Author Topic: The Oscar Race
Reynar_Tedros 
Registered: Jul '06
7874_Gabe
Date Posted: 2/25 4:13pm Subject: RE: The Oscar Race: We Have a Winner of the Oscar Contest
Leto II posted:
...and no awards to make you woof your cookies all over the screen.

I disagree. Tilda Swinton, in no way, shape, or form, deserved that Oscar. No ******* way. Michael Clayton featured some of the worst overacting of all-time.

 

-----signature-----
Gaming: Guitar Hero III, Call of Duty 4
XBL GamerTag: martian janitor
http://boards.theforce.net/non_star_wars_fan_fiction/b10808/28827381/p1/?2
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
dp4m 
Registered: Nov '01
13878_Luke Skywalker<br>Dark Empire
Date Posted: 2/25 10:29pm Subject: RE: The Oscar Race: We Have a Winner of the Oscar Contest
Leto II posted:
Pretty much, yup. peace I use multiple aliases over there, due to certain...reasons...going back a couple years.


I'm totally gonna rat you out to Jeff! (I miss it these days; he never quotes me any more sad ) as well as MiraJeff and Moriarty who also both post there! tongue

 

-----signature-----
"Looks like you're about to get pwned" - Eric Cartman
"Awarding experience points for cleverly and creatively generating an enjoyable experience. How warped is that?" - Darths & Droids
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Zaz 
Title: Manager:
The Amphitheatre

Registered: Oct '98
40038_Jawa
Date Posted: 2/26 8:40am Subject: RE: The Oscar Race: We Have a Winner of the Oscar Contest
How Oscar Could Improve It's Ratings

My suggestions:

a. montage-free zone;
b. no musical numbers

 

Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
JediPrettyBoy 
Registered: Jan '05
6289_A-Wing
Date Posted: 2/26 11:06am Subject: RE: The Oscar Race: How to Increase the Ratings of the Oscar Show
Zaz posted:
How Oscar Could Improve It's Ratings

My suggestions:

a. montage-free zone;
b. no musical numbers


One of the real and main problems is that, many times, those in the Academy have gotten away from the notion that movies can just tell a great, and even, fun story. Some of these pseudo-intellectual types think that it is beneath the Academy to have a summer or holiday blockbuster nominated for Best Picture; even if it is a deserved nomination. Don't get me wrong, many blockbusters are total crap which appeal only to the other extreme in our culture -- those with very little thinking power at all. However, what would have been so bad to have, say, Batman Begins nominated for Best Picture back in 2006. The vast majority of critics and the public agreed that the film was fantastic. I even think it wouldn't hurt to recognize people like Michael Caine and/or Morgan Freeman for Best Supporting Actor in a film like that. Unfortunately, it has gotten to the point that as soon as a film carries the title of being a blockbuster, it is usually dismissed as having no chance for some of the more well known nominations. What happened to films like Star Wars, Jaws, Jurassic Park, etc being nominated for Best Picture? What happened to nominating seasoned actors like Alec Guiness was for Star Wars?

I was very impressed that they nominated Depp for the POTC 1, but disappointed that they ignored Rush for his amazing job as Barbossa. They need more variety in each category so that they appeal to audience members who want realism in the films they watch; without neglecting those who want fantasy.

 

-----signature-----
"They scream and they cry. Much as your doing now." -- Dr. J. Crane/Scarecrow
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Lord_NoONE 
Registered: Dec '01
41725_Naboo
Date Posted: 2/26 12:39pm Subject: RE: The Oscar Race: How to Increase the Ratings of the Oscar Show - Date Edited: 2/26 12:41pm (1 edits total) Edited By: Lord_NoONE
Well, to its credit, the Academy did show repeated love to the LotR trilogy. You can't argue with the accolades RotK received, even though Cold Mountain was a far better film than RotK.

Ian McKellan got a nod for Gandalf in FotR; the films were constantly nominated in several categories, and I think each film was nominated for Best Picture. Overall, fantasy has been shown substantial love recently. I agree that BB should have gotten some sort of recognition since the film is solid on so many fronts...but there were some better films that year, imo.

As to how to improve the Oscars:

1. I agree with Zaz, no musical numbers.

2. Less cheesy time-fillers, ala Seth Rogan.

 

Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Chancellor_Ewok 
Registered: Nov '04
20459_Dark Trooper
Date Posted: 2/26 12:56pm Subject: RE: The Oscar Race: How to Increase the Ratings of the Oscar Show - Date Edited: 2/26 1:00pm (1 edits total) Edited By: Chancellor_Ewok
Lord_NoONE posted:
Well, to its credit, the Academy did show repeated love to the LotR trilogy. You can't argue with the accolades RotK received, even though Cold Mountain was a far better film than RotK.


To its disredit, however, the Academy utterly Ep.III. shame_on_you

I agree with Jedi Pretty Boy. Just because a movie is financially successful, shouldn't eliminate it from Oscar consideration. After all, isn't that how Hollywood measures a film's success, through ticket sales, and therefore, asses in seats?

 

-----signature-----
For more information about the crack spider's bitch contact the Canadian Wildlife Service in Ottawa.
I robbed the second largest bank in France using only a ballpoint pen
I killed a man with this thumb.
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Coruscant 
Registered: Feb '04
14787_Coruscant
Date Posted: 2/26 12:59pm Subject: RE: The Oscar Race: How to Increase the Ratings of the Oscar Show
Face it, if the Oscars want higher ratings, they have to have a serious populist contender in the Best Picture category, ala TITANIC and RETURN OF THE KING.

Gil Cates can try all manner of things, but everyone one of those small efforts would be dwarfed tenfold by the above solution.

 

Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Chancellor_Ewok 
Registered: Nov '04
20459_Dark Trooper
Date Posted: 2/26 1:10pm Subject: RE: The Oscar Race: How to Increase the Ratings of the Oscar Show
Coruscant posted:
Face it, if the Oscars want higher ratings, they have to have a serious populist contender in the Best Picture category, ala TITANIC and RETURN OF THE KING.


Agreed. Or if its not Best Picture material, but clearly strong in other areas, nominate it for those awards and actaully let it win. Again, Ep.III is a good example. It wasn't Best Picture material, but it easily could have taken home 5 or 6 awards in the technical categories, if given the opportunity.

 

-----signature-----
For more information about the crack spider's bitch contact the Canadian Wildlife Service in Ottawa.
I robbed the second largest bank in France using only a ballpoint pen
I killed a man with this thumb.
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Hammurabi 
Registered: Jan '07
44291_Han Solo
Date Posted: 2/26 5:53pm Subject: RE: The Oscar Race: How to Increase the Ratings of the Oscar Show
Chancellor_Ewok posted:
To its disredit, however, the Academy utterly Ep.III. shame_on_you


Compared to the other prequels, RotS was great. Compared to most films, though, it was mediocre.

 

-----signature-----
and i know no one can sing the blues like blind willie mctell
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Chancellor_Ewok 
Registered: Nov '04
20459_Dark Trooper
Date Posted: 2/26 6:14pm Subject: RE: The Oscar Race: How to Increase the Ratings of the Oscar Show
Hammurabi posted:
Chancellor_Ewok posted:
To its disredit, however, the Academy utterly Ep.III. shame_on_you


Compared to the other prequels, RotS was great. Compared to most films, though, it was mediocre.


Yes and no. In terms of some of the acting, ie Natalie Portman, yes it was somewhat mediocre, however, from a technical standpoint, Ep.III is an undeniably impressive film that more than holds its own against the films that were actually nominated in the technical categories.

 

-----signature-----
For more information about the crack spider's bitch contact the Canadian Wildlife Service in Ottawa.
I robbed the second largest bank in France using only a ballpoint pen
I killed a man with this thumb.
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Jango10 
Registered: Sep '02
46371_2008 Olympics
Date Posted: 2/26 7:49pm Subject: RE: The Oscar Race: How to Increase the Ratings of the Oscar Show - Date Edited: 2/26 7:50pm (1 edits total) Edited By: Jango10
Exactly what others have said. Nominate movies that people actually have seen. Also, nominated for the Best Picture of the Year, not just Best Picture of the last Two Months.

(Although I am kinda contradicting my self since The Departed came out in October and Crash came out in May.)

But for the most part, the Oscars go to films that hardly anyone sees and hardly anyone cares about. Three movies that a very good case could have been made for Best Picture this year that were also mainstream films:

1. The Bourne Ultimatum - According to Rotten Tomatoes, this is the second best reviewed (if I remember right)film of the year.

2. Ratatouille - Just think how much buzz that would have caused if an animated film would have gotten nominated for Best Picture. (It was also the best reviewed film of the year, according to RT.)

3. American Gangster - Yet another mainstream film that recieved good reviews.


Btw:


Lord_NoOne posted:
You can't argue with the accolades RotK received, even though Cold Mountain was a far better film than RotK.



Cold Mountain sucks! tongue

 

-----signature-----
"I love the smell of Napalm in the morning."
Chipper Jones MVP Watch:
BA: .369 HR: 18 RBI: 55 OBP: 466 SLG: .596
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Yodas-evil-twin 
Registered: Jun '05
46297_The Clone Wars: Obi-Wan Kenobi
Date Posted: 2/26 8:06pm Subject: RE: The Oscar Race: How to Increase the Ratings of the Oscar Show - Date Edited: 2/26 8:16pm (1 edits total) Edited By: Yodas-evil-twin
I liked American Gangster, but it wasn't good enough to be nominated for Best Picture, let alone win it. Then again, neither was Michael Clayton.

 

-----signature-----
"Who watches the Watchmen?"
"The JCC is pretty much Lord of the Flies without the healthy outdoorsy atmosphere."
-soitscometothis
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
JohnWesleyDowney 
Registered: Jan '04
46363_2008 Olympics
Date Posted: 2/26 9:11pm Subject: RE: The Oscar Race: How to Increase the Ratings of the Oscar Show


Just add a lot of Jessica Alba in a low cut gown to the show and the ratings, along with other things, will inevitably rise.

 

-----signature-----
Peace.
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Jedi_Keiran_Halcyon 
Registered: Dec '00
17824_Kieran Halcyon
Date Posted: 2/26 9:14pm Subject: RE: The Oscar Race: How to Increase the Ratings of the Oscar Show
I wish they would rename 'Best Picture' to something more accurate like, "Most important sociopolitical statement made by a non-fiction film that no one under 13 can really enjoy"

 

Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
The2ndQuest 
Title: :
-Games
-LACWAC
-Lit Mod of Death

Registered: Jan '00
45729_Ithorian "Hammerhead"
Date Posted: 2/26 9:16pm Subject: RE: The Oscar Race: How to Increase the Ratings of the Oscar Show
Once they created the Best Animated Film category, they essentially killed any chance of an animated film ever winning Best Picture.


Jango10 posted:
Exactly what others have said. Nominate movies that people actually have seen. Also, nominated for the Best Picture of the Year, not just Best Picture of the last Two Months. But for the most part, the Oscars go to films that hardly anyone sees and hardly anyone cares about.


But is it really an honest response to not nominate a great movie just because few people saw it?

And they do nominate picture of the year- it's just that studios intentionally place most oscar-calibe movies in the fall-to-winter timeslot so they're fresher in voters' minds when it comes time to vote for the awards. Additionally, it's easier for movies that do win or get nominated for an Oscar to take advantage of the added level of visibility from being such at the box office. Finally, heavier drama material aimed at oscar gold usually does better in the fall/winter, when there's less competition from major blockbusters that they'd normally get lost in the mix of,while still being a more prime moviegoing season to get decent returns.

 

-----signature-----
K'Kruhk, 140 ABY: "Why haven't I come forth earlier to share my Jedi knowledge with Skywalker?
Well, it's kinda a long story, see, I had this freaking sweet hat..."
"If I don't die, I don't feel like I'm getting my money's worth." - Drew_Atreides
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History