Author Topic: The 50 Biggest Hollywood Disasters -- #1: The tyranny of the opening weekend box office
The2ndQuest 
Title: :
-LACWAC
-Lit Mod of Death
-Games

Registered: Jan '00
45729_Ithorian "Hammerhead"
Date Posted: 1/8/07 7:53pm Subject: RE: The 50 Biggest Hollywood Disasters -- 49: Commercials in movie theaters - Date Edited: 1/8/07 7:53pm (1 edits total) Edited By: The2ndQuest
I don't mind the commercials so long as they are meant specifically for theaters and not just a big screen replay of commercials I tivo through on a daily basis, or, if they are replays, are of a cinematic nature. Video games in particular lend themselvs well to theatrical advertisements- the full version of the Gears of War "Mad World" commercial, or the Metroid Prime commercial directed by Alex Proyas, for example.

As for trailers that give the whole plot away, they call those Robert Zemeckis films.

 

-----signature-----
Currently Reading: Death Star
K'Kruhk, 140 ABY: "Why haven't I come forth earlier to share my Jedi knowledge with Skywalker?
Well, it's kinda a long story, see, I had this freaking sweet hat..."
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Rogue1-and-a-half 
Title: Manager: Amphitheatre
Registered: Nov '00
16485_Wedge Antilles
Date Posted: 1/9/07 1:56pm Subject: RE: The 50 Biggest Hollywood Disasters -- 49: Commercials in movie theaters
Siths_Revenge posted:
^ROTS gave away every single spoiler, too, and it was a huge success.


The trailer for that movie could have been the last five minutes of the movie and it still would have been a huge success.

All I'm saying is its annoying to have a movie spoiled for you before you watch it.

 

-----signature-----
I never saw a wild thing sorry for itself.
A small bird will drop frozen dead from a bough
Without having ever felt sorry for itself.
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Beowulf 
Registered: May '99
6615_Darth Vader
Date Posted: 1/9/07 2:15pm Subject: RE: The 50 Biggest Hollywood Disasters -- 49: Commercials in movie theaters
True, but if you want to avoid that, take recreational drugs that destroy your memory, then you can watch the trailers, then the movies, and it'll be fresh and new every time! Of course, the rest of your memory would suffer too...

What I find to be the absolute worst is having commercials in the theaters, then go home to see the same damn body spray commercial on TV. I've never cursed at my TV so loudly before.

 

-----signature-----
"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy."
Benjamin Franklin
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
rogue_wookiee 
Registered: Apr '04
7942_Chewbacca
Date Posted: 1/9/07 2:24pm Subject: RE: The 50 Biggest Hollywood Disasters -- 49: Commercials in movie theaters
I don't mind sitting through a commercial or three before a film. The only thing that gets on my nerves are trailers that give too much of the film away. I rarely go see comedies because the only time almost all of the good jokes don't go in the trailer is when they can't; ie 40 Year Old Virgin which was hilarious because almost everything in it was either to dirty or too weird to go in a trailer. I hope I don't see a Spider-man 3 trailer after 2's trailer showed all the best moments from the film and left the actual film feeling like a second viewing instead of a first.

 

-----signature-----
“You’re probably the biggest taxer in the country, even bigger than the Congress,”
- Ron Paul on the Federal Reserve.
Be aware of inflation and how it affects our daily life.
http://mises.org/story/2914
-What You Should Know About Inflation
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
NYCitygurl 
Title: Manager of SFFBC, C&G, and NSWFF
Registered: Jul '02
Date Posted: 1/13/07 4:53pm Subject: RE: The 50 Biggest Hollywood Disasters -- 49: Commercials in movie theaters
#48: Werner Herzog's Fitzcarraldo


It kicked off in the Amazon with Jason Robards and Mick Jagger in key roles, but health worries subtracted Robards, and a Stones tour claimed Jagger. Taking Robards's place was temperamental German thespian Klaus Kinski, who so alienated the natives that they offered to murder him. The longest drought in 65 years stranded the film's crucial steamship on a sandbar, and then torrential rains and a border war dogged filming.

I've never heard of it, but probably because it was such a flop (and before my time).

 

-----signature-----
"Not till the moon falls. Not till the world ends."
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Rogue1-and-a-half 
Title: Manager: Amphitheatre
Registered: Nov '00
16485_Wedge Antilles
Date Posted: 1/13/07 5:14pm Subject: RE: The 50 Biggest Hollywood Disasters -- #48: Werner Herzog's Fitzcarraldo
The movie itself is supposed to be quite good; haven't seen it though.

 

-----signature-----
I never saw a wild thing sorry for itself.
A small bird will drop frozen dead from a bough
Without having ever felt sorry for itself.
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
General_Dodonna 
Registered: Feb '05
44304_Padme Watching the Jedi Temple
Date Posted: 1/14/07 1:22am Subject: RE: The 50 Biggest Hollywood Disasters -- #48: Werner Herzog's Fitzcarraldo
Fitzcarraldo is only a "disaster" in that it cost someone some money and had a myriad of production problems. Is the film itself actually a "disaster?" No, it's a masterpiece. This list is no doubt typical Hollywood-perspective crap. Sort of like how we're constantly given Hollywood's perspective on everything Orson Welles ever made.

 

-----signature-----
"A film is difficult to explain because it is easy to understand." - Christian Metz
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Nrf-Hrdr 
Registered: Aug '00
18604_Coruscant
Date Posted: 1/14/07 3:36am Subject: RE: The 50 Biggest Hollywood Disasters -- #48: Werner Herzog's Fitzcarraldo
Did this movie even have anything to do with hollywood? Anyway, plenty of people feel Fizcarraldo is a masterpiece. Its been on my 'to watch' list for years, but aside from Aguirre and Grizzly Man you usually have to go out of your way and spend a fair bit to see a Herzog movie.

From what I hear, it could have been a serious physical disaster: apparently they were pretty lax with safety precautions when making it, and that's not really the best attitude to have when you're pushing an actual steamship over a hill to make your little movie project.

 

Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Zaz 
Title: Manager, The Ampitheatre
Registered: Oct '98
40038_Jawa
Date Posted: 1/16/07 12:28pm Subject: RE: The 50 Biggest Hollywood Disasters -- #48: Werner Herzog's Fitzcarraldo
There is a documentary about the production of "Fitzcarraldo" which is called "Burden of Dreams", if memory serves. Anyway, they showed a clip of the Mick Jagger footage, and Jagger is godawful.

I don't think they are referring to the quality of the film itself.

 

Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
NYCitygurl 
Title: Manager of SFFBC, C&G, and NSWFF
Registered: Jul '02
Date Posted: 1/16/07 2:40pm Subject: RE: The 50 Biggest Hollywood Disasters -- #48: Werner Herzog's Fitzcarraldo
Ah, didn't get that. I'll trust you guys that it's a good movie; doesn't really look like something I'll be seeing.

 

-----signature-----
"Not till the moon falls. Not till the world ends."
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
General_Dodonna 
Registered: Feb '05
44304_Padme Watching the Jedi Temple
Date Posted: 1/16/07 8:27pm Subject: RE: The 50 Biggest Hollywood Disasters -- #48: Werner Herzog's Fitzcarraldo
I'd just like to add that Fitzcarraldo's presence on this list is entirely perplexing (to me anyway), because, as Nrf Hrdr alludes to, the film had absolutely no Hollywood financing. How then could it be a Hollywood disaster? And you can bet that no Hollywood producer would ever let his director hire natives to actually drag a real steamboat over a mountain. Again though, this is no doubt a part of a long line of thought that argues essentially that anything that fails financially is a failure as a motion picture. This kind of thinking often reduces otherwise interesting films like Gates of Heaven or Ishtar to the rubbish bin of history, which is unfortunate. While these films might have been financial disasters, and while I might be picking a semantic bone here, the term "disaster" connotes utter failure, when in fact, none of these films were failures as art, merely as commerce (and I include Fitzcarraldo among those I listed, despite its lack of Hollywood financing).

 

-----signature-----
"A film is difficult to explain because it is easy to understand." - Christian Metz
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
NYCitygurl 
Title: Manager of SFFBC, C&G, and NSWFF
Registered: Jul '02
Date Posted: 1/20/07 8:02am Subject: RE: The 50 Biggest Hollywood Disasters -- #48: Werner Herzog's Fitzcarraldo
#47: Nipples on Batman's suit



I can honestly say that I never really noticed or cared tongue

 

-----signature-----
"Not till the moon falls. Not till the world ends."
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
DarthBoba 
Registered: Jun '00
8187_Luke Skywalker
Date Posted: 1/20/07 9:12am Subject: RE: The 50 Biggest Hollywood Disasters -- #47: Nipples on Batman's suit
As a batman fan, I care. Batman is not gay, or murderous. Something the first four films never quite seemed to figure out.

 

-----signature-----
Studies find that being drunk is like being a girl.
TOYB!
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Chancellor_Ewok 
Registered: Nov '04
20459_Dark Trooper
Date Posted: 1/20/07 9:13am Subject: RE: The 50 Biggest Hollywood Disasters -- #47: Nipples on Batman's suit - Date Edited: 1/20/07 9:15am (1 edits total) Edited By: Chancellor_Ewok
Will 46 and 45 be the Batsuit's asscrack and cod piece? tongue

 

-----signature-----
For more information about the crack spider's bitch contact the Canadian Wildlife Service in Ottawa.
I robbed the second largest bank in France using only a ballpoint pen
I killed a man with this thumb.
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Jedi_Keiran_Halcyon 
Registered: Dec '00
17824_Kieran Halcyon
Date Posted: 1/20/07 11:12am Subject: RE: The 50 Biggest Hollywood Disasters -- #47: Nipples on Batman's suit
DarthBoba posted:
As a batman fan, I care. Batman is not gay, or murderous. Something the first four films never quite seemed to figure out.


Batman wasn't anywhere near gay in the Burton movies, not that I mind that interpretation of the character.

And as far as murder, I think the character is mythological enough that those other interpretations can be explored, just like I'm fine with a movie where Jesus and Mary Magdalene are lovers. Honestly I think the 'no-killing-EVER' thing is really nonsensical, and at heart a gimmick to keep the rogues' gallery from thinning out. I mean, I don't see Batman as the kind of guy that views himself as judge-jury-executioner, but if you have to choose between killing the bad guy and letting him get away (as in 1989's BATMAN) I don't see why the former is unacceptable. I think when one man is almost perpetually engaged in mortal combat, it's silly to expect him to always defeat the bad guy wthout killing him. Ultimately, stopping the villain is more important than preserving the villain's life for a jail sentence. I understand the objection to the somewhat casual attitude displayed in the film (the chest-bomb in Batman Returns comes to mind), but I would repectfully argue that the question "how does this work as a film?" (IMO, very well, as Returns moved significantly into the realm of pop-expressionism) is more important than "how does this work as a Batman story?"

I think the big problem with the nipples is that they're emblematic of Schumacher's whole approach to the films, particularly in Batman and Robin. "Hey Joel, why is X in the movie?" "Why not?" "Oh, OK!" If you're ever bored enough to listen to the DVD commentaries, Schumacher freely admits to putting tons of stuff in his movies for no reason other than because the suits thought it would sell toys.

 

Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History