Author Topic: What is Christianity? How can we understand it better? What don't we understand?
Kimball_Kinnison 
Registered: Oct '01
6249_Veers
Date Posted: 4/3 8:40am Subject: RE: What is Christianity? How can we understand it better? What don't we understand? - Date Edited: 4/3 8:43am (1 edits total) Edited By: Kimball_Kinnison
king_alvarez posted:
So let me see if I got this straight according to LDS doctrine. Sin causes death (both physical and spiritual separation from God). This type of death is not a restitution but a consequence. It can't be used to buy back or exchange for a pure condition, it is merely a cause and effect type of reaction. Therefore, even after this death, a person would still be in an impure, sinful state except through Christ.
Exactly.

We've all mentioned the scripture saying "The wages of sin is death" a bit in here. For me, it helps to look at what that actually means.

For example, what does "wages" mean? A wage is what is given to someone in exchange for their labor. The dictionary defines it in this context as "recompense or return". One thing that it is not is a restitution. Therefore, "the wages of sin" are the results of your sin, the effects caused by your sins.

What is sin? The short version is sin is choosing to violate God's commandments. When you know God's will and choose not to follow it.

What is death? As I said before, it is separation. Physical death is a result of Adam's fall, and it is the separation of our bodies and our spirits. Spiritual death is a result of our personal sins, and is the separation of us from God's presence, because of our impurity.

In short, death doesn't serve as restitution for our sins. It is the result of them.

But, Christ overcame both types of death. Because of that, Paul wrote, "O death, where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory?" (1 Corinthians 15:55). The sting of death comes from our sins. But, because of Christ's Atonement (where he overcame both types of death), physical and spiritual death don't have control over us. As Paul said, because of Christ, all will be made alive again (resurrected from physical death). Similarly, through Christ, we can all be purified of our sins if we accept the deal that Christ offers us.

Kimball Kinnison

EDIT: And this isn't just some LDS interpretation. For example, this page discusses the differences between death and hell in the scriptures from a non-LDS perspective, and it also talks about a separation from God as a result of sin.

 

-----signature-----
You deserve the wrath of Kimball...- OWM
Why, Kimball... I didn't know you had it in you.- KW
I think that Kimball just made a joke, and a funny joke at that.- Raven
Stupidity got us into this mess, why can't it get us out?
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
king_alvarez 
Registered: May '07
23980_Luke
Date Posted: 4/3 9:08am Subject: RE: What is Christianity? How can we understand it better? What don't we understand?
OK, that makes sense. I think I was getting held up on the concept of death as restitution rather than a consequence.

I still have some issues with the necessity of Jesus' sacrifice, but I'm going to spend more time thinking about that before posting those questions here.

I appreciate the link, KK. I've heard that view of hell and separation from God from some of my (what I consider more enlightened) Christian acquaintances, and it is a view that I find to be much more preferable than the literal hellfire view that many Christians still hold on to.

 

-----signature-----
Because there are no story-book romances, no fairy-tale endings. So before you run out and change the world, ask yourself, "What do you really want?"
Because life... is not a movie. Everyone lies. Good guys lose. And love... does not conquer all.
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
ObiWan506 
Title: JC Head Admin
Registered: Aug '03
40223_Obi-Wan
Date Posted: 4/3 10:44am Subject: RE: What is Christianity? How can we understand it better? What don't we understand?
It might be an easier view to accept, but it doesn't appear to be what the Bible is talking about. The Bible seems very clear on a literal Hell. It's something I hesitate sometimes to talk about because of how unpleasant it is to think about.

Either way, it does not matter. Saved men are free from the bondage of that place. Press forward, don't drift back. Attach yourself to Jesus and never let go.

Matthew 7:15-19: “Watch out for false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing but inwardly are voracious wolves. You will recognize them by their fruit. Grapes are not gathered from thorns or figs from thistles, are they? In the same way, every good tree bears good fruit, but the bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree is not able to bear bad fruit, nor a bad tree to bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. So then, you will recognize them by their fruit."

Hang on to that tree that's Jesus.

 

Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Kimball_Kinnison 
Registered: Oct '01
6249_Veers
Date Posted: 4/3 11:17am Subject: RE: What is Christianity? How can we understand it better? What don't we understand? - Date Edited: 4/3 11:18am (1 edits total) Edited By: Kimball_Kinnison
ObiWan506 posted:
It might be an easier view to accept, but it doesn't appear to be what the Bible is talking about. The Bible seems very clear on a literal Hell.
Here, I'm going to address one of my pet peeves.

According to your interpretation the Bible seems very clear on a literal Hell. As we've already seen on countless other subjects in this thread, what might seem perfectly clear according to one person's interpretation can seem downright murky according to another person's interpretation.

For example, I could say (using the exact scripture you just cited in Matthew 7) that by warning about false prophets, it makes it very clear that more true prophets would come as well, which would support Joseph Smith's claim of being a prophet. However, according to many other Christians, that scripture seems very clear that there would be no more prophets, except false ones. (At least I've had quite a few people cite that scripture to me, explaining that it says that there would be no more prophets.) Which "clear" interpretation is correct?

Personally, I'd rather avoid getting into a debate here over what the Bible "clearly" says or not, because if the Bible said something as clearly as people claim, there wouldn't be so many differing interpretations.

Kimball Kinnison

 

-----signature-----
You deserve the wrath of Kimball...- OWM
Why, Kimball... I didn't know you had it in you.- KW
I think that Kimball just made a joke, and a funny joke at that.- Raven
Stupidity got us into this mess, why can't it get us out?
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Jabba-wocky 
Registered: May '03
44296_YJCC War Rhino
Date Posted: 4/3 12:43pm Subject: RE: What is Christianity? How can we understand it better? What don't we understand?
KK, very briefly (because I have to go) the argument you just made relies on the proposition that all prophets must necessarily have been called to make canonical level writings. That is pretty demonstrably not the case, as throughout the Old Testament there is frequent mention of prophets and people prophesying where no attempt was made to record it for posterity. The debate between the LDS and the everyone else is not whether there could ever possibly be "more prophets." It is whether there are extant, any writings produced since the time of the New Testament that are divinely inspired and deserve to be elevated to their status.

 

-----signature-----
Penitent & Unforgiven sad
Sorry JediAngela
The Yankees are awesome.
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Kimball_Kinnison 
Registered: Oct '01
6249_Veers
Date Posted: 4/3 3:30pm Subject: RE: What is Christianity? How can we understand it better? What don't we understand?
Jabba-wocky posted:
KK, very briefly (because I have to go) the argument you just made relies on the proposition that all prophets must necessarily have been called to make canonical level writings. That is pretty demonstrably not the case, as throughout the Old Testament there is frequent mention of prophets and people prophesying where no attempt was made to record it for posterity. The debate between the LDS and the everyone else is not whether there could ever possibly be "more prophets." It is whether there are extant, any writings produced since the time of the New Testament that are divinely inspired and deserve to be elevated to their status.
Not to take things off track, but it does not rest on that, because we don't claim that all prophets must make canonical-level writings.

The LDS Church has been led by 16 different prophets* (including Joseph Smith) since it was organized in 1830. Of those, only 5 have added any writings to our canon, the "Standard Works" (Joseph Smith, Brigham Young, Wilford Woodruff, Joseph F. Smith, and Spencer W. Kimball). And that's not counting 95 Apostles** that we've had over the years who we sustain as prophets as well.

But all of that misses the point that I was making (since we already have a thread to discuss Mormonism - which is why I have limited myself to using only Biblical scriptures here unless asked otherwise). My point was about differing interpretations showing that it's not always "clear" what the Bible intended. At least not as "clear" as most people claim. Let's not turn this into "What are the differences between LDS doctrines and other Christians?"

Kimball Kinnison

*This Saturday in the morning session of our General Conference, we will be sustaining Thomas S. Monson as the 16th President of the LDS Church in a "solemn assembly". If you are interested in watching the process, it will actually be carried on most cable and satellite systems, and will start at 10am MDT (9am board time).
**A new Apostle will actually be called and sustained this Saturday in our General Conference, likely in the Saturday morning session.

 

-----signature-----
You deserve the wrath of Kimball...- OWM
Why, Kimball... I didn't know you had it in you.- KW
I think that Kimball just made a joke, and a funny joke at that.- Raven
Stupidity got us into this mess, why can't it get us out?
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
ObiWan506 
Title: JC Head Admin
Registered: Aug '03
40223_Obi-Wan
Date Posted: 4/4 7:28am Subject: RE: What is Christianity? How can we understand it better? What don't we understand?
I agree with you Kimball. I would like to keep things biblical only as well.

You're also right. Different things can be taken by different people. There are all kinds of different interpretations.

 

Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
king_alvarez 
Registered: May '07
23980_Luke
Date Posted: 4/4 8:07am Subject: RE: What is Christianity? How can we understand it better? What don't we understand?
The Center For Theology and the Natural Sciences is designed to create a dialogue between scientists and theologians.

One aspect of this is The Divine Action Project.

"The Vatican Observatory (VO) and the Center for Theology and Natural Sciences (CTNS) jointly sponsor a series of conferences on divine action. The theme of each conference is an area of the natural sciences: quantum cosmology and the laws of nature (1992), chaos and complexity (1994), evolutionary and molecular biology (1996), neuroscience (1998), and quantum mechanics (2000). This brings specificity and precision to the discussions of divine action."


There is an excerpt in Synaptic Self: How Our Brains Become Who We Are by Joseph LeDoux, regarding one of these conferences and the nature of the soul. While LeDoux wasn’t trying to make any particular statement about the soul itself, I found this to be interesting.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A few months after starting this book, I attended a conference on the relation between the brain and the soul, sponsored by (fittingly enough) the Vatican. The specific topic was “Neuroscience and Divine Action,” and the theologians who organized this meeting were trying to reconceptualize Church teachings in a way that would make sense in light of current scientific understanding of how the world works. In particular, they were attempting to determine how it is possible for God to influence people’s lives without violating the laws of physics. I can’t present the full range of views expressed, but one that stood out was the notion that God interacts but doesn’t intervene.

Our concern here is not with the theological arguments for and against a noninterventionist view of God but rather with the possibility (or impossibility) of a scientific view of interaction…. If you believe in the existence of a nonmaterial soul, then all you need to assume is that when God was creating the universe, he worked out some way of interacting with the soul. Since both God and the soul are nonmaterial, that interaction would also be nonmaterial, and the laws of physics would therefore be unviolated when interactions occur.

Much to my surprise, however, many of the theologians attending this meeting didn’t believe in a classic nonmaterial soul (this would probably be an even bigger surprise to the faithful they represent). Instead, they seemed to accept the principle that the mind is inexorably tied to the brain, and they consequently believed in a soul that is pretty much one and the same as the neurally mediated mind, a part of the physical world that must by its nature obey the laws of physics.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


This surprised me, because I had assumed that most religions’ belief in a soul was based on the belief of a nonmaterial soul. If the soul is material instead of nonmaterial, that has some pretty far reaching implications in our understanding of communication with God, the nature of the soul, concept of self and personhood, and even the idea of free will and Divine intervention.

 

-----signature-----
Because there are no story-book romances, no fairy-tale endings. So before you run out and change the world, ask yourself, "What do you really want?"
Because life... is not a movie. Everyone lies. Good guys lose. And love... does not conquer all.
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
ObiWan506 
Title: JC Head Admin
Registered: Aug '03
40223_Obi-Wan
Date Posted: 4/7 10:34am Subject: RE: What is Christianity? How can we understand it better? What don't we understand?
I don't think we're smart enough to understand everything in the Bible. Just one of those things. It can be debated and talked about though, sure.

 

Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
kungfuquaker 
Registered: Nov '06
23689_Obi-Wan
Date Posted: 4/11 6:34am Subject: RE: What is Christianity? How can we understand it better? What don't we understand?
My understanding of the soul is that it is the part of us that is constantly thinking, 'I want, I think, I feel.' It is the spirit that is eternal.

The Chinese Christian theologian Watchman Nee has written about this extensively.

 

Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
ObiWan506 
Title: JC Head Admin
Registered: Aug '03
40223_Obi-Wan
Date Posted: 4/11 10:12am Subject: RE: What is Christianity? How can we understand it better? What don't we understand?
It's sort of hard to define at times. Scripture says "mind, body and soul".

 

Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Saintheart 
Title: Manager and Wandering Swordsman of the RPF
Registered: Dec '00
39869_Aragon
Date Posted: 4/13 7:07pm Subject: RE: What is Christianity? How can we understand it better? What don't we understand?
Evening, all; thought I'd stop by and engage in some chatter. Roman Catholic by origin here; lapsed over the years, with a belief system somewhere away from the traditional Catholic dogma, admittedly... happy

My interpretation of the distinction between mind, body and soul is this: the body is obviously the physical. The body passes away when signs of life cease. The soul is the eternal - that supernatural stuff which can neither be measured nor captured since it does not exist by the physical rules. I think of it as our primal essence, our best self, that which most mirrors the Creator within us. I believe that the conscience forms a very large part of the soul, that "still small voice" which tells us whether we do right or wrong somewhat independent of our upbringing and morals. The real question (and for me the real miracle of existence) is, how does the mind straddle both?

You cannot put your hand on the brain and say "Here is the mind". But neither is your soul the mind, since the soul is supernatural and the mind does not seem to be; the mind can be damaged by mental illness or affected by physical substances -- and yet it, too, is influenced by one's conscience. The mind is, for me, the unique expression of an individual's self-consciousness.

Interestingly, some "new age" forms of belief do support in part the idea that the soul is the part of us constantly thinking "I want, I think, I feel", and suggest what survives of us in the afterlife is our impulses. I could accept such a notion mostly because it allows for our actions in this world to resonate in the next; one can control and change their impulses with commitment -- accepting that there are some biological drives that cannot be turned around.

 

-----signature-----
Michelle: my Italian queen, my angel, my reason, my wife.
Jessica: my little princess, my daughter, born 10 August 2007
Director -- Star Wars: Knighthood
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Bravo 
Registered: Sep '01
7931_Binary Sunset
Date Posted: 4/19 3:38pm Subject: RE: What is Christianity? How can we understand it better? What don't we understand? - Date Edited: 4/19 3:44pm (2 edits total) Edited By: Bravo
Kimball_Kinnison posted:


Personally, I'd rather avoid getting into a debate here over what the Bible "clearly" says or not, because if the Bible said something as clearly as people claim, there wouldn't be so many differing interpretations.

Kimball Kinnison



That's funny, I was talking about that with someone yesterday and I would just like to say that I think God made all of these different view points on the Bible on purpose, that's right, I said on PURPOSE. If there weren't all of these view points, what use would we have for God if we already knew everything? (Lord I need you, so don't take offense to that one please! I'm all for you God!) There's some food for thought! tongue And we have to remember, in The Gospals (sp?) (I think that's where its at at least), that if all of Jesus's miracles were recorded, there wouldn't have been enough books in the world to record it all! So, in short, we are given a little bitty piece of God, Jesus, Holy Spirit Heaven, Hell, satan, etc. If Heaven and God could all be concluded in a series of small books to make up The Holy Bible, then doing this thing called following God should be easy, right? And furthermore, I had a fellow brother in Christ say this one time and it stuck with me ever since. We have to remember that The Bible is a handbook to life, just a instruction manual on how to use the TV called life, not how it was built at the factory (added on from the instruction manual with what God was saying to add on there).


**************************

I'm interested here. Just get out of a leadership conference of shorts at Church and then I wind up here. How interesting...God have anything to o with this? thinking

I'm a Roman Catholic by birth...now I'm a...lets say wherever God leads be to go in whichever Church. I'll go to Catholic, Baptist, Methodist, Free Methodist, Lutheran, etc. I'm staying mostly to the Methodist and Free Methodist sides of things, but that's only because I feel that they follow the Bible more then just adding 'religous' things to it. I think, just personally, that it is the closet to what Jesus spoke when he walked the Earth. But admittly (sp?), I have not studied enough into all religous to make my opinion in that matter nothing more then personal fact, not based on a studied conclusion.

In any event, this is how I see it. The Bible very clearly states that we are Spirit beings (New Testament, after Romans) and it also states that our battles are not against things of this world, but of the spirit realm (Esp. chapter 6, New Testament). So, focusing on those two points, I'll state my view. This is what the Holy Spirit is bringing to mind.

So, taking those, we are spirit beings; if we weren't, we wouldn't have to worry about the whole satan and God battle for our souls. Case in point, if we weren't spirit beings, we wouldn't have ACCESS into the Spiritual Warfare that surrounds us everyday. If we didn't have access into it, we wouldn't even have to worry about satan. But since we do, our prayers DO affect the spiritual realms. Other case in point, why do we have ghosts (I've heard it said they're demons, but I have yet to confirm that personally in the Bible...just been lazy wink ), who are spiritual beings. So, that takes care of the 'Do we have a spirit?'

Now, however, that also raises another question. Were the people before Christ came spiritual beings? If there's confirmed ghost sightings, maybe, but my knowledge in that area is lacking, so nay argument I make on that subject would be guessing at best. Now, God did give the Holy Spirit to certain people (Moses the first example coming to mind, Jerimiah as well..that thought from God there wink ) to do miralces in His Name, parting of the Red Sea, etc. Case in point, God couldn't just give you His Holy Power without the Spirit, both in Exodus and in Geninus, it speaks about how God is too Holy to be looked at it and if someone did, they would die, case in point in Geninus, God tells Abraham to not turn around or he would die (or something like that, been a while since I've read that book).

Also, we have to remember, that we were created in God's imagine, for that to be true, we were created as spiritual beings. God knew us before we were born, meaning He knew us before we had a physical body.

Now, for the physical body. I've heard from a Pastor and I've think I've read in the Bible that in Heaven, we will be given new bodies, or why would God raise the dead's bodies from the ground if there was no use for them? Case in point, in James or one of the Timothy Books, it talks about a new Heaven and a new Earth after Jesus brings Judgement on both the Godly and ungodly.

Now, for the mind and body. Our physical bodies are a mute point almost, since we are spiritual beings. Its more of a prison, I think Paul says it that way, I THINK, don't quote me on that please. wink Now, for the mind. The Book of Romans talks a lot about the mind. Our hearts are decitful (sp?), but the mind, our mind is what controls our ultimate actions, including sin. Sin is born by our lustful hearts, we can not avoid that. Our skin (meaning our physical body) craves water, food, excercise, etc. But it also craves sex, drugs, etc. The body is like a car, it requires things to keep going. But when it comes to the body, like a car, we can never please the body fully, the body always wanting more; like a car, we can only make a car go so fast, even after all the upgrades and rebuilds, etc. So our skin (aka our hearts I think too would fit in there then) crave sin. We were cursed through Adam with sin, but Jesus came to fix that curse of sin. We have to remember, it took Jesus three days to rise. Where was He? He was in hell for three days, conquering death and giving everyone (since the dead will rise to Christ first during Judgment and be Judged first) a chance; for Jesus had to give everyone, including those before Him, a chance at God's gift and a chance to Beleive in Him, Jesus Christ. Now, three days for us could be three thousand for the spiritual realm, who knows? As such is the debate on the world being made in six days and rest on the seventh day. But is the Bible talking in human days or in spirit days? Eternity and the spirit realm are probably (or so I've heard people say) a lot longer then human days, we know Eternity is at least! tongue And I would venture that the Spirit realm is as well, considering that God has no timing, but everything, Godly and ungodly, all happen in His time, which sometimes takes more then seven human days. wink

So, back to my point (sorry guys, the Holy Spirit has been taking over here! Praise be to God! happy ), the mind controls the ultimate outcome of what our skin, aka the physical body, (and heart) desire. And the Holy Spirit is what that quite voice in our souls.

Now, for the soul, I don't even have a clue. I, at least, always thought our Spirit and soul as one.

EDIT: Just some grammer corrections.
EDIT 2: More grammer corrections. tongue doh!

 

-----signature-----
Believer in Jesus Christ
"All right, I'll give it a try." - Luke Skywalker, ESB
"No. Try not. Do... or do not. There is no try." - Yoda, ESB
"Now, be brave, and don't look back. Don't look back." - Shmi Skywalker, TPM
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Jango10 
Registered: Sep '02
24124_Indiana Jones
Date Posted: 4/19 6:23pm Subject: RE: What is Christianity? How can we understand it better? What don't we understand?
Bravo posted:
Now, however, that also raises another question. Were the people before Christ came spiritual beings? If there's confirmed ghost sightings, maybe, but my knowledge in that area is lacking, so nay argument I make on that subject would be guessing at best.


Saul went to the witch of Endor, and she called the ghost of Samuel. So I would say that people before Christ were also spiritual beings just as we are today.

This question comes to me: What about Enoch and Elijah? They did not die, and their physical bodies were taken from this earth. Upon entering heaven, were they given new bodies as well?

 

-----signature-----
"I love the smell of Napalm in the morning."
Chipper Jones MVP Watch:
BA: .390 HR: 17 RBI: 48 OBP: 483 SLG: .632
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
TrulyGhent 
Registered: Jun '07
19251_Seal of the Rebellion
Date Posted: 4/20 4:05pm Subject: RE: What is Christianity? How can we understand it better? What don't we understand?
Jango10 posted:
Bravo posted:
Now, however, that also raises another question. Were the people before Christ came spiritual beings? If there's confirmed ghost sightings, maybe, but my knowledge in that area is lacking, so nay argument I make on that subject would be guessing at best.


Saul went to the witch of Endor, and she called the ghost of Samuel. So I would say that people before Christ were also spiritual beings just as we are today.

This question comes to me: What about Enoch and Elijah? They did not die, and their physical bodies were taken from this earth. Upon entering heaven, were they given new bodies as well?

I was going to quote Yoda's "Luminous beings. . ." but that would be a little flippant. blush tongue

The way I understand it, we are not given new bodies at the last judgment, our original bodies are refreshed. happy Hope that helps.

 

-----signature-----
flag <^> Happy Independence Day! <^> flag
Kadi --> mischief worried <-- Ghenty.
Padawans: Alasse_Earfalas and tjace <\/>
New Jedi Trials padawan \|/ SWC Rebel Slicer.
Droid Fan Club: http://boards.theforce.net/eu_community/b10194/28442477/p1/?30
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History