Author Topic: Sequels That Surpass Their Predecessors - Now Disc. "Aliens"
DarthArsenal6 
Registered: Oct '01
6247_Death Star II
Date Posted: 6/5 4:00pm Subject: RE: Sequels That Surpass Their Predecessors - Now Disc. 21. "Return of the Jedi" (1983)


The only thing that ROTJ can take credit is the Space Battle scene
especailly the scene where the DSII starts zipping rebel ships out of the stars.

That was something and the DSII chase tell me which space battlescene can equate to that
Of cause now the Starfighter vs Starfighter fight in the space battle is not intense as it once was. Blame that on B5 and BSG.

 

-----signature-----
|-o-| {OO} <-o-> /-o-\ <=o=>
"You mean you'll put down your rock, and I'll put down my sword and we'll try and kill each other like civilized people?"
A,B XY
DA6 calender goes from March 31st to April 2nd, no one fools DarthArsenal6.
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
JohnWesleyDowney 
Registered: Jan '04
8081_ILM
Date Posted: 6/5 5:46pm Subject: RE: Sequels That Surpass Their Predecessors - Now Disc. 21. "Return of the Jedi" (1983)


Also has some of the worst scenes, with Luke's reveal to Leia of their kinship a strong contender for worst in the entire OT.

Despite what the internet tells me, I love that scene. It's well-written and well-acted, and we really see how challenging and complex Luke's problems are, and how he's struggling to deal with everything. He's maturing. And I like the way the tension is broken afterward with Han walking up and saying "Hey, what's going on?" That's great. Perfect chord change.

 

-----signature-----
"The biggest battles we fight are on the inside."
Nick Nolte in WAY OF THE PEACEFUL WARRIOR
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Bacon164 
Registered: Mar '05
6377_Jocasta Nu
Date Posted: 6/5 8:18pm Subject: RE: Sequels That Surpass Their Predecessors - Now Disc. 21. "Return of the Jedi" (1983)
yeah, I've never understood the hatred for that scene.

 

-----signature-----
aqua is a better color than bushes
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
DarthAJ 
Registered: Dec '04
14856_R5 Unit<br>Bad Programming
Date Posted: 6/5 8:42pm Subject: RE: Sequels That Surpass Their Predecessors - Now Disc. 21. "Return of the Jedi" (1983)
RotJ is quite a tricky film to judge....idk, as a kid RotJ was always my favorite, and the Ewoks didn't seem as cheesy, but in retrospect its the weakest link in the trilogy.

Including everyone's favorite teddy bears, RotJ has a couple of unfortunate missteps. Slow start, and when we finally get going the film halts for snooze fest of Dagobah scenes and the less-than-exciting Endor adventures. Another, Death Star seemed kinda weak and I would have preferred the original planned Coruscaunt location instead.

 

-----signature-----
:]
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Gonk 
Registered: Jul '98
6234_GNK droid
Date Posted: 6/6 4:24am Subject: RE: Sequels That Surpass Their Predecessors - Now Disc. 21. "Return of the Jedi" (1983)
No, that's a horrible scene in comparison to what had taken place in the OT.

However, the level of acting here ends up being heads and shoulders above what would come in the PT.

 

-----signature-----
What shall we do to fill the empty spaces
Where waves of hunger gnaw?
Shall we set out upon this sea of faces
In search of more and more and more?
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Vortigern99 
Title: Manager Emeritus
Registered: Nov '00
6129_Anakin Skywalker
Date Posted: 6/6 8:34am Subject: RE: Sequels That Surpass Their Predecessors - Now Disc. 21. "Return of the Jedi" (1983)
ROTJ should not even be up for discussion in a thread about movies that "surpass their predecessors". Does anyone here actually feel that way? It's a good movie compared to other fantasy/action-adventure movies, but compared to 'ANH' and ESB, it's a bit thin and tired. There are some amazing scenes in it, though, and the SPFX are topnotch.

 

-----signature-----
"I knew from the beginning I was not doing science fiction.
I was doing a space opera, a fantasy film, a mythological piece,
a fairy tale."--George Lucas
My "Vader's Origins" thread:
http://boards.theforce.net/Classic_Trilogy/b10002/8708417/p1
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Jango10 
Registered: Sep '02
46458_MLB 2008
Date Posted: 6/6 11:20am Subject: RE: Sequels That Surpass Their Predecessors - Now Disc. 21. "Return of the Jedi" (1983)
Vortigern99 posted:
ROTJ should not even be up for discussion in a thread about movies that "surpass their predecessors". Does anyone here actually feel that way? It's a good movie compared to other fantasy/action-adventure movies, but compared to 'ANH' and ESB, it's a bit thin and tired. There are some amazing scenes in it, though, and the SPFX are topnotch.


I'm just taking movies from a list of the top 25 best sequels. And now we are discussing whether they are better than the originals or not.

 

-----signature-----
"I love the smell of Napalm in the morning."
McCain/Palin '08
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Vortigern99 
Title: Manager Emeritus
Registered: Nov '00
6129_Anakin Skywalker
Date Posted: 6/6 11:38am Subject: RE: Sequels That Surpass Their Predecessors - Now Disc. 21. "Return of the Jedi" (1983)
Fair enough. I think we have yet to hear from anyone who actually thinks ROTJ surpasses its predecessors. Not that such people don't exist, as I've talked to a few, but they seem to be in the minority, which to my mind rather contradicts the idea of including the movie on such a list. /shrug/

 

-----signature-----
"I knew from the beginning I was not doing science fiction.
I was doing a space opera, a fantasy film, a mythological piece,
a fairy tale."--George Lucas
My "Vader's Origins" thread:
http://boards.theforce.net/Classic_Trilogy/b10002/8708417/p1
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Jango10 
Registered: Sep '02
46458_MLB 2008
Date Posted: 6/9 8:16pm Subject: RE: Sequels That Surpass Their Predecessors - Now Disc. 21. "Return of the Jedi" (1983)
20. Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan

After 10 'Star Treks,' they all start to seem the same -- with the exception of this character-driven classic, in which Kirk's brooding, Khan's evil glee (no one overacts like Ricardo Montalban) and Spock's noble death make for a sci-fi action flick with the pathos of a Greek tragedy. KHAAAAN!

 

-----signature-----
"I love the smell of Napalm in the morning."
McCain/Palin '08
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
RX_Sith 
Registered: Mar '06
42342_Star Wars Monopoly
Date Posted: 6/9 8:21pm Subject: RE: Sequels That Surpass Their Predecessors - Now Disc. 20. Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan
Definitely the best Star Trek sequel ever. Should have been higher.

 

-----signature-----
Chief of Staff - The SWC Rebel Scum
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
rumsmuggler 
Registered: Aug '00
42319_Lando Playing Sabacc
Date Posted: 6/9 8:43pm Subject: RE: Sequels That Surpass Their Predecessors - Now Disc. 20. Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan
Wrath of Khan definitely surpassed the first trek film.

 

-----signature-----
" Conan, what's best in life?" " Crush your enemies, see them driven before you and hear the lamentations of the women."
W.W.L.D. What Would Lando Do
"Why is the rum always gone?"
Retcons = making the dumb stuff look even dumber.
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
The2ndQuest 
Title: :
-Games
-LACWAC
-Lit Mod of Death

Registered: Jan '00
45729_Ithorian "Hammerhead"
Date Posted: 6/9 8:59pm Subject: RE: Sequels That Surpass Their Predecessors - Now Disc. 20. Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan
It wouldn't have been terribly difficult. Only 5 & 9 are harder to watch than 1.

 

-----signature-----
K'Kruhk, 140 ABY: "Why haven't I come forth earlier to share my Jedi knowledge with Skywalker?
Well, it's kinda a long story, see, I had this freaking sweet hat..."
Is your Death Magnetic?
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Zaz 
Title: Manager:
The Amphitheatre

Registered: Oct '98
40038_Jawa
Date Posted: 6/9 9:07pm Subject: RE: Sequels That Surpass Their Predecessors - Now Disc. 20. Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan
It would be my vote as the best of the movies, and the reason is that it's character-driven, as the blurb said.

 

Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Mustafar_66 
Registered: May '05
46177_Malcolm Reynolds
Date Posted: 6/9 10:04pm Subject: RE: Sequels That Surpass Their Predecessors - Now Disc. 20. Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan
Definitely the best of the original cast films (closely followed by The Undiscovered Country) and was only equalled with First Contact. There really isn't anything to fault this film for: Great acting? Check. Great story? Check. Amazing score? Check. Fantastic space battles? Check. I honestly cannot think of a flaw in it.

 

-----signature-----
Why no, I won't get in your car. You can pass me the candy through the window.
Pink Floyd are the Greatest!
Proud Jacen, NJO and LOTF fan. One of few.
cow chicken pig monkey
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
somethingfamiliar 
Registered: Aug '03
42760_Asajj Ventress
Date Posted: 6/10 5:11am Subject: RE: Sequels That Surpass Their Predecessors - Now Disc. 20. Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan
I put I and II pretty close. II's a little ahead because of the battle in the Mutara Nebula and Spock's death.

 

-----signature-----
I'm not a quitter, but that human pile of garbage would make Satan weep.
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History