Author Topic: Mormonism
darthOB1 
Registered: Mar '00
7901_Obi-Wan Kenobi
Date Posted: 8/15 6:48am Subject: RE: Mormonism
DarthKomar posted:
Kimball_Kinnison posted:

However, we believe that the priesthood authority, the authority to act in the name of God, was taken from the Earth because of transgression (a period known as the "Great Apostasy"). When the Apostles were killed, the authority to direct the Church was lost. That authority was restored to Joseph Smith in 1829 by John the Baptist and Peter, James, and John. That authority is necessary in order to perform the ordinances (what other churches call "sacraments") of the Gospel (such as baptism). Without receiving those ordinances, no one can be saved. People who lived and died during the time of the Great Apostasy did not have access to those ordinances.


In The Acts of The Apostles, they ordained more priests and deacons with the authority given to them by Jesus. If all that authority was lost in the "Great Apostasy" then Christianity (especially Catholicism) would have died out completely and we would have no record of it until 1829 when you say Joseph Smith was given authority.
Not being a mormon I cannot fully say how/what they believe but this "great Apostasy" was an incorporation of pagan and false doctrine into the church, thus the notion that they would have disappeared is wrong. It would be more that "true" christianity was lost. The form of Christainity that the original apostles in the first century followed. After they were all dead, which scripture clearly says would happen, there was no check point if you will to filter unscriptual knowledge from being incorporated into Christianity.

 

-----signature-----
“This most beautiful system [The Universe] could only proceed from the dominion of an intelligent and powerful Being.”
Isaac Newton
"The fact that a theory is able to describe an observation does not mean the observation proves the theory"
unknown
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Kimball_Kinnison 
Registered: Oct '01
6249_Veers
Date Posted: 8/15 11:45am Subject: RE: Mormonism
darthOB1 posted:
DarthKomar posted:
Kimball_Kinnison posted:

However, we believe that the priesthood authority, the authority to act in the name of God, was taken from the Earth because of transgression (a period known as the "Great Apostasy"). When the Apostles were killed, the authority to direct the Church was lost. That authority was restored to Joseph Smith in 1829 by John the Baptist and Peter, James, and John. That authority is necessary in order to perform the ordinances (what other churches call "sacraments") of the Gospel (such as baptism). Without receiving those ordinances, no one can be saved. People who lived and died during the time of the Great Apostasy did not have access to those ordinances.


In The Acts of The Apostles, they ordained more priests and deacons with the authority given to them by Jesus. If all that authority was lost in the "Great Apostasy" then Christianity (especially Catholicism) would have died out completely and we would have no record of it until 1829 when you say Joseph Smith was given authority.
Not being a mormon I cannot fully say how/what they believe but this "great Apostasy" was an incorporation of pagan and false doctrine into the church, thus the notion that they would have disappeared is wrong. It would be more that "true" christianity was lost. The form of Christainity that the original apostles in the first century followed. After they were all dead, which scripture clearly says would happen, there was no check point if you will to filter unscriptual knowledge from being incorporated into Christianity.
That's part of it, but there's more to it.

There are two different aspects to priesthood authority: power and authority. When a person is ordained to a priesthood, the power of the office to which they are ordained is granted to them. However, that does not necessarily give them the authority to exercise that power. They can only exercise it 1) if they are worthy, and 2) under the direction of the individuals who hold the relevant keys of the priesthood.

For example, I am an Elder in the Melchizedek Priesthood. As such, I have the power to ordain other Elders, to bestow the Gift of the Holy Ghost, as well as do everything that a Priest in the Aaronic Priesthood could do (such as baptize or bless the sacrament, among other things). However, I don't have the authority to simply take you to the nearest body of water, baptize you, give you the Gift of the Holy Ghost, and then ordain you an Elder as well. I would need to gain authorization from the people holding the appropriate keys of the priesthood to do any of those. In a Ward, the Bishop is the President of the Aaronic Priesthood, and has the authority to direct how it is exercised (and is the one who authorizes baptisms to happen). In a Stake, the Stake President is the President of the Melchizedek Priesthood, and must authorize things such as ordinations within that Priesthood.

During the Apostasy, not only were the teachings of Christianity corrupted, but those keys (the authority to direct the exercising of the Priesthood) were lost.

Kimball Kinnison

 

-----signature-----
You deserve the wrath of Kimball...- OWM
Why, Kimball... I didn't know you had it in you.- KW
I think that Kimball just made a joke, and a funny joke at that.- Raven
Stupidity got us into this mess, why can't it get us out?
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
DarthKomar 
Registered: Nov '07
42053_Red Lightsaber
Date Posted: 8/15 1:56pm Subject: RE: Mormonism
Kimball_Kinnison posted:
During the Apostasy, not only were the teachings of Christianity corrupted, but those keys (the authority to direct the exercising of the Priesthood) were lost.

Kimball Kinnison


I don't know much about the Apostasy, but on what do you base that Christianity was corrupted? The Reformation?

 

-----signature-----
Lightsabre Blender tutorial.
http://boards.theforce.net/fan_films/b10015/28508544/p1/?22
My fan filming website
www.FanFilmers.com
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Kimball_Kinnison 
Registered: Oct '01
6249_Veers
Date Posted: 8/15 2:11pm Subject: RE: Mormonism
DarthKomar posted:
Kimball_Kinnison posted:
During the Apostasy, not only were the teachings of Christianity corrupted, but those keys (the authority to direct the exercising of the Priesthood) were lost.

Kimball Kinnison


I don't know much about the Apostasy, but on what do you base that Christianity was corrupted? The Reformation?
It actually has nothing to do with the Reformation, and more to do with what led to the Reformation.

Tell me, why are there so many different Christian churches in the world, with so many different beliefs? Which one of them teaches the same Gospel that Christ taught? After all, look at just one doctrinal example: baptism. Is it necessary for salvation? How should it be performed? Do little children need to be baptized? These are just a few questions that would give you a wide variety of answers, depending on which church you ask, and the answers can't all be correct.

The reason that there are so many churches is because the priesthood keys needed to direct the Church were lost. Look in Acts, when the question of teaching Gentiles came up (specifically whether they needed to convert to Judaism first before becoming Christian, or whether they could just become Christian directly). In the end, Peter spoke on the subject, and it was settled, because he held the keys to direct the Church.

But that didn't happen during the Apostasy. Look at all of the Councils that they held, and how beliefs and doctrines changed over time as a result. The Nicene Creed, for one, contains teachings that are found nowhere in a study of First Century Christianity. In fact, it draws more from Aristotelean logic than from Biblical teaching. in some cases, the Councils were called (and decided) not for doctrinal reasons, but for political reasons.

Ultimately, though, the basis for stating that Christianity had become corrupted comes down to Joseph Smith's First Vision. In it, while praying to find out which church he should join, God the Father and Jesus Christ appeared to him and told him to join none of them, because they were all wrong, and their teachings corrupted.

Kimball Kinnison

 

-----signature-----
You deserve the wrath of Kimball...- OWM
Why, Kimball... I didn't know you had it in you.- KW
I think that Kimball just made a joke, and a funny joke at that.- Raven
Stupidity got us into this mess, why can't it get us out?
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
DarthKomar 
Registered: Nov '07
42053_Red Lightsaber
Date Posted: 8/15 2:22pm Subject: RE: Mormonism
Jesus posted:
No one may come to the Father except though me


Thus the need for baptism.

 

-----signature-----
Lightsabre Blender tutorial.
http://boards.theforce.net/fan_films/b10015/28508544/p1/?22
My fan filming website
www.FanFilmers.com
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Kimball_Kinnison 
Registered: Oct '01
6249_Veers
Date Posted: 8/16 5:06am Subject: RE: Mormonism
DarthKomar posted:
Jesus posted:
No one may come to the Father except though me


Thus the need for baptism.
Two things:

1) Did you even bother to read past my first paragraph answering your question? As I said there, I was using baptism as an example, because there are many doctrinal differences between different branches of Christianity.

2) What you did post doesn't actually provide any link between the scripture you quoted and the rest of what you posted.

Kimball Kinnison

 

-----signature-----
You deserve the wrath of Kimball...- OWM
Why, Kimball... I didn't know you had it in you.- KW
I think that Kimball just made a joke, and a funny joke at that.- Raven
Stupidity got us into this mess, why can't it get us out?
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
DarthKomar 
Registered: Nov '07
42053_Red Lightsaber
Date Posted: 8/20 3:57pm Subject: RE: Mormonism - Date Edited: 8/20 3:57pm (1 edits total) Edited By: DarthKomar

Facepalm

 

-----signature-----
Lightsabre Blender tutorial.
http://boards.theforce.net/fan_films/b10015/28508544/p1/?22
My fan filming website
www.FanFilmers.com
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Kimball_Kinnison 
Registered: Oct '01
6249_Veers
Date Posted: 8/20 6:45pm Subject: RE: Mormonism
DarthKomar posted:

Facepalm

If you're just going to spam this thread, don't bother. The next time you will be reported to the mods.

If you have questions, ask them. Otherwise, please just walk away.

Kimball Kinnison

 

-----signature-----
You deserve the wrath of Kimball...- OWM
Why, Kimball... I didn't know you had it in you.- KW
I think that Kimball just made a joke, and a funny joke at that.- Raven
Stupidity got us into this mess, why can't it get us out?
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
LostOnHoth 
Registered: Feb '00
43871_Stormtrooper Loser
Date Posted: 8/20 7:13pm Subject: RE: Mormonism
My reading of the last page or two of this thread concerning the "Great Apostasy" and the questioning/skepticism between adherents of the LDS church and the Catholic Church (for example) is not terribly different to my understanding of the differences between Sunni and Shia Muslims. Both worship the same God and scripture, but each claims to have inherited the keys to Church. Is that not too far off?

 

-----signature-----
Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities - Voltaire
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
DarthKomar 
Registered: Nov '07
42053_Red Lightsaber
Date Posted: 8/20 10:03pm Subject: RE: Mormonism
I didn't spam, I used a picture rather than words. If you want to get aggressive then I believe it will be you who shall explain themselves to a modderator.

But you are right, I should have read your post more throughly.

What you said about the Nicene Creed containing teachings found nowhere in the first century. Does it really matter when it was written? All it is is an outline of what we as Christians believe. If anyone asks me what Catholics believe, I'm not at a loss for words, I just say the creed.

I'm sorry if I've misunderstood you again here.

Could you give some examples of the changing doctrines? I never even heard of the Apostasy until you mentioned it so I'm curious to learn.

Also, I believe the councils being called for political reasons is ok because the Pope is also the head of state as Vatican City is it's own country. Also, they did political stuff at a time when most (if not all) of Europe was Catholic and they met to sort out disputes between countries before they became open war. I don't think God would want war, especially one that could have been avoided.

About Joseph Smith's vision, is he the only one to have had such a vision? Ie: Has God/Jesus told anyone else that the churches are corrupt?

I'm just curious.

 

-----signature-----
Lightsabre Blender tutorial.
http://boards.theforce.net/fan_films/b10015/28508544/p1/?22
My fan filming website
www.FanFilmers.com
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Kimball_Kinnison 
Registered: Oct '01
6249_Veers
Date Posted: 8/21 6:17am Subject: RE: Mormonism - Date Edited: 8/21 6:36am (1 edits total) Edited By: Kimball_Kinnison
DarthKomar posted:
I didn't spam, I used a picture rather than words. If you want to get aggressive then I believe it will be you who shall explain themselves to a modderator.
I have been the caretaker of this thread for better than 6 years, both as a user and as a moderator, and I have helped maintain it through some of the worst trolls to hit the Senate Floor. This is the oldest, continually open thread in the Senate. It has never been locked either through inactivity or for cause, and I hope to keep it that way.

One of the ways that we've maintained this thread for so long is that we don't really take a lot of JCC-style drive-by posts. Many of the LDS members here are willing to take a good deal of our own time to research and write detailed answers for people, and we ask that our efforts be treated with the same sort of respect. We have very little patience for people who waste our time.

DarthKomar posted:
What you said about the Nicene Creed containing teachings found nowhere in the first century. Does it really matter when it was written? All it is is an outline of what we as Christians believe. If anyone asks me what Catholics believe, I'm not at a loss for words, I just say the creed.
Except, what is the source of the doctrines that it teaches? Go and research the Arian* Controversy, which is what led to the Council of Nicaea, where the Nicene Creed was adopted. The Arian beliefs are at least as scripturally supported as the Nicene beliefs, and in many cases are better supported.

In fact, the reason that the Nicene Creed is used in so many churches today has nothing to do with religion and everything to do with politics. It wasn't decided by revelation, nor even by the Church. What it came down to was that Constantine exiled anyone who would not accept it. The reality is that there was a lot of doctrinal dispute because the doctrines had been corrupted by people who either "reinterpreted" them, or simply did not understand them. Without someone with the authority to speak in the name of God, there was no way to settle those doctrinal disputes in any definitive fashion.

* NOTE: Arianism has nothing to do with Aryanism. Arianism is derived from Arius, its main proponent at the time of the Council of Nicaea. Aryanism is derived from the Aryan race.

DarthKomar posted:
Could you give some examples of the changing doctrines? I never even heard of the Apostasy until you mentioned it so I'm curious to learn.
I used this as an example before, but how about baptism? Specifically, how should a baptism be performed? The original Greek root for the word was "baptizo", which means "immersion". In the New Testament, John the Baptist baptized in the river Jordan, and it describes that Christ came up out of the water. We also have Paul's doctrinal descriptions of baptism (such as in Romans 6) that describe it as symbolic of death, burial, and resurrection. Of all of the methods for baptism, only complete immersion satisfies this symbolism. All of these suggest that baptism should be performed by immersing or completely covering someone in water.

And yet, how many different forms of baptism are performed in various Christian churches today? You have Aspersion (sprinkling), Affusion (pouring), Immersion, and almost everything in between. In some churches (such as the Quakers), they don't even perform baptisms at all.

So, which doctrine is correct? If a church teaches an incorrect baptism, how can it be God's true church?

That's only one example of a doctrine. If you wish, I could provide more, but I think that one point illustrates what I mean.

DarthKomar posted:
Also, I believe the councils being called for political reasons is ok because the Pope is also the head of state as Vatican City is it's own country. Also, they did political stuff at a time when most (if not all) of Europe was Catholic and they met to sort out disputes between countries before they became open war. I don't think God would want war, especially one that could have been avoided.
Except that doctrine is not a matter of politics. The Councils weren't there to solve political matters, but to address doctrinal questions. Instead of actually seeking out the authoritative doctrines, they sought the best political compromise. God's doctrines don't change because of politics.

DarthKomar posted:
About Joseph Smith's vision, is he the only one to have had such a vision? Ie: Has God/Jesus told anyone else that the churches are corrupt?
A vision specifically saying that? Yes, as far as I know. However, there have been many others prior to him who had reached similar conclusions (for example, Martin Luther when he ignited the Protestant Reformation).

The difference with Joseph was that he was called to restore the fullness of the Gospel to the earth, including the Priesthood authority (which prior reformers had lacked). As part of that, he was commanded to translate the Book of Mormon as proof of his prophetic calling.

Kimball Kinnison

EDIT: Sorry I missed this:
LostOnHoth posted:
My reading of the last page or two of this thread concerning the "Great Apostasy" and the questioning/skepticism between adherents of the LDS church and the Catholic Church (for example) is not terribly different to my understanding of the differences between Sunni and Shia Muslims. Both worship the same God and scripture, but each claims to have inherited the keys to Church. Is that not too far off?
It's not too far off, except that it doesn't account for the fact that LDS teachings are Restorationist. Our claim to authority does not lie in a historical line of descent, or dispute over who really got the authority, but in the direct, heavenly restoration of that authority to the earth.

 

-----signature-----
You deserve the wrath of Kimball...- OWM
Why, Kimball... I didn't know you had it in you.- KW
I think that Kimball just made a joke, and a funny joke at that.- Raven
Stupidity got us into this mess, why can't it get us out?
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
DarthKomar 
Registered: Nov '07
42053_Red Lightsaber
Date Posted: 8/21 1:47pm Subject: RE: Mormonism
Thank you for answering my questions Kimball happy

 

-----signature-----
Lightsabre Blender tutorial.
http://boards.theforce.net/fan_films/b10015/28508544/p1/?22
My fan filming website
www.FanFilmers.com
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
-polymath- 
Title: SFF:F/TV Trivia Host
Registered: Jun '07
44272_Jaina Solo
Date Posted: 10/21 12:21pm Subject: RE: Mormonism
Proposition 8 in California has been getting a lot of play in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. I'm a member of the Church, believe the gospel is true, and believe in modern-day prophets. I've been hearing a lot about Proposition 8 in the local newspaper (Idaho Falls, Idaho) and the local leaders have also been addressing the issue. Apparently, BYU-Idaho has established a call center at the university to call residents in California and lobby for the passage of Prop 8. The Church leadership has gone to the local level outside of Rexburg to recruit members of wards and branches to man the call center when BYU-I students have low numbers. I also watched the excerpt of the broadcast by Quentin L. Cook and M. Russell Ballard to the California members about the issue on lds.org.

Now, the point that I am going to get to in a bit is not whether the Church has the right to speak out on moral issues. I don't dispute that and the Church has certainly done so in the past (see ERA). The Church does not tell its membership how to vote except in extremely rare circumstances (I can only think of one example and it related to the establishment of lotteries). Anyway, I am personally having a difficult time reconciling the Church's position on Prop 8 with reality. I hesitate to even bring this up because in the past when I have wanted to discuss this very topic, I've been reminded about the verbotten nature of questioning church authorities and that to do so, even in the slightest, could start down the path of apostasy. I certainly don't want to apostatize but I also want things to make sense to me.

I attended BYU and also graduate school obtaining my law degree. I've studied the First Amendment, Equal Protection, and Due Process. I think I understand those concepts/doctrines to a reasonably intelligent degree. The legal implications are all relevant to parts of the issue. (Elder Wirthlin's grandon actually filed suit regarding the teaching of homosexual relationships in his child's school. I followed the Wirthlin's lawsuit from the time it was filed until it was dismissed.)

Has anyone else had a problem with the Church's support of Prop 8? If so, how have you been able to reconcile any apparent conflicts in your own minds and hearts? Is such reconciliation possible? I am seriously searching for some help because I feel that the Church's position is a gross overreaction to a quandry that turns, essentially, on semantics.

One of the issues I am trying to resolve in my own mind and heart is whether the Prop 8 issue is even a moral issue at all. To me, it seems that Prop 8 is one step removed from being a moral issue. Maybe I'm wrong; I don't know. To me the moral issue is that of homosexuality. The Church's stand on homosexuality is unequivocal that is a gross sin. I completely agree with the Church's position on homosexuality as a moral issue. But the issues involved in Prop 8 don't speak to the moral issue of homosexuality. Instead, Prop 8 speaks to the legal rights appurtenant to social relationship. People won't immediate "stop" being homosexual if Prop 8 is passed. The only impacts the homosexual community will see, I think, is that their legal rights in their social relationships will remain limited if not non-existent.

I also wonder whether Prop 8 makes any difference in protecting the family? Homosexual couples can, and do, adopt children. Such adoptive placement can be significantly better for children when the other option is foster care. Families are constantly undergoing redefinition as far as parenting roles, socio-economic expectations, etc. So, can the "traditional" family ever truly be protected or preserved? (Not to mention the inherent definitional difficulty in defining "traditional family.)

Then, let's say hypothetically, that civil unions are later recognized granting the same legal rights to homosexual couples as married couples. Has anything been gained by the proponents of Prop 8? Has marriage been protected at all from a substantive perspective? Are civil unions not marriage but in a different dress? See, this is my quandry. I am having trouble seeing and understanding the substantive difference all of this makes in the end. (This assumes that civil unions are granted all the same legal benefits, rights, obligations, and privileges that marriage enjoys.) Wouldn't a marriage/civil union, at that point, just be a distinction without difference?

I read a talk by Elder Maxwell the other night from 1979, I think. He quoted, I believe, Marion G. Romney, who said, in substance, that when the brethren have chosen to speak on an issue that it has never been to the detriment of society, even if the pronouncements differed from his own personal or political beliefs. I am sure that's true.

I'd like to read people's thoughts. If you'd rather discuss this via PM, that's fine too. I'm not trying to stir up controversy or argue against the brethren. Please take the post for the intent with which I have drafted it.

Thanks.

 

-----signature-----
SFF Films & TV Trivia Contest: Subject is "Stargate SG1"
**Sign-ups Open**
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
Jabbadabbado 
Title: Senate Floor Moderator
Registered: Mar '99
7388_Throne Room
Date Posted: 10/21 12:39pm Subject: RE: Mormonism
This might be relevant as a general topic of church involvement in proposition 8 in the homosexuality/marriage thread.

 

-----signature-----
"There is a country out there where tens of millions
of white Christians, voting freely, selected as their
leader a black man of modest origin, the son
of a Muslim. There is a place on Earth - call it
America - where such a thing happens."
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History
-polymath- 
Title: SFF:F/TV Trivia Host
Registered: Jun '07
44272_Jaina Solo
Date Posted: 10/21 12:48pm Subject: RE: Mormonism - Date Edited: 10/21 12:49pm (1 edits total) Edited By: -polymath-
I agree that it has a lot to do with the involvement but this particular topic deals with reconciling personal beliefs with the LDS hierarchy and statements from the leaders of the Church. If you'd rather it be posted in the other thread, that's fine too. I just didn't want to overflow the other thread with what will be a heavily dominant LDS-slant to the discussion.


 

-----signature-----
SFF Films & TV Trivia Contest: Subject is "Stargate SG1"
**Sign-ups Open**
Post Reply | Quote Reply | Active Topic Notification | Private Message | Post History