Discussion in 'Archive: Census and Games' started by NYCitygurl, Dec 2, 2007.
Looks like Huckabee's movin' into second.
Should, instead of will?
then Huckabee, so that way the Democrats can thrash him good, just like Nixon did to McGovern.
Nixon was an incumbent, though. I doubt we'd see a trashing quite like that.
Well, I am pretty sure that in an election of Huckabee v. Hillary or Obama, then Florida, Ohio, New Hampshire, Missouri, Arizona, and New Mexico would go for the Democrat.
But don't quote me!
Huckabee, if for no other reason than to provide for an almost certain Democratic win.
I like Rudy a lot these days. I have decided that I will vote for him if he goes against Hillary. He's a moderate with a brain on his shoulders. I think he has some potential.
Guliani is a dangerous man, and he's hardly a moderate.
Why is going back to the basics of the Constitution radical????
Because our government has only been vaguely constitutional for at least a century.
It's likely down to McCain and Romney now, with Huckabee having an outside shot.
If McCain wins, I look for Huck to get the VP nod to shore up the Republican base.
Rudy is done, and his Florida strategy couldn't have failed any more spectacularly.
Thank goodness. I'm rooting for McCain -- I don't think I can deal with Huckabee as president. I think I'd move to Canada.
My vote's going to Ron Paul. I can't stand half the other candidates.