Senate Abortion

Discussion in 'Archive: The Senate Floor' started by Katana_Geldar, Nov 18, 2012.

  1. Jedi Merkurian Episode VII Thread-Reaper

    Manager
    Member Since:
    May 25, 2000
    star 6
    Actually this got started when folks made the comparison between medicines that increased sexual function in men, compared to medicines that prevented contraception. My point stands: call it whatever pejorative you want, one is covered by insurance without qualm, while the other causes people to get all butthurt about it being covered by insurance policy. Three guesses as to which is which [face_whistling]
    Juliet316 and anakinfansince1983 like this.
  2. Kimball_Kinnison Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Oct 28, 2001
    star 6
    Except, that's not necessarily a fair comparison.

    First of all, medications aren't simply covered or not covered by insurance. They are covered for specific uses, not necessarily for every use. In general, insurance will cover drugs that are intended to correct a dysfunction (something not behaving normally), but will not cover drugs that are considered preventative. Many of the insurance plans that you mention will cover the use of contraceptives to correct hormonal imbalances (which is correcting a dysfunction), but not for contraceptive purposes (which is considered elective, preventative, or recreational). When used for the former purpose, they are covered "without a qualm", but when used for the latter, they are not covered.

    That makes for a very big difference, because the two are not directly comparable.
  3. Jedi Merkurian Episode VII Thread-Reaper

    Manager
    Member Since:
    May 25, 2000
    star 6
    Again, my HSA covers condoms.
  4. anakinfansince1983 Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Mar 4, 2011
    star 7
    And from the insurance company's perspective, it is cheaper to cover birth control than to cover the expenses of giving birth to a child. From the perspective of the employer paying for the insurance, it would be the same.
    Juliet316 and Jedi Merkurian like this.
  5. LostOnHoth Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Feb 15, 2000
    star 5
    I know health insurance is complicated in the US but it seems silly to me that insurers wouldn't cover medications which are preventative. Providing cover for condoms (no pun intended) is a seriously good investment and potentially avoids a range of future claims and payouts which may naturally arise from unprotected sexual activity, from pregnancy to the large range of STDs. In Australia, some car insurers are now handing out free mobile phone holders for the car as a way of avoiding claims arising from accidents caused by people holding their phone and talking whilst driving. That small investment probably saves them millions in future claims.
  6. Darth Guy Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Aug 16, 2002
    star 10
    I'm pretty sure that in the case of birth control it isn't usually the insurers but rather the employers who pay for the policies (e.g., the Catholic church) that don't want it covered.
    Last edited by Darth Guy, Jul 9, 2013
    Jedi Merkurian likes this.
  7. Katana_Geldar Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Mar 3, 2003
    star 8
    Is the contraceptive pill on the Pharmacutical Benefits Scheme? I don't know if it is, but it might be. It's not a whole lot. $20-$40 for three months supply, depending on the brand and pharmacy.

    How much is it over there?
  8. Asterix_of_Gaul Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Sep 13, 2007
    star 5

    Which is why it's kind of stupid to have employers so tied up with insurance in the first place.

    I was thinking today that one solution both sides might like would be a tax funded program designed specifically for people who don't have financial access to birth control. It would require the reallocation of tax dollars already collected i.e. make cuts somewhere else...say...defense...and spend that same money on something more...here and now, like birth control. Then again, Republicans probably would hate that....but this doesn't really involve the government specifically telling businesses how they need to spend their money i.e. Catholic institutions.

    The thing is, as I already pointed out--birth control is already pretty darn cheap. If a man and woman split the cost, then that's like 5 dollars a piece. Moreover condoms, if they're not free, literally cost like...2 bucks....
    Jedi Merkurian likes this.
  9. anakinfansince1983 Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Mar 4, 2011
    star 7
    I'm on board with your solution, Asterix.

    Katana, the last time I was on the Pill was 10 years ago and it was $20 a month then.
  10. Asterix_of_Gaul Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Sep 13, 2007
    star 5
    Thanks, maybe I should start with things like that first before discussing the principles of natural rights and where consumer products like birth control fit into that (morally and economically). :p
  11. Darth Guy Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Aug 16, 2002
    star 10
    $2 each would be very expensive for condoms. :p
    Jedi Merkurian likes this.
  12. Obi-Zahn Kenobi Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Aug 23, 1999
    star 7


    Direct abortion, that is, the killing of a distinct human organism, from when it is a zygote to when it is a late-term fetus, is immoral and equal to murder.

    Acting in order to prevent implantation, which is different than directly attacking an embryo, is also immoral. It's like failing to feed a starving person when you have plenty of food, and they die. It's murder by negligence.

    Preventing the creation of a human being during the act of sex by placing a physical barrier between the gametes, which are human cell, and unite to become distinct human organisms, is murder by prevention.

    They are all gravely immoral.

    I'm dating a girl who is from a Catholic family of nine children. At their parish, everyone leaves that specific pew open for them, even if they're out of town that Sunday.

    And as for the idea of every act of sex being open to pregnancy? We're both for it. Good possibility I may end up marrying her, and we would probably have around the same number as our parents (my parents have nine as well).

    The meek will inherit the earth? More like the fecund.
    Last edited by Obi-Zahn Kenobi, Jul 9, 2013
  13. anakinfansince1983 Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Mar 4, 2011
    star 7
    Not sure what your point is.

    If you want nine children and can care for them--go for it. That's your business.

    If you think everyone should either prepare to have at least that many children or avoid having sex--this is where we disagree.
  14. Obi-Zahn Kenobi Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Aug 23, 1999
    star 7
    I'm saying that unlike you, I, and women I have dated, can wrap our heads around it.
  15. anakinfansince1983 Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Mar 4, 2011
    star 7
    That's fine, but again, it's your choice.

    I have not and would not make the same choice.
  16. Asterix_of_Gaul Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Sep 13, 2007
    star 5
    Yeah, it would be :p
    anakinfansince1983 likes this.
  17. Obi-Zahn Kenobi Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Aug 23, 1999
    star 7
    A guy who goes to my parish said when he was young, he would buy condoms in Jersey and sell them for 50 cents to a buck in the City. Mind you, this was like $4 to $8 back then.
  18. PiettsHat Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Jan 1, 2011
    star 4
    Let me see if I understand this correctly: your contention is that by preventing gametes from uniting, you are murdering a person through prevention. Would it be fair to say, then, that you consider masturbation to be murder as well, given that the expelled gametes are also prevented from forming a human life? Or am I misinterpreting your stance?
  19. Obi-Zahn Kenobi Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Aug 23, 1999
    star 7
    Let me put it to you like this.

    Asterix_of_Gaul likes this.
  20. anakinfansince1983 Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Mar 4, 2011
    star 7
    I don't need to watch four minutes of that, the title is enough to leave me going "oh hell to the no."

    How many sperm are one man capable of producing in a lifetime? Millions?
  21. Obi-Zahn Kenobi Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Aug 23, 1999
    star 7
  22. PiettsHat Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Jan 1, 2011
    star 4
    I just find the idea disturbing because it seems to imply that "wasting" sperm is equivalent to murder (or, at least, highly immoral).
  23. Ramza JC Head Admin and RPF Manager

    Administrator
    Member Since:
    Jul 13, 2008
    star 6
    "Every Sperm is Sacred" is probably one of the best songs Monty Python ever did, and I am completely on the opposite side of the fence from OZK on every conceivable issue regarding human reproduction. You are, in fact, missing out.

    That said, the song's intended ironically in its original context. The point is he considers wasting sperm to somehow be more immoral than selling his children for scientific experiments.
    Last edited by Ramza, Jul 9, 2013
  24. Darth Guy Chosen One

    Member Since:
    Aug 16, 2002
    star 10
    The video is a segment from a Monty Python film.

    EDIT: Goddammit.
    Last edited by Darth Guy, Jul 9, 2013
  25. Asterix_of_Gaul Force Ghost

    Member Since:
    Sep 13, 2007
    star 5

    On Monty Python's The Meaning of Life--it's awesome