master, who was suppose to be a great swordsman (though a step below the likes of Yoda, Mace, and Dooku) was killed by maul. Not to mention, he defeated arguibly one of the best swordsman in the entire order, in Anakin Skywalker. He defeated Anakin after a long, dragged out duel.

Obi Wan's greatest strength is his endurance and his intelligence.


I'll give you props on this GS335! Most people don't give Obi-wan the time of day in some instances... But, I love the man! dancing He kicks some major butt!

I never said that Lucas doesn't agree with Gillard. If one believes Lucas's word to be impossible to argue with then your interpretation definitely wins. However, I reject that premise.

As do I. I don't believe you should think Lucas's word impossible to argue with... where's the fun in that? If you do that, then you can't interpretate the Saga the way you want to because you'll be referring to Lucas's ideas, not your own, right? confused Besides you'll be changing your opinions how many times debating other people on views of certain events in the movies... so much fun! dancing

The only reason Vader couldn't generate Force Lightning was because of his mechanical limbs. It has nothing to do with his knowledge of the Dark Side.

Exactly. You can't hold that against him if he can't even perform the task. He would do it if he didn't have mechanical limbs... most likely.

It's not called the tragedy of Darth Vader because he becomes a shell physically. It can be called the tragedy of Darth Vader because he becomes a twisted inhuman monster as opposed to the fully realized heroic Jedi he was supposed to be.

I agree with that one. Obi-wan most likely would see it as Anakin became Vader and didn't fulfill the prophecy Qui-gon oh so thought he would bring into fruition(at the time being of the very end of ROTS to the very end of ROTJ). Vader may see it himself that he can no longer do some of the activities he could have as in Anakin's form, but still a Sith. Either way... raised_brow

Oh, I'm not saying that he's admirable. I'm saying that I love the character of Vader, not that I think he's a good person. One can think a character was masterfully created and realized while still acknowledging that they're evil.

Yup. I love that Darth Vader/Anakin Skywalker is such a complex character, creatively created for this story and you can just pick apart the numerous layers that make him who he is. All the way through the Saga he does things that just make you say... Huh?

oh wow...my head is spinning in circles here lol.

hypnotized I'm getting a headache just trying to reply to most of this... such a tasteful discussion!

are you serious? you're kidding right? you make it out to be like Anakin in ROTS was the best he could ever become. the kid was a Jedi Knight for crying out loud, and something close to a Sith Apprentice. he was so emotionally unstable, he caused his ownself to lose three of his limbs and burn to a pulp as you even mentioned.

Beautifully said... Yes, he was the Chosen One, and very powerful, but it was raw power when he became a Sith. He couldn't control it that well. And being emotionally unstable doesn't help that much either... worried

no one is saying choking a defenseless bystander with the Force is the ultimate way of proving Vader was stronger than ROTS Anakin, but just look at the difference. Anakin had to use his hand and full concentration to choke Padme in ROTS, and then comes the OT and Vader just looks at someone and they're on the floor squirming. that just proves one point, that Vader had so much more control with the Force.

Stellar observation! Vader learned to control that raw power and within an instant has someone wheezing for life... *shudder* Vaderkin was so... all over the place with his actions. He had to really focus on how Padme 'betrayed' him so he could impulsively choke her.

you say this about 10 times through your post and might i just say that Vader is not a shell of what he once was. he was a shell of what he might have become.

I don't think you could've said it any better than this. Well done. Anakin was never at his full potential during the entire PT... at least I don't think so. His few overwhelming emotions sort of held him back... I don't know how else to say that.

again, Anakin is a Jedi Knight...he has so much more to learn. i don't think there's one Jedi out there that you can say was "fully trained"...even Yoda was just learning new things about communicating with the dead.

Just like life... you are never done learning, even if you had how many lifetimes. People and things keep evolving.

i actually haven't watched the OT in a while, but i just remembered a thought that went through my head during that one scene. i always got the feeling that even though Yoda said Luke didn't require anymore training, i don't think he meant it Jedi skills wise...i think he meant that he couldn't do anymore for Luke and that the only way Luke would beat his father is if he truly surrendered himself to the Force, and set his mind to it..yada yada. but that also proves that Luke didn't need as good Jedi skills as Vader to beat him...which says a lot about Luke's abilities.

I always felt that way, from the very first time I actually was old enough to understand most of the SW movies. Yoda was like "I have no more that I can teach you that will help you when you face your father."

Man, I thought that would never be over. This is a fun discussion though.

Rachel Rose rose

P.S. They need way more Anakin and Obi-wan icons here. tongue

 

-----signature-----
e-sister to Dee and Crystal and Alley!
Star Wars, Twilight, and Superheros - Trio of my Life happy
Proud Cheesehead & Movie Fanatic**
Edward: "Do you want me to sing to you? I'll sing all night if it will keep the bad dreams away."
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Master_Starwalker 
Registered: Sep '03
17815_Obi-Wan Kenobi
Date Posted: 7/16 11:45pm Subject: RE: A Fateful Bond: The Anakin/Obi-Wan Brotherhood Fan Thread V 2.0
anakin_luver posted:
Master_Starwalker posted:
And if Luke requires no more training he has been fully trained.


i actually haven't watched the OT in a while, but i just remembered a thought that went through my head during that one scene. i always got the feeling that even though Yoda said Luke didn't require anymore training, i don't think he meant it Jedi skills wise...i think he meant that he couldn't do anymore for Luke and that the only way Luke would beat his father is if he truly surrendered himself to the Force, and set his mind to it..yada yada. but that also proves that Luke didn't need as good Jedi skills as Vader to beat him...which says a lot about Luke's abilities.



I actually agree with that. Luke doesn't know very many of the technicalities, but the Force is his ally and his complete and utter trust in the Force allows him to overcome opponents who are more technically proficient.

Beautifully said... there are too many sides to this argument to even begin to think who supposedly had the "correct" one... Personally for me... I don't think there is even a thing as canon. Sounds wierd doesn't it? Who says we have to take the movies as they are? There are way too many ways to intepret what events take place in these films. I don't think things are ever definite. peace Peace to you who think there is canon!!!

I used to be a big canon guy, so I do see where they're coming from. The only real argument I can see for canon(outside of Lucasfilm) is that it makes it easier to debate as you're using the same facts(though even then interpretations vary wildly.) As far as I know, the reason canon was created was so that they could rank sources inside of Lucasfilm in a predictable way so that authors would know how to rank sources that contradicted each other.

As do I. I don't believe you should think Lucas's word impossible to argue with... where's the fun in that? If you do that, then you can't interpretate the Saga the way you want to because you'll be referring to Lucas's ideas, not your own, right? confused Besides you'll be changing your opinions how many times debating other people on views of certain events in the movies... so much fun! dancing

Exactly. It's also kind of funny that canon has become a kind of dogma when you consider that Lucas doesn't seem to be the biggest fan of dogma.

Yup. I love that Darth Vader/Anakin Skywalker is such a complex character, creatively created for this story and you can just pick apart the numerous layers that make him who he is. All the way through the Saga he does things that just make you say... Huh?

Exactly.

P.S. They need way more Anakin and Obi-wan icons here. tongue

They also need more Luke icons. tongue

 

-----signature-----
"The ways of the Living Force are beyond our understanding... But fear not. You are in the hands of something much greater and much better than you can imagine." - Qui-Gon Jinn
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
iLoveAnakin7 
Registered: Apr '05
43761_Princess Leia
Date Posted: 7/17 5:42am Subject: RE: A Fateful Bond: The Anakin/Obi-Wan Brotherhood Fan Thread V 2.0
Wow, great discussion guys, I'll have to come back and read it all, and comment later.


Just wanted to say hey to Rachel! shock love

and HAPPY BIRTHDAY to Crystal!!!!!!!!!! grin dancing I hope you have a great day!

 

-----signature-----
Obama/Biden '08
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
amidalachick 
Registered: Aug '03
23036_Padme
Date Posted: 7/17 8:58am Subject: RE: A Fateful Bond: The Anakin/Obi-Wan Brotherhood Fan Thread V 2.0
Interesting discussion! I've been reading it on and off, in between vote counts. tongue

Anyway, just wanted to say Happy Birthday again to Crystal! happy

 

-----signature-----
"We figured if it wasn't skimming off the top, tax evasion, or unwed mother death sports, it had to be insurance fraud."
"No! It was for someone who needed it!"
"You were serious about that?"
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
GS335 
Registered: Feb '01
22997_Ghosts ROTJ (DVD)
Date Posted: 7/17 1:34pm Subject: RE: A Fateful Bond: The Anakin/Obi-Wan Brotherhood Fan Thread V 2.0 - Date Edited: 7/17 1:35pm (1 edits total) Edited By: GS335
"Vader does things Anakin could only dream of in the Original Trilogy. Anakin is never shown to have mastery over telepathy or "the ability to choke people without gesturing. As for Ben, I'm still not sure he's as much weaker as most people suggest. You mentioned the forms earlier, and the description of the way a form 3 master would fight fits Ben's highly defensive style more than it does RotS Kenobi's acrobatic style. "....endqoute


You are clearly confusing Episode I with Episode III.

In episode I, Kenobi used Form IV, which deals more with acrobatics.

In episode II, he begins to use Form III, which deals more with defense. By the time Episode III rolls along, Kenobi has mastered Form III. Form III is used to beat Grevious and beat vader.

Oh and BTW, we didn't see Anakin use telepathy much, because the script and storyline didn't call for it. But if you watch the clone wars mini cartoons, we've seen Anakin use telepathy with ease, and show more agility than vader would've dreamed of.

vader is weaker than Anakin because he lost his limbs, thats why. That's why a half trained Luke beat him.

The Ben we see from ANH is an Obi Wan who's been out of practice for a long time. That is NOT an Obi Wan Kenobi in his prime. Rots is Obi Wan in his prime, and that guy would've schooled ROTJ Luke like it was no tomorrow.

Again, don't underestimate Obi Wan. Luke has potential, but he's no where near his peak by the time of ROTJ. We've seen how far potential will get you with Anakin. Luke is no different.

 

-----signature-----
We can do ALL things through Christ Jesus, who strengthens us!
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
GS335 
Registered: Feb '01
22997_Ghosts ROTJ (DVD)
Date Posted: 7/17 1:39pm Subject: RE: A Fateful Bond: The Anakin/Obi-Wan Brotherhood Fan Thread V 2.0
"Just like life... you are never done learning, even if you had how many lifetimes. People and things keep evolving. "....endqoute


He's had far more training than Luke's had in ROTJ. Not to mention, Rots Anakin fought better opponents. All RoTJ Luke has fought, is a crippled vader who's not as strong as he was, before. He tires easy in the suit and can't defend like he would've if he wasn't in the suit. This has been said a thousand times.

Do you honestly think ROTJ Luke would've had a chance against vader if vader never lost his limbs?

Yoda said Luke didn't need anymore training, because Yoda knows that Luke's potential alone would beat vader. vader was a crippled old man who didn't have much in the tank and was limited by the suit. That's why. Yoda wouldn't be saying that if vader wasn't limited.

 

-----signature-----
We can do ALL things through Christ Jesus, who strengthens us!
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
GS335 
Registered: Feb '01
22997_Ghosts ROTJ (DVD)
Date Posted: 7/17 1:43pm Subject: RE: A Fateful Bond: The Anakin/Obi-Wan Brotherhood Fan Thread V 2.0 - Date Edited: 7/17 2:21pm (6 edits total) Edited By: GS335
"i actually haven't watched the OT in a while, but i just remembered a thought that went through my head during that one scene. i always got the feeling that even though Yoda said Luke didn't require anymore training, i don't think he meant it Jedi skills wise...i think he meant that he couldn't do anymore for Luke and that the only way Luke would beat his father is if he truly surrendered himself to the Force, and set his mind to it..yada yada. but that also proves that Luke didn't need as good Jedi skills as Vader to beat him...which says a lot about Luke's abilities. "....endquote


Again, Yoda said that because he knew vader was limited by the suit, didn't have much left in the tank, and wouldn't have the mobility to beat a younger opponent.

vader was not as strong as he was, pre-suit. If you read 'Dark Lord, the rise of darth vader,' you would see how this is true. vader had to totally reinvent his fighting style, because of his limitations. vader was frustrated, because he couldn't react to things like he used to, because of those limitations. He would easily tire by straining himself, if he was fighting a strong oppoent or had to fight more than one Jedi.

So yes, raw power would beat someone like vader who was limited.


"If Dooku is on par with Mace he's on par with Yoda given that both are level 9s. However I don't see any evidence of that. Tyranus is certainly powerful, but if he was equal to Mace and Yoda he'd be on par with Palpatine and could have overthrown him. He's at most a high eight which would simply put him slightly above RotS Kenobi and Anakin, but not on par with anyone in the top tier(ie: Yoda, Windu, and Palpatine.)

As for Luke, I would with you if I agreed with the premise that Vader was weaker. Of course, having a completely different premise which says Vader is at worst on par with Dooku means there's no difference."....endquote



Read information on Dooku at the SW wiki. It will tell you that Dooku is on par with Mace in lightsaber skills. He and Yoda are the only two that's ever bested Mace in sparring.

So yes, Dooku is THAT good. ROTJ Luke has never had to face anyone like that. His father on the other hand, did. He lost to him the first time and easily defeated him in the rematch. Facing Dooku who's highly skilled is far different than facing a guy who is in a support suit, who has no mobility, and who's far weaker than what he was, before.


"I never said that Lucas doesn't agree with Gillard. If one believes Lucas's word to be impossible to argue with then your interpretation definitely wins. However, I reject that premise. "...endquote


Just because Lucas says something you don't like, it doesn't mean its true. Lucas writes the story, not the fans. Lucas comes up with the concepts of the story, not the fans. Lucas is the creator of Star Wars, not the fans. If Lucas says something is true in regards to Star Wars, than its true. He created the story. This is something fans need to accept, and move on.

I think the biggest flaw of any fanbase, is when they think they know more than the creator, when they didn't even write the story or create the characters.

When it comes to Star Wars, what Lucas says is canon. He can do whatever he want, change whatever he wants when it comes to Star Wars. Its his story and HIS characters, so he has that right.

So Luke being the weakest Jedi in terms of skill in the entire movie saga is true.



"i actually haven't watched the OT in a while, but i just remembered a thought that went through my head during that one scene. i always got the feeling that even though Yoda said Luke didn't require anymore training, i don't think he meant it Jedi skills wise...i think he meant that he couldn't do anymore for Luke and that the only way Luke would beat his father is if he truly surrendered himself to the Force, and set his mind to it..yada yada. but that also proves that Luke didn't need as good Jedi skills as Vader to beat him...which says a lot about Luke's abilities.".....endquote


But Luke is also fighting a sith who lost his limbs and who is limited because of a support suit. So that argument is nullified, my friend.

Fighting a crippled vader is far different than fighting Dooku or Mace Windu who are highly skilled, and who are not limited by a support suit. Even as an older guy, Dooku was still kicking ass, and taking names. He showed plenty of agility fighting Yoda, which was a draw, BTW. There's no way RoTJ Luke does that. He's just not good enough, yet.




"It's not called the tragedy of Darth Vader because he becomes a shell physically. It can be called the tragedy of Darth Vader because he becomes a twisted inhuman monster as opposed to the fully realized heroic Jedi he was supposed to be. "....endquote


vader losing his limbs is apart of the traegity that is, darth vader. Its a story about wasted potential, all because of vader's greed and massive ego. Anakin had everything. He was a level 8, which is unheard of for any Jedi so young. He was the hero of the Clone Wars, had a beautiful wife who loved him dearly, and was on his way to becoming the greatest living Jedi, ever. But the arrogant punk wanted more power. The guy had selfish attachments to his mother and to his wife and as a result, he got punked by his former master. The end result was him losing his limbs, needing a life support suit to just survive, and becoming Palpatine's lap dog. That's the traegity of darth vader.





"Again, I don't see anything on screen which shows that he's unable to move faster when he wants to given the varying speeds he fights at in the Original Trilogy. I also don't see why he couldn't simply choke Obi-Wan and throw him aside given that Tyranus was able to. "....endquote

vader couldn't because he's not as strong in the force as before. He lost his abilities and raw power when he lost his limbs and got stuck in the suit. He's like a painter who's gone blind.

pre-suit vader was stronger than Dooku. post-suit vader is a step below Dooku. That's why.



 

-----signature-----
We can do ALL things through Christ Jesus, who strengthens us!
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
GS335 
Registered: Feb '01
22997_Ghosts ROTJ (DVD)
Date Posted: 7/17 1:55pm Subject: RE: A Fateful Bond: The Anakin/Obi-Wan Brotherhood Fan Thread V 2.0 - Date Edited: 7/17 2:11pm (1 edits total) Edited By: GS335
"are you serious? you're kidding right? you make it out to be like Anakin in ROTS was the best he could ever become. the kid was a Jedi Knight for crying out loud, and something close to a Sith Apprentice. he was so emotionally unstable, he caused his ownself to lose three of his limbs and burn to a pulp as you even mentioned.

no one is saying choking a defenseless bystander with the Force is the ultimate way of proving Vader was stronger than ROTS Anakin, but just look at the difference. Anakin had to use his hand and full concentration to choke Padme in ROTS, and then comes the OT and Vader just looks at someone and they're on the floor squirming. that just proves one point, that Vader had so much more control with the Force. "....endquote


Because Rots Anakin lost his limbs towards the end of the movie, what we saw of him in that movie (pre suit), sadly, is the best from him, skill wise. Level 8 was the highest Anakin went, because of his lost of limbs.

Yes vader was calmer, but he was evil. Not to mention, he was not as strong as he was before. That's why he lost to a half trained Luke later on.

That's why Old Ben said vader was a master of evil. He was not complementing vader. He was insulting the guy and telling the truth at the same time.

 

-----signature-----
We can do ALL things through Christ Jesus, who strengthens us!
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
GS335 
Registered: Feb '01
22997_Ghosts ROTJ (DVD)
Date Posted: 7/17 1:57pm Subject: RE: A Fateful Bond: The Anakin/Obi-Wan Brotherhood Fan Thread V 2.0
"Exactly. It's also kind of funny that canon has become a kind of dogma when you consider that Lucas doesn't seem to be the biggest fan of dogma."...endquote


But he is the creator of Star Wars and has creative control over the characters in the movies. He has the final say in everything.

It is what it is.

 

-----signature-----
We can do ALL things through Christ Jesus, who strengthens us!
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
GS335 
Registered: Feb '01
22997_Ghosts ROTJ (DVD)
Date Posted: 7/17 2:10pm Subject: RE: A Fateful Bond: The Anakin/Obi-Wan Brotherhood Fan Thread V 2.0
"The only reason Vader couldn't generate Force Lightning was because of his mechanical limbs. It has nothing to do with his knowledge of the Dark Side"...endquote

And his inability to generate force lighting is a direct result of him being weaker in the force. Having knowledge and being able to put the knowledge to use are two different things. vader's limitations made him a lost cause. There's a good reason why Palpatine was after Luke.

 

-----signature-----
We can do ALL things through Christ Jesus, who strengthens us!
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
GS335 
Registered: Feb '01
22997_Ghosts ROTJ (DVD)
Date Posted: 7/17 2:37pm Subject: RE: A Fateful Bond: The Anakin/Obi-Wan Brotherhood Fan Thread V 2.0 - Date Edited: 7/17 2:39pm (1 edits total) Edited By: GS335
"I actually agree with that. Luke doesn't know very many of the technicalities, but the Force is his ally and his complete and utter trust in the Force allows him to overcome opponents who are more technically proficient."....endquote


Luke also fought a weakened vader who was limited by a suit. Far different than facing Jedi in their prime. Not to mention, Luke used the darkside. So again, that point is nullified.


Lucas has said more than once that the PT is about Jedi in their prime. That is what we've seen with several characters, from Yoda, to Mace, to Obi Wan, to Anakin. It makes the OT even more sad, especially when we see how much was lost.

Luke did not face any Jedi in their prime, so again, him beating vader is nullified since vader was just a shell of what he once was, or what he could've been if he never would've fell to the darkside of the force.

 

-----signature-----
We can do ALL things through Christ Jesus, who strengthens us!
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Master_Starwalker 
Registered: Sep '03
17815_Obi-Wan Kenobi
Date Posted: 7/17 4:28pm Subject: RE: A Fateful Bond: The Anakin/Obi-Wan Brotherhood Fan Thread V 2.0
GS335 posted:
"Vader does things Anakin could only dream of in the Original Trilogy. Anakin is never shown to have mastery over telepathy or "the ability to choke people without gesturing. As for Ben, I'm still not sure he's as much weaker as most people suggest. You mentioned the forms earlier, and the description of the way a form 3 master would fight fits Ben's highly defensive style more than it does RotS Kenobi's acrobatic style. "....endqoute


You are clearly confusing Episode I with Episode III.

In episode I, Kenobi used Form IV, which deals more with acrobatics.

In episode II, he begins to use Form III, which deals more with defense. By the time Episode III rolls along, Kenobi has mastered Form III. Form III is used to beat Grevious and beat vader.


Oh, I know that officially he switches to Form III after TPM because seeing Qui-Gon die made Obi-Wan think the form's defense was too weak to be counted on. However, the films don't show that switch as clearly. Obi-Wan and Anakin continue to be actrobatic and fight with very similar styles despite the fact that they supposedly use different forms.

GS335 posted:
Oh and BTW, we didn't see Anakin use telepathy much, because the script and storyline didn't call for it. But if you watch the clone wars mini cartoons, we've seen Anakin use telepathy with ease, and show more agility than vader would've dreamed of.


The Clone Wars cartoons Force use is exaggerated for effect.

GS335 posted:
vader is weaker than Anakin because he lost his limbs, thats why. That's why a half trained Luke beat him.

The Ben we see from ANH is an Obi Wan who's been out of practice for a long time. That is NOT an Obi Wan Kenobi in his prime. Rots is Obi Wan in his prime, and that guy would've schooled ROTJ Luke like it was no tomorrow.


Yet I don't actually agree with either of those premises. You keep insisting that it's the case, and I know that it is according to Lucasfilm, but the films themselves don't show that's the case beyond a reasonable doubt.

GS335 posted:
Again, don't underestimate Obi Wan. Luke has potential, but he's no where near his peak by the time of ROTJ. We've seen how far potential will get you with Anakin. Luke is no different.



I think Luke would realize that he shouldn't jump when his opponent explicitly tells him not to. tongue

GS335 posted:
Again, Yoda said that because he knew vader was limited by the suit, didn't have much left in the tank, and wouldn't have the mobility to beat a younger opponent.


You're ascribing reasoning to Yoda's statement that he himself never makes clear.

GS335 posted:
vader was not as strong as he was, pre-suit. If you read 'Dark Lord, the rise of darth vader,' you would see how this is true. vader had to totally reinvent his fighting style, because of his limitations. vader was frustrated, because he couldn't react to things like he used to, because of those limitations. He would easily tire by straining himself, if he was fighting a strong oppoent or had to fight more than one Jedi.

So yes, raw power would beat someone like vader who was limited.


Of course, Dark Lord also says that Vader's limitations weren't due to his injuries, but rather due to his mentality. Palpatine also thinks about the fact that once Vader is a threat to him, he will have conquered death through Plagueis' teachings. Palpatine also mentions that Vader is now able to take command of his full power. Dark Lord gives the impression that Vader's weakness has been greatly exaggerated. He improves greatly over the course of the book and that's set over two decades before Empire.

GS335 posted:
Read information on Dooku at the SW wiki. It will tell you that Dooku is on par with Mace in lightsaber skills. He and Yoda are the only two that's ever bested Mace in sparring.

So yes, Dooku is THAT good. ROTJ Luke has never had to face anyone like that. His father on the other hand, did. He lost to him the first time and easily defeated him in the rematch. Facing Dooku who's highly skilled is far different than facing a guy who is in a support suit, who has no mobility, and who's far weaker than what he was, before.


We have no idea when he beat Mace. For all we know, he beat Mace when he was a younger and less skilled Jedi. That doesn't prove that Dooku as a Sith Lord is on the level of Mace and Yoda. As for Luke, he has faced someone on Tyranus' level in the form of his father.

GS335 posted:
Just because Lucas says something you don't like, it doesn't mean its true. Lucas writes the story, not the fans. Lucas comes up with the concepts of the story, not the fans. Lucas is the creator of Star Wars, not the fans. If Lucas says something is true in regards to Star Wars, than its true. He created the story. This is something fans need to accept, and move on.


I'm not saying what Lucas says isn't true. I'm simply saying that Artistic Theory says Lucas' intent and interpretation aren't absolute. It's certainly true from a certain point view.

GS335 posted:

I think the biggest flaw of any fanbase, is when they think they know more than the creator, when they didn't even write the story or create the characters.

When it comes to Star Wars, what Lucas says is canon. He can do whatever he want, change whatever he wants when it comes to Star Wars. Its his story and HIS characters, so he has that right.


I'm not saying I know more than Lucas does. I'm simply pointing out that a modern understanding of art undercuts the notion that his is the only valid interpretation.

GS335 posted:
So Luke being the weakest Jedi in terms of skill in the entire movie saga is true.


...from a certain point of view.

GS335 posted:
But Luke is also fighting a sith who lost his limbs and who is limited because of a support suit. So that argument is nullified, my friend.

Fighting a crippled vader is far different than fighting Dooku or Mace Windu who are highly skilled, and who are not limited by a support suit. Even as an older guy, Dooku was still kicking ass, and taking names. He showed plenty of agility fighting Yoda, which was a draw, BTW. There's no way RoTJ Luke does that. He's just not good enough, yet.


It wasn't a draw, Yoda forced Dooku to retreat. Dooku tried to hurt Yoda with the Force but was too weak to do so and he was too weak to get through Yoda's defenses. Dooku simply played upon Yoda's compassion and fled. The difference in power between Palpatine and his apprentice is clear given how much harder it was for Yoda to fight the Emperor.

GS335 posted:
vader losing his limbs is apart of the traegity that is, darth vader. Its a story about wasted potential, all because of vader's greed and massive ego. Anakin had everything. He was a level 8, which is unheard of for any Jedi so young. He was the hero of the Clone Wars, had a beautiful wife who loved him dearly, and was on his way to becoming the greatest living Jedi, ever. But the arrogant punk wanted more power. The guy had selfish attachments to his mother and to his wife and as a result, he got punked by his former master. The end result was him losing his limbs, needing a life support suit to just survive, and becoming Palpatine's lap dog. That's the traegity of darth vader.


That's what I meant with the phrase "fully-realized heroic Jedi." tongue

GS335 posted:
vader couldn't because he's not as strong in the force as before. He lost his abilities and raw power when he lost his limbs and got stuck in the suit. He's like a painter who's gone blind.

pre-suit vader was stronger than Dooku. post-suit vader is a step below Dooku. That's why.


Except the first is only partially true and the latter isn't true at all. The first is partially true because he lost his potential ceiling of 2 times Palpatine and lost some of his raw power. However, he gained a newfound skill with his abilities that makes up for it.

GS335 posted:
Because Rots Anakin lost his limbs towards the end of the movie, what we saw of him in that movie (pre suit), sadly, is the best from him, skill wise. Level 8 was the highest Anakin went, because of his lost of limbs.

Yes vader was calmer, but he was evil. Not to mention, he was not as strong as he was before. That's why he lost to a half trained Luke later on.

That's why Old Ben said vader was a master of evil. He was not complementing vader. He was insulting the guy and telling the truth at the same time.


I'm not saying it's a complement. However, villains can at times be more proficient than the heroes. Palpatine for instance was far stronger than Obi-Wan and he's the worst villain of them all. In Star Wars turning evil only prevents you from becoming a Force Ghost, in combat it seems to give you a boost if anything(because you're now free to draw on hate and anger.)

GS335 posted:
But he is the creator of Star Wars and has creative control over the characters in the movies. He has the final say in everything.

It is what it is.


He has the final say in terms of official canon, yes. In terms of what is and isn't a valid interpretation, no one does.

GS335 posted:
And his inability to generate force lighting is a direct result of him being weaker in the force. Having knowledge and being able to put the knowledge to use are two different things. vader's limitations made him a lost cause. There's a good reason why Palpatine was after Luke.


His inability to use Force Lightning has nothing do with him becoming weaker, it's simply because he would die if he used it because it would fry his life support just like Palpatine's lightning did in RotJ. The reason Palpatine wanted Luke was because Vader lacked his full potential while Luke still had it. Luke was Palpatine's last chance to realize a Sith Order that was lead by the equivalent of a Sith Chosen One. It's got nothing to do with Force Lightning and everything do with Luke's undiminished potential.

GS335 posted:
Luke also fought a weakened vader who was limited by a suit. Far different than facing Jedi in their prime. Not to mention, Luke used the darkside. So again, that point is nullified.


It's not nullified. If that point is then so is your point about Anakin beating Tyranus given that he also needed to use the Dark Side to do it. Luke was also holding his own against Vader throughout the duel prior to that. He just didn't want to fight Vader because Luke was there to redeem not to kill.

GS335 posted:
Lucas has said more than once that the PT is about Jedi in their prime. That is what we've seen with several characters, from Yoda, to Mace, to Obi Wan, to Anakin. It makes the OT even more sad, especially when we see how much was lost.


It is the Jedi in their prime. I'm not contesting that. The Prequels show a Jedi Order which is still thousands strong as opposed to two or three in the OT. That doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the strength of individual Jedi. I'm also not arguing that Luke could beat Yoda or Mace. I'm arguing that he could beat level 8s.

GS335 posted:
Luke did not face any Jedi in their prime, so again, him beating vader is nullified since vader was just a shell of what he once was, or what he could've been if he never would've fell to the darkside of the force.


He's not what he could have been, I agree. But he was greater than he once was in terms of power.

 

-----signature-----
"The ways of the Living Force are beyond our understanding... But fear not. You are in the hands of something much greater and much better than you can imagine." - Qui-Gon Jinn
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
GS335 
Registered: Feb '01
22997_Ghosts ROTJ (DVD)
Date Posted: 7/18 9:34am Subject: RE: A Fateful Bond: The Anakin/Obi-Wan Brotherhood Fan Thread V 2.0 - Date Edited: 7/18 9:58am (6 edits total) Edited By: GS335
"The Clone Wars cartoons Force use is exaggerated for effect. "...endquote


The CW cartoons are canon. In any discussion, you have to use all aspects of the SW universe. In that cartoon, we had Anakin, as a Padawan Learner, use a powerful force push to knock Ventress (a highly skilled dark Jedi) through a concrete wall. The powerful display of Anakin's telekenesis blew the wall open. Not to mention, Anakin ran through Ventress' own force push. Anakin showed his superiority over Ventress in that fight. This is Anakin, as just a Padawan, before he became a Knight. We've never seen him do anything like that as vader. That was to show how strong he was at such a young age. He was way better than any Padawan in the order and was probably better than some Jedi Knights. When he became a Knight, he was even better. This is after several years of Jedi training and experience, something ROTJ Luke has not had, yet.

Lucas did not show as much in the movies from any Jedi, because of budget constraints. So in the EU universe (aka cartoons), that worry is not there so the writers are free to show more impressive stuff.



"It's not nullified. If that point is then so is your point about Anakin beating Tyranus given that he also needed to use the Dark Side to do it. Luke was also holding his own against Vader throughout the duel prior to that. He just didn't want to fight Vader because Luke was there to redeem not to kill. "...endquote


vader didn't want to fight Luke, either. Hence, the conflict that was shown from vader in the movie. Luke felt it.

Yes Anakin used the darkside to defeat Tyranus, but its not like he was fighting a crippled cyborg who lost limbs, either. Dooku was still at his peak. Anakin just got better. And neither of them were swinging their lightsabers like wild men, either, much like what we saw in the vader/Luke fight in ROTJ. Anakin did display great lightsaber skills in that fight. While Luke is stronger in ROTJ than he was in ESB, he does not have the experience, yet. If he fought Dooku, Luke would've had a much harder time than he did against his father.



"His inability to use Force Lightning has nothing do with him becoming weaker, it's simply because he would die if he used it because it would fry his life support just like Palpatine's lightning did in RotJ. The reason Palpatine wanted Luke was because Vader lacked his full potential while Luke still had it. Luke was Palpatine's last chance to realize a Sith Order that was lead by the equivalent of a Sith Chosen One. It's got nothing to do with Force Lightning and everything do with Luke's undiminished potential."...endquote


Again, its due to vader losing his abilities as a result of his injuries. Palpatine thought vader wasn't focus when in reality, vader was limited. He was a lost cause, hence, the reason Palps went after Luke. This has been discussed before.


"Except the first is only partially true and the latter isn't true at all. The first is partially true because he lost his potential ceiling of 2 times Palpatine and lost some of his raw power. However, he gained a newfound skill with his abilities that makes up for it."...endquote


vader didn't gain any newfound skills. He was limited, dude. The only thing he was good at, was intimidating people. If folks got past their fear, than they would see that all vader was, was just a shell of what he once was. He wasn't that good.


"It is the Jedi in their prime. I'm not contesting that. The Prequels show a Jedi Order which is still thousands strong as opposed to two or three in the OT. That doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the strength of individual Jedi. I'm also not arguing that Luke could beat Yoda or Mace. I'm arguing that he could beat level 8s. "....endquote


No offense, but I think its silly if anyone thinks an untrained boy with limited experience would beat Obi Wan in his prime, or even beat Rots Anakin. Anyone can have great potential. But it takes a lot of training to reach that potential. We've seen with Anakin that potential means nothing if you lack the training. That's why he lost to a more experienced Dooku in AOTC. Luke is no different.

Level 8s are usually the highest level Jedi go. Obi Wan was at that level in Rots. Anakin was at that level in Rots and was close to becoming a level 9. That's the result of training and experience.

At best, ROTJ Luke is a level 5 or 6, due to his lack of experience. There's no way he beats a level 8 or 9, regardless of his potential in the force.


"Of course, Dark Lord also says that Vader's limitations weren't due to his injuries, but rather due to his mentality. Palpatine also thinks about the fact that once Vader is a threat to him, he will have conquered death through Plagueis' teachings. Palpatine also mentions that Vader is now able to take command of his full power. Dark Lord gives the impression that Vader's weakness has been greatly exaggerated. He improves greatly over the course of the book and that's set over two decades before Empire."...endquote


That was Palpatine's opinion, but the fact that vader has struggled against Jedi who are mobile and powerful proves that he's weaknened. Before his fight with Obi Wan, pre-suit vader (post darkside for Anakin) took out Cin Drallig, who was a powerful and highly skilled Jedi Master. Anavader fought him with one hand, while he used his other hand to force choke one of Drallig's Padawan Learners. He also took out Jedi Knight Serra Keto, when she used two lightsabers to fight Anavader. When you have an experienced, highly skilled Jedi Master who's no match for a younger guy like Anavader, than you know that Anavader was ridiculously powerful. This was from the video game Operation: Knightfall, where its talks about the Jedi slaughter at the temple in great detail. Its canon.

After his fight with Obi Wan, vader lost a lot of that. He was still strong, yes, but not like he was before. I bet you that if vader fought Cin Drallig post-suit, vader would've had a much harder time against him. Again, the Jedi Knights vader defeated post-suit were far weaker than he was, in the force. Using a force choke on a defenseless guy is not impressive, neither does it equate to him being stronger than he was before he was forced into the suit.






 

-----signature-----
We can do ALL things through Christ Jesus, who strengthens us!
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
anakin_luver 
Registered: Jul '05
40217_Anakin
Date Posted: 7/18 12:24pm Subject: RE: A Fateful Bond: The Anakin/Obi-Wan Brotherhood Fan Thread V 2.0
Thanks Dee and Kim grin grin


GS335 posted:
But Luke is also fighting a sith who lost his limbs and who is limited because of a support suit. So that argument is nullified, my friend.


i wasn't actually commenting on that discussioon at all, i was just pointing out what i thought about Yoda's comment.


GS335 posted:
Because Rots Anakin lost his limbs towards the end of the movie, what we saw of him in that movie (pre suit), sadly, is the best from him, skill wise. Level 8 was the highest Anakin went, because of his lost of limbs.


okay buddy, you just changed your whole arguement there. you first said that ROTS Anakin was the best he would ever be...and now your saying that that's the best we've seen him in saber skills. i agree with what your saying now, but it's only because you changed your opinioon from before.

oh and i have read Dark Lord, by the by, and i think you've forgotten that that is pretty much right after ROTS...no use in using that book to support how Vader is in the OT.

 

-----signature-----
PRISON BREAK love
mrs. s <scofield> <sparrow> <skywalker>
COME ON CANADA! YOU CAN DO IT!
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Master_Starwalker 
Registered: Sep '03
17815_Obi-Wan Kenobi
Date Posted: 7/18 1:36pm Subject: RE: A Fateful Bond: The Anakin/Obi-Wan Brotherhood Fan Thread V 2.0
GS335 posted:
The CW cartoons are canon. In any discussion, you have to use all aspects of the SW universe. In that cartoon, we had Anakin, as a Padawan Learner, use a powerful force push to knock Ventress (a highly skilled dark Jedi) through a concrete wall. The powerful display of Anakin's telekenesis blew the wall open. Not to mention, Anakin ran through Ventress' own force push. Anakin showed his superiority over Ventress in that fight. This is Anakin, as just a Padawan, before he became a Knight. We've never seen him do anything like that as vader. That was to show how strong he was at such a young age. He was way better than any Padawan in the order and was probably better than some Jedi Knights. When he became a Knight, he was even better. This is after several years of Jedi training and experience, something ROTJ Luke has not had, yet.

Lucas did not show as much in the movies from any Jedi, because of budget constraints. So in the EU universe (aka cartoons), that worry is not there so the writers are free to show more impressive stuff.


The events are canon, but the Force Powers are exaggerated according to Lucasfilm. Mace Windu may have defeated a lot of battle droids singlehandedly, but he didn't do it with his fists like the cartoon showed.

As for Ventress, that's no more impressive than Luke defeating Guri without using his weapon.

GS335 posted:
vader didn't want to fight Luke, either. Hence, the conflict that was shown from vader in the movie. Luke felt it.


True, though Vader was certainly more willing to fight than Luke was.

GS335 posted:
Yes Anakin used the darkside to defeat Tyranus, but its not like he was fighting a crippled cyborg who lost limbs, either. Dooku was still at his peak. Anakin just got better. And neither of them were swinging their lightsabers like wild men, either, much like what we saw in the vader/Luke fight in ROTJ. Anakin did display great lightsaber skills in that fight. While Luke is stronger in ROTJ than he was in ESB, he does not have the experience, yet. If he fought Dooku, Luke would've had a much harder time than he did against his father.


Anakin and Obi-Wan were simply unable to touch Dooku, until Anakin drew on the Dark Side. If Luke fought Dooku he would do as well as he did against his father. The only reason I could see Luke having any trouble with Dooku would be due to his fighting style, not his power.

GS335 posted:
Again, its due to vader losing his abilities as a result of his injuries. Palpatine thought vader wasn't focus when in reality, vader was limited. He was a lost cause, hence, the reason Palps went after Luke. This has been discussed before.


It's never been shown not to be an issue of focus given that he grows more powerful(and arguably significantly depending on what Lucasfilm says about The Force Unleashed's Force powers in terms of canon.) Luke was simply a better option because Luke still had the full potential of the Chosen One while Vader only had a portion of that top ceiling.

GS335 posted:
vader didn't gain any newfound skills. He was limited, dude. The only thing he was good at, was intimidating people. If folks got past their fear, than they would see that all vader was, was just a shell of what he once was. He wasn't that good.


The films show otherwise. Anakin never uses telepathy, Vader does. Anakin never Force Chokes someone without being near them, Vader does. Anakin never shows enough control to throw objects without a gesture, Vader does. Anakin was simply faster while Vader was slower, more deliberate, and more powerful.

GS335 posted:
No offense, but I think its silly if anyone thinks an untrained boy with limited experience would beat Obi Wan in his prime, or even beat Rots Anakin. Anyone can have great potential. But it takes a lot of training to reach that potential. We've seen with Anakin that potential means nothing if you lack the training. That's why he lost to a more experienced Dooku in AOTC. Luke is no different.


And if I thought Luke was simply on the level of AotC Anakin, I'd agree. But, he's not. If he was, Vader would have easily defeated him just as Dooku was able to defeat Anakin. If you want to bring in the EU, it's made even clearer. Luke is 8 years away from being as powerful as Palpatine. He's 4 years away from being able to heal after being fatally wounded, from being able to land himself, another, and a figher using the Force from a freefall in orbit, and from being able to fly the Falcon with greater skill than Han by manipulating the controls and the crew stations with the Force.

GS335 posted:
Level 8s are usually the highest level Jedi go. Obi Wan was at that level in Rots. Anakin was at that level in Rots and was close to becoming a level 9. That's the result of training and experience.

At best, ROTJ Luke is a level 5 or 6, due to his lack of experience. There's no way he beats a level 8 or 9, regardless of his potential in the force.


And there's no way he's only a 5 or a 6. He beats someone who is at the very least a level 8 in the form of Vader.

GS335 posted:
That was Palpatine's opinion, but the fact that vader has struggled against Jedi who are mobile and powerful proves that he's weaknened. Before his fight with Obi Wan, pre-suit vader (post darkside for Anakin) took out Cin Drallig, who was a powerful and highly skilled Jedi Master. Anavader fought him with one hand, while he used his other hand to force choke one of Drallig's Padawan Learners. He also took out Jedi Knight Serra Keto, when she used two lightsabers to fight Anavader. When you have an experienced, highly skilled Jedi Master who's no match for a younger guy like Anavader, than you know that Anavader was ridiculously powerful. This was from the video game Operation: Knightfall, where its talks about the Jedi slaughter at the temple in great detail. Its canon.


Yep, I loved that level in the RotS game. However, Vader in the suit could do all of those things in his suited prime. The EU's depiction of Vader's power varies widely anyway. There's the weakened and crippled Vader from the Purge miniseries where 8 mostly average Jedi nearly kill him and he's saved by Clones and then there's stories like Resurrection where Vader dominates the powerful and unorthodox Dark Woman in their duel.

GS335 posted:
After his fight with Obi Wan, vader lost a lot of that. He was still strong, yes, but not like he was before. I bet you that if vader fought Cin Drallig post-suit, vader would've had a much harder time against him. Again, the Jedi Knights vader defeated post-suit were far weaker than he was, in the force. Using a force choke on a defenseless guy is not impressive, neither does it equate to him being stronger than he was before he was forced into the suit.


The reason it's impressive isn't who Vader was choking, but how. Every other time Vader chokes somebody, they're in his presence. However, with Ozzel he was at least a couple of decks away from him and yet he was still able to do it without choking him. Anakin never demonstrates that kind of fine tuned control.

 

-----signature-----
"The ways of the Living Force are beyond our understanding... But fear not. You are in the hands of something much greater and much better than you can imagine." - Qui-Gon Jinn
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History