Author Topic: Atheism Discussion 2.0 - Roundtable Discussion in Progress
_Darth_Brooks_ 
Registered: Sep '00
23037_Jedi Outcast
Date Posted: 5/10 4:44pm Subject: RE: Atheism Discussion 2.0 - (Humanism, just don't tell Adler..) - Date Edited: 5/10 5:12pm (3 edits total) Edited By: _Darth_Brooks_
VadersLament,

"What a nice why of apologizing for intolerance against homosexuals."

I'm not apologizing. Annnd, your argument basically represents an argument from outrage.
But, yes, homosexuality is something I consider to be immoral. Not that it matters.
I also think this topic is something to be discussed in the homosexuality thread.
There are a number of activities I find to be immoral, nor do I find "intolerance" is a 'bad, bad word.'

But, I wonder how you feel homosexuals are being treated intolerantly, or how homosexuality is treated more intolerantly than marital infidelity and so forth? I'm speaking within the context of the religion here.

"I did not say anything about society or government. Nice try. No wait, that was not a nice try, that was really quite stupid."

Again, my point is simply that intolerance is not confined to the 'religious.' So, no, it was not "really quite stupid."

I've worked with some very pointedly irreligious people who dislike homosexuality and express great disdain in no uncertain terms for those engaged in that lifestyle.


 

-----signature-----
"I once wanted to become an atheist but I gave up . . . they have no holidays. "
I AM AN ACT OF GOD. If you doubt it ask my insurance agent.
Whom the Mod's would destroy they first drive mad.
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
_Darth_Brooks_ 
Registered: Sep '00
23037_Jedi Outcast
Date Posted: 5/10 4:49pm Subject: RE: Atheism Discussion 2.0 - (Humanism, just don't tell Adler..) - Date Edited: 5/10 5:02pm (1 edits total) Edited By: _Darth_Brooks_
LostOnHoth,

"So it is God's will that a person is born homosexual but it is not God's will that a person engage in homosexual sexual activity, even if that sexual activity occurs in a loving relationship?

That's harsh."


Who stated that it's God's will that a person is born homosexual?
In fact, I don't think it has been proven that individuals are born homosexual. To one degree or another everyone experiences realization of physical beauty in members of the same sex. No different from realizing someone is intelligent or a superb athlete.

I think we all are aware of individuals who are bi-sexual, or engage in S & M, or enjoy watching child pornography, or who experience 'sexual addiction', and so on. How do we explain this...that they are simply born that way?

 

-----signature-----
"I once wanted to become an atheist but I gave up . . . they have no holidays. "
I AM AN ACT OF GOD. If you doubt it ask my insurance agent.
Whom the Mod's would destroy they first drive mad.
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
_Darth_Brooks_ 
Registered: Sep '00
23037_Jedi Outcast
Date Posted: 5/10 4:59pm Subject: RE: Atheism Discussion 2.0 - (Humanism, just don't tell Adler..) - Date Edited: 5/10 5:09pm (1 edits total) Edited By: _Darth_Brooks_
LostOnHoth,

I'm not a Roman Catholic, and my take on the issue is decidedly protestant. I do attend Catholic services periodically. Some issues I agree with and some I do not. Generally, my approach is to consider what scripture and tradition say on a given issue. This is an issue of some debate.

"Brooks - do you believe in transubstantiation?"

This is getting into spirituality,...whereas I've attempted to keep most of my statements along more materialistic lines.


I will say this, there is more going on the spiritual realm in direct correspondence to the physical world than even many believers fully accept. I do know this from my own personal experiences.

 

-----signature-----
"I once wanted to become an atheist but I gave up . . . they have no holidays. "
I AM AN ACT OF GOD. If you doubt it ask my insurance agent.
Whom the Mod's would destroy they first drive mad.
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
_Darth_Brooks_ 
Registered: Sep '00
23037_Jedi Outcast
Date Posted: 5/10 5:23pm Subject: RE: Atheism Discussion 2.0 - (Humanism, just don't tell Adler..) - Date Edited: 5/10 5:25pm (1 edits total) Edited By: _Darth_Brooks_
LostOnHoth,

"I thought World Youth Day was a Catholic event? It's being held in Sydney this year and the Pope is visiting - kind of hypocritical that they are putting condoms in the packs when contraception is considered a sin."

Being unfamiliar with the event I did a google. One site reported that Gay activists handed out the condoms in Sydney, and another site reported that at the German location were present Catholic organizations lobbying to have the Churches stance on condoms reversed.

 

-----signature-----
"I once wanted to become an atheist but I gave up . . . they have no holidays. "
I AM AN ACT OF GOD. If you doubt it ask my insurance agent.
Whom the Mod's would destroy they first drive mad.
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Quixotic-Sith 
Title: Manager Emeritus
Registered: Jun '01
6264_Darth Maul
Date Posted: 5/10 5:48pm Subject: RE: Atheism Discussion 2.0 - (Humanism, just don't tell Adler..)
_Darth_Brooks_ posted:
LostOnHoth,

"So it is God's will that a person is born homosexual but it is not God's will that a person engage in homosexual sexual activity, even if that sexual activity occurs in a loving relationship?

That's harsh."


Who stated that it's God's will that a person is born homosexual?
In fact, I don't think it has been proven that individuals are born homosexual. To one degree or another everyone experiences realization of physical beauty in members of the same sex. No different from realizing someone is intelligent or a superb athlete.

I think we all are aware of individuals who are bi-sexual, or engage in S & M, or enjoy watching child pornography, or who experience 'sexual addiction', and so on. How do we explain this...that they are simply born that way?


You are making a lot of assumptions in that last sentence, and conflating some things that are entirely different. Further, there is significant evidence of structural differences in the brains of those attracted to members of the same sex, and sexual orientation has been changed by affecting structural changes in animal brains. Unless you've read up on current neuroscience, I wouldn't recommend making either the "it's a choice" claim -or- the "jury's still out claim", as both are explicitly not supported by the data. That is, however, more appropriate for the other thread.

 

-----signature-----
Yeah, mind power, Swede; mind power.
You can never have too much precision in your soup.
Exit, pursued by a bear
More Rockets = More Science
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
_Darth_Brooks_ 
Registered: Sep '00
23037_Jedi Outcast
Date Posted: 5/10 5:54pm Subject: RE: Atheism Discussion 2.0 - (Humanism, just don't tell Adler..) - Date Edited: 5/10 6:00pm (3 edits total) Edited By: _Darth_Brooks_
Quix,

I think my claim was simply and efficiently that it hasn't been proven or verified.
Of the studies performed, three of which to my understanding were performed by researchers who were themselves gay, which raises certain obvious questions of self-interest, nothing was shown to be conclusive.

Other study data seemed to indicate the greater likelihood that homosexuals were born heterosexual and later developed the homosexual behavior.

If you're aware of a conclusive study I'd certainly be willing to examine it.

( I wonder if like studies have been performed involving other sexual proclivities which have indicated a genetic basis? )



 

-----signature-----
"I once wanted to become an atheist but I gave up . . . they have no holidays. "
I AM AN ACT OF GOD. If you doubt it ask my insurance agent.
Whom the Mod's would destroy they first drive mad.
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Quixotic-Sith 
Title: Manager Emeritus
Registered: Jun '01
6264_Darth Maul
Date Posted: 5/10 6:04pm Subject: RE: Atheism Discussion 2.0 - (Humanism, just don't tell Adler..)
_Darth_Brooks_ posted:
Quix,

I think my claim was simply and efficiently that it hasn't been proven or verified.
Of the studies performed, three of which to my understanding were performed by researchers who were themselves gay, which raises certain obvious questions of self-interest, nothing was shown to be conclusive.

Other study data seemed to indicate that greater liklihood that homosexuals were born heterosexual and later developed the homosexual behavior.

If you're aware of a conclusive study I'd certainly be willing to examine it.




I was actually pulling up my PowerPoint slides as you were typing your response. All of the information I'm presenting can be found in Kandel's Principles of Neural Science in the chapter discussing sexual differences in neural development: http://www.amazon.com/Principles-Neural-Science-Eric-Kandel/dp/0838577016/ref=pd_bbs_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1210467385&sr=1-1

Kandel's Text in PowerPoint Bullet Format posted:


  • Greater degree of lesbianism in individuals exposed to excess androgens before birth.

  • Genetic males with androgen insensitivity syndrome are psychosexual females (develop feminine phenotypes at puberty).

  • Post-mortem studies of transsexuals show differences in the central nucleus of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis. (Typically larger in men than women; structure in male-to-female transsexuals is similar in size to women.)

  • Pedigree analysis found common markers in one sample at Xq28 on the X chromosome.

  • The suprachiasmatic nucleus is larger in volume and contains more neurons in homosexual men than in heterosexual men.

  • The hypothalamic nucleus INAH-3 (larger in men than in women) is larger in heterosexual men than in homosexual men.

  • The midsagittal cross-sectional anterior commissure (larger in women than in men) can be larger in homosexual men.




  • Note that this information has been available since 2000, so there has been an additional eight years of research conducted, and I haven't presented anything on the additional animal or twin data. Additional studies can be found at PubMed and via academic databases (no, I don't have access to them at the moment - Panera Bread doesn't have the same access permissions as the University of Pittsburgh).

     

    -----signature-----
    Yeah, mind power, Swede; mind power.
    You can never have too much precision in your soup.
    Exit, pursued by a bear
    More Rockets = More Science
    Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
    _Darth_Brooks_ 
    Registered: Sep '00
    23037_Jedi Outcast
    Date Posted: 5/10 6:42pm Subject: RE: Atheism Discussion 2.0 - (Humanism, just don't tell Adler..) - Date Edited: 5/10 7:23pm (6 edits total) Edited By: _Darth_Brooks_
    Quix,


    Let me be very clear...I did not bring up the subject of homosexuality in this thread. Nor has it been my interest to engage in a discussion beyond presenting some replies.



    Here's some info gleaned from a quick google for recent articles.
    I'll see if I can locate some information more directly related to the aforementioned studies.

    Geneticist Francis Collins Responds to NARTH’s Dean Byrd
    posted:
    "The evidence we have at present strongly supports the proposition that there are hereditary factors in male homosexuality — the observation that an identical twin of a male homosexual has approximately a 20% likelihood of also being gay points to this conclusion, since that is 10 times the population incidence. But the fact that the answer is not 100% also suggests that other factors besides DNA must be involved. That certainly doesn’t imply, however, that those other undefined factors are inherently alterable.

    "Your note indicated that your real interest is in the truth. And this is about all that we really know. No one has yet identified an actual gene that contributes to the hereditary component (the reports about a gene on the X chromosome from the 1990s have not held up), but it is likely that such genes will be found in the next few years."



    From:
    Box Turtle Gay Website

    This was a reactionary response to the following excerpted article.


    Article posted:
    "Homosexuality Is Not Hardwired," Concludes Dr. Francis S. Collins, Head Of The Human Genome Project

    "The heritability estimates for personality traits were varied: General Cognitive Ability (50%), Extroversion (54%), Agreeableness (42%), Conscientiousness (49%), Neuroticism (48%), Openness (57%), Aggression (38%) and Traditionalism (54%).

    "Kirk et al. (2000) in their research using a community-based cohort of Australian twins reported a heritability estimate of 30% for homosexuality. Whitehead (1999, 2006) in his extensive review of the research cites 30% as the estimate of heritability for homosexuality as well, though he views the estimate as a maximum.

    "Estimates of heritability are based upon careful analyses of studies conducted with identical twins. Such studies are important and lead to the conclusion that heredity is important in many of these traits. It is important however, to note that even in such studies with identical twins, that heritability is not to be confused as inevitability.

    "As Dr. Collins would agree, environment can influence gene expression, and free will determines the response to whatever predispositions might be present."



    From:
    Article at NARTH

    Gay Gene posted:
    Gene Linkage Studies


    "Dean Hamer and his colleagues had performed a common type of behavioral genetics investigation called the "linkage study." Researchers identify a behavioral trait that runs in a family, and then:


    a) look for a chromosomal variant in the genetic material of that family, and

    b) determine whether that variant is more frequent in family members who share the particular trait.


    To the layman, the "correlation" of a genetic structure with a behavioral trait means that trait "is genetic"-in other words, inherited.


    "In fact, it means absolutely nothing of the sort, and it should be emphasized that there is virtually no human trait without innumerable such correlations."




    From:
    Is There a "Gay Gene"?


    Additional article at another source:
    Genetic modeling of homosexuality

    EDIT: Due to mark ups.

    Retracted some questions to Quix, and I will not be presenting additional pertinent information as stated. Lowbacca has wisely intervened to point out we're off topic.

     

    -----signature-----
    "I once wanted to become an atheist but I gave up . . . they have no holidays. "
    I AM AN ACT OF GOD. If you doubt it ask my insurance agent.
    Whom the Mod's would destroy they first drive mad.
    Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
    Lowbacca_1977 
    Title: Senate Moderator
    Registered: Jun '06
    Date Posted: 5/10 6:58pm Subject: RE: Atheism Discussion 2.0 - (Humanism, just don't tell Adler..)
    While its an interesting topic, its getting quite off topic. I would redirect to here:
    http://boards.theforce.net/the_senate_floor/b10320/22965104/p72/?1788
    And I figure there the question can be addressed of why a rebuttal criticising there being a gay gene is relevant when Quix's sources cite hormones, not genes.

     

    Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
    _Darth_Brooks_ 
    Registered: Sep '00
    23037_Jedi Outcast
    Date Posted: 5/10 7:03pm Subject: RE: Atheism Discussion 2.0 - (Humanism, just don't tell Adler..)
    Lowbacca,

    My address was basically to the premise put forth by LostOnHoth in regard to individuals born homosexual.

    I have no interest in the matter beyond replying to few assertions presented by others in this thread.

    Whether one wants to address hormonal imbalances or genetics there are a large number of complex issues associated with the topic.

    Anway, moving on down the line...

     

    -----signature-----
    "I once wanted to become an atheist but I gave up . . . they have no holidays. "
    I AM AN ACT OF GOD. If you doubt it ask my insurance agent.
    Whom the Mod's would destroy they first drive mad.
    Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
    LostOnHoth 
    Registered: Feb '00
    43871_Stormtrooper Loser
    Date Posted: 5/10 8:13pm Subject: RE: Atheism Discussion 2.0 - (Humanism, just don't tell Adler..)
    Sorry, I'll drop out for a while until the topic changes - discussing humanism is like watching paint dry.

     

    -----signature-----
    The reasonable man adapts himself to the world.
    The unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
    Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
    Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
    _Darth_Brooks_ 
    Registered: Sep '00
    23037_Jedi Outcast
    Date Posted: 5/10 8:40pm Subject: RE: Atheism Discussion 2.0 - (Humanism, just don't tell Adler..)
    LostOnHoth,

    Agreed.

     

    -----signature-----
    "I once wanted to become an atheist but I gave up . . . they have no holidays. "
    I AM AN ACT OF GOD. If you doubt it ask my insurance agent.
    Whom the Mod's would destroy they first drive mad.
    Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
    Lowbacca_1977 
    Title: Senate Moderator
    Registered: Jun '06
    Date Posted: 5/10 9:51pm Subject: RE: Atheism Discussion 2.0 - (Humanism, just don't tell Adler..)
    A question i'd pose is can someone be a secular humanist, but also be religious, or does the qualities of secular humanism make it imcompatible with being a theist, or at least limiting the types of theism available (deism vs christianity, for example)

     

    Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
    Subnigma 
    Registered: May '08
    Date Posted: 5/10 11:43pm Subject: RE: Atheism Discussion 2.0 - (Humanism, just don't tell Adler..) - Date Edited: 5/11 12:00am (2 edits total) Edited By: Subnigma
    _Darth_Brooks_ posted:
    LostOnHoth,

    "What is the purpose of prayer? Is it not to connect with God and determine His will on all things? To open a dialogue?"

    Partially, but this through self-awareness and self-allowance, reflection. It's a process of growth and maturity of character.



    "Clearly, secular humanism has no similar imperative so I don't understand the parallell?"

    Only in so far as you mention self-improvement. Some individuals choose meditiation or reflection, which is part of the purpose of prayer.




    But then would not the self improvement concept of secular humanism contradict the very idea of humanism? Unless self improvement was beneficial to all. But that would be up to the individual. That is also assuming that everyone agrees on what is beneficial. I'm sure the Nazi's believed what they were doing was beneficial. (I know it's cliche to use Nazi's; Oh well...)

     

    Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
    Subnigma 
    Registered: May '08
    Date Posted: 5/10 11:52pm Subject: RE: Atheism Discussion 2.0 - (Humanism, just don't tell Adler..) - Date Edited: 5/10 11:55pm (1 edits total) Edited By: Subnigma
    Lowbacca_1977 posted:
    A question i'd pose is can someone be a secular humanist, but also be religious, or does the qualities of secular humanism make it imcompatible with being a theist, or at least limiting the types of theism available (deism vs christianity, for example)

    Secularity in itself is non-condemning of religious activities. Secular activities are nothing more than non-religious activities. In the context of humanism, a religious person can not be considered secular. The idea of humanism is based on morality/ethics: since morality has a direct relation to religion, especially monothesistic religion, humanism can never be secular to a theist. (at least by definition)

     

    Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History