Big Bang vs Creation

I'm Roman Cathoic, and I believe in both evolution and creation.

They are both a compatable process.

The universe could not have exploded from nothingness without a creative force. I believe just the incredible complexity of the universe reflects the glory of God. You can look at one flower and see it.

Things must evolve and adapt to the environment, and I don't see a reason why God would create a static universe.

In other words, God planted the seed to the universe, and now it is growing. When you plant a tree, it's branches can go in many different directions. Thats the way I visualize the creative/evolutionary process. God is the gardener, we are the garden.

 

Everest is a very young mountain.



Wait, let me guess, only a few million years old? I belive the earth in only around 6,000.

 

I belive the earth in only around 6,000

Observations of the temperature of the earth and a combination of the laws of thermodynamics and a knowledge of properties of radioactive substances lead most people to conclude otherwise.

 

Observations of the temperature of the earth and a combination of the laws of thermodynamics and a knowledge of properties of radioactive substances lead most people to conclude otherwise.


They you people go again using logical explinations.

When are you ever going to accept the fact that myths are the truth?!

If the bible says 6,000 years, then it must be 6,000 years, no matter what kind of scientific investigations have been conducted.

Latre!

 

I'm going to make a new thread for all this. Partly because this one has more of the same problems the last one had, and partly so I can follow it more closely from the beginning.

Hope everyone understands.