President George W Bush has asked the US Congress to set aside $30bn (£15bn) over five years for the global fight against HIV/Aids. He said the sum would double the current US commitment and provide treatment for 2.5 million people. Mr Bush said the funding would also be aimed at preventing more than 12 million new infections. The president said his wife Laura would visit Africa next month as part of the US campaign against Aids. "When I took office, an HIV diagnosis in Africa's poorest communities was usually a death sentence," Mr Bush said. "Once again, the generosity of the American people is one of the great untold stories of our time." In 2003, the US Government approved a $15bn package over five years to fight the spread of Aids. The US Congress stipulated that a proportion of those funds must be spent on encouraging abstinence-until-marriage programmes. Increases everywhere United Nations agencies say about 40 million people worldwide are infected with Aids or HIV. Almost three-quarters of deaths from Aids last year occurred in sub-Saharan Africa, and two-thirds of those living with HIV are found there. The number living with the virus has increased everywhere, with the most striking increases in East Asia and Central Asia/Eastern Europe. On Wednesday the World Health Organization urged affected countries to carry out HIV tests on everyone attending health centres unless they "opt out". It said 200 million people could benefit from the policy. Currently 80% of people infected with HIV in areas such as sub-Saharan Africa do not know they have it. <img src="http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/42340000/gif/_42340074_aids_hiv_gra3416.gif">
SuperWatto posted:Seems like E_S is warming up to Bush, just when the rest of the world is buying Bush Countdown Clocks. I know what it is, E_S: pity on the underdog!
Ender_Sai posted: Guys This is to talk about world responses to AIDs, now that Mr Bush has offered a solid package to fighting the virus. It's not a Bush bash. Honestly, has nobody any opinions on if this package is enough, not enough, or too much? Anyone? Hellloooooooo? E_S
Master_SweetPea posted:Foreign Aid is actually a U.S. Shame. By percentage of our economy we give very little compared to the rest of the world. I believe it's because people ASSUME the government is doing so much, when you do the math, they don't not trying to derail so I'll leave the conversation now.
Surfer_With_A_Badge posted:Why not just tell the Africans to fund their own programs instead of relying on the West to fund it?