Author Topic: The College Football Thread
Rohniss 
Registered: May '05
46111_Thuggee Slave Driver
Date Posted: 2/6 3:26pm Subject: RE: The College Football Thread - Date Edited: 2/6 3:29pm (2 edits total) Edited By: Rohniss
thats only on EPSN, who as I have always said is biased against Alabama.

There are only two Major recruiting services, Scout and Rivals (the largest recruiting service). Coincidently they both ranked us #1.

http://recruiting.scout.com/a.z?s=73&p=9&c=14&yr=2008

http://rivals100.rivals.com/teamrank.asp?SID=0

Also, ESPN's is out of date, we've signed Jones. Seriously, for "the world wide leader in sports" get your facts right, they are probably waiting to try to spin it someway thats negative to us. Also according to my sources on other forums ESPN weighs their rankings on their ESPN top 150, which is basically self-promotion.

EDIT:

also #1 for Sporting News:

http://www.sportingnews.com/yourturn/viewtopic.php?t=347962

 

-----signature-----
PAW&CotHP: Minister of (dis)Info
Rammer Jammer Yellowhammers, Give 'Em Hell, Alabama
TF.N's resident Gun Nut
Mejor morir a pie que vivir a rodillas.
Re-defeat Communism in '08
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
EMPEROR_WINDU 
Registered: Nov '02
7463_Duel
Date Posted: 2/6 5:59pm Subject: RE: The College Football Thread
Talk about ESPN bias, the establishment of recruiting (rivals, scouts, Tom Lemming) had my Irish ranked number one all year long until some swapping with Florida at the end for the top spot. All the while they (espn) had ND ranked down around the ten spot until they added Kapron Lewis-Moore a few days ago.

I noticed that they'd been kinda doing the same thing to 'Bama. Obviously they are the new kid on the block and they want to make a name by changing things up.

I'm surprised the Tide had that many scholarships to give out in a year, it's well over a third of all available scholarship players for a team. That's assuming that they all pass admissions and stick around.

ND still has a chance to grab the #1 spot back from the Tide tonight though, Milton Knox is a 4 star RB from So Cal that's expected to pick either ND or UCLA and could put the Blue and Gold over the top.




Still, no matter who else ND could have possibly landed the biggest ND "get" this off season was Jon Tenuta from Georgia Tech. Can't wait for September!

 

-----signature-----
Champion of the 6th installment of the 2004 Jedi Draft cool
YOU WERE THE CHOSEN ONE!
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Rohniss 
Registered: May '05
46111_Thuggee Slave Driver
Date Posted: 2/6 8:51pm Subject: RE: The College Football Thread
Technically we can only sign 25 for a year, max, but we have plenty of scholarships to give out thanks to the Fat One over at Tennessee. However, some are gonna go JUCO for grades, one is going to sign but without a football scholarship (Bryant Academic Scholarship), another is gonna do Minor League Baseball plus Football (not eligible for scholarship), They've played with the numbers so that everyone will get in that can, or go JUCO/prep if they cant. Ah the upside to sanctions, when its finally over, we have plenty of schollies to give away. grin

 

-----signature-----
PAW&CotHP: Minister of (dis)Info
Rammer Jammer Yellowhammers, Give 'Em Hell, Alabama
TF.N's resident Gun Nut
Mejor morir a pie que vivir a rodillas.
Re-defeat Communism in '08
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Obese_1_Ka-Blooey 
Registered: Jan '06
46363_2008 Olympics
Date Posted: 2/6 11:12pm Subject: RE: The College Football Thread - Date Edited: 2/6 11:20pm (1 edits total) Edited By: Obese_1_Ka-Blooey
Ugh, Cal's recruiting class gives me nothing to cheer about. Not a single blue-chip prospect... We didn't even get the Bay Area's top player this year (unlike the past few, with Lynch, Jackson, etc). But, Cal signed a lot of WRs, which was what they needed.

Quite frankly, either Tedford believes this class is better than what Rivals.com thinks, or nobody wants to play for a team like Cal. I think it's both.

 

-----signature-----
Tim Lincecum Cy Young Watch: 15-3 (T-2nd NL), 2.43 ERA (T-1st MLB), 210 K (1st MLB)
SF Giants: 59-74, 4th NL West
California Football: vs. Michigan St. August 30
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
EMPEROR_WINDU 
Registered: Nov '02
7463_Duel
Date Posted: 2/7 6:26am Subject: RE: The College Football Thread - Date Edited: 2/7 6:31am (1 edits total) Edited By: EMPEROR_WINDU
I really think recruiting competition hurts Cal. They have the entire PAC-10 competing for the elite Cali kids which would make more than enough to go around, but then other national powers come in (like an ND) and take another couple of top kids from the state.

It's just not like that in Ohio where I'm from for instance. We have high school football that's almost as good as California, but only 2 or 3 schools legitimately competing for the top 5% of the talent (Michigan, OSU, and ND). Since Cal really doesn't recruit nationally they are in a bit of a bind. Tedford has done a solid job of developing the kids he can bring in however. With Rick coming in to UCLA things may only get tougher at Cal, but maybe the NCAA will grow a pair and sanction USC and the Poodle.

And I'm all for the Tide rising again... I'm not a fan of Saban in the slightest, but the SEC has the shadiest coach in all the land with Urban Liar, I mean Meyer. I'd love to see him finish with a .500 record one of these years, and if it takes a decent Alabama team to do it then so be it.


EDIT: Recruiting rankings if you want to take quantity out of the equation.

Scout - Avg Stars

1. Notre Dame - 3.96
2. Ohio State - 3.84
3. USC - 3.83
4. Oklahoma - 3.76
5. Georgia - 3.70


Rivals - Avg Stars

1. Notre Dame - 3.96
2. USC - 3.89
3. Florida - 3.82
4. Oklahoma - 3.81
5. Ohio State - 3.79

To me I think this is the most important indicator of where a team is or is heading. Obviously there isn't a ton of difference between the teams on there but it kind of levels the rankings instead of penalizing a USC or OSU (or even ND) for taking fewer players than something crazy in the 30s. If you're wondering, Alabama was 9th and 6th respectively which still shows they recruited a solid class but a lot of those kids won't be practicing with the Tide next fall.

 

-----signature-----
Champion of the 6th installment of the 2004 Jedi Draft cool
YOU WERE THE CHOSEN ONE!
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
rechedelphar 
Registered: Mar '04
24192_Anakin Burned
Date Posted: 2/7 3:34pm Subject: RE: The College Football Thread
Clemson finishes #2 in ESPN and around 10 in the other sites. But also keep in mind that Rivals and such want to sell and Notre Dame has a big following and they have supposedly had a top class the last few seasons and we all know where they are now.

Daquan Bowers will be a beast for us and Harper is a great signing and Harmon is a great steal from those brainwashing Georgia Bulldogs.

 

-----signature-----
Hey never have you seen in your lifetime,
A more defined Southern poster with a swag like mine.
West Bromwich Albion Baggies
2-1 loss to Everton, next: vs Bolton
Clemson starts ACC champioship season 8/30 vs Alabama
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
SLR 
Registered: Oct '02
19230_Obi-Wan Kenobi
Date Posted: 2/7 6:57pm Subject: RE: The College Football Thread
Obese_1_Ka-Blooey posted:
Ugh, Cal's recruiting class gives me nothing to cheer about. Not a single blue-chip prospect... We didn't even get the Bay Area's top player this year (unlike the past few, with Lynch, Jackson, etc). But, Cal signed a lot of WRs, which was what they needed.

Quite frankly, either Tedford believes this class is better than what Rivals.com thinks, or nobody wants to play for a team like Cal. I think it's both.


Which Jackson are you talking about? DeSean Jackson is from SoCal. There are a lot of people down here that are still shocked that he chose Cal over USC a few years ago.

 

-----signature-----
***"Sir Tampon" of the Knights of The 3SA Sarcasm Table***
Philadelphia Phillies 2007 NL East Champions happy
Fight on USC peace
Fire Andy "Fat ***" Reid
Rest in Peace Snowball
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Obese_1_Ka-Blooey 
Registered: Jan '06
46363_2008 Olympics
Date Posted: 2/7 10:31pm Subject: RE: The College Football Thread
^ Whoops, I should have stated that differently. I meant to say that Cal got neither the Bay Area's top prospect (thanks to U$C) nor a 5-star "blue-chip" prospect this year. I jumbled it together...

I'm still dazed by DeSean's choice, even after he's left and gone.

 

-----signature-----
Tim Lincecum Cy Young Watch: 15-3 (T-2nd NL), 2.43 ERA (T-1st MLB), 210 K (1st MLB)
SF Giants: 59-74, 4th NL West
California Football: vs. Michigan St. August 30
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
EMPEROR_WINDU 
Registered: Nov '02
7463_Duel
Date Posted: 2/8 9:14am Subject: RE: The College Football Thread
rechedelphar posted:
Clemson finishes #2 in ESPN and around 10 in the other sites. But also keep in mind that Rivals and such want to sell and Notre Dame has a big following and they have supposedly had a top class the last few seasons and we all know where they are now.

Daquan Bowers will be a beast for us and Harper is a great signing and Harmon is a great steal from those brainwashing Georgia Bulldogs.



Nah, not buying that. Our previous coach had a few classes that were ranked in the 30s and 40s by all the recruiting companies, and those classes just happen to be the seniors and juniors on last year's team. Which is obviously why ND was so bad. If what you're saying is true than they would have ranked Willingham's classes high too, but they didn't.

The last two ND classes were consensus top 10 classes but those kids were either true freshmen or sophomores. ND had seven seniors on the team and 22 freshmen got significant playing time. This year ND should compete for a BCS bowl game and in 2009 should be fighting for the title.

 

-----signature-----
Champion of the 6th installment of the 2004 Jedi Draft cool
YOU WERE THE CHOSEN ONE!
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
rechedelphar 
Registered: Mar '04
24192_Anakin Burned
Date Posted: 2/8 9:58am Subject: RE: The College Football Thread
Ok, but teams all over the country play Freshman and Sophmores who are amazing. The youth argument for any team isn't nearly as valid as it used to be in football and basketball

 

-----signature-----
Hey never have you seen in your lifetime,
A more defined Southern poster with a swag like mine.
West Bromwich Albion Baggies
2-1 loss to Everton, next: vs Bolton
Clemson starts ACC champioship season 8/30 vs Alabama
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
EMPEROR_WINDU 
Registered: Nov '02
7463_Duel
Date Posted: 2/8 2:05pm Subject: RE: The College Football Thread - Date Edited: 2/8 2:07pm (1 edits total) Edited By: EMPEROR_WINDU
Yeah, USC had one guy. Florida may have had a couple. They're almost always skill players and I'd be willing to bet a lot of money that no one in the country gave playing time to 22 freshmen.

ND had major contributors on the offensive and defensive line, as well as two starting underclassman WRs, three underclassman RBs who got almost all the carries, and a true freshman QB. The OLB's were also underclassman. I'm not making excuses for anything beyond last year, but a lot of people think ND just wasn't good last year because Charlie Weis suddenly forgot how to coach. That's simply not the truth and this coming year ND will have just as much talent as any team in the nation. It's not as experienced as some of the other programs, but that was the hole we've been left in by the previous coach.

Even the experienced ND teams that Weis coached up in 2005 and 2006 had nowhere near the talent that he's brought in these now last three classes. Comparing Clausen and Quinn's freshmen numbers point unquestionably to the superiority of Clausen, will he fulfill that? Who really knows, but signs for ND are pointing towards becoming an elite program like they were in the late 80s and early 90s.

 

-----signature-----
Champion of the 6th installment of the 2004 Jedi Draft cool
YOU WERE THE CHOSEN ONE!
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
DRHJ9 
Registered: May '03
14003_Darth Vader
Date Posted: 2/8 2:26pm Subject: RE: The College Football Thread
To me it looks like USC recruited for need. They have a lot of talent from the previous two recruiting classes that are ready to step in this year. They filled holes with very good talent at the OL, and DL positions. They are loaded at RB, WR, and I believe they got a good TE.

As a CAL fan, I don't like it. But I just call it like I see it.

CAL's class is not up to par. UCLA, and USC did pretty well, and are the glamour places to be. One thing Tedford has done, is get good JUCO transfers. I can only hope that he has enough talent coming up to fill in some of the huge holes left by Hawkins, Jackson, DeCoud, and Jordin. Not to mention Forsett.

 

-----signature-----
" If you beat me.....I'm still the best"-Paul Newman," The Hustler"
"I saw a guy lying there with an ankle holster. So I took the gun. Thought it might come in handy. And guess what?
I SHOT A BEAR!"-Sawyer, "Lost"
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
SLR 
Registered: Oct '02
19230_Obi-Wan Kenobi
Date Posted: 2/8 6:30pm Subject: RE: The College Football Thread - Date Edited: 2/8 6:32pm (1 edits total) Edited By: SLR
Cal should be worried that UCLA is finally ready to rejoin USC at the top of the conference (as the two teams dominated the conference between 1970-2000). Neuhisal and Chow are looking poised to make UCLA a national power once again. This is going to spell trouble for Cal and Oregon who have been basing much of their recent success on improved recruiting in the talent rich SoCal area. If UCLA becomes relevant again, between USC and UCLA, it will be very difficult for Cal and Oregon to get top recruits from SoCal.

 

-----signature-----
***"Sir Tampon" of the Knights of The 3SA Sarcasm Table***
Philadelphia Phillies 2007 NL East Champions happy
Fight on USC peace
Fire Andy "Fat ***" Reid
Rest in Peace Snowball
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
DRHJ9 
Registered: May '03
14003_Darth Vader
Date Posted: 2/9 3:20pm Subject: RE: The College Football Thread
You are right...

But Cal's recent success has a lot to do with Northern CA recruiting as well. Thay have been able to keep northern CA Valley and Bay Area recruits like Lavalle Hawkins, Worrell Williams, and Syd Quan Thompson.

They will have trouble now that UCLA seems to be on the rise, you are absolutely right about that.

 

-----signature-----
" If you beat me.....I'm still the best"-Paul Newman," The Hustler"
"I saw a guy lying there with an ankle holster. So I took the gun. Thought it might come in handy. And guess what?
I SHOT A BEAR!"-Sawyer, "Lost"
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
s65horsey 
Title: EUC Manager
SWC Lil' Sis
Forum Feud Winner

Registered: Jun '06
46075_Cade Skywalker
Date Posted: 2/24 1:57pm Subject: RE: The College Football Thread
There is a vote going on for NCAA Football for the Wii. You can vote a mascot onto the cover.

I voted for Bucky because there isn't an Aggie one. They're only doing 'dead' mascots, not live ones. tongue

Linky

 

-----signature-----
Sexy Sinre's Sey love
"Excellence, did you forget your 3P0 unit when you left Lit for Comms?" - dp4m
"Me give up Cade's chappless butt?
Only when they pry it from cold, dead hands.
Wait, that didn't sound right. . . . " - John O
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History