1. A Message For Everyone:

    TCW vs. Rebels debates are not allowed in the Television forum. As in, discussions that descend into TCW/Rebels bashing/gushing will be subject to Mod action. Contrasting the themes, story lines, characters, etc. between the shows is allowed (welcomed, even). "Versus" debates/arguments, however, are a deal-breaker.
  2. Welcome to the new boards! Details here!

Clone Wars Adaptations?

Discussion in 'Star Wars TV' started by Sable_Hart, Mar 30, 2013.


Should TCW have adapted extant material?

  1. Yes

    7 vote(s)
  2. No

    8 vote(s)
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. 07jonesj

    07jonesj Jedi Master star 4

    Aug 16, 2010
    I honestly would have preferred that Savage filled both his and Maul's role in Seasons 4 and 5. I hate it when they resurrect characters, hell I hate it even when it's done quickly (Fringe, Harry Potter, Ahsoka on Mortis), never mind when it's 10 years after the fact!

    But, yes, at least Maul was a strong villain. One of the only cases of "terrible concept, good execution" that I can think of.
  2. Seerow

    Seerow Manager Emeritus star 6 VIP - Former Mod/RSA

    Jun 7, 2011
    Savage was cool as a monster. I don't think he would have been the conniving dude Maul was in season 5. What was always needed in TCW was a high ranking living military officer on the CIS side whom was not afraid to get his hands dirty and a few really good OC minions to go with him. We also never did get a Jedi who switched to the CIS believing it was the right thing to do. Some characters who were really good matches for the Jedi and could be arch enemies like Maul was to Obi-wan.
    Circular_Logic and 07jonesj like this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.