See, I came here and contributed a perfectly valid post, offering my reasons for why I think the character of Ahsoka Tano should'nt be considered for a new series (which, like it, or not, was suggested only a couple of pages back, by more than one poster), and then, in order to keep the discussion about a film, too, I gave my thoughts on a stand-alone film, in general, thinking that I would enjoy some discussion. You, my new friend, then saw fit to attack me and question my motives in posting. Saying that my "long-winded spiel" was aimed only at discouraging discussion. You then made obnoxious, sarcastic use of very large, bolded letters in trying to put your 'point' across. And you think YOU feel "vehemently attacked?" See if you can get this through your head: My post original post, which you found fit to attack, had nothing to do with yours. Nothing.. I read what you had written, but did not find it interesting enough to reply to directly, so I chose to tilt the direction just a hair and because you failed to see this, you assumed I was replying directly to your position, thus my sarcastic "comprehension" comments. There never was any basis in reality for your original wounded assertions, yet you chose to question my motives and attack my position out of hand? Give me a break. - You don't like "mean-spirited rhetoric," but this is precisely what you introduced to this discussion first. - You don't like to be called "gusher," because you feel it doesn't apply, but you called me a "hater" without any basis for doing so. And "haters?" "Gushers?" What are we, twelve years old? I would never opt to use such juvenile verbage. Are you getting the picture? My last post was an attempt at reaching (not attacking) you by responding to your offesnsive in kind. But no, you can't see it, because you're too quick to cry "Foul!" after reading a post (which again, was never aimed at you in the first place) and then go on that offensive. You saw red, because of your stated "hatred of haters," and decided for yourself that anyone who doesn't share your view is a "hater." Just because I feel Tano's character has been resolved, doesn't mean I don't enjoy her. I simply see no need for another five years of watching her star in a television series. Because you disagree with this position, does not make me a "hater." Either of the character, or the people who want more of her. I even went so far as to inject a little Star Wars humor by quoting Threepio, to make it clear that I've no personal issue with anybody else's opinion. You, sir or madame, came off as a bully and chose to divert a perfectly valid post I made into all of this. Not I. Oh, and honestly, I don't have a mean-spirited bone in my body. Certainly not over anything Star Wars related, or a post on my screen from a faceless person. My suggestion, if you are sincere when you say you came here for honest Star Wars discourse, is to get to know some of the folks here and their style of posting before flying off the handle next time. We're a great bunch of folks, the best Star Wars community I've found.