Author Topic: The Bible: A Discussion (The Tower of Babel)
Katana_Geldar  27948 posts
Title: Former CR Tasmania, AU'
Registered: Mar '03
48693_Elaine (617092)
Date Posted: 3/19 4:18pm Subject: The Bible: A Discussion (Noah & the Flood)
I don't think I have read that, or numbers or Deutoronomy except for the end with Moses on the mountain. I usually skip that part and go right on the Judges.

 

-----signature-----
Jacen and the two Vergeres http://gmgeldar.wordpress.com/vergere-essay/
Now, if you don't mind, I am somewhat preoccoupied telling the laws of physics to shut up and sit down.
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Darth-Ghost  5778 posts
Registered: Oct '03
48129_Anakin Skywalker (42109)
Date Posted: 3/19 4:22pm Subject: The Bible: A Discussion (Noah & the Flood) - Date Edited: 3/19 4:30pm (1 edits total) Edited By: Darth-Ghost
Captain_Typho posted:
Ok, sorry I'm being the tough kid who is asking all of the tough questions but someone has to:

1. chapter 6, verse 2. The sons of God saw that the daughters of men were beautiful, and they married any of them they chose. HOLD ON A SECOND! What! Men are considered the "sons of God", but women aren't considered daughters of God, merely daughters of men? How wrong is that? And second, I'm pretty sure I can't go around the world and choose any woman I want to be my wife. From everything I've heard, it's the woman who ultimately does the choosing anyway!



Was browsing through and just had to respnd to this one.

The "sons of God" weren't men but angels known as the Grigori, or the Watchers. These angels were supposed to watch over humanity, but instead gave in to their lust for human women and gave humen men forbidden knowledge of war and cosmetics. The hybrid children of the women and the Watchers were said to be monstrous Giants that consumed everything in their path, and also seem to be the oldest depiction of "Vampires" for drinking the blood of their foes. By the time of Noah almost all of the (surviving) human bloodline was tainted as descendants of these angels, Noah and his family were some of the few that had not been tainted. If Noah and his family were kileld or tainted, humanity would be lost forever. So God created the Flood to wipe out all of these giants, and when they died they did not have human souls or angelic spirits, and became the demons and ghosts of the world. That's all according to ancient Jewish beliefs, anyways.

Here's a link describing it more: Here.

Basically, this Jewish story was long regarded as the origin of evil and the fallen angels. The tale of Adam and Eve was recorded later, before that the Hebrews believed humanity had come to known evil after their encounter with the Watchers, with the women having sex with them and the men learning forbidden knowledge from them. The beleif still existed in the time of Jesus, which is why Paul writes that women should cover their heads when going to church, to protect their beauty from any angels that may be watching. This tale of the Watchers also predates our ideas of Satan and his fall, before the snake became the devil, before a metaphor referring to a Babylonian king was interpreted as being the story of Lucifer and his fall. It also helps explain God's reasoning behind the Flood better, I think.




The Origin of Evil posted:
The Origin of Evil and the End of the World

Lloyd D. Graham

To a large extent, Judaeo-Christian beliefs have shaped the values and morals of the Western world. It is therefore somewhat surprising to find that the Old Testament lacks an account of the origin of evil, other than attributing it to God (Isa 45:7), and that neither it nor the New Testament provides a convincing reason for the fall of Satan and his cohorts from heaven. One possible allusion - the desire of Lucifer to exalt himself above God, resulting in his being cast down (Isa 14:12-15) - occurs in a context that shows it to refer to the ambitions of a particular King of Babylon. So is there, then, no explanation of evil that dates to Old Testament times? There is, and yet - despite its prominence in apocryphal literature and some scriptural allusions to it - the story remains little known. A passage in Genesis mentions it as follows:


And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them, that the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose ... There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown. And God looked upon the earth ... [and said:] The end of all flesh is come before me; for the earth is filled with violence through them ... (Gen 6:1-13)

These profoundly important events are described in much greater detail in Old Testament pseudepigrapha and apocrypha, such as the Book of Enoch (1 En) and the Book of Jubilees (Jub). Such sources describe how two hundred heavenly beings, all drawn from the angelic order known as Watchers (Heb. 'irin, 'those who are awake'), ensured their own damnation by forsaking their heavenly estate in favour of sexual liaisons with mortal women:


And it came to pass, when the children of men had multiplied, that in those days were born unto them beautiful and comely daughters. And the angels, the children of the heaven, saw and lusted after them, and said to one another: "Come, let us choose wives from among the children of men, and beget us children". And Semjaza, who was their leader ... and all the others together with [him] took unto themselves wives, and ... they began to go in unto them and to defile themselves with them, and they taught them charms and enchantments, and the cutting of roots, and they made them acquainted with plants. And they became pregnant, and they bare great giants ... who consumed all the acquisitions of men. And when men could no longer sustain them, the giants turned against them and devoured mankind. And they began to sin against birds, and beasts, and reptiles, and fish, and to devour one another's flesh, and drink the blood. Then the earth laid accusation against the lawless ones. (1 En 6:1-7:6)

Thus the immediate consequences of this forbidden intercourse were twofold. The first outcome was that the fallen angels imparted their heavenly knowledge of the sciences and the arts to mortals:


And Azazel taught men ... the metals of the earth and the art of working them ... Semjaza taught enchantments, and root-cuttings ... Kokabel the constellations, Ezeqeel the knowledge of the clouds... (1 En 8:1-3); ...[they] revealed the eternal secrets which were in heaven, which men were striving to learn (1 En 9:6-7). And the whole earth has been corrupted through the works that were taught by Azazel: to him ascribe all sin. (1 En 10:8-9).

Such enlightenment parallels the outcome of the well-known Genesis story (Gen 3:1-7) where Adam and Eve were induced to eat from the Tree of Knowledge by the Serpent (an entity later identified with Satan, as in Rev 12:9). In fact, the story of Eve succumbing to the temptations of the diabolical and phallic serpent can be viewed as a prudish encryption of the Watcher legend that was moved to an earlier position in the Genesis chronology in order to emphasise its singular importance. If this view is accepted - and it is supported by a passage (1 En 69:6) in which one of the fallen Watchers is credited with leading Eve astray - then the fall of the angels and the fall of man become two aspects of a single event.

The second outcome of the fall of the angels was the giant and monstrous offspring (Heb. nephilim, 'fallen ones') born to Watcher fathers by human mothers, monsters that turned against humanity and the other creatures of the Earth. A passage in Jubilees (Jub 7:21-25) identifies the nephilim with the mighty men of renown (Heb. gibborim) of Genesis 6:4. One of God's avenging archangels arranged the destruction of the nephilim by inciting them to battle each other; when the giants perished, their souls became the evil spirits and demons that have afflicted mankind ever since (1 En 15:8-16:1; Jub 10:5).

The fallen Watchers - now the princes of evil - were imprisoned in torment until the Day of Judgement, and God instigated the Flood in order to purge and purify the earth.

Dates and Words The earliest reference to the Watcher story is probably Gen 6:1-13, and it may date from as long ago as the eighth or ninth centuries BC. Early copies of the Septuagint translation of 270 BC (where the Old Testament and related apocrypha were rendered into Greek) suggest that the Hebrew term bene ha-elohim, 'sons of God' or 'sons of gods', in Gen 6:2 was translated from the outset as 'angels of God'. The Book of Enoch contains the earliest detailed account of the full story. It dates to the period 200-100 BC, although 1 En 1-36 (the Book of the Watchers) may have been written in the third century BC.

The term 'Watcher' (Heb. 'irin) occurs mainly in the Old Testament pseudepigrapha that deal with the fallen angels, but it is also found in the Book of Daniel, a canonical book contemporary with 1 Enoch. There the phrase 'a watcher and an holy one' (Dan 4:13 & 23) is used to denote a particular class of angel, and precisely the same phrase is found in some fragments from the Dead Sea Scrolls (e.g., 1 QapGen II:1). Most sources identify Azazel and Semyaza as the leaders of the fallen Watchers. The name Azazel appears also in the canonical Old Testament (Lev 16:8-10), where it seems to refer to a wilderness demon of Judaeo-pagan origin. In this respect, it resembles Isa 34:14, the single Old Testament reference to Lilith (see below).

The Christian church later attempted to reinterpret the phrase 'sons of God' in Gen 6:2 as 'sons of Seth' and 'daughters of men' as 'daughters of Cain' so that the Watcher story could be dispensed with. In contrast, Josephus (see below) specifies not only that the males were angels but that the women were of untainted lineage - the daughters of Seth. The Church's re-interpretation also sits oddly with other events in the same epoch, where illicit heterosexual couplings (inter-generational incest, to be precise) were tolerated by God and gave rise to normal offspring (Gen 19:30-38), while 'unnatural' unions were punished (Gen 19:1-26). Clearly, there was something more abhorrent about intermarriage between 'sons of God' and daughters of men than would be warranted by unions between humans of opposite sex, whatever their lines of descent.

Retellings and Allusions In 1 Enoch, the Watcher story is first given in ch. 6-16, recapitulated in ch. 64-69, and re-told in a disguised form in the Animal Apocalypse (ch. 86-89). In the Book of Jubilees, a work of 153-105 BC, it is given in Jub 4:21-24; 5:1-13; 7:20-27; and 10:1-15. As in 1 Enoch, the fallen Watchers were imprisoned within the earth until Judgement Day. In the final version given in Jubilees, the prince of the nephilim-derived evil spirits is called both Mastema and Satan, and - in a duplication of the imprisonment of the Watchers - these spirits too were bound in the earth until Judgement Day. In this account, God granted Mastema's request that a tenth of the evil spirits should be left free to roam the earth while the remainder were bound. As a remedy for their corrupting activities, though, God ordered one of his loyal angels to instruct Noah in the science of medicine (Jub 10:10-14).

The Watcher episode features in sources other than 1 Enoch and Jubilees, appearing also in Wis 14:6, some Dead Sea Scroll texts, the Ethiopic Kebra Nagast, and in the Book of the Secrets of Enoch (2 Enoch, a Slavonic work written after AD 100). Aspects of the Watcher story are also mentioned in the canonical New Testament (e.g., 1 Pet 3:19-20; 2 Pet 2:4-5; Jude 1:6; Rev 12:9; Rev 20:1-3). There are also references in the writings of first century Christians like Tertullian, and of their Jewish contemporary, Josephus. The author of the pseudo-Clementine homilies resolved some of the theological difficulties inherent in the Watcher story by proposing that the angels were not overpowered with sensual passion while in their purely spiritual state (Hom 8:9). He maintained that the angels asked God to endow them with human bodies so that they could descend to earth and rectify the wickedness of mankind. Once they had taken human form, however, they also acquired the weaknesses and passions of mortal men and gave themselves up to the gratification of their lust.

Reuben's admonitions in the apocryphal Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs (c. AD 70-200) present a variation in which the Watchers are portrayed as sexual voyeurs, which may go some way towards explaining their unusual name: 'For thus [women] allured the Watchers who were before the flood; for as these continually beheld them, they lusted after them, and they conceived the act in their mind; for they changed themselves into the shape of men, and appeared to them when they were with their husbands. And the women lusting in their minds after their forms, gave birth to giants, for the Watchers appeared to them as reaching even unto heaven.' (Testament of Reuben 5:6-7). Although the woman/angel union is here portrayed as mental, indulging this fantasy during copulation was evidently potent enough to transform the offspring born to the human parents. Finally, the New Testament apocryphal work known as the Questions of Bartholomew (c. AD 300-500) insinuates that the fall of man was caused by intercourse between Eve and Satan soon after the latter and his troop of angels were banished from heaven. The idea of sexual transgression in the Garden of Eden between the leader of the fallen spirits and the first mortal woman reinforces the link between the fall of man (as told in Genesis) and the fall of the angels (as found in the Watcher narrative).

In a curious twist, a Hebrew midrash published in 1625 - but claiming Biblical antiquity - describes illicit unions in the days leading up to the Flood in terms that nowadays are suggestive of genetic engineering:

And every man […] corrupted the earth, and the earth was filled with violence. And […] the sons of men in those days took from the cattle of the earth, the beasts of the field and the fowls of the air, and taught the mixture of animals of one species with the other, in order therewith to provoke the Lord; and God saw the whole earth and it was corrupt, for all flesh had corrupted its ways upon earth, all men and all animals. (Book of Jasher 4:17-18)

Possible Sources Babylonian myths may date from as early as 3000 BC. The main Babylonian creation epic, Enuma Elish, describes a war between the gods in which those allied with Tiamat and her monsters (enormous serpents ... snarling dragons ... the worm ...) were vanquished by Bel-Marduk. The gods were then divided into two groups by Marduk, 'three hundred above for the watchers of heaven, ... five times sixty for earth, six hundred gods between earth and heaven'. The defeated rebel gods appear to have been the ones assigned to earth. The Babylonians also believed in 'edimmu', vampires that were violent giants, which were originally created as a result of intermarriage between human beings and the spirit world. These demons 'neither eat nor drink' but 'are full of violence, ceaselessly devouring blood'. Similarly, in 1 En 15:11-12, we read that the spirits of the giant nephilim 'work destruction on the earth, and cause trouble: they take no food, but nevertheless hunger and thirst, and cause offences'. In combination, a belief in edimmu and earth-based rebel gods could account for some of the elements of the Enochian Watcher episode. A Babylonian connection is supported by the fact that one of the Watcher-human progeny in the Dead Sea Scrolls' Book of the Giants is called Gilgamesh, the name of the giant in the eponymous Babylonian epic.

Greek theogony also shares some motifs with the Watcher story. In Greek myths from the eighth century BC, the mating of sky-god (Uranus) with earth-goddess (Gaea) produced the Titans, the Cyclops, and the hundred-handed Giants. Like the fallen Watchers, the Cyclops and Giants were imprisoned within the earth; later, this became the fate of the Titans who had fought with Cronos against Zeus and Prometheus. The latter was subsequently punished by Zeus for bestowing a number of favours, including fire, on mankind. Man was punished, too: the first mortal woman (Pandora) was created so beautiful that - despite being warned - Prometheus's brother allowed her to stay on Earth. Pandora subsequently unleashed evil into the world.

A Related Theme There are many myths about Lilith, who in Judaeo-Christian tradition is credited as an alternative (or additional) source of the world's demons. The name, which means 'wind-spirit', first appears in a prologue to the Epic of Gilgamesh and recurs as part of a triad of female furies invoked in Babylonian spells. When Lilith was co-opted into Judaic lore during the Babylonian captivity (i.e., after 586 BC), an etymological confusion resulted in her being identified as a night-spirit. Later, Talmudic and Kabbalistic speculation identified her (sometime during the third to tenth centuries AD) as a female who was co-created with Adam (Gen 1:27) and before Eve (Gen 2:22). In this elaboration, she refused to submit to Adam and left Eden. Lilith was reunited with Adam after his and Eve's expulsion from Eden, and bore him demonic offspring. When Adam and Eve were later reconciled, Lilith lived in a cave near the Red Sea where she copulated with lascivious demons and gave birth daily to hundreds more. In additional (or alternative) stories, Lilith and three other female spirits (Naamah, Igrat, and Mahaath) are seen as consorts to demons, seducers of men, killers of unprotected infants, and as vampires.

Lilith is often paired with Samael, the King of Demons, who in some versions has been castrated; there are hints that these two were once an androgynous pair. In her various guises, Lilith is at once a human-like creature who had intercourse with Adam to become the mother of demons, a human mate for demons who begat more of their kind at a prodigious rate, and a demonic succubus who takes unused human semen to impregnate herself or her daughters to create more demons. No doubt many of these attributes are a legacy of Lilith's Babylonian origin. The Lilith themes have obvious overlaps with the Watcher story, and some may well have been borrowed directly from this source. In the Kabbala, the two legends intersect in a passage on Lilith: 'For 130 years Adam had intercourse with female spirits, until Naamah came. Because of her beauty the sons of God went astray after her, 'Ussa and 'Azel, and she bore from them, and from her spread evil spirits and demons in the world' (Zohar 1:19b).

A Search for Meaning To recapitulate: the earliest explanation of evil in the Judaeo-Christian tradition involves an original sin of lust on the part of angelic beings called Watchers, which led to a transfer of forbidden skills and knowledge to mankind, but which also led to the birth of monsters who ravaged the Earth, and whose malevolence persists on Earth in the form of demons. Compared with orthodox rationalisations of the Fall, the Watchers' original sin engenders both more empathy (as a lapse of judgement in the face of overwhelming temptation) and more abhorrence (in its breach of sexual taboo). It is safe to say that traditional alternatives such as Lucifer's pride (Isa 14:12-15), Satan's reluctance to pay homage to Adam (The Life of Adam and Eve and the Koran), or Eve's curiosity about the forbidden fruit (Gen 3:6) pale in comparison. Oddly enough, the Watchers' position - pure spirits craving the pleasures of the flesh - would later find its complete antithesis in certain Gnostic sects of the first few centuries AD, whose devotees despised flesh as a prison of the spirit. In contrast, people today are more likely to feel compassion for the angels who succumbed to the lure of physical pleasure.

Shorn of its lurid details, the mythic content of the Watcher story is a strong and perhaps surprising statement of the relationship between illicit desire, hidden knowledge, and evil. Above all, though, the Watchers' crime constitutes disobedience to God. To those who regard the creator-God as a tyrannical Demiurge, such defiance constitutes a laudable act of self-determination. The Watcher myth has sometimes been presented in this light by Satanists, who point out that the forbidden knowledge imparted by the Watchers to mankind serves as the basis for the arts and sciences on which our current civilization is founded. Their Covenant of Samyaza says that the legacy of the gibborim, known to the fearful as evil spirits or demons, are also known to the wise as 'guardian geniuses of the great of Earth, who shall inspire the best among Man to great heights, to beautiful works of art, and to further discoveries of Earth and cosmos.' While this stance may comfort those who are unable to view the rise of human civilization as anything other than a virtue, it comes at the considerable cost of burdening us with an evil Creator. One does, however, have to wonder about the divinity of a God who feels threatened by the art of writing: 'for men were not created for such a purpose, to give confirmation to their good faith with pen and ink ... but through this their knowledge they are perishing, and through this power it [death] is consuming me' (1 En 69:10-12). There is in fact a fundamental tension in the myth between the works of man (as encouraged by the Watchers) and the works of God, an opposition that is not alleviated by reversing the moral polarity of the original account, as the Satanists have done. It is noteworthy that one of the versions in the Book of Jubilees (Jub 10:10-14; see above) has been revised to defuse this tension. In the sanitized account, useful arts such as medicine were imparted to mankind by God's loyal angels to afford us protection against the demons.

The End of the World Perhaps the tension inherent in the authentic Watcher legend is felt most keenly today in the conflict between environmental conservation (preservation of the divine creation) and urban-industrial development (promotion of human progress). Although initiated by lust, the Watchers' actions led also to great human advancement, just as today the selfish ambitions of those with ability (or in authority) underpin so many of the material advances that benefit our species. However, it is important to remember that the actions of the Watchers led not only to expanded human capabilities but also to uncontrollable consequences that ultimately laid waste to the Earth. In this interpretation, the ancient myth sounds a clear warning about the potentially cataclysmic consequences of using our genius to interfere with nature, a warning that is more valid now than ever before. Perhaps it is to us that Enoch refers in the opening words of his book, when he writes: 'from [the heavenly angels] I heard everything, and from them I understood as I saw, but not for this generation, but for a remote one which is to come' (1 En 1:2-3). The Watcher myth provides an origin for evil in the world. It may also warn of the ultimate and final evil: can we imagine a greater sin than the needless and self-inflicted ruin of our entire planet?

 

Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
KithuraVess  1001 posts
Registered: Nov '08
48640_Revan (61309)
Date Posted: 3/19 9:52pm Subject: The Bible: A Discussion (Noah & the Flood)
Sorry I'm late. tongue I was going to try and answer these too, only the boards were acting really strangely yesterday and I couldn't post here. confused

1. chapter 6, verse 2. The sons of God saw that the daughters of men were beautiful, and they married any of them they chose. HOLD ON A SECOND! What! Men are considered the "sons of God", but women aren't considered daughters of God, merely daughters of men? How wrong is that? And second, I'm pretty sure I can't go around the world and choose any woman I want to be my wife. From everything I've heard, it's the woman who ultimately does the choosing anyway!

This is why some scholars believe 'sons of God' refers to angels, not to men, because of that sharp division you mention between 'of God' and 'of men.' Or, as I mentioned earlier, perhaps aliens. tongue


I believe the "sons of God" here referred to were fallen angels (angels being the sons of God) who possessed male humans. The male humans being possessed, they were most likely stronger and more powerful than ordinary male humans, making them capable of doing all they did.

2. still verse 2. My spirit cannot contend with man forever, for he is mortal, his days will be a hundred and twenty years. NOW HOLD ON JUST A SECOND! A few verses later, it says Noah lives to be 950 years old!

Perhaps the better point to make here is that our days have averaged out substantially below 120 years in the intervening years.


Yes, indeed. Looking through the genealogies, one notices that the ages generally decrease (with a few people getting older than their fathers, but their sons then being younger again).

3. 450 feet long, 75 feet wide, and 45 feet high. Not too shabby, but I still see it impossible to carry 14 of every living creature on Earth. Also, I am going to go on assumption here and say that the creatures of the sea remained in the water?

I doubt the ark was equipped with aquariums; and consider how early in history this is. The number of different animals was probably substantially lower than it is now. Still, point.


Not every single living creature; the main kinds. I.e., not poodles, foxes, etc, but canines; and the really large animals, like elephants and dinosaurs, were presumably still babies or eggs.
Also, it would only make sense for the water creatures to stay in the sea. Why have them on board when they'd be happier in the floodwaters?

4. Rain and floods completely covering the Earth is a mathematical impossibility, as the Earth has a set amount of water in it, that is always constant, and even if it all covered the Earth, the peaks of Mountains would still be visible. However, I am willing to let this one slide because we are dealing with God here who is capable of all things, and I do believe he could bring the rains heavy like that on a whim if he wanted to.

Same here.


Some people believe there was a "canopy" around the earth which poured down. Even if there wasn't, there was certainly enough water, both in the atmosphere, under the ground, etc, to cover the mountain peaks. (And the water is still around today, just maybe in different places than in the antediluvian world.)

5. The waters flooded the Earth for a hundred and fifty days. I hope Noah and his family had lots of food and bottled water for themselves and all the animals! tongue

One would think they would, given the hundred years they had to get ready. And then there's always fishing for meat and rain for fresh water. If we want to get this detailed, which I think, is something of a mistake with a work of art.


Nothing to add here.

6. Another contradictory statement. God says in 6:19 to bring 2 of every animal with him, one male and one female. Then in 7:2, he says to take 7 pairs of each animal with him. Did God change his mind? "Eh, I think maybe we'll need more than 2 of each after all." tongue

It says quite plainly that Noah is to bring seven of every clean animal and two of every unclean animal; later in the law of Moses God will give a straight breakdown of how to tell the difference. Whether the difference was the same when God gave the word to Noah or not is up in the air, but regardless, there was apparently a difference that Noah would understand.


Yes; snakes, pigs, and other animals which were then very risque food materials were considered unclean. (We're allowed to eat them now, seeing as these animals can now be farmed and looked after so they don't eat any random thing they find.)

7. An olive leaf....that plant must have grown in record time! But again, I won't question what God is capable of, I'll just question when he contradicts Himself.

That sounds fair. tongue Though, in all seriousness, if his ways (or actions) are above our ways, doesn't it make sense that his thoughts would also be above our thoughts? Apologies to the prophet Isaiah. tongue


It wasn't necessarily completely fully grown. There was enough time for a few very young olive trees to have grown. God could have let it grow quickly through a miracle, but usually everything He does is scientifically possible, unless stated that it was a miracle.

8. And speaking of that, I thought it was mentioned elsewhere in the Bible that animals would not be judged and enter heaven with us humans. Yet in Genesis 9:5, God says he will demand an accounting from every animal and from each man too.

I don't know of anywhere in the Bible where God says animals will go to Heaven. As to this demanding of accounting, I think, again to jump ahead to the law, the passage implies a principle of life for life. (Actually, it explicitly states that principle in verse six, immediately following). In the law of Moses, it's stated even more explicitly, that if a bull, for instance, that is owned by an Israelite kills a human being that it must die. It's a simple principle, I think, that doesn't have anything to do with the soul, or lack thereof, of the animal in question.


Indeed.

Again, sorry to pose the tough questions, but I know there are some people posting in these boards who are very capable of answering the tough questions. happy

Yes, I know there are some as well. I wonder where they are. tongue


Well, I tried. happy

 

-----signature-----
rose Praise the LORD! rose
"If something is a country, then South Africa will be friends with it. It's a good policy."
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Captain_Typho  5798 posts
Registered: Jul '03
6126_Captain Typho
Date Posted: 3/20 3:13am Subject: The Bible: A Discussion (Noah & the Flood)
Thank you everyone for your responses! happy

 

-----signature-----
To answer Typho's question from January, we have not banned his account. Murder is not a bannable offense here on TFN.

Right now, you wanna go out and kill like ten guys, you can still post here, long as ya don't say naughty words.-Adam Bertocci
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
KithuraVess  1001 posts
Registered: Nov '08
48640_Revan (61309)
Date Posted: 3/20 3:33am Subject: The Bible: A Discussion (Noah & the Flood)
No problem! grin It was fun. happy

 

-----signature-----
rose Praise the LORD! rose
"If something is a country, then South Africa will be friends with it. It's a good policy."
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Katana_Geldar  27948 posts
Title: Former CR Tasmania, AU'
Registered: Mar '03
48693_Elaine (617092)
Date Posted: 3/20 3:12pm Subject: The Bible: A Discussion (Noah & the Flood)
Wait just a moment, isn't the whole idea of things being considered "clean" and "unclean" part of Mosaic law? God hasn't told Noah what is clean and unclean, has he? I see some retrospective editing here, just as I thought had happened anyway.

 

-----signature-----
Jacen and the two Vergeres http://gmgeldar.wordpress.com/vergere-essay/
Now, if you don't mind, I am somewhat preoccoupied telling the laws of physics to shut up and sit down.
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Captain_Typho  5798 posts
Registered: Jul '03
6126_Captain Typho
Date Posted: 3/20 3:50pm Subject: The Bible: A Discussion (Noah & the Flood)
I took a class on New Testament in college, and we discussed at length the editing and reediting of the Bible by religious figures, leaders, Pope's etc, so that what we have now is probably not 100% reflective of the original ideas and events that happened. Also, leaders edited their own racist and political ideas into the Bible, which is why we have so many passages that openly attacks the idea of homosexuality. But we'll get to that topic later when it actually comes up... happy

 

-----signature-----
To answer Typho's question from January, we have not banned his account. Murder is not a bannable offense here on TFN.

Right now, you wanna go out and kill like ten guys, you can still post here, long as ya don't say naughty words.-Adam Bertocci
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Katana_Geldar  27948 posts
Title: Former CR Tasmania, AU'
Registered: Mar '03
48693_Elaine (617092)
Date Posted: 3/20 4:18pm Subject: The Bible: A Discussion (Noah & the Flood)
One of these people I think was King Josiah who had a lot of revision done.

 

-----signature-----
Jacen and the two Vergeres http://gmgeldar.wordpress.com/vergere-essay/
Now, if you don't mind, I am somewhat preoccoupied telling the laws of physics to shut up and sit down.
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
SoloKnight  604 posts
Registered: Feb '03
50121_H727: Mal
Date Posted: 3/20 4:56pm Subject: The Bible: A Discussion (Noah & the Flood)
The Israelite people apparently forgot a bunch of God's commands by the time He handed out The Mosaic Law. I mean look at the whole issue of circumcision. God gave Abraham the command to circumcise every male member of his household and all their descendants but by the time we get to Moses, God once again commands all the males to be circumcised.

 

-----signature-----
I am a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar...
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Katana_Geldar  27948 posts
Title: Former CR Tasmania, AU'
Registered: Mar '03
48693_Elaine (617092)
Date Posted: 3/20 6:50pm Subject: The Bible: A Discussion (Noah & the Flood)
Ypu know, with all the idiotic things that the Israelite people do in the OT I often wondered why God bothered with them.

 

-----signature-----
Jacen and the two Vergeres http://gmgeldar.wordpress.com/vergere-essay/
Now, if you don't mind, I am somewhat preoccoupied telling the laws of physics to shut up and sit down.
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Jaden1138  2642 posts
Registered: Feb '09
50976_Mara Jade (1107091)
Date Posted: 3/20 6:58pm Subject: The Bible: A Discussion (Noah & the Flood)
Because He loves us.

 

-----signature-----
**On temporary leave due to internet access issues.
But I will be on when I can.**
Nails were not enough to hold God-and-man nailed & fastened
on the Cross, had not love held Him there. Catherine Of Siena
AoD Apprentice to Lord Zohak
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Rogue1-and-a-half  22238 posts
Title: Manager: Amphitheatre
Registered: Nov '00
16485_Wedge Antilles
Date Posted: 3/21 8:38am Subject: The Bible: A Discussion (Noah & the Flood) - Date Edited: 3/21 8:45am (1 edits total) Edited By: Rogue1-and-a-half
Katana_Geldar posted:
Wait just a moment, isn't the whole idea of things being considered "clean" and "unclean" part of Mosaic law? God hasn't told Noah what is clean and unclean, has he? I see some retrospective editing here, just as I thought had happened anyway.


As I stated above, there was apparently a distinction between clean and unclean that Noah would understand. The Mosaic law is at least partly an extension of things already revealed in part to God's people. You'll note that Abraham gives a tithe of one tenth to the priest of Salem (read: Jerusalem) after his battle with the seven (?) kings, but the tithe wouldn't be instituted by the law until much later.

I suppose you can read retrospective editing into, if you want too. But that's certainly not the only option. The Bible makes no pretense to being exhaustive; just because it doesn't tell us the standards by which Noah judged between clean and unclean doesn't mean there were none.

Just treat the Bible like any other book; read between the lines. Like all books, it'll make more sense that way. tongue

Katana_Geldar posted:
Ypu know, with all the idiotic things that the Israelite people do in the OT I often wondered why God bothered with them.


I'll just respond by saying, "You know, with all the idiotic things that I do, I often wonder why God bothers with me." I think the Bible calls it grace, which is as good an explanation as any.

 

-----signature-----
Don't be a fool, don't be blind
Heart of mine
If you can't do the time, don't do the crime
Heart of mine
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
King_of_Red_Lions  733 posts
Registered: Mar '03
41081_Kuat Drive Yards Insignia
Date Posted: 3/21 2:15pm Subject: The Bible: A Discussion (Noah & the Flood)
I'll chime in again with the view that God does not like his creation intermingling where they are not supposed to. Adam and Eve tried to be like God and he banished them from Heaven. Caine took life - which is God's right - and he was banished. Mankind mixed with angels and God wiped them out with a Flood.

The pattern of separation continues at the Tower of Babel...

 

-----signature-----
Who is John Galt?
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
darth_frared  6397 posts
Registered: Jun '05
51199_WH173: Christmas Robin
Date Posted: 3/29 11:40am Subject: The Bible: A Discussion (Noah & the Flood)
surely the bible is a bit longer than that??!!

 

-----signature-----
are you out of your vulcan mind?
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Sven_Starcrown  1684 posts
Registered: Mar '09
48649_Ganner Rhysode (613092)
Date Posted: 3/29 12:34pm Subject: The Bible: A Discussion (Noah & the Flood)
Jaden 1138 posted
,,Because He loves us."

Why dont we all live in heaven then?

 

-----signature-----
Nobody's perfect. There was never a perfect person around. You just have half-angel and half-devil in you.
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History