1. A Message For Everyone:

    TCW vs. Rebels debates are not allowed in the Television forum. As in, discussions that descend into TCW/Rebels bashing/gushing will be subject to Mod action. Contrasting the themes, story lines, characters, etc. between the shows is allowed (welcomed, even). "Versus" debates/arguments, however, are a deal-breaker.

A Question of Cannonity

Discussion in 'Star Wars TV' started by slobadog, May 2, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. slobadog Jedi Padawan

    Member Since:
    Aug 28, 2002
    star 4
    Is the star wars holiday special and the ewok adventure considered cannon? And thus a important chronological part of the epic star wars saga?
  2. JSnyder Jedi Youngling

    Member Since:
    Apr 25, 2005
    star 1
    Well, Kashyyyk is mentioned first in Holiday Special.

    As for Ewoks, sure.
    I'd like to see the grown up Cindel Towani and Jedi Luke have their adventures together as a new series.
  3. morgue Jedi Youngling

    Member Since:
    Mar 28, 2002
    star 1
    I consider everything Cannon... even Splinter of the Eye´s Mind
  4. slimybug Jedi Master

    Member Since:
    Aug 14, 2001
    star 5
    Mind's Eye is included in the NJO's continuity list, but there is no way it fits.

  5. The2ndQuest Tri-Mod With a Mouth

    Member Since:
    Jan 27, 2000
    star 10
    Splinter fits, but there's a a healthy amount of Continuity Spackle(tm) applied ;)

    The Ewok movies are c-canon and have been referenced elsewhere in continuity (Cindel, for example, cameos in the Black Fleet Crisis as a holonet reporter).

    The Holiday Special is probably one of the rare s-canon sources that is only partially part of continuity- many elements and characters from it are used throughout the EU (Kashyyk, Chewie's family, the Life Day holiday, the Boba Fett cartoon events, etc), but I think certain things from it are either not canon or chalked up as incredibly strange holonet entertainment ;)

    Neither are g-canon, despite Lucas being involved with them.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.