2003 Jedi Council Discussion Forums Awards

-Most likely to cause LFL to completely shut down the message boards

-Worst Mafia player

-Mod most likely to be Keyzer Soze

-Wittiest one-liner accompanying a ban

-Most pointless Line-by-line thread

-Most loved by Rick McCallum

that's just the tip of the iceburg...

-Chris

 

Most likely to suck at humour

Most ironic to suck at humour

 

"-Most pointless Line-by-line thread"

Alarm bells ringing! Which LbL has a point!?

 

Is there an award for most creative use of markups yet?

 

Hawk- If there is it should go to Darth Wenley. G-S even called him the master of the mark ups.

 

JC Anti-Awards 2003
Most Worn Out Comms Discussion
Most Egregiously Beaten Dead Horse
Most Ridiculous Complaint About the Administration
Most Obvious Troll Who Claims to Actually Not Be a Troll
Most Obvious Non-Troll Who Claims to Actually Be a Troll
Most Blatantly Anti-Christian Rant
Most Anti-American Spammer
Quickest Invocation of Godwin's Law
Biggest Administration Ass-Kisser
Sexist Poster with the Worst Political Views
Poster Most Likely To Tell Other Posters How They Should Live
Biggest Lucas Hater Who Still Claims to Be a Star Wars Fan
Administrator most likely to wear a cheesehead
Most likley to accuse the Focus Groups of being another AC and ask for their disbanment
Most likely to start a canon war
Most persecuted basher
Most persecuted gusher
Most likely to start a basher/gusher war
Most intolerant of others opinions
Most likely to be a male impersonating a female for attention
Most Unintentionally Hilarious Thread
Most Effective Use of Google Image Search
Most Likely to Threaten to Actually Beat Up Another JCer in Real Life
Most Likely to Spend His Evenings Huddled in the Fetal Position Whimpering Like a Little Girl
Most Fair and Even-Handed Moderator
Least Likely to Take the Bait When Antagonized
Least Likely to Get Involved in Drama
Mod who looks sexiest in a skirt
Mod who looks sexiest without one
User recorded for the most notorious spelling mistake
User who hates a nameless character the most
User who calls himself a SW fan and doesn't know who Luke Skywalker is
JCer Most Likely To Piss Off the Most People
JCer Who Writes the Longest Posts
JCer Most Likely to Write "PPOR"
JCer Most Likely to trip OPPM
Former Moderators Missed the Most
Most Likely fanforce to be spammed?
Coolest CR?
Laziest CR?
Coolest Mod?
Laziest Mod?
Most Helpy-Helper JC Member
JCer most likely to derail a thread
Most likely to overuse 'Teh'
Least Interesting Username
Most likely to illicit a +1 style response
Least Interesting Username
Closest to violating TOS without actually violating it
Biggest liar exposed by his/her own former post
Best praiser of Debo
Most owned
Most likely to liek milk
Most likely to cause LFL to completely shut down the message boards
Worst Mafia player
Mod most likely to be Keyzer Soze
Wittiest one-liner accompanying a ban
Most pointless Line-by-line thread
Most loved by Rick McCallum

 

Poster who broke the TOS countless times but still avoided to be banned.


Well, PiaS has to win something.

 

Most Unintentionally Hilarious Thread

Jawas Are "Friends", Not Food...


I see two awards with my name on them:

Biggest liar exposed by his/her own former post

Hehehe...my lie about my age and origin on this board went so far that a letter by "Rex Sundale" is in Clone Wars cartoon issue of Insider.


JCer Who Writes the Longest Posts

I mean, it's not that I want to write long posts, or try write long posts, but they just become long posts.

But, what is long? How do you define long? If "long" is simply something of great length, then "long" is nothing more the interpreted electromagnetic signal in your brain that compares the object in question with other objects of the same context, i.e. if you see a post your brain designates as "long" or "lengthy", you must have had some gauge of a standard length of posts, either from past experience of seeing other posts or from your own personal mindset as to what the specifics of a regular post would be.

The structure of the word "long" is as follows:

Linguistics: Having a comparatively great duration. Used of a vowel or consonant.

Grammar: Of, relating to, or being a vowel sound in English that is descended from a vowel of long duration.

In fact, here's a handy Pronunciation Key, which can be found at Dictionary.com.


Webster's defines long in a number of ways, twelve to be exact, a few with certain subsections that help us try and figure out what precisely "long" is, and why some are apprehensive as to read-- let alone type-- posts that are marked as "long".

The first example is that of extending or traveling a relatively great distance. Naturally that doesn't help us describe "long" in relation to a post, and neither does its second subsection of having relatively great height; tall.

However, the third subsection does help us in a way: "Having the greater length of two or the greatest length of several. For example- the long edge of the door. That brings us back to our original hypothesis that, in order to correctly identify a post as "long", a standard must be created in one's personal perspective as to what a regular length of such a post would be.

The second definition, "Of relatively great duration," as in "a long time" doesn't help much- a post is not a duration, and though it may take a "long" time to read, it is not a "long" post in this instance.

I skip definition three, describing specific duration, as it gets us nowhere just like number two. Four, five, and six however, do lend some help in our search:

4. Made up of many members or items, such as in "a long shopping list."

5.
a. Extending beyond an average or standard (yes, real proof ), such as in "a long post."
b. Extending or landing beyond a given boundary, limit, or goal, such as in "Her first serve was long."

6. Tediously protracted; lengthy, such as in "a long speech."

Without even needing to go further, thus skipping sections seven to twelve, we already have the evidence that supports and gives proper credence to our hypothesis. First, that many "members or items" are needed to begin making a post long- letters, words, sentences, paragraphs, all do this job well. Second, that an average, a standard, or a boundary must be created or instated to judge something as lengthy. And, third, that "long" can also be used as an adjective to describe a noun that has been tediously protracted.

That said, I think all three instances occur with this post. My post here, while not excessively, is long. Compared to the standard of my other posts, I would describe it as short, but c

 

Oo, thanks for the list, jedi-mind-trick! I'm having fun mentally filling it out

Least Interesting Username
There should be a most interesting (or maybe weirdest!) username too...I think Dashy McUnderscore would win that one hands down .

 

Poster who broke the TOS countless times but still avoided to be banned.

I think I have this one in the bag. Never been banned.

 

Most owned!

 

Most Fair and Even-Handed Moderator

You actually intend on finding this person? Hah!

 

Person to have "left" the JC the most times in 2003

Drama-monkey of 2003 (the person who picks up any comms activity 24/7)

Moderator/Administrator/City Rep most likely to step down due to Jar Jar scandal.

User most likely to be George Lucas

 

Person to have "left" the JC the most times in 2003

I k_n_o_w w_h_o t_h_a_t m_i_g_h_t b_e ._._.

 

Do I detect a hint of cynicism there Bane?

 

Least Interesting Username

That would be me...

EDIT: Actually, I changed my mind. That's Gandolf the Gray, who has changed his screenname to that obviously misspelled name of a certain wizard.

 

at Stackpole_The_Hobbit.

 

Person who sucks up the most to the moderators.

We have numerous people to select from in the third page of this thread *alone*!