Author Topic: Neofascistconservativeleftistprogre ssiveliberalism, FTW!
Espaldapalabras 
Registered: Aug '05
46173_Robot Chicken: Ackbar Cereal
Date Posted: 9/25/07 1:12pm Subject: RE: Neofascistconservativeleftistprogre ssiveliberalism, FTW!
Jabbadabbado, I think that it might still be possible to create such communities within the United States, although they would be completely voluntary.

Also it isn't something new that Christians haven't tried. The Mormon ideal state has always been one of a voluntary communal theocracy and was attempted in various forms. Many criticize early Utah for the communal economy, and the territory's integration into the US made it difficult to continue. The Shakers also seemed to have something going, besides a lack of Human Biology 101.

 

-----signature-----
A vote is like a rifle: its usefulness depends upon the character of the user.
Theodore Roosevelt
We should be eternally vigilant against attempts to check the expression of opinions that we loathe.
Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Rogue_Ten 
Registered: Aug '02
6514_Ooryl Qrygg
Date Posted: 9/25/07 1:15pm Subject: RE: Neofascistconservativeleftistprogre ssiveliberalism, FTW!
Shakers = most massive Fail in the history of religion.

 

-----signature-----
Carpe deez nuts.
---------
We're ready, Tupac. We're finally ready. flag
---------
There are no skeletons in my closet, save for the ones I put there.
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
MASTERPRENN 
Title: Manager Emeritus
Registered: Dec '05
43768_Korriban
Date Posted: 9/25/07 1:36pm Subject: RE: Neofascistconservativeleftistprogre ssiveliberalism, FTW!
Care to elaborate, mate?

 

-----signature-----
"When you see me, what do you see?
I see a big bushy beard and hair."
- Stephen Colbert/Cornel West
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Rogue_Ten 
Registered: Aug '02
6514_Ooryl Qrygg
Date Posted: 9/25/07 1:53pm Subject: RE: Neofascistconservativeleftistprogre ssiveliberalism, FTW!
Well, their order's most notable characteristic is the belief in total celibacy. IIRC, this stems from the belief that Adam and Eve's "Apple" is actually sex, and that sexual contact is essentially reinstating the Original Sin which Jesus removed. They believe the Second Coming was their founder, who revealed this fact.

So basically, they've eliminated the easiest, most reliable method of sustaining a religion: sexual reproduction. Without fresh, pliable young minds to indoctrinate, they tend to die out. Adoption helped them out for a long time, but religious groups can't adopt in the US anymore, so, they're pretty much screwed.

Right now there are four or five left, IIRC.

 

-----signature-----
Carpe deez nuts.
---------
We're ready, Tupac. We're finally ready. flag
---------
There are no skeletons in my closet, save for the ones I put there.
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Jabbadabbado 
Title: Senate Floor Manager
Registered: Mar '99
7388_Throne Room
Date Posted: 9/25/07 2:25pm Subject: RE: Neofascistconservativeleftistprogre ssiveliberalism, FTW! - Date Edited: 9/25/07 2:25pm (1 edits total) Edited By: Jabbadabbado
Uniting Christianity with The Profit Motive has been one of the most culturally productive if also strangely absurd social innovations of the last 500 years. And it defines the U.S. as a society - demarcates the boundaries of who we are.

 

-----signature-----
"There is a country out there where tens of millions
of white Christians, voting freely, selected as their
leader a black man of modest origin, the son
of a Muslim. There is a place on Earth - call it
America - where such a thing happens."
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Rogue_Ten 
Registered: Aug '02
6514_Ooryl Qrygg
Date Posted: 9/25/07 2:33pm Subject: RE: Neofascistconservativeleftistprogre ssiveliberalism, FTW!
You get to feel righteous about being greedy! What more could you want? flag

 

-----signature-----
Carpe deez nuts.
---------
We're ready, Tupac. We're finally ready. flag
---------
There are no skeletons in my closet, save for the ones I put there.
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Jabbadabbado 
Title: Senate Floor Manager
Registered: Mar '99
7388_Throne Room
Date Posted: 9/25/07 2:49pm Subject: RE: Neofascistconservativeleftistprogre ssiveliberalism, FTW!
The reason it's been such a successful match is that it shifts attention away from greed onto the austerity and discipline of hard work.

In the Middle ages, when the role of the church was to provide the moral underpinning of feudal society, the church was happy to undermine the morality of mercantilism. You could say that the very point of the Reformation was to shift the focus of the moral order to the new source of economic wealth: the merchants/traders/craftsmen in towns. In some sense the whole point of religion all along has been to make moral sense of political/economic activity.

With that in mind, when the Soviet Union booted religion as the foundation for cultural hegemony, it was perhaps ill advised.

 

-----signature-----
"There is a country out there where tens of millions
of white Christians, voting freely, selected as their
leader a black man of modest origin, the son
of a Muslim. There is a place on Earth - call it
America - where such a thing happens."
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Ender_Sai 
Title: Manager Emeritus
Registered: Feb '01
44324_Kyle Katarn
Date Posted: 9/25/07 3:13pm Subject: RE: Neofascistconservativeleftistprogre ssiveliberalism, FTW! - Date Edited: 9/25/07 4:58pm (1 edits total) Edited By: Ender_Sai
Rogue, Communism isn't a good idea and I've found over the years people who claim it is are parrotting someone else rather than speaking from their own hours spent reading Marx.

I can't blame people, in a sense, as Marx was deathly boring. As a postgrad I was a tutor for a course on liberalism and Marxism, so I had to read it but I will never pretend I enjoyed it. tongue

Communism is a nasty idea because it destroys the individual in favour of the collective. Think of every single great work of art, every piece of uplifting music, every novel which has celebrated the human spirit. Think of the greatest orators, leaders, and philosophers of all time and understand that in ideal theoretical communism they can't exist, because the point is that anyone like that cultivates respect, influence, a following, and that begins to change the classless, stateless dynamic - like a magnet over iron filings, or a leak in a large body of water, it alters the distribution of equality.

I cannot have more I need in communism, and what happens when I try to celebrate my individuality and attract a following? I have more influence than I "need". How is that imbalance restored?

Jabbadabbado posted:
I know this is heretical to strict Marxism..


Actually, no it's not.

Marx's notion of an opiate for the masses has been, for lack of a better word, raped quite extensively over time.

It comes from his critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right, and taken in context it never justifies the reputation it's gained. In fact, it's probably one of the only two quotes that people know from Marx, and unfortunately they don't know the context:


Marx, in his critique posted:
Religious distress is at the same time the expression of real distress and the protest against real distress. Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, just as it is the spirit of a spiritless situation. It is the opium of the people. The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is required for their real happiness. The demand to give up the illusion about its condition is the demand to give up a condition which needs illusions.



Marx is saying that religion provides solace for distress; whilst not religious himself, he's nevertheless sympathetic to it's role. True communism, attained after prolonged "socialism" (as Lenin calls it), would lead to the eventual abandonment of religion because oppression of the proletariat comes from the servitude to the urban bourgeois.

Take away capitialism, you take away the bourgeois to create a classless societal replacement. Once you've done that, you don't need religion anymore because that which has oppressed and distressed you (capitalist exploitation and the period of class struggle) has gone. Ergo, your chains are broken, you're free.

People never cite Marx calling religion the "heart in a heartless world", and that alone indicates the man was tolerant of religion in pre-communist socieities. It was a useful opiate to help the proletariat through their class struggle.

ES

 

-----signature-----
In this truth he knew himself to be.
From sinking sands he stepped into light's embrace.
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
GrandAdmiralJello 
Title:
Emperor
• EUC
• JCC

Registered: Nov '00
44644_Imperial Laurels
Date Posted: 9/25/07 4:22pm Subject: RE: Neofascistconservativeleftistprogre ssiveliberalism, FTW!
Jabbadabbado posted:
Communism and socialism have never really been given a chance to fail on their own terms, not that they wouldn't.



That's worth debating




E_S posted:
Communism is a nasty idea because it destroys the individual in favour of the collective. Think of every single great work of art, every piece of uplifting music, every novel which has celebrated the human spirit. Think of the greatest orators, leaders, and philosophers of all time and understand that in ideal theoretical communism they can't exist, because the point is that anyone like that cultivates respect, influence, a following, and that begins to change the classless, stateless dynamic - like a magnet over iron filings, or a leak in a large body of water, it alters the distribution of equality.



Admirably put.

 

-----signature-----
SPQR
Vates Jυλιαδις
Moribus antiquis res stat Romana virisque - Ennius
Tu regere imperio populos, Romanæ, memento; hæ tibi erunt artes;
pascisque imponere morem, parcere subjectis et debellare superbos - Virgil
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Ender_Sai 
Title: Manager Emeritus
Registered: Feb '01
44324_Kyle Katarn
Date Posted: 9/25/07 4:56pm Subject: RE: Neofascistconservativeleftistprogre ssiveliberalism, FTW!
Sorry, I missed this:

Jabbadabbado posted:
This is not necessarily true of state-owned companies that compete in international markets. Saudi Aramco competes spectacularly - some of the most innovative oil producers in the world. The Saudis know how to invest in their business.


Well this is true, and so are most of the Singaporean city-state ventures.

But the difference is, I think, that they don't have any socialist pretensions, and these companies are stocked with businesspeople rahter than bureaucrats.

E_S

 

-----signature-----
In this truth he knew himself to be.
From sinking sands he stepped into light's embrace.
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Rogue_Ten 
Registered: Aug '02
6514_Ooryl Qrygg
Date Posted: 9/25/07 5:57pm Subject: RE: Neofascistconservativeleftistprogre ssiveliberalism, FTW! - Date Edited: 9/25/07 6:01pm (2 edits total) Edited By: Rogue_Ten
Perhaps I should have said "nice" or "well-intentioned" idea, rather than "good", to avoid your knee-jerk attack reflex. wink

I am in no way in favor of the application of Communism, nor do I have any illusions about it being at all tenable. Does that help? Can you back off implying I'm intellectually shallow? raised_brow

For your information, as a Sociology/Anthropology major, I consider myself well-read in Marx. The Marx & Engels reader, (though I admittedly have not read ALL of this monumental compilation), & Anthony Gidden's analyses of Marx factored strongly into my education. I would be happy to discuss Marx, Engels, or Giddens with you any time. happy

BTW: I do not find Marx boring, but simply hard to read and comprehend. I find him endlessly interesting and insightful on the topic of Capitalism, and worth the effort of scholarship.

 

-----signature-----
Carpe deez nuts.
---------
We're ready, Tupac. We're finally ready. flag
---------
There are no skeletons in my closet, save for the ones I put there.
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Ender_Sai 
Title: Manager Emeritus
Registered: Feb '01
44324_Kyle Katarn
Date Posted: 9/25/07 7:55pm Subject: RE: Neofascistconservativeleftistprogre ssiveliberalism, FTW!
Not suggesting you're intellectually shallow at all - I just have a literal, 100% "success rate" ratio of people saying "good idea in theory" to not having read the theory. wink

But you're right, Marx is a very difficult read and intensely boring along the way.

E_S

 

-----signature-----
In this truth he knew himself to be.
From sinking sands he stepped into light's embrace.
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Rogue_Ten 
Registered: Aug '02
6514_Ooryl Qrygg
Date Posted: 9/25/07 8:12pm Subject: RE: Neofascistconservativeleftistprogre ssiveliberalism, FTW! - Date Edited: 9/25/07 8:24pm (2 edits total) Edited By: Rogue_Ten
I just have a literal, 100% "success rate" ratio of people saying "good idea in theory" to not having read the theory.

Not any more. happy

 

-----signature-----
Carpe deez nuts.
---------
We're ready, Tupac. We're finally ready. flag
---------
There are no skeletons in my closet, save for the ones I put there.
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Ender_Sai 
Title: Manager Emeritus
Registered: Feb '01
44324_Kyle Katarn
Date Posted: 9/25/07 8:50pm Subject: RE: Neofascistconservativeleftistprogre ssiveliberalism, FTW!
Should read "had". wink

E_S

 

-----signature-----
In this truth he knew himself to be.
From sinking sands he stepped into light's embrace.
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Jabbadabbado 
Title: Senate Floor Manager
Registered: Mar '99
7388_Throne Room
Date Posted: 9/25/07 11:52pm Subject: RE: Neofascistconservativeleftistprogre ssiveliberalism, FTW! - Date Edited: 9/25/07 11:58pm (2 edits total) Edited By: Jabbadabbado
E_S posted:
Actually, no it's not.

Marx's notion of an opiate for the masses has been, for lack of a better word, raped quite extensively over time.

It comes from his critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right, and taken in context it never justifies the reputation it's gained. In fact, it's probably one of the only two quotes that people know from Marx, and unfortunately they don't know the context:

Marx, in his critique posted:Religious distress is at the same time the expression of real distress and the protest against real distress. Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, just as it is the spirit of a spiritless situation. It is the opium of the people. The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is required for their real happiness. The demand to give up the illusion about its condition is the demand to give up a condition which needs illusions.


I think this perception comes from the abolition of religion not being including as a plank in the Communist Manifesto, a valid point. But it's more complicated than that. Your quote comes not actually from the "Kritik der Hegelschen Rechtsphilosophie" but from a later introduction to it.

But to put it in even broader context than you provided, the introduction to the Kritik launches directly with an attack on religion, as follows:
Marx posted:
Für Deutschland ist die Kritik der Religion im wesentlichen beendigt, und die Kritik der Religion ist die Voraussetzung aller Kritik.

For Germany, the criticism of religion is largely completed; the criticism of religion is the prerequisite for all criticism.

and then:
Marx posted:
Das Fundament der irreligiösen Kritik ist: Der Mensch macht die Religion, die Religion macht nicht den Menschen. Und zwar ist die Religion das Selbstbewußtsein und das Selbstgefühl des Menschen, der sich selbst entweder noch nicht erworben oder schon wieder verloren hat. Aber der Mensch, das ist kein abstraktes, außer der Welt hockendes Wesen. Der Mensch, das ist die Welt des Menschen, Staat, Sozietät. Dieser Staat, diese Sozietät produzieren die Religion, ein verkehrtes Weltbewußtsein, weil sie eine verkehrte Welt sind. Die Religion ist die allgemeine Theorie dieser Welt, ihr enzyklopädisches Kompendium, ihre Logik in populärer Form, ihr spiritualistischer Point-d`honneur, ihr Enthusiasmus, ihre moralische Sanktion, ihre feierliche Ergänzung, ihr allgemeiner Trost- und Rechtfertigungsgrund. Sie ist die phantastische Verwirklichung des menschlichen Wesens, weil das menschliche Wesen keine wahre Wirklichkeit besitzt. Der Kampf gegen die Religion ist also mittelbar der Kampf gegen jene Welt, deren geistiges Aroma die Religion ist.

Here is the basis for an anti-religious criticism: Men make religion, religion does not make men. Religion is mankind's self-consciousness and self-awareness to the extent he has not yet found himself or has become lost. But, man is no abstraction perched outside the world. Man comprises his world, the state, the society. This state and this society create religion, an inverted consciousness of the world arising from an inverted world. Religion is the general theory of this world, its encyclopedia, its popular logic, its spiritual point d'honneur, its enthusiasm, its morality, its solemn addition, and its shared foundation for consolation and justification. It is the fantastical realization of human essence when human essence has no reality of its own. Thus the struggle against religion is the indirect struggle against a world whose spiritual fragrance is religion.

Followed by the bit you quoted. Given that I don't think "opiate of the masses" is out of context at all. It has a nice ring to it and is less perplexing than "the struggle against religion is the indirect struggle against a world whose spiritual fragrance is religion."

So, yes, there is an expression of sympathy for religion in there, but we can put it into the context of Marx leading into his "Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right" with a discussion of the struggle against religion. The struggle against religion is difficult when so much of society defines itself through religion. But clearly, Marx believes that religion is worth struggling against, even if outlawing it doesn't make it up into the tier of communist plank.

If you think Marx is boring, try reading it in German.

 

-----signature-----
"There is a country out there where tens of millions
of white Christians, voting freely, selected as their
leader a black man of modest origin, the son
of a Muslim. There is a place on Earth - call it
America - where such a thing happens."
Locked Topic | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History