DarthOlsenTwins: Excellent post... though this isn't an evolution thread, and let's not turn it into one. I just wanted to commend you on this point. Creationists often point to scientific explanations and call them backwards for this very reason... except when the scientific explanation might suit their theopolitical agenda. Then you see them quoting scientists of every discipline in the hopes that these scientists rhetorical observations, not their actual research, will somehow boost the confidence in Creationism. Yet they will not hesitate to declare these same scientists unfit to reach the scientific conclusions in their research pertaining to their field of expertise when such research contradicts Creation. In spite of Creationists' great desire for myth to be accepted as scientific fact, this sort of "badgering the witness" only serves to destroy Creationist credibility... because it demonstrates selective observation on their part. That belies objectivity... which is paramount to the scientific method.